Lyapunov stability of 4x4 matrix.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider the following continuous-time state space representation of the form:



$frac{d}{dx}x(t) = Ax(t)+Bu(t), quad y(t)=Cx(t), quad tin mathbb{R}^{+}$



$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&3&0&0\-3&-1&0&0\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix} quad B = begin{bmatrix}0\1\0\0 end{bmatrix} quad C=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}$



The corresponding eigenvalues are: $-1+3i, -1-3i, 0+3i text{and} 0-3i$.



The answer states that this system is Lyaponov stable.
But I'm wondering why.



Is it because the Jordan blocks of the eigenvalues with zero real-part are $1$x$1$. Because this matrix is in Jordan Form?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Your $A$ matrix in not in Jordan form, but in its real Jordan form, so you have to look at the size of each full real Jordan block.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:28










  • I thought that a 4x4 real jordan form had an identity matrix in the upper right corner? like this:$begin{bmatrix}-1&3&1&0\-3&-1&0&1\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix}$
    – user463102
    Nov 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    Yes, only your example is not a real Jordan block, because then both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal need to be the same.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 18:54










  • Thank you. I did not know that a right upper 2x2 identity only appears if both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal are the same.
    – user463102
    Nov 22 at 7:44

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider the following continuous-time state space representation of the form:



$frac{d}{dx}x(t) = Ax(t)+Bu(t), quad y(t)=Cx(t), quad tin mathbb{R}^{+}$



$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&3&0&0\-3&-1&0&0\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix} quad B = begin{bmatrix}0\1\0\0 end{bmatrix} quad C=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}$



The corresponding eigenvalues are: $-1+3i, -1-3i, 0+3i text{and} 0-3i$.



The answer states that this system is Lyaponov stable.
But I'm wondering why.



Is it because the Jordan blocks of the eigenvalues with zero real-part are $1$x$1$. Because this matrix is in Jordan Form?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Your $A$ matrix in not in Jordan form, but in its real Jordan form, so you have to look at the size of each full real Jordan block.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:28










  • I thought that a 4x4 real jordan form had an identity matrix in the upper right corner? like this:$begin{bmatrix}-1&3&1&0\-3&-1&0&1\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix}$
    – user463102
    Nov 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    Yes, only your example is not a real Jordan block, because then both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal need to be the same.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 18:54










  • Thank you. I did not know that a right upper 2x2 identity only appears if both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal are the same.
    – user463102
    Nov 22 at 7:44















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Consider the following continuous-time state space representation of the form:



$frac{d}{dx}x(t) = Ax(t)+Bu(t), quad y(t)=Cx(t), quad tin mathbb{R}^{+}$



$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&3&0&0\-3&-1&0&0\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix} quad B = begin{bmatrix}0\1\0\0 end{bmatrix} quad C=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}$



The corresponding eigenvalues are: $-1+3i, -1-3i, 0+3i text{and} 0-3i$.



The answer states that this system is Lyaponov stable.
But I'm wondering why.



Is it because the Jordan blocks of the eigenvalues with zero real-part are $1$x$1$. Because this matrix is in Jordan Form?










share|cite|improve this question















Consider the following continuous-time state space representation of the form:



$frac{d}{dx}x(t) = Ax(t)+Bu(t), quad y(t)=Cx(t), quad tin mathbb{R}^{+}$



$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&3&0&0\-3&-1&0&0\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix} quad B = begin{bmatrix}0\1\0\0 end{bmatrix} quad C=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}$



The corresponding eigenvalues are: $-1+3i, -1-3i, 0+3i text{and} 0-3i$.



The answer states that this system is Lyaponov stable.
But I'm wondering why.



