Simultaneous diagonalization of hermitian operators using the spectral theorem











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let a Hilbert space $mathscr{H}$ be given and two operators $A,B$ which are hermitian and commute.



In that setting, for each of them we can apply the spectral theorem to get projection valued measures $mu_A$ and $mu_B$ on their spectra $sigma(A),sigma(B)$ such that $$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda),quad B=int_{sigma(B)}lambda dmu_B(lambda).$$



In other words, $A,B$ are "diagonal" in the "basis of eigenvectors".



Now, in the finite dimensional case, when they commute they can be "simultaneously diagonalized". I want to understand this statement here.



I think Fubini's theorem is key in this.



I mean, my first thought was to consider the product measure $mu_Atimes mu_B$ on $sigma(A)times sigma(B)$. What we would like then is to have $$A=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_1 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2),quad B=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_2 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2)$$



Now, suppose Fubini's theorem holds, in that case



$$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda_1 dmu_A(lambda_1)int_{sigma(B)}dmu_B(lambda_2)=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda)$$



and similarly for $B$ so that we indeed recover the usual expression.



On the other hand, I think that for projection-valued measures, Fubini's theorem is then tied with the operators commuting. I don't know how to make this precise.



So I ask: how does the spectral theorem generalizes for a (finite) collection of commuting operators so that we generalize the idea that they can be "simultaneously diagonalized"?



Am I correct that the above is the right procedure? If so, why Fubini's theorem can only be applied when the operators commute? If not, what is the correct way to do it?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Every bounded operator $B$ that commutes with a seladjoint operator $A$ also commutes with the spectral measure $E_A$ for $A$. If $A$ and $B$ are selfadjoint and commute, then their spectral measures commute.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 22 at 0:45

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let a Hilbert space $mathscr{H}$ be given and two operators $A,B$ which are hermitian and commute.



In that setting, for each of them we can apply the spectral theorem to get projection valued measures $mu_A$ and $mu_B$ on their spectra $sigma(A),sigma(B)$ such that $$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda),quad B=int_{sigma(B)}lambda dmu_B(lambda).$$



In other words, $A,B$ are "diagonal" in the "basis of eigenvectors".



Now, in the finite dimensional case, when they commute they can be "simultaneously diagonalized". I want to understand this statement here.



I think Fubini's theorem is key in this.



I mean, my first thought was to consider the product measure $mu_Atimes mu_B$ on $sigma(A)times sigma(B)$. What we would like then is to have $$A=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_1 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2),quad B=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_2 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2)$$



Now, suppose Fubini's theorem holds, in that case



$$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda_1 dmu_A(lambda_1)int_{sigma(B)}dmu_B(lambda_2)=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda)$$



and similarly for $B$ so that we indeed recover the usual expression.



On the other hand, I think that for projection-valued measures, Fubini's theorem is then tied with the operators commuting. I don't know how to make this precise.



So I ask: how does the spectral theorem generalizes for a (finite) collection of commuting operators so that we generalize the idea that they can be "simultaneously diagonalized"?



Am I correct that the above is the right procedure? If so, why Fubini's theorem can only be applied when the operators commute? If not, what is the correct way to do it?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Every bounded operator $B$ that commutes with a seladjoint operator $A$ also commutes with the spectral measure $E_A$ for $A$. If $A$ and $B$ are selfadjoint and commute, then their spectral measures commute.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 22 at 0:45















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let a Hilbert space $mathscr{H}$ be given and two operators $A,B$ which are hermitian and commute.



In that setting, for each of them we can apply the spectral theorem to get projection valued measures $mu_A$ and $mu_B$ on their spectra $sigma(A),sigma(B)$ such that $$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda),quad B=int_{sigma(B)}lambda dmu_B(lambda).$$



In other words, $A,B$ are "diagonal" in the "basis of eigenvectors".



Now, in the finite dimensional case, when they commute they can be "simultaneously diagonalized". I want to understand this statement here.



I think Fubini's theorem is key in this.



I mean, my first thought was to consider the product measure $mu_Atimes mu_B$ on $sigma(A)times sigma(B)$. What we would like then is to have $$A=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_1 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2),quad B=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_2 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2)$$



Now, suppose Fubini's theorem holds, in that case



$$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda_1 dmu_A(lambda_1)int_{sigma(B)}dmu_B(lambda_2)=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda)$$



and similarly for $B$ so that we indeed recover the usual expression.



On the other hand, I think that for projection-valued measures, Fubini's theorem is then tied with the operators commuting. I don't know how to make this precise.



So I ask: how does the spectral theorem generalizes for a (finite) collection of commuting operators so that we generalize the idea that they can be "simultaneously diagonalized"?



Am I correct that the above is the right procedure? If so, why Fubini's theorem can only be applied when the operators commute? If not, what is the correct way to do it?










share|cite|improve this question













Let a Hilbert space $mathscr{H}$ be given and two operators $A,B$ which are hermitian and commute.



