What is the utilitarian purpose of artificial waterfalls?
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
In sci-fi and fantasy artwork, I often see a city built on top of or incorporating waterfalls:

James Gurney's Dinotopia (above) is an egregious example with "waterfall towers". When the city is underground, there's often a central waterfall pouring into a lake. And in the film Logan's Run (below) they escape the city through a postmodern water sculpture park – it's purpose isn't explained.

Is there a utilitarian excuse for artificial waterfalls in a (mostly) realistic fantasy or sci-fi setting?
I'm looking for plausible infrastructure, sanitation, irrigation, or atmospheric purpose that would justify the expense and maintenance of channeling artificial waterways through a city, or deliberately building a megastructure city on top of natural water channels and cliffs.
A watermill in every home does not sound like plausible infrastructure – even in a medieval watermill-punk world. I can't imagine that thousands of localized water turbines (even Tesla turbines) would be better than a large centralized hydroelectric powerplant. (Maybe I am wrong?)
How can I justify a City of Waterfalls trope to serve a plausible utilitarian purpose?
As suggested by the two photos, the waterfalls don't need to be impressively large or in any particular configuration, just open-air and scattered throughout the structures. I want the form to follow function – whatever that is. My setting is sci-fi/fantasy (no magic, not Earth, all human) with refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls" need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
I am specifically not looking for aesthetics or "because they can" reasons, such as the waterfall skyscraper in China, rather a utilitarian or infrastructure purpose.
water infrastructure city-design
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
In sci-fi and fantasy artwork, I often see a city built on top of or incorporating waterfalls:

James Gurney's Dinotopia (above) is an egregious example with "waterfall towers". When the city is underground, there's often a central waterfall pouring into a lake. And in the film Logan's Run (below) they escape the city through a postmodern water sculpture park – it's purpose isn't explained.

Is there a utilitarian excuse for artificial waterfalls in a (mostly) realistic fantasy or sci-fi setting?
I'm looking for plausible infrastructure, sanitation, irrigation, or atmospheric purpose that would justify the expense and maintenance of channeling artificial waterways through a city, or deliberately building a megastructure city on top of natural water channels and cliffs.
A watermill in every home does not sound like plausible infrastructure – even in a medieval watermill-punk world. I can't imagine that thousands of localized water turbines (even Tesla turbines) would be better than a large centralized hydroelectric powerplant. (Maybe I am wrong?)
How can I justify a City of Waterfalls trope to serve a plausible utilitarian purpose?
As suggested by the two photos, the waterfalls don't need to be impressively large or in any particular configuration, just open-air and scattered throughout the structures. I want the form to follow function – whatever that is. My setting is sci-fi/fantasy (no magic, not Earth, all human) with refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls" need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
I am specifically not looking for aesthetics or "because they can" reasons, such as the waterfall skyscraper in China, rather a utilitarian or infrastructure purpose.
water infrastructure city-design
22
Waterfalls make mist, and mist makes your dwarves happy... No one wants unhappy dwarves
– adaliabooks
12 hours ago
1
waterfalls can be used to generate energy, water can clear the air and i assume that waterfalls are good for the mental health
– Julian Egner
12 hours ago
5
@adaliabooks Sure you do. Unhappy dwarves is FUN.
– Stian Yttervik
11 hours ago
3
In Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971), a waterfall mixed the chocolate.
– user535733
10 hours ago
2
Not an answer as it seems you're looking for something more industrial rather than built for human well-being, but waterfalls to keep people happy isn't just an aesthetic or relaxation thing: there have been studies suggesting that depression is reduced by air with a high density of negative ions, and waterfalls are one natural source of negative ions in the air. Here's a summary study: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598548
– trichoplax
3 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
In sci-fi and fantasy artwork, I often see a city built on top of or incorporating waterfalls:

James Gurney's Dinotopia (above) is an egregious example with "waterfall towers". When the city is underground, there's often a central waterfall pouring into a lake. And in the film Logan's Run (below) they escape the city through a postmodern water sculpture park – it's purpose isn't explained.

Is there a utilitarian excuse for artificial waterfalls in a (mostly) realistic fantasy or sci-fi setting?
I'm looking for plausible infrastructure, sanitation, irrigation, or atmospheric purpose that would justify the expense and maintenance of channeling artificial waterways through a city, or deliberately building a megastructure city on top of natural water channels and cliffs.
A watermill in every home does not sound like plausible infrastructure – even in a medieval watermill-punk world. I can't imagine that thousands of localized water turbines (even Tesla turbines) would be better than a large centralized hydroelectric powerplant. (Maybe I am wrong?)
How can I justify a City of Waterfalls trope to serve a plausible utilitarian purpose?
As suggested by the two photos, the waterfalls don't need to be impressively large or in any particular configuration, just open-air and scattered throughout the structures. I want the form to follow function – whatever that is. My setting is sci-fi/fantasy (no magic, not Earth, all human) with refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls" need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
I am specifically not looking for aesthetics or "because they can" reasons, such as the waterfall skyscraper in China, rather a utilitarian or infrastructure purpose.
water infrastructure city-design
In sci-fi and fantasy artwork, I often see a city built on top of or incorporating waterfalls:

James Gurney's Dinotopia (above) is an egregious example with "waterfall towers". When the city is underground, there's often a central waterfall pouring into a lake. And in the film Logan's Run (below) they escape the city through a postmodern water sculpture park – it's purpose isn't explained.