Is it because the Jordan blocks of the eigenvalues with zero real-part are $1$x$1$. Because this matrix is in Jordan Form?







control-theory linear-control






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 13:11

























asked Nov 21 at 13:00









user463102

14213




14213








  • 1




    Your $A$ matrix in not in Jordan form, but in its real Jordan form, so you have to look at the size of each full real Jordan block.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:28










  • I thought that a 4x4 real jordan form had an identity matrix in the upper right corner? like this:$begin{bmatrix}-1&3&1&0\-3&-1&0&1\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix}$
    – user463102
    Nov 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    Yes, only your example is not a real Jordan block, because then both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal need to be the same.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 18:54










  • Thank you. I did not know that a right upper 2x2 identity only appears if both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal are the same.
    – user463102
    Nov 22 at 7:44
















  • 1




    Your $A$ matrix in not in Jordan form, but in its real Jordan form, so you have to look at the size of each full real Jordan block.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:28










  • I thought that a 4x4 real jordan form had an identity matrix in the upper right corner? like this:$begin{bmatrix}-1&3&1&0\-3&-1&0&1\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix}$
    – user463102
    Nov 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    Yes, only your example is not a real Jordan block, because then both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal need to be the same.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 18:54










  • Thank you. I did not know that a right upper 2x2 identity only appears if both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal are the same.
    – user463102
    Nov 22 at 7:44










1




1




Your $A$ matrix in not in Jordan form, but in its real Jordan form, so you have to look at the size of each full real Jordan block.
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 21 at 14:28




Your $A$ matrix in not in Jordan form, but in its real Jordan form, so you have to look at the size of each full real Jordan block.
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 21 at 14:28












I thought that a 4x4 real jordan form had an identity matrix in the upper right corner? like this:$begin{bmatrix}-1&3&1&0\-3&-1&0&1\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix}$
– user463102
Nov 21 at 17:00




I thought that a 4x4 real jordan form had an identity matrix in the upper right corner? like this:$begin{bmatrix}-1&3&1&0\-3&-1&0&1\0&0&0&3\0&0&-3&0 end{bmatrix}$
– user463102
Nov 21 at 17:00




1




1




Yes, only your example is not a real Jordan block, because then both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal need to be the same.
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 21 at 18:54




Yes, only your example is not a real Jordan block, because then both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal need to be the same.
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 21 at 18:54












Thank you. I did not know that a right upper 2x2 identity only appears if both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal are the same.
– user463102
Nov 22 at 7:44






Thank you. I did not know that a right upper 2x2 identity only appears if both 2x2 matrices on the diagonal are the same.
– user463102
Nov 22 at 7:44












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Write $I_n$ for a $n times n$ identity matrix.



Take $P = (1/2)I_4$ and $V(x) = x^T P x$, which is clearly positive definite. Now calculate the directional derivative:



$$
begin{align}
dot{V}(x) &= dot{x}^T P x + x^T P dot{x} \
&= x^T A^T P x + x^T P A x \
&= x^T(A^T P + P A) x \
&= x^T Q x,
end{align}
$$



insert $A$ and $P$ and derive $Q$:



$$
begin{align}
Q = A^T P + P A &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & -3 & 0 & 0 \
3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & -3 \
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
end{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} I_4 + frac{1}{2} I_4
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 3 & 0 & 0 \
-3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
0 & 0 & -3 & 0
end{bmatrix} \ &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} .
end{align}
$$



So your directional derivative is $dot{V}(x) = -x_1^2 - x_2^2$, which is negative semi-definite. Therefore, the system is Lyapunov stable (but not asymptotically Lyapunov stable).






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:37











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007700%2flyapunov-stability-of-4x4-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Write $I_n$ for a $n times n$ identity matrix.