In that setting, for each of them we can apply the spectral theorem to get projection valued measures $mu_A$ and $mu_B$ on their spectra $sigma(A),sigma(B)$ such that $$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda),quad B=int_{sigma(B)}lambda dmu_B(lambda).$$



In other words, $A,B$ are "diagonal" in the "basis of eigenvectors".



Now, in the finite dimensional case, when they commute they can be "simultaneously diagonalized". I want to understand this statement here.



I think Fubini's theorem is key in this.



I mean, my first thought was to consider the product measure $mu_Atimes mu_B$ on $sigma(A)times sigma(B)$. What we would like then is to have $$A=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_1 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2),quad B=int_{sigma(A)times sigma(B)} lambda_2 d(mu_Atimes mu_B)(lambda_1,lambda_2)$$



Now, suppose Fubini's theorem holds, in that case



$$A=int_{sigma(A)}lambda_1 dmu_A(lambda_1)int_{sigma(B)}dmu_B(lambda_2)=int_{sigma(A)}lambda dmu_A(lambda)$$



and similarly for $B$ so that we indeed recover the usual expression.



On the other hand, I think that for projection-valued measures, Fubini's theorem is then tied with the operators commuting. I don't know how to make this precise.



So I ask: how does the spectral theorem generalizes for a (finite) collection of commuting operators so that we generalize the idea that they can be "simultaneously diagonalized"?



Am I correct that the above is the right procedure? If so, why Fubini's theorem can only be applied when the operators commute? If not, what is the correct way to do it?







real-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces spectral-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 21 at 13:17









user1620696

11.3k340113




11.3k340113












  • Every bounded operator $B$ that commutes with a seladjoint operator $A$ also commutes with the spectral measure $E_A$ for $A$. If $A$ and $B$ are selfadjoint and commute, then their spectral measures commute.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 22 at 0:45




















  • Every bounded operator $B$ that commutes with a seladjoint operator $A$ also commutes with the spectral measure $E_A$ for $A$. If $A$ and $B$ are selfadjoint and commute, then their spectral measures commute.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 22 at 0:45


















Every bounded operator $B$ that commutes with a seladjoint operator $A$ also commutes with the spectral measure $E_A$ for $A$. If $A$ and $B$ are selfadjoint and commute, then their spectral measures commute.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 22 at 0:45






Every bounded operator $B$ that commutes with a seladjoint operator $A$ also commutes with the spectral measure $E_A$ for $A$. If $A$ and $B$ are selfadjoint and commute, then their spectral measures commute.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 22 at 0:45












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













The critical point here is the construction of the product measure (mind you, these are not scalar-valued measures for which the theory is usually developed). However, it can be done. This is exactly the content of the spectral theorem for commuting normal operators (see Schmüdgen. Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Theorem 5.21):



Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space, then there exists a unique projection-valued measure $E$ on $mathcal{B}(mathbb{C}^n)$ such that
$$
A_j=int_{mathbb{C}^n}lambda_j,dE(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)
$$

for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Moreover, the support of $E$ is contained in the product of the supports of the spectral measures of $A_1,dots,A_n$.



If you are dealing with unbounded operators, you have to be a little careful. In this case "commuting" is to be understood as strongly commuting, i.e., the spectral projections of the operators commute.



Finally, I think that the better generalization of diagonalization is the spectral theorem in multiplication operator form. For commuting normal operators it reads as follows.



Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space $H$, then there exists a measure space $(X,mathcal{B},mu)$, measurable functions $phi_1,dots,phi_ncolon Xto mathbb{C}$ and a unitary operator $Ucolon Hto L^2(X,mu)$ such that
$$
A_j=U^ast M_{phi_j}U
$$

for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Here $M_phi$ denotes the multiplication operator defined by
$$
D(M_phi)={fin L^2(X,mu)mid phi fin L^2(X,mu)},,M_phi f=phi f.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007715%2fsimultaneous-diagonalization-of-hermitian-operators-using-the-spectral-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The critical point here is the construction of the product measure (mind you, these are not scalar-valued measures for which the theory is usually developed). However, it can be done. This is exactly the content of the spectral theorem for commuting normal operators (see Schmüdgen. Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Theorem 5.21):



    Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space, then there exists a unique projection-valued measure $E$ on $mathcal{B}(mathbb{C}^n)$ such that
    $$
    A_j=int_{mathbb{C}^n}lambda_j,dE(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)
    $$

    for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Moreover, the support of $E$ is contained in the product of the supports of the spectral measures of $A_1,dots,A_n$.



    If you are dealing with unbounded operators, you have to be a little careful. In this case "commuting" is to be understood as strongly commuting, i.e., the spectral projections of the operators commute.



    Finally, I think that the better generalization of diagonalization is the spectral theorem in multiplication operator form. For commuting normal operators it reads as follows.



    Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space $H$, then there exists a measure space $(X,mathcal{B},mu)$, measurable functions $phi_1,dots,phi_ncolon Xto mathbb{C}$ and a unitary operator $Ucolon Hto L^2(X,mu)$ such that
    $$
    A_j=U^ast M_{phi_j}U
    $$

    for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Here $M_phi$ denotes the multiplication operator defined by
    $$
    D(M_phi)={fin L^2(X,mu)mid phi fin L^2(X,mu)},,M_phi f=phi f.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      The critical point here is the construction of the product measure (mind you, these are not scalar-valued measures for which the theory is usually developed). However, it can be done. This is exactly the content of the spectral theorem for commuting normal operators (see Schmüdgen. Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Theorem 5.21):



      Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space, then there exists a unique projection-valued measure $E$ on $mathcal{B}(mathbb{C}^n)$ such that
      $$
      A_j=int_{mathbb{C}^n}lambda_j,dE(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)
      $$

      for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Moreover, the support of $E$ is contained in the product of the supports of the spectral measures of $A_1,dots,A_n$.



      If you are dealing with unbounded operators, you have to be a little careful. In this case "commuting" is to be understood as strongly commuting, i.e., the spectral projections of the operators commute.



      Finally, I think that the better generalization of diagonalization is the spectral theorem in multiplication operator form. For commuting normal operators it reads as follows.



      Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space $H$, then there exists a measure space $(X,mathcal{B},mu)$, measurable functions $phi_1,dots,phi_ncolon Xto mathbb{C}$ and a unitary operator $Ucolon Hto L^2(X,mu)$ such that
      $$
      A_j=U^ast M_{phi_j}U
      $$

      for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Here $M_phi$ denotes the multiplication operator defined by
      $$
      D(M_phi)={fin L^2(X,mu)mid phi fin L^2(X,mu)},,M_phi f=phi f.
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        The critical point here is the construction of the product measure (mind you, these are not scalar-valued measures for which the theory is usually developed). However, it can be done. This is exactly the content of the spectral theorem for commuting normal operators (see Schmüdgen. Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Theorem 5.21):



        Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space, then there exists a unique projection-valued measure $E$ on $mathcal{B}(mathbb{C}^n)$ such that
        $$
        A_j=int_{mathbb{C}^n}lambda_j,dE(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)
        $$

        for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Moreover, the support of $E$ is contained in the product of the supports of the spectral measures of $A_1,dots,A_n$.



        If you are dealing with unbounded operators, you have to be a little careful. In this case "commuting" is to be understood as strongly commuting, i.e., the spectral projections of the operators commute.



        Finally, I think that the better generalization of diagonalization is the spectral theorem in multiplication operator form. For commuting normal operators it reads as follows.



        Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space $H$, then there exists a measure space $(X,mathcal{B},mu)$, measurable functions $phi_1,dots,phi_ncolon Xto mathbb{C}$ and a unitary operator $Ucolon Hto L^2(X,mu)$ such that
        $$
        A_j=U^ast M_{phi_j}U
        $$

        for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Here $M_phi$ denotes the multiplication operator defined by
        $$
        D(M_phi)={fin L^2(X,mu)mid phi fin L^2(X,mu)},,M_phi f=phi f.
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The critical point here is the construction of the product measure (mind you, these are not scalar-valued measures for which the theory is usually developed). However, it can be done. This is exactly the content of the spectral theorem for commuting normal operators (see Schmüdgen. Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Theorem 5.21):



        Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space, then there exists a unique projection-valued measure $E$ on $mathcal{B}(mathbb{C}^n)$ such that
        $$
        A_j=int_{mathbb{C}^n}lambda_j,dE(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)
        $$

        for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Moreover, the support of $E$ is contained in the product of the supports of the spectral measures of $A_1,dots,A_n$.



        If you are dealing with unbounded operators, you have to be a little careful. In this case "commuting" is to be understood as strongly commuting, i.e., the spectral projections of the operators commute.



        Finally, I think that the better generalization of diagonalization is the spectral theorem in multiplication operator form. For commuting normal operators it reads as follows.



        Theorem. If $A_1,dots,A_n$ are pairwise commuting normal operators on a Hilbert space $H$, then there exists a measure space $(X,mathcal{B},mu)$, measurable functions $phi_1,dots,phi_ncolon Xto mathbb{C}$ and a unitary operator $Ucolon Hto L^2(X,mu)$ such that
        $$
        A_j=U^ast M_{phi_j}U
        $$

        for $jin{1,dots,n}$. Here $M_phi$ denotes the multiplication operator defined by
        $$
        D(M_phi)={fin L^2(X,mu)mid phi fin L^2(X,mu)},,M_phi f=phi f.
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 13:56









        MaoWao

        2,333616




        2,333616






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007715%2fsimultaneous-diagonalization-of-hermitian-operators-using-the-spectral-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ellipse (mathématiques)

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Mont Emei