Is there a utilitarian excuse for artificial waterfalls in a (mostly) realistic fantasy or sci-fi setting?
I'm looking for plausible infrastructure, sanitation, irrigation, or atmospheric purpose that would justify the expense and maintenance of channeling artificial waterways through a city, or deliberately building a megastructure city on top of natural water channels and cliffs.
A watermill in every home does not sound like plausible infrastructure – even in a medieval watermill-punk world. I can't imagine that thousands of localized water turbines (even Tesla turbines) would be better than a large centralized hydroelectric powerplant. (Maybe I am wrong?)
How can I justify a City of Waterfalls trope to serve a plausible utilitarian purpose?
As suggested by the two photos, the waterfalls don't need to be impressively large or in any particular configuration, just open-air and scattered throughout the structures. I want the form to follow function – whatever that is. My setting is sci-fi/fantasy (no magic, not Earth, all human) with refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls" need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
I am specifically not looking for aesthetics or "because they can" reasons, such as the waterfall skyscraper in China, rather a utilitarian or infrastructure purpose.
water infrastructure city-design
water infrastructure city-design
asked 13 hours ago
wetcircuit
6,4931852
6,4931852
22
Waterfalls make mist, and mist makes your dwarves happy... No one wants unhappy dwarves
– adaliabooks
12 hours ago
1
waterfalls can be used to generate energy, water can clear the air and i assume that waterfalls are good for the mental health
– Julian Egner
12 hours ago
5
@adaliabooks Sure you do. Unhappy dwarves is FUN.
– Stian Yttervik
11 hours ago
3
In Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971), a waterfall mixed the chocolate.
– user535733
10 hours ago
2
Not an answer as it seems you're looking for something more industrial rather than built for human well-being, but waterfalls to keep people happy isn't just an aesthetic or relaxation thing: there have been studies suggesting that depression is reduced by air with a high density of negative ions, and waterfalls are one natural source of negative ions in the air. Here's a summary study: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598548
– trichoplax
3 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
22
Waterfalls make mist, and mist makes your dwarves happy... No one wants unhappy dwarves
– adaliabooks
12 hours ago
1
waterfalls can be used to generate energy, water can clear the air and i assume that waterfalls are good for the mental health
– Julian Egner
12 hours ago
5
@adaliabooks Sure you do. Unhappy dwarves is FUN.
– Stian Yttervik
11 hours ago
3
In Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971), a waterfall mixed the chocolate.
– user535733
10 hours ago
2
Not an answer as it seems you're looking for something more industrial rather than built for human well-being, but waterfalls to keep people happy isn't just an aesthetic or relaxation thing: there have been studies suggesting that depression is reduced by air with a high density of negative ions, and waterfalls are one natural source of negative ions in the air. Here's a summary study: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598548
– trichoplax
3 hours ago
22
22
Waterfalls make mist, and mist makes your dwarves happy... No one wants unhappy dwarves
– adaliabooks
12 hours ago
Waterfalls make mist, and mist makes your dwarves happy... No one wants unhappy dwarves
– adaliabooks
12 hours ago
1
1
waterfalls can be used to generate energy, water can clear the air and i assume that waterfalls are good for the mental health
– Julian Egner
12 hours ago
waterfalls can be used to generate energy, water can clear the air and i assume that waterfalls are good for the mental health
– Julian Egner
12 hours ago
5
5
@adaliabooks Sure you do. Unhappy dwarves is FUN.
– Stian Yttervik
11 hours ago
@adaliabooks Sure you do. Unhappy dwarves is FUN.
– Stian Yttervik
11 hours ago
3
3
In Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971), a waterfall mixed the chocolate.
– user535733
10 hours ago
In Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971), a waterfall mixed the chocolate.
– user535733
10 hours ago
2
2
Not an answer as it seems you're looking for something more industrial rather than built for human well-being, but waterfalls to keep people happy isn't just an aesthetic or relaxation thing: there have been studies suggesting that depression is reduced by air with a high density of negative ions, and waterfalls are one natural source of negative ions in the air. Here's a summary study: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598548
– trichoplax
3 hours ago
Not an answer as it seems you're looking for something more industrial rather than built for human well-being, but waterfalls to keep people happy isn't just an aesthetic or relaxation thing: there have been studies suggesting that depression is reduced by air with a high density of negative ions, and waterfalls are one natural source of negative ions in the air. Here's a summary study: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598548
– trichoplax
3 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
up vote
49
down vote
Still water is heaven for proliferating algae and bacteria.
A large city with large bodies of still water is a recipe for plague spreading. Having water on the move keeps the water clean and, as a consequence, the city healtier.
Also, waterfalls help enriching the water with oxygen, helping bacteria to decompose organic matter suspended in it, again improving cleanliness.
3
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
48
down vote
Low-tech climate control: the waterfalls fill the air with spray, which evaporates off and cools the populace.
The Romans used to achieve a similar effect with fountains.
10
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
1
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Energy storage.
You use a form of energy generation with unreliable or periodic output. As a form of energy storage you pump water up into a nice big reservoir when you have surplus, then power turbines by letting the water spill back down to a lower reservoir to create a more steady power supply.
It might be more efficient in an enclosed system of pipes, but for aesthetic reasons and public morale it’s much nicer to have exposed waterfalls in public spaces. As @PluckedKiwi pointed out in the comments, the presence of additional waterfalls/ absence of usual waterfalls can act as a very public indicator of current energy supplies.
It’s pretty simple, pretty reliable and pretty.
7
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
1
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
2
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
1
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
1
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
There are several purposes which you can fulfill with a structure of channels and waterfalls.
On the one hand, channels within your city provide a fast lane means of transportation in any age of human technology. As L.Dutch pointed out, keeping the water moving instead of standing still keeps bacteria and algae from developing into serious health problems for your citizens. They can also provide either a source of fresh water or a sanitation possibility (more plausible in a low tech setting) for your citizens. Definitely, if have water channels and even more so, if you have water falls, you are provided with a natural way of micro-climate regulation. Cities tends to heat up in summer time/during heat periods, which water can compensate providing a cooling effect and keep the air from becoming too dry to make infections of the respiratory system more likely. In addition, the aesthetic effect of water channels and park lanes or avenues alongside it should not be underestimated - it keeps your citizens happy alongside more efficient infrastructural uses. The platforms above water falls can also make attractions for the city's more advantaged citizens/nobility or possibly every citizen and demonstrates the power of their ruler to be able to build such an amazing structure.
In addition, these large waterfall structure can actually have the turbines of your city-wide power plants at their bottoms without limiting the effect of any of the advantages listed above.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Waterfall is power
In Shannara Chronicles castle of Humans was built on what looks like hydroelectric dam:

Both having electricity (or other kind of energy if it's fantasy) and being able to dry or flood large terrain is pretty utilitary, and nothing shows it off better and is foolproof more than simple waterfall - it keeps maximum level of water in reservoir without any moving parts that could break.
Graduation towers
If you have a salt mine nearby, waterfall can be used to increase salt in solution, an important step in salt purification. Sure, most common design is based on wooden sticks, but regular waterfall requires far less maintenance.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls"
need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
Vital minerals were found under a large natural waterfall (Niagara etc.) In order to mine them, a method of diverting the water away was invented that didn't require changing the course of the whole river. That was impossible for large-scale geographical/geological reasons.
The old civilisation simply built chutes outwards from the top of the existing falls. Eventually the outward aspect of the mine became huge and more and extended chutes were added at different levels. People who lived at the mine workings had their own personal chute to keep their house or front door dry. This all proliferated in a haphazard and ad hoc way.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
You're looking at it backwards. Nobody added artificial waterways to a city. They did what they had to do to support building a city on top of existing waterways.
Human settlements naturally spring up near water sources for a number of different reasons. An annoying drawback of these water sources is that they limit the settlement's ability to expand. When the settlement evolves into a city and you need more room, you can't simply move the water source out of the way (unless you're Dutch, of course). In your image, the cliffs add another limit to how far you can expand your city.
You're trying to make the most use of the land available so you've clearly built your city all the way out to the cliff edges and to the very banks of the river. Rivers are notoriously restless things, though. They meander all over the map and when they run over a cliff edge, they slowly erode away the cliff. Neither of these are particularly good things when you have roads and buildings in very close proximity.
A relatively cheap and easy solution is to constrain the river so that its course is fixed. Line the river channel with concrete to prevent meandering, and design outlets at the cliffs that prevent erosion. Add artificial channels with multiple outflow points to increase your water throughput, which helps protect your city against river flooding.
You'll end up with a large-scale erosion control project where you've carefully replaced the river's natural bed and channel with erosion-resistant material, and where you carefully monitor and control water levels, diverting water as necessary to avoid flooding. To an outside observer that didn't see your city before the project, it looks like you built a bunch of waterfalls for some reason.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
If staged and planned right artificial waterfalls can increase the sound quality to an area. Flowing water can dampen sounds that are undesirable and create curtains of white noise to block out anything that could be considered undesirable as noise in an area. I've worked construction jobs before where if you had a river or waterfall near by you wouldn't hear as much construction depending on which side of the water you were on.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
1
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Your city gets its water from nearby mountains, however due to the proximity and difference in height the water arrives at very high pressure, too high for the primitive pipes of the time to handle. Since the city does not have valves and other control systems more importantly part of the city needs that high pressure (water wheels). The simplest way to bring the pressure back down so the water can be sent to other districts is a waterfall which releases all the pressure at once in effect resetting the pressure gradient and bringing it back down to a manageable level.
But the city is clever the pressure is used to drive a water wheel system, overshot water wheels in which the water comes from above are much more powerful than undershots ones. So they have row/stacks of water wheels powering various mills around the city, but you cant push all the water through wheels it is too unpredictable and will wreck tour mills. so excess water simply goes an alternate route and falls (see image). The city designer was smart enough to realize leaving the waterfall design allows for the city to build more mills and wheels later, allows the mill wheels to be well controlled, and lets the same water be sent to homes, irrigation, ect. You will see many falls staggering downward to generate different pressures for different purposes, high pressure for irrigation, low for drinking water, ect.
Niagara falls used to have a massive mill complex, but the mills could never use even a fraction of the water available there was just too much. later tourism became more profitable than the unsightly mills. If a city had been built around both the unsightly mills might never have disappeared.

1
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Defensive purposes:
The city is on water, but cannot be attacked on water, because the the waterfall is making an almost unescapeable stream. The city is also granting very less option for an ground attack, because of such small bridges, which are even destroyable or which can be pulled in like castle bridges.
If the bridges are completely destroyed the city is only accessable to creatures(/machines) which can fly or can resist a waterfall stream.
That makes good military bases.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You could also work it into your story, by allowing the water to be exchanged for other substances substantially more dangerous, such as burning oil. Then it would not only be an aesthetic choice, but also a defensive choice.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Energy storage to maintain a study spot power supply
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hydathodes

https://www.botany.one/2017/07/hooray-for-the-hydathode/
Plants sometimes can build up internal water pressure. The water needs somewhere to go or it could burst the tissues. Some leaves have special pores called hydathodes. These pores release excess water in a process called guttation.
So too your city. Underneath there is excess water pressure. It must be released in a controlled fashion or it will invade buildings and ruin roads. The hydathode towers allow the pressure to be contained and released.
Bonus: Hydathode is a rocking fantasy name for a city.
add a comment |
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
49
down vote
Still water is heaven for proliferating algae and bacteria.
A large city with large bodies of still water is a recipe for plague spreading. Having water on the move keeps the water clean and, as a consequence, the city healtier.
Also, waterfalls help enriching the water with oxygen, helping bacteria to decompose organic matter suspended in it, again improving cleanliness.
3
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
49
down vote
Still water is heaven for proliferating algae and bacteria.
A large city with large bodies of still water is a recipe for plague spreading. Having water on the move keeps the water clean and, as a consequence, the city healtier.
Also, waterfalls help enriching the water with oxygen, helping bacteria to decompose organic matter suspended in it, again improving cleanliness.
3
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
49
down vote
up vote
49
down vote
Still water is heaven for proliferating algae and bacteria.
A large city with large bodies of still water is a recipe for plague spreading. Having water on the move keeps the water clean and, as a consequence, the city healtier.
Also, waterfalls help enriching the water with oxygen, helping bacteria to decompose organic matter suspended in it, again improving cleanliness.
Still water is heaven for proliferating algae and bacteria.
A large city with large bodies of still water is a recipe for plague spreading. Having water on the move keeps the water clean and, as a consequence, the city healtier.
Also, waterfalls help enriching the water with oxygen, helping bacteria to decompose organic matter suspended in it, again improving cleanliness.
answered 12 hours ago
L.Dutch♦
73.1k23178355
73.1k23178355
3
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
3
3
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
IIRC, moving oxygen-rich water is also a great for aquaponics.
– Rogem
8 hours ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
If you had a city with troublesome open sewers, but could not dig to put them underground, you could incorporate waterfalls to flush the sewers and turn them into streams.
– Willk
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
48
down vote
Low-tech climate control: the waterfalls fill the air with spray, which evaporates off and cools the populace.
The Romans used to achieve a similar effect with fountains.
10
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
1
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
48
down vote
Low-tech climate control: the waterfalls fill the air with spray, which evaporates off and cools the populace.
The Romans used to achieve a similar effect with fountains.
10
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
1
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
48
down vote
up vote
48
down vote
Low-tech climate control: the waterfalls fill the air with spray, which evaporates off and cools the populace.
The Romans used to achieve a similar effect with fountains.
Low-tech climate control: the waterfalls fill the air with spray, which evaporates off and cools the populace.
The Romans used to achieve a similar effect with fountains.
answered 12 hours ago
Chronocidal
3,805522
3,805522
10
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
1
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
add a comment |
10
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
1
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
10
10
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
So effective, it's still used in many cities in southern Europe. In the summertime heat, plazas with fountains in them are noticeably cooler than the surrounding streets.
– Nuclear Wang
12 hours ago
1
1
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
@NuclearWang not only Southern, it works all right in Poland, too!
– Mołot
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Energy storage.
You use a form of energy generation with unreliable or periodic output. As a form of energy storage you pump water up into a nice big reservoir when you have surplus, then power turbines by letting the water spill back down to a lower reservoir to create a more steady power supply.
It might be more efficient in an enclosed system of pipes, but for aesthetic reasons and public morale it’s much nicer to have exposed waterfalls in public spaces. As @PluckedKiwi pointed out in the comments, the presence of additional waterfalls/ absence of usual waterfalls can act as a very public indicator of current energy supplies.
It’s pretty simple, pretty reliable and pretty.
7
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
1
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
2
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
1
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
1
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
26
down vote
Energy storage.
You use a form of energy generation with unreliable or periodic output. As a form of energy storage you pump water up into a nice big reservoir when you have surplus, then power turbines by letting the water spill back down to a lower reservoir to create a more steady power supply.
It might be more efficient in an enclosed system of pipes, but for aesthetic reasons and public morale it’s much nicer to have exposed waterfalls in public spaces. As @PluckedKiwi pointed out in the comments, the presence of additional waterfalls/ absence of usual waterfalls can act as a very public indicator of current energy supplies.
It’s pretty simple, pretty reliable and pretty.
7
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
1
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
2
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
1
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
1
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
26
down vote
up vote
26
down vote
Energy storage.
You use a form of energy generation with unreliable or periodic output. As a form of energy storage you pump water up into a nice big reservoir when you have surplus, then power turbines by letting the water spill back down to a lower reservoir to create a more steady power supply.
It might be more efficient in an enclosed system of pipes, but for aesthetic reasons and public morale it’s much nicer to have exposed waterfalls in public spaces. As @PluckedKiwi pointed out in the comments, the presence of additional waterfalls/ absence of usual waterfalls can act as a very public indicator of current energy supplies.
It’s pretty simple, pretty reliable and pretty.
Energy storage.
You use a form of energy generation with unreliable or periodic output. As a form of energy storage you pump water up into a nice big reservoir when you have surplus, then power turbines by letting the water spill back down to a lower reservoir to create a more steady power supply.
It might be more efficient in an enclosed system of pipes, but for aesthetic reasons and public morale it’s much nicer to have exposed waterfalls in public spaces. As @PluckedKiwi pointed out in the comments, the presence of additional waterfalls/ absence of usual waterfalls can act as a very public indicator of current energy supplies.
It’s pretty simple, pretty reliable and pretty.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
Joe Bloggs
34.2k1998171
34.2k1998171
7
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
1
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
2
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
1
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
1
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
7
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
1
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
2
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
1
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
1
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
7
7
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
As a bonus you have a great visual and auditory signal to all residents that it is a time of plentiful energy, so they should conduct any energy-intensive activities while the waterfalls are going. If the waterfalls are not apparent, city is on restricted power consumption and everyone should be attempting to conserve power.
– pluckedkiwi
12 hours ago
1
1
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
@pluckedkiwi :Excellent point!!
– Joe Bloggs
11 hours ago
2
2
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
@pluckedkiwi that’s the wrong way round; the water is pumped up during “plentiful” electricity consumption, and released when they need more electricity. And plentiful is a poor descriptor; electricity is produced precisely as needed.
– Tim
5 hours ago
1
1
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
@Harper: A turbine at the top of a pipe will pull out exactly the same energy as a turbine at the bottom of a pipe. The only energy wasted is that which is lost to air friction and dispersion. If it’s a problem then have a set of stepped reservoirs for even more architectural joy.
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
1
1
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
You're talking about the impact energy of free water landing, which is a diffent thing. It's hard to do. It's also not what Joe said that I challenged.
– Harper
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
There are several purposes which you can fulfill with a structure of channels and waterfalls.
On the one hand, channels within your city provide a fast lane means of transportation in any age of human technology. As L.Dutch pointed out, keeping the water moving instead of standing still keeps bacteria and algae from developing into serious health problems for your citizens. They can also provide either a source of fresh water or a sanitation possibility (more plausible in a low tech setting) for your citizens. Definitely, if have water channels and even more so, if you have water falls, you are provided with a natural way of micro-climate regulation. Cities tends to heat up in summer time/during heat periods, which water can compensate providing a cooling effect and keep the air from becoming too dry to make infections of the respiratory system more likely. In addition, the aesthetic effect of water channels and park lanes or avenues alongside it should not be underestimated - it keeps your citizens happy alongside more efficient infrastructural uses. The platforms above water falls can also make attractions for the city's more advantaged citizens/nobility or possibly every citizen and demonstrates the power of their ruler to be able to build such an amazing structure.
In addition, these large waterfall structure can actually have the turbines of your city-wide power plants at their bottoms without limiting the effect of any of the advantages listed above.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
There are several purposes which you can fulfill with a structure of channels and waterfalls.
On the one hand, channels within your city provide a fast lane means of transportation in any age of human technology. As L.Dutch pointed out, keeping the water moving instead of standing still keeps bacteria and algae from developing into serious health problems for your citizens. They can also provide either a source of fresh water or a sanitation possibility (more plausible in a low tech setting) for your citizens. Definitely, if have water channels and even more so, if you have water falls, you are provided with a natural way of micro-climate regulation. Cities tends to heat up in summer time/during heat periods, which water can compensate providing a cooling effect and keep the air from becoming too dry to make infections of the respiratory system more likely. In addition, the aesthetic effect of water channels and park lanes or avenues alongside it should not be underestimated - it keeps your citizens happy alongside more efficient infrastructural uses. The platforms above water falls can also make attractions for the city's more advantaged citizens/nobility or possibly every citizen and demonstrates the power of their ruler to be able to build such an amazing structure.
In addition, these large waterfall structure can actually have the turbines of your city-wide power plants at their bottoms without limiting the effect of any of the advantages listed above.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
There are several purposes which you can fulfill with a structure of channels and waterfalls.
On the one hand, channels within your city provide a fast lane means of transportation in any age of human technology. As L.Dutch pointed out, keeping the water moving instead of standing still keeps bacteria and algae from developing into serious health problems for your citizens. They can also provide either a source of fresh water or a sanitation possibility (more plausible in a low tech setting) for your citizens. Definitely, if have water channels and even more so, if you have water falls, you are provided with a natural way of micro-climate regulation. Cities tends to heat up in summer time/during heat periods, which water can compensate providing a cooling effect and keep the air from becoming too dry to make infections of the respiratory system more likely. In addition, the aesthetic effect of water channels and park lanes or avenues alongside it should not be underestimated - it keeps your citizens happy alongside more efficient infrastructural uses. The platforms above water falls can also make attractions for the city's more advantaged citizens/nobility or possibly every citizen and demonstrates the power of their ruler to be able to build such an amazing structure.
In addition, these large waterfall structure can actually have the turbines of your city-wide power plants at their bottoms without limiting the effect of any of the advantages listed above.
There are several purposes which you can fulfill with a structure of channels and waterfalls.
On the one hand, channels within your city provide a fast lane means of transportation in any age of human technology. As L.Dutch pointed out, keeping the water moving instead of standing still keeps bacteria and algae from developing into serious health problems for your citizens. They can also provide either a source of fresh water or a sanitation possibility (more plausible in a low tech setting) for your citizens. Definitely, if have water channels and even more so, if you have water falls, you are provided with a natural way of micro-climate regulation. Cities tends to heat up in summer time/during heat periods, which water can compensate providing a cooling effect and keep the air from becoming too dry to make infections of the respiratory system more likely. In addition, the aesthetic effect of water channels and park lanes or avenues alongside it should not be underestimated - it keeps your citizens happy alongside more efficient infrastructural uses. The platforms above water falls can also make attractions for the city's more advantaged citizens/nobility or possibly every citizen and demonstrates the power of their ruler to be able to build such an amazing structure.
In addition, these large waterfall structure can actually have the turbines of your city-wide power plants at their bottoms without limiting the effect of any of the advantages listed above.
answered 12 hours ago
Alex2006
2,8251723
2,8251723
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Waterfall is power
In Shannara Chronicles castle of Humans was built on what looks like hydroelectric dam:

Both having electricity (or other kind of energy if it's fantasy) and being able to dry or flood large terrain is pretty utilitary, and nothing shows it off better and is foolproof more than simple waterfall - it keeps maximum level of water in reservoir without any moving parts that could break.
Graduation towers
If you have a salt mine nearby, waterfall can be used to increase salt in solution, an important step in salt purification. Sure, most common design is based on wooden sticks, but regular waterfall requires far less maintenance.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Waterfall is power
In Shannara Chronicles castle of Humans was built on what looks like hydroelectric dam:

Both having electricity (or other kind of energy if it's fantasy) and being able to dry or flood large terrain is pretty utilitary, and nothing shows it off better and is foolproof more than simple waterfall - it keeps maximum level of water in reservoir without any moving parts that could break.
Graduation towers
If you have a salt mine nearby, waterfall can be used to increase salt in solution, an important step in salt purification. Sure, most common design is based on wooden sticks, but regular waterfall requires far less maintenance.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Waterfall is power
In Shannara Chronicles castle of Humans was built on what looks like hydroelectric dam:

Both having electricity (or other kind of energy if it's fantasy) and being able to dry or flood large terrain is pretty utilitary, and nothing shows it off better and is foolproof more than simple waterfall - it keeps maximum level of water in reservoir without any moving parts that could break.
Graduation towers
If you have a salt mine nearby, waterfall can be used to increase salt in solution, an important step in salt purification. Sure, most common design is based on wooden sticks, but regular waterfall requires far less maintenance.
Waterfall is power
In Shannara Chronicles castle of Humans was built on what looks like hydroelectric dam:

Both having electricity (or other kind of energy if it's fantasy) and being able to dry or flood large terrain is pretty utilitary, and nothing shows it off better and is foolproof more than simple waterfall - it keeps maximum level of water in reservoir without any moving parts that could break.
Graduation towers
If you have a salt mine nearby, waterfall can be used to increase salt in solution, an important step in salt purification. Sure, most common design is based on wooden sticks, but regular waterfall requires far less maintenance.
answered 12 hours ago
Mołot
27.8k1286129
27.8k1286129
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls"
need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
Vital minerals were found under a large natural waterfall (Niagara etc.) In order to mine them, a method of diverting the water away was invented that didn't require changing the course of the whole river. That was impossible for large-scale geographical/geological reasons.
The old civilisation simply built chutes outwards from the top of the existing falls. Eventually the outward aspect of the mine became huge and more and extended chutes were added at different levels. People who lived at the mine workings had their own personal chute to keep their house or front door dry. This all proliferated in a haphazard and ad hoc way.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls"
need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
Vital minerals were found under a large natural waterfall (Niagara etc.) In order to mine them, a method of diverting the water away was invented that didn't require changing the course of the whole river. That was impossible for large-scale geographical/geological reasons.
The old civilisation simply built chutes outwards from the top of the existing falls. Eventually the outward aspect of the mine became huge and more and extended chutes were added at different levels. People who lived at the mine workings had their own personal chute to keep their house or front door dry. This all proliferated in a haphazard and ad hoc way.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls"
need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
Vital minerals were found under a large natural waterfall (Niagara etc.) In order to mine them, a method of diverting the water away was invented that didn't require changing the course of the whole river. That was impossible for large-scale geographical/geological reasons.
The old civilisation simply built chutes outwards from the top of the existing falls. Eventually the outward aspect of the mine became huge and more and extended chutes were added at different levels. People who lived at the mine workings had their own personal chute to keep their house or front door dry. This all proliferated in a haphazard and ad hoc way.
refugees living around repurposed heavy industry, so my "waterfalls"
need to serve a utilitarian function (at one time if not currently).
Vital minerals were found under a large natural waterfall (Niagara etc.) In order to mine them, a method of diverting the water away was invented that didn't require changing the course of the whole river. That was impossible for large-scale geographical/geological reasons.
The old civilisation simply built chutes outwards from the top of the existing falls. Eventually the outward aspect of the mine became huge and more and extended chutes were added at different levels. People who lived at the mine workings had their own personal chute to keep their house or front door dry. This all proliferated in a haphazard and ad hoc way.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
chasly from UK
10k34697
10k34697
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
You're looking at it backwards. Nobody added artificial waterways to a city. They did what they had to do to support building a city on top of existing waterways.
Human settlements naturally spring up near water sources for a number of different reasons. An annoying drawback of these water sources is that they limit the settlement's ability to expand. When the settlement evolves into a city and you need more room, you can't simply move the water source out of the way (unless you're Dutch, of course). In your image, the cliffs add another limit to how far you can expand your city.
You're trying to make the most use of the land available so you've clearly built your city all the way out to the cliff edges and to the very banks of the river. Rivers are notoriously restless things, though. They meander all over the map and when they run over a cliff edge, they slowly erode away the cliff. Neither of these are particularly good things when you have roads and buildings in very close proximity.
A relatively cheap and easy solution is to constrain the river so that its course is fixed. Line the river channel with concrete to prevent meandering, and design outlets at the cliffs that prevent erosion. Add artificial channels with multiple outflow points to increase your water throughput, which helps protect your city against river flooding.
You'll end up with a large-scale erosion control project where you've carefully replaced the river's natural bed and channel with erosion-resistant material, and where you carefully monitor and control water levels, diverting water as necessary to avoid flooding. To an outside observer that didn't see your city before the project, it looks like you built a bunch of waterfalls for some reason.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
You're looking at it backwards. Nobody added artificial waterways to a city. They did what they had to do to support building a city on top of existing waterways.
Human settlements naturally spring up near water sources for a number of different reasons. An annoying drawback of these water sources is that they limit the settlement's ability to expand. When the settlement evolves into a city and you need more room, you can't simply move the water source out of the way (unless you're Dutch, of course). In your image, the cliffs add another limit to how far you can expand your city.
You're trying to make the most use of the land available so you've clearly built your city all the way out to the cliff edges and to the very banks of the river. Rivers are notoriously restless things, though. They meander all over the map and when they run over a cliff edge, they slowly erode away the cliff. Neither of these are particularly good things when you have roads and buildings in very close proximity.
A relatively cheap and easy solution is to constrain the river so that its course is fixed. Line the river channel with concrete to prevent meandering, and design outlets at the cliffs that prevent erosion. Add artificial channels with multiple outflow points to increase your water throughput, which helps protect your city against river flooding.
You'll end up with a large-scale erosion control project where you've carefully replaced the river's natural bed and channel with erosion-resistant material, and where you carefully monitor and control water levels, diverting water as necessary to avoid flooding. To an outside observer that didn't see your city before the project, it looks like you built a bunch of waterfalls for some reason.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
You're looking at it backwards. Nobody added artificial waterways to a city. They did what they had to do to support building a city on top of existing waterways.
Human settlements naturally spring up near water sources for a number of different reasons. An annoying drawback of these water sources is that they limit the settlement's ability to expand. When the settlement evolves into a city and you need more room, you can't simply move the water source out of the way (unless you're Dutch, of course). In your image, the cliffs add another limit to how far you can expand your city.
You're trying to make the most use of the land available so you've clearly built your city all the way out to the cliff edges and to the very banks of the river. Rivers are notoriously restless things, though. They meander all over the map and when they run over a cliff edge, they slowly erode away the cliff. Neither of these are particularly good things when you have roads and buildings in very close proximity.
A relatively cheap and easy solution is to constrain the river so that its course is fixed. Line the river channel with concrete to prevent meandering, and design outlets at the cliffs that prevent erosion. Add artificial channels with multiple outflow points to increase your water throughput, which helps protect your city against river flooding.
You'll end up with a large-scale erosion control project where you've carefully replaced the river's natural bed and channel with erosion-resistant material, and where you carefully monitor and control water levels, diverting water as necessary to avoid flooding. To an outside observer that didn't see your city before the project, it looks like you built a bunch of waterfalls for some reason.
You're looking at it backwards. Nobody added artificial waterways to a city. They did what they had to do to support building a city on top of existing waterways.
Human settlements naturally spring up near water sources for a number of different reasons. An annoying drawback of these water sources is that they limit the settlement's ability to expand. When the settlement evolves into a city and you need more room, you can't simply move the water source out of the way (unless you're Dutch, of course). In your image, the cliffs add another limit to how far you can expand your city.
You're trying to make the most use of the land available so you've clearly built your city all the way out to the cliff edges and to the very banks of the river. Rivers are notoriously restless things, though. They meander all over the map and when they run over a cliff edge, they slowly erode away the cliff. Neither of these are particularly good things when you have roads and buildings in very close proximity.
A relatively cheap and easy solution is to constrain the river so that its course is fixed. Line the river channel with concrete to prevent meandering, and design outlets at the cliffs that prevent erosion. Add artificial channels with multiple outflow points to increase your water throughput, which helps protect your city against river flooding.
You'll end up with a large-scale erosion control project where you've carefully replaced the river's natural bed and channel with erosion-resistant material, and where you carefully monitor and control water levels, diverting water as necessary to avoid flooding. To an outside observer that didn't see your city before the project, it looks like you built a bunch of waterfalls for some reason.
answered 3 hours ago
bta
1,912610
1,912610
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
If staged and planned right artificial waterfalls can increase the sound quality to an area. Flowing water can dampen sounds that are undesirable and create curtains of white noise to block out anything that could be considered undesirable as noise in an area. I've worked construction jobs before where if you had a river or waterfall near by you wouldn't hear as much construction depending on which side of the water you were on.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
1
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
If staged and planned right artificial waterfalls can increase the sound quality to an area. Flowing water can dampen sounds that are undesirable and create curtains of white noise to block out anything that could be considered undesirable as noise in an area. I've worked construction jobs before where if you had a river or waterfall near by you wouldn't hear as much construction depending on which side of the water you were on.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
1
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
If staged and planned right artificial waterfalls can increase the sound quality to an area. Flowing water can dampen sounds that are undesirable and create curtains of white noise to block out anything that could be considered undesirable as noise in an area. I've worked construction jobs before where if you had a river or waterfall near by you wouldn't hear as much construction depending on which side of the water you were on.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
If staged and planned right artificial waterfalls can increase the sound quality to an area. Flowing water can dampen sounds that are undesirable and create curtains of white noise to block out anything that could be considered undesirable as noise in an area. I've worked construction jobs before where if you had a river or waterfall near by you wouldn't hear as much construction depending on which side of the water you were on.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 11 hours ago
Michael H.
511
511
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael H. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
1
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
1
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
Probably not that useful (how much construction do you expect to have?), but certainly an interesting effect.
– Draco18s
10 hours ago
1
1
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
I was using the construction as an example but you could use it to block "industrial" noise from a manufacturing district from effecting a residential district.
– Michael H.
3 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
That makes more sense.
– Draco18s
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Your city gets its water from nearby mountains, however due to the proximity and difference in height the water arrives at very high pressure, too high for the primitive pipes of the time to handle. Since the city does not have valves and other control systems more importantly part of the city needs that high pressure (water wheels). The simplest way to bring the pressure back down so the water can be sent to other districts is a waterfall which releases all the pressure at once in effect resetting the pressure gradient and bringing it back down to a manageable level.
But the city is clever the pressure is used to drive a water wheel system, overshot water wheels in which the water comes from above are much more powerful than undershots ones. So they have row/stacks of water wheels powering various mills around the city, but you cant push all the water through wheels it is too unpredictable and will wreck tour mills. so excess water simply goes an alternate route and falls (see image). The city designer was smart enough to realize leaving the waterfall design allows for the city to build more mills and wheels later, allows the mill wheels to be well controlled, and lets the same water be sent to homes, irrigation, ect. You will see many falls staggering downward to generate different pressures for different purposes, high pressure for irrigation, low for drinking water, ect.
Niagara falls used to have a massive mill complex, but the mills could never use even a fraction of the water available there was just too much. later tourism became more profitable than the unsightly mills. If a city had been built around both the unsightly mills might never have disappeared.

1
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Your city gets its water from nearby mountains, however due to the proximity and difference in height the water arrives at very high pressure, too high for the primitive pipes of the time to handle. Since the city does not have valves and other control systems more importantly part of the city needs that high pressure (water wheels). The simplest way to bring the pressure back down so the water can be sent to other districts is a waterfall which releases all the pressure at once in effect resetting the pressure gradient and bringing it back down to a manageable level.
But the city is clever the pressure is used to drive a water wheel system, overshot water wheels in which the water comes from above are much more powerful than undershots ones. So they have row/stacks of water wheels powering various mills around the city, but you cant push all the water through wheels it is too unpredictable and will wreck tour mills. so excess water simply goes an alternate route and falls (see image). The city designer was smart enough to realize leaving the waterfall design allows for the city to build more mills and wheels later, allows the mill wheels to be well controlled, and lets the same water be sent to homes, irrigation, ect. You will see many falls staggering downward to generate different pressures for different purposes, high pressure for irrigation, low for drinking water, ect.
Niagara falls used to have a massive mill complex, but the mills could never use even a fraction of the water available there was just too much. later tourism became more profitable than the unsightly mills. If a city had been built around both the unsightly mills might never have disappeared.

1
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Your city gets its water from nearby mountains, however due to the proximity and difference in height the water arrives at very high pressure, too high for the primitive pipes of the time to handle. Since the city does not have valves and other control systems more importantly part of the city needs that high pressure (water wheels). The simplest way to bring the pressure back down so the water can be sent to other districts is a waterfall which releases all the pressure at once in effect resetting the pressure gradient and bringing it back down to a manageable level.
But the city is clever the pressure is used to drive a water wheel system, overshot water wheels in which the water comes from above are much more powerful than undershots ones. So they have row/stacks of water wheels powering various mills around the city, but you cant push all the water through wheels it is too unpredictable and will wreck tour mills. so excess water simply goes an alternate route and falls (see image). The city designer was smart enough to realize leaving the waterfall design allows for the city to build more mills and wheels later, allows the mill wheels to be well controlled, and lets the same water be sent to homes, irrigation, ect. You will see many falls staggering downward to generate different pressures for different purposes, high pressure for irrigation, low for drinking water, ect.
Niagara falls used to have a massive mill complex, but the mills could never use even a fraction of the water available there was just too much. later tourism became more profitable than the unsightly mills. If a city had been built around both the unsightly mills might never have disappeared.

