Expected waiting time at tennis court [simplified version]
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to understand that why the answers for both these scenarios are the same.
Q1. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds all courts busy and also that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
Q2. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds that a team just went inside and after that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
I feel that the answer to Q1 should be 40k + 20 and answer to Q2 should also be 40k + 40. My TA says that answer to both the questions is 40k+40 . I am not getting the reason.
probability expected-value
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to understand that why the answers for both these scenarios are the same.
Q1. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds all courts busy and also that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
Q2. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds that a team just went inside and after that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
I feel that the answer to Q1 should be 40k + 20 and answer to Q2 should also be 40k + 40. My TA says that answer to both the questions is 40k+40 . I am not getting the reason.
probability expected-value
Because the exponential distribution has no memory. So the probability of the players staying on the court another 40 min from when you first observe them is the same as the probability of them staying on the court for 40 min from when they first started.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 18:50
Expanding on my previous comment. Say they have already being playing for a time $t_1$ when you arrive, then the probability that they will play a further amount $Delta t$ is given by $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)$ It does not take much to show that this is equal to $P(T>t_1)$. So the expected time they will continue to play is still the mean play time of 40 min.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 20:35
A mistake in my comment which I can no longer edit. Should read more like $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)=P(T>Delta t)$
– user121049
Nov 22 at 14:12
I understood it. Thank you very much @user121049
– Raj Rajvir
Nov 22 at 16:38
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to understand that why the answers for both these scenarios are the same.
Q1. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds all courts busy and also that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
Q2. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds that a team just went inside and after that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
I feel that the answer to Q1 should be 40k + 20 and answer to Q2 should also be 40k + 40. My TA says that answer to both the questions is 40k+40 . I am not getting the reason.
probability expected-value
I want to understand that why the answers for both these scenarios are the same.
Q1. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds all courts busy and also that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
Q2. An athletic facility has 1 tennis court. Pairs of players arrive at the courts and use a court for an exponentially distributed amount of time with mean 40 minutes. Suppose a pair of players arrives and finds that a team just went inside and after that k other teams are waiting in queue. What is the expected waiting time to get a court?.
I feel that the answer to Q1 should be 40k + 20 and answer to Q2 should also be 40k + 40. My TA says that answer to both the questions is 40k+40 . I am not getting the reason.
probability expected-value
probability expected-value
edited Nov 21 at 18:36
asked Nov 21 at 13:38
Raj Rajvir
161
161
Because the exponential distribution has no memory. So the probability of the players staying on the court another 40 min from when you first observe them is the same as the probability of them staying on the court for 40 min from when they first started.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 18:50
Expanding on my previous comment. Say they have already being playing for a time $t_1$ when you arrive, then the probability that they will play a further amount $Delta t$ is given by $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)$ It does not take much to show that this is equal to $P(T>t_1)$. So the expected time they will continue to play is still the mean play time of 40 min.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 20:35
A mistake in my comment which I can no longer edit. Should read more like $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)=P(T>Delta t)$
– user121049
Nov 22 at 14:12
I understood it. Thank you very much @user121049
– Raj Rajvir
Nov 22 at 16:38
add a comment |
Because the exponential distribution has no memory. So the probability of the players staying on the court another 40 min from when you first observe them is the same as the probability of them staying on the court for 40 min from when they first started.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 18:50
Expanding on my previous comment. Say they have already being playing for a time $t_1$ when you arrive, then the probability that they will play a further amount $Delta t$ is given by $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)$ It does not take much to show that this is equal to $P(T>t_1)$. So the expected time they will continue to play is still the mean play time of 40 min.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 20:35
A mistake in my comment which I can no longer edit. Should read more like $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)=P(T>Delta t)$
– user121049
Nov 22 at 14:12
I understood it. Thank you very much @user121049
– Raj Rajvir
Nov 22 at 16:38
Because the exponential distribution has no memory. So the probability of the players staying on the court another 40 min from when you first observe them is the same as the probability of them staying on the court for 40 min from when they first started.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 18:50
Because the exponential distribution has no memory. So the probability of the players staying on the court another 40 min from when you first observe them is the same as the probability of them staying on the court for 40 min from when they first started.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 18:50
Expanding on my previous comment. Say they have already being playing for a time $t_1$ when you arrive, then the probability that they will play a further amount $Delta t$ is given by $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)$ It does not take much to show that this is equal to $P(T>t_1)$. So the expected time they will continue to play is still the mean play time of 40 min.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 20:35
Expanding on my previous comment. Say they have already being playing for a time $t_1$ when you arrive, then the probability that they will play a further amount $Delta t$ is given by $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)$ It does not take much to show that this is equal to $P(T>t_1)$. So the expected time they will continue to play is still the mean play time of 40 min.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 20:35
A mistake in my comment which I can no longer edit. Should read more like $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)=P(T>Delta t)$
– user121049
Nov 22 at 14:12
A mistake in my comment which I can no longer edit. Should read more like $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)=P(T>Delta t)$
– user121049
Nov 22 at 14:12
I understood it. Thank you very much @user121049
– Raj Rajvir
Nov 22 at 16:38
I understood it. Thank you very much @user121049
– Raj Rajvir
Nov 22 at 16:38
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007737%2fexpected-waiting-time-at-tennis-court-simplified-version%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Because the exponential distribution has no memory. So the probability of the players staying on the court another 40 min from when you first observe them is the same as the probability of them staying on the court for 40 min from when they first started.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 18:50
Expanding on my previous comment. Say they have already being playing for a time $t_1$ when you arrive, then the probability that they will play a further amount $Delta t$ is given by $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)$ It does not take much to show that this is equal to $P(T>t_1)$. So the expected time they will continue to play is still the mean play time of 40 min.
– user121049
Nov 21 at 20:35
A mistake in my comment which I can no longer edit. Should read more like $P(T>t_1+Delta t|T>t_1)=P(T>Delta t)$
– user121049
Nov 22 at 14:12
I understood it. Thank you very much @user121049
– Raj Rajvir
Nov 22 at 16:38