Take $P = (1/2)I_4$ and $V(x) = x^T P x$, which is clearly positive definite. Now calculate the directional derivative:



$$
begin{align}
dot{V}(x) &= dot{x}^T P x + x^T P dot{x} \
&= x^T A^T P x + x^T P A x \
&= x^T(A^T P + P A) x \
&= x^T Q x,
end{align}
$$



insert $A$ and $P$ and derive $Q$:



$$
begin{align}
Q = A^T P + P A &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & -3 & 0 & 0 \
3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & -3 \
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
end{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} I_4 + frac{1}{2} I_4
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 3 & 0 & 0 \
-3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
0 & 0 & -3 & 0
end{bmatrix} \ &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} .
end{align}
$$



So your directional derivative is $dot{V}(x) = -x_1^2 - x_2^2$, which is negative semi-definite. Therefore, the system is Lyapunov stable (but not asymptotically Lyapunov stable).






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:37















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Write $I_n$ for a $n times n$ identity matrix.



Take $P = (1/2)I_4$ and $V(x) = x^T P x$, which is clearly positive definite. Now calculate the directional derivative:



$$
begin{align}
dot{V}(x) &= dot{x}^T P x + x^T P dot{x} \
&= x^T A^T P x + x^T P A x \
&= x^T(A^T P + P A) x \
&= x^T Q x,
end{align}
$$



insert $A$ and $P$ and derive $Q$:



$$
begin{align}
Q = A^T P + P A &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & -3 & 0 & 0 \
3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & -3 \
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
end{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} I_4 + frac{1}{2} I_4
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 3 & 0 & 0 \
-3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
0 & 0 & -3 & 0
end{bmatrix} \ &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} .
end{align}
$$



So your directional derivative is $dot{V}(x) = -x_1^2 - x_2^2$, which is negative semi-definite. Therefore, the system is Lyapunov stable (but not asymptotically Lyapunov stable).






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:37













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Write $I_n$ for a $n times n$ identity matrix.



Take $P = (1/2)I_4$ and $V(x) = x^T P x$, which is clearly positive definite. Now calculate the directional derivative:



$$
begin{align}
dot{V}(x) &= dot{x}^T P x + x^T P dot{x} \
&= x^T A^T P x + x^T P A x \
&= x^T(A^T P + P A) x \
&= x^T Q x,
end{align}
$$



insert $A$ and $P$ and derive $Q$:



$$
begin{align}
Q = A^T P + P A &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & -3 & 0 & 0 \
3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & -3 \
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
end{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} I_4 + frac{1}{2} I_4
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 3 & 0 & 0 \
-3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
0 & 0 & -3 & 0
end{bmatrix} \ &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} .
end{align}
$$



So your directional derivative is $dot{V}(x) = -x_1^2 - x_2^2$, which is negative semi-definite. Therefore, the system is Lyapunov stable (but not asymptotically Lyapunov stable).






share|cite|improve this answer












Write $I_n$ for a $n times n$ identity matrix.



Take $P = (1/2)I_4$ and $V(x) = x^T P x$, which is clearly positive definite. Now calculate the directional derivative:



$$
begin{align}
dot{V}(x) &= dot{x}^T P x + x^T P dot{x} \
&= x^T A^T P x + x^T P A x \
&= x^T(A^T P + P A) x \
&= x^T Q x,
end{align}
$$



insert $A$ and $P$ and derive $Q$:



$$
begin{align}
Q = A^T P + P A &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & -3 & 0 & 0 \
3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & -3 \
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
end{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} I_4 + frac{1}{2} I_4
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 3 & 0 & 0 \
-3 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
0 & 0 & -3 & 0
end{bmatrix} \ &=
begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} .
end{align}
$$



So your directional derivative is $dot{V}(x) = -x_1^2 - x_2^2$, which is negative semi-definite. Therefore, the system is Lyapunov stable (but not asymptotically Lyapunov stable).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 21 at 13:57









SampleTime

52139




52139








  • 1




    In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:37














  • 1




    In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
    – Kwin van der Veen
    Nov 21 at 14:37








1




1




In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 21 at 14:37




In this case it might be even easier to just look at the eigenvalues, because they all have an algebraic multiplicity of one. Only if the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue with zero real part is higher than one, you also need to check its geometric multiplicity.
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 21 at 14:37


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007700%2flyapunov-stability-of-4x4-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei