Show that $phi_x(t) = int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds$ is continuous on $C[0,1]$
Let $X=Y=C[0,1]$ with the uniform metric $d(x,y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|x(t) - y(t)|}$
Define $$phi:X to Y$$
$$phi_x(t) = int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds$$ Show that $phi$ is continuous on $X$
$d(phi_x,phi_y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds - int_{0}^{t}y(s)ds|}$=sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|}$
$|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|leq int_{0}^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds$
How can I use this to prove it?
general-topology limits continuity metric-spaces
add a comment |
Let $X=Y=C[0,1]$ with the uniform metric $d(x,y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|x(t) - y(t)|}$
Define $$phi:X to Y$$
$$phi_x(t) = int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds$$ Show that $phi$ is continuous on $X$
$d(phi_x,phi_y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds - int_{0}^{t}y(s)ds|}$=sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|}$
$|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|leq int_{0}^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds$
How can I use this to prove it?
general-topology limits continuity metric-spaces
1
you assume $|x(s)-y(s)| le delta$ for each $s$, which gives a bound of $int_0^t delta ds = delta t le delta$. Therefore, $d(x,y) < epsilon implies d(phi_x,phi_y) < epsilon$.
– mathworker21
Nov 25 at 5:19
add a comment |
Let $X=Y=C[0,1]$ with the uniform metric $d(x,y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|x(t) - y(t)|}$
Define $$phi:X to Y$$
$$phi_x(t) = int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds$$ Show that $phi$ is continuous on $X$
$d(phi_x,phi_y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds - int_{0}^{t}y(s)ds|}$=sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|}$
$|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|leq int_{0}^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds$
How can I use this to prove it?
general-topology limits continuity metric-spaces
Let $X=Y=C[0,1]$ with the uniform metric $d(x,y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|x(t) - y(t)|}$
Define $$phi:X to Y$$
$$phi_x(t) = int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds$$ Show that $phi$ is continuous on $X$
$d(phi_x,phi_y)=$sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}x(s)ds - int_{0}^{t}y(s)ds|}$=sup$_{tin [0,1]};{|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|}$
$|int_{0}^{t}(x(s)-y(s))ds|leq int_{0}^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds$
How can I use this to prove it?
general-topology limits continuity metric-spaces
general-topology limits continuity metric-spaces
asked Nov 25 at 5:11
So Lo
63719
63719
1
you assume $|x(s)-y(s)| le delta$ for each $s$, which gives a bound of $int_0^t delta ds = delta t le delta$. Therefore, $d(x,y) < epsilon implies d(phi_x,phi_y) < epsilon$.
– mathworker21
Nov 25 at 5:19
add a comment |
1
you assume $|x(s)-y(s)| le delta$ for each $s$, which gives a bound of $int_0^t delta ds = delta t le delta$. Therefore, $d(x,y) < epsilon implies d(phi_x,phi_y) < epsilon$.
– mathworker21
Nov 25 at 5:19
1
1
you assume $|x(s)-y(s)| le delta$ for each $s$, which gives a bound of $int_0^t delta ds = delta t le delta$. Therefore, $d(x,y) < epsilon implies d(phi_x,phi_y) < epsilon$.
– mathworker21
Nov 25 at 5:19
you assume $|x(s)-y(s)| le delta$ for each $s$, which gives a bound of $int_0^t delta ds = delta t le delta$. Therefore, $d(x,y) < epsilon implies d(phi_x,phi_y) < epsilon$.
– mathworker21
Nov 25 at 5:19
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$int_0^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds leq d(x,y)$ so $d(phi_x,phi_y) leq d(x,y)$.
add a comment |
I'd write $phi(x)(t) = int_0^t x(s)ds$.
Then for any $x,y in X$ and any $t in [0,1]$:
$$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| = |int_0^t (x(s)-y(s))ds| le int_0^t |x(s)-y(s)| ds$$
and as for all $s$, $|x(s) -y(s)|le d(x,y)$ we can estimate the final term above
by $t d(x,y) le d(x,y)$ (as $t le 1$).
So know that for all $t$, $$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| le d(x,y)$$
and taking the sup on the left:
$$d(phi(x), phi(y)) le d(x,y)$$ showing that $phi$ is distance-shrinking and is even uniformly continuous: taking $delta=varepsilon$ will work at any point.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012462%2fshow-that-phi-xt-int-0txsds-is-continuous-on-c0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$int_0^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds leq d(x,y)$ so $d(phi_x,phi_y) leq d(x,y)$.
add a comment |
$int_0^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds leq d(x,y)$ so $d(phi_x,phi_y) leq d(x,y)$.
add a comment |
$int_0^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds leq d(x,y)$ so $d(phi_x,phi_y) leq d(x,y)$.
$int_0^{t}|x(s)-y(s)|ds leq d(x,y)$ so $d(phi_x,phi_y) leq d(x,y)$.
answered Nov 25 at 5:19
Kavi Rama Murthy
48.7k31854
48.7k31854
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'd write $phi(x)(t) = int_0^t x(s)ds$.
Then for any $x,y in X$ and any $t in [0,1]$:
$$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| = |int_0^t (x(s)-y(s))ds| le int_0^t |x(s)-y(s)| ds$$
and as for all $s$, $|x(s) -y(s)|le d(x,y)$ we can estimate the final term above
by $t d(x,y) le d(x,y)$ (as $t le 1$).
So know that for all $t$, $$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| le d(x,y)$$
and taking the sup on the left:
$$d(phi(x), phi(y)) le d(x,y)$$ showing that $phi$ is distance-shrinking and is even uniformly continuous: taking $delta=varepsilon$ will work at any point.
add a comment |
I'd write $phi(x)(t) = int_0^t x(s)ds$.
Then for any $x,y in X$ and any $t in [0,1]$:
$$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| = |int_0^t (x(s)-y(s))ds| le int_0^t |x(s)-y(s)| ds$$
and as for all $s$, $|x(s) -y(s)|le d(x,y)$ we can estimate the final term above
by $t d(x,y) le d(x,y)$ (as $t le 1$).
So know that for all $t$, $$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| le d(x,y)$$
and taking the sup on the left:
$$d(phi(x), phi(y)) le d(x,y)$$ showing that $phi$ is distance-shrinking and is even uniformly continuous: taking $delta=varepsilon$ will work at any point.
add a comment |
I'd write $phi(x)(t) = int_0^t x(s)ds$.
Then for any $x,y in X$ and any $t in [0,1]$:
$$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| = |int_0^t (x(s)-y(s))ds| le int_0^t |x(s)-y(s)| ds$$
and as for all $s$, $|x(s) -y(s)|le d(x,y)$ we can estimate the final term above
by $t d(x,y) le d(x,y)$ (as $t le 1$).
So know that for all $t$, $$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| le d(x,y)$$
and taking the sup on the left:
$$d(phi(x), phi(y)) le d(x,y)$$ showing that $phi$ is distance-shrinking and is even uniformly continuous: taking $delta=varepsilon$ will work at any point.
I'd write $phi(x)(t) = int_0^t x(s)ds$.
Then for any $x,y in X$ and any $t in [0,1]$:
$$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| = |int_0^t (x(s)-y(s))ds| le int_0^t |x(s)-y(s)| ds$$
and as for all $s$, $|x(s) -y(s)|le d(x,y)$ we can estimate the final term above
by $t d(x,y) le d(x,y)$ (as $t le 1$).
So know that for all $t$, $$|phi(x)(t) - phi(y)(t)| le d(x,y)$$
and taking the sup on the left:
$$d(phi(x), phi(y)) le d(x,y)$$ showing that $phi$ is distance-shrinking and is even uniformly continuous: taking $delta=varepsilon$ will work at any point.
answered Nov 25 at 6:59
Henno Brandsma
104k346113
104k346113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012462%2fshow-that-phi-xt-int-0txsds-is-continuous-on-c0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
you assume $|x(s)-y(s)| le delta$ for each $s$, which gives a bound of $int_0^t delta ds = delta t le delta$. Therefore, $d(x,y) < epsilon implies d(phi_x,phi_y) < epsilon$.
– mathworker21
Nov 25 at 5:19