Values of Chebyshev’s ϑ-function for large numbers
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there website or article that has values of Chebyshev’s ϑ-function for very large numbers?
Chebyshev’s ϑ-function is
$$vartheta(x)=sum_{pleq x} ln p,$$
where $p$ is a prime number.
I have searched but I really couldn't find a resource that gives values of the function for numbers like $10^{19}$ or $10^{23}$.
prime-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there website or article that has values of Chebyshev’s ϑ-function for very large numbers?
Chebyshev’s ϑ-function is
$$vartheta(x)=sum_{pleq x} ln p,$$
where $p$ is a prime number.
I have searched but I really couldn't find a resource that gives values of the function for numbers like $10^{19}$ or $10^{23}$.
prime-numbers
Only goes up to $10^{10}$ arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0442.pdf ... but you might find this interesting (sorry ?)
– Donald Splutterwit
Sep 4 '17 at 17:42
You could look for well-formatted prime tables and write a little program that computes the theta function from that, splitting the string at commata or something like that.
– Cloudscape
Sep 4 '17 at 17:54
Otherwise you'll find tables for $psi(x) = sum_{p^k le x} log p$. And you can construct it from the zeta zeros.
– reuns
Sep 4 '17 at 17:59
For smaller values, there are programs like Perl/ntheory that can produce arbitrary psi or theta values in reasonable times (e.g. 10 seconds for $10^{10}$). Scaling is close to linear so that makes $10^{19}$ not practical. Precision matters as well -- using native precision (e.g. 15 digits) is much faster than using extended precision (e.g. 40-100+ digits). Pari/GP could give the latter in a reasonable time for smaller values. Both via brute force. To get results for large values it seems you'd need to modify a fast prime count method (see prime sum methods using LMO / DR).
– DanaJ
Sep 4 '17 at 22:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there website or article that has values of Chebyshev’s ϑ-function for very large numbers?
Chebyshev’s ϑ-function is
$$vartheta(x)=sum_{pleq x} ln p,$$
where $p$ is a prime number.
I have searched but I really couldn't find a resource that gives values of the function for numbers like $10^{19}$ or $10^{23}$.
prime-numbers
Is there website or article that has values of Chebyshev’s ϑ-function for very large numbers?
Chebyshev’s ϑ-function is
$$vartheta(x)=sum_{pleq x} ln p,$$
where $p$ is a prime number.
I have searched but I really couldn't find a resource that gives values of the function for numbers like $10^{19}$ or $10^{23}$.
prime-numbers
prime-numbers
edited Nov 21 at 13:35
Klangen
1,36511231
1,36511231
asked Sep 4 '17 at 17:36
Bright Chancellor
351311
351311
Only goes up to $10^{10}$ arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0442.pdf ... but you might find this interesting (sorry ?)
– Donald Splutterwit
Sep 4 '17 at 17:42
You could look for well-formatted prime tables and write a little program that computes the theta function from that, splitting the string at commata or something like that.
– Cloudscape
Sep 4 '17 at 17:54
Otherwise you'll find tables for $psi(x) = sum_{p^k le x} log p$. And you can construct it from the zeta zeros.
– reuns
Sep 4 '17 at 17:59
For smaller values, there are programs like Perl/ntheory that can produce arbitrary psi or theta values in reasonable times (e.g. 10 seconds for $10^{10}$). Scaling is close to linear so that makes $10^{19}$ not practical. Precision matters as well -- using native precision (e.g. 15 digits) is much faster than using extended precision (e.g. 40-100+ digits). Pari/GP could give the latter in a reasonable time for smaller values. Both via brute force. To get results for large values it seems you'd need to modify a fast prime count method (see prime sum methods using LMO / DR).
– DanaJ
Sep 4 '17 at 22:53
add a comment |
Only goes up to $10^{10}$ arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0442.pdf ... but you might find this interesting (sorry ?)
– Donald Splutterwit
Sep 4 '17 at 17:42
You could look for well-formatted prime tables and write a little program that computes the theta function from that, splitting the string at commata or something like that.
– Cloudscape
Sep 4 '17 at 17:54
Otherwise you'll find tables for $psi(x) = sum_{p^k le x} log p$. And you can construct it from the zeta zeros.
– reuns
Sep 4 '17 at 17:59
For smaller values, there are programs like Perl/ntheory that can produce arbitrary psi or theta values in reasonable times (e.g. 10 seconds for $10^{10}$). Scaling is close to linear so that makes $10^{19}$ not practical. Precision matters as well -- using native precision (e.g. 15 digits) is much faster than using extended precision (e.g. 40-100+ digits). Pari/GP could give the latter in a reasonable time for smaller values. Both via brute force. To get results for large values it seems you'd need to modify a fast prime count method (see prime sum methods using LMO / DR).
– DanaJ
Sep 4 '17 at 22:53
Only goes up to $10^{10}$ arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0442.pdf ... but you might find this interesting (sorry ?)
– Donald Splutterwit
Sep 4 '17 at 17:42
Only goes up to $10^{10}$ arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0442.pdf ... but you might find this interesting (sorry ?)
– Donald Splutterwit
Sep 4 '17 at 17:42
You could look for well-formatted prime tables and write a little program that computes the theta function from that, splitting the string at commata or something like that.
– Cloudscape
Sep 4 '17 at 17:54
You could look for well-formatted prime tables and write a little program that computes the theta function from that, splitting the string at commata or something like that.
– Cloudscape
Sep 4 '17 at 17:54
Otherwise you'll find tables for $psi(x) = sum_{p^k le x} log p$. And you can construct it from the zeta zeros.
– reuns
Sep 4 '17 at 17:59
Otherwise you'll find tables for $psi(x) = sum_{p^k le x} log p$. And you can construct it from the zeta zeros.
– reuns
Sep 4 '17 at 17:59
For smaller values, there are programs like Perl/ntheory that can produce arbitrary psi or theta values in reasonable times (e.g. 10 seconds for $10^{10}$). Scaling is close to linear so that makes $10^{19}$ not practical. Precision matters as well -- using native precision (e.g. 15 digits) is much faster than using extended precision (e.g. 40-100+ digits). Pari/GP could give the latter in a reasonable time for smaller values. Both via brute force. To get results for large values it seems you'd need to modify a fast prime count method (see prime sum methods using LMO / DR).
– DanaJ
Sep 4 '17 at 22:53
For smaller values, there are programs like Perl/ntheory that can produce arbitrary psi or theta values in reasonable times (e.g. 10 seconds for $10^{10}$). Scaling is close to linear so that makes $10^{19}$ not practical. Precision matters as well -- using native precision (e.g. 15 digits) is much faster than using extended precision (e.g. 40-100+ digits). Pari/GP could give the latter in a reasonable time for smaller values. Both via brute force. To get results for large values it seems you'd need to modify a fast prime count method (see prime sum methods using LMO / DR).
– DanaJ
Sep 4 '17 at 22:53
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2416681%2fvalues-of-chebyshev-s-%25cf%2591-function-for-large-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Only goes up to $10^{10}$ arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0442.pdf ... but you might find this interesting (sorry ?)
– Donald Splutterwit
Sep 4 '17 at 17:42
You could look for well-formatted prime tables and write a little program that computes the theta function from that, splitting the string at commata or something like that.
– Cloudscape
Sep 4 '17 at 17:54
Otherwise you'll find tables for $psi(x) = sum_{p^k le x} log p$. And you can construct it from the zeta zeros.
– reuns
Sep 4 '17 at 17:59
For smaller values, there are programs like Perl/ntheory that can produce arbitrary psi or theta values in reasonable times (e.g. 10 seconds for $10^{10}$). Scaling is close to linear so that makes $10^{19}$ not practical. Precision matters as well -- using native precision (e.g. 15 digits) is much faster than using extended precision (e.g. 40-100+ digits). Pari/GP could give the latter in a reasonable time for smaller values. Both via brute force. To get results for large values it seems you'd need to modify a fast prime count method (see prime sum methods using LMO / DR).
– DanaJ
Sep 4 '17 at 22:53