Your city gets its water from nearby mountains, however due to the proximity and difference in height the water arrives at very high pressure, too high for the primitive pipes of the time to handle. Since the city does not have valves and other control systems more importantly part of the city needs that high pressure (water wheels). The simplest way to bring the pressure back down so the water can be sent to other districts is a waterfall which releases all the pressure at once in effect resetting the pressure gradient and bringing it back down to a manageable level.
But the city is clever the pressure is used to drive a water wheel system, overshot water wheels in which the water comes from above are much more powerful than undershots ones. So they have row/stacks of water wheels powering various mills around the city, but you cant push all the water through wheels it is too unpredictable and will wreck tour mills. so excess water simply goes an alternate route and falls (see image). The city designer was smart enough to realize leaving the waterfall design allows for the city to build more mills and wheels later, allows the mill wheels to be well controlled, and lets the same water be sent to homes, irrigation, ect. You will see many falls staggering downward to generate different pressures for different purposes, high pressure for irrigation, low for drinking water, ect.
Niagara falls used to have a massive mill complex, but the mills could never use even a fraction of the water available there was just too much. later tourism became more profitable than the unsightly mills. If a city had been built around both the unsightly mills might never have disappeared.

edited 9 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
John
30k841106
30k841106
1
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
1
1
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
Your comment about needing to reduce the pressure for home delivery reminded me of the distribution towers in Pompeii (as always, look to history and you will likely find something of the sort). Think of it as a water tower, but with an open top. The water coming from higher elevations comes up like a fountain, releasing all its pressure as it fills the box at the top of the tower, which is drained by other pipes going elsewhere only pressurized by the height of the distribution tower.
– pluckedkiwi
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Defensive purposes:
The city is on water, but cannot be attacked on water, because the the waterfall is making an almost unescapeable stream. The city is also granting very less option for an ground attack, because of such small bridges, which are even destroyable or which can be pulled in like castle bridges.
If the bridges are completely destroyed the city is only accessable to creatures(/machines) which can fly or can resist a waterfall stream.
That makes good military bases.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Defensive purposes:
The city is on water, but cannot be attacked on water, because the the waterfall is making an almost unescapeable stream. The city is also granting very less option for an ground attack, because of such small bridges, which are even destroyable or which can be pulled in like castle bridges.
If the bridges are completely destroyed the city is only accessable to creatures(/machines) which can fly or can resist a waterfall stream.
That makes good military bases.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Defensive purposes:
The city is on water, but cannot be attacked on water, because the the waterfall is making an almost unescapeable stream. The city is also granting very less option for an ground attack, because of such small bridges, which are even destroyable or which can be pulled in like castle bridges.
If the bridges are completely destroyed the city is only accessable to creatures(/machines) which can fly or can resist a waterfall stream.
That makes good military bases.
Defensive purposes:
The city is on water, but cannot be attacked on water, because the the waterfall is making an almost unescapeable stream. The city is also granting very less option for an ground attack, because of such small bridges, which are even destroyable or which can be pulled in like castle bridges.
If the bridges are completely destroyed the city is only accessable to creatures(/machines) which can fly or can resist a waterfall stream.
That makes good military bases.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Jannis
97216
97216
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You could also work it into your story, by allowing the water to be exchanged for other substances substantially more dangerous, such as burning oil. Then it would not only be an aesthetic choice, but also a defensive choice.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You could also work it into your story, by allowing the water to be exchanged for other substances substantially more dangerous, such as burning oil. Then it would not only be an aesthetic choice, but also a defensive choice.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You could also work it into your story, by allowing the water to be exchanged for other substances substantially more dangerous, such as burning oil. Then it would not only be an aesthetic choice, but also a defensive choice.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
You could also work it into your story, by allowing the water to be exchanged for other substances substantially more dangerous, such as burning oil. Then it would not only be an aesthetic choice, but also a defensive choice.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 11 hours ago
Brian Deragon
1011
1011
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Brian Deragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Energy storage to maintain a study spot power supply
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Energy storage to maintain a study spot power supply
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Energy storage to maintain a study spot power supply
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Energy storage to maintain a study spot power supply
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
user34697
1
1
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user34697 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
1
1
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
Welcome to Worldbuilding. Can you elaborate how waterfalls are "storing" energy? To me it looks more like wasting it.
– Paŭlo Ebermann
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hydathodes

https://www.botany.one/2017/07/hooray-for-the-hydathode/
Plants sometimes can build up internal water pressure. The water needs somewhere to go or it could burst the tissues. Some leaves have special pores called hydathodes. These pores release excess water in a process called guttation.
So too your city. Underneath there is excess water pressure. It must be released in a controlled fashion or it will invade buildings and ruin roads. The hydathode towers allow the pressure to be contained and released.
Bonus: Hydathode is a rocking fantasy name for a city.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hydathodes

https://www.botany.one/2017/07/hooray-for-the-hydathode/
Plants sometimes can build up internal water pressure. The water needs somewhere to go or it could burst the tissues. Some leaves have special pores called hydathodes. These pores release excess water in a process called guttation.
So too your city. Underneath there is excess water pressure. It must be released in a controlled fashion or it will invade buildings and ruin roads. The hydathode towers allow the pressure to be contained and released.
Bonus: Hydathode is a rocking fantasy name for a city.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Hydathodes

https://www.botany.one/2017/07/hooray-for-the-hydathode/
Plants sometimes can build up internal water pressure. The water needs somewhere to go or it could burst the tissues. Some leaves have special pores called hydathodes. These pores release excess water in a process called guttation.
So too your city. Underneath there is excess water pressure. It must be released in a controlled fashion or it will invade buildings and ruin roads. The hydathode towers allow the pressure to be contained and released.
Bonus: Hydathode is a rocking fantasy name for a city.
Hydathodes

https://www.botany.one/2017/07/hooray-for-the-hydathode/
Plants sometimes can build up internal water pressure. The water needs somewhere to go or it could burst the tissues. Some leaves have special pores called hydathodes. These pores release excess water in a process called guttation.
So too your city. Underneath there is excess water pressure. It must be released in a controlled fashion or it will invade buildings and ruin roads. The hydathode towers allow the pressure to be contained and released.
Bonus: Hydathode is a rocking fantasy name for a city.
answered 24 mins ago
Willk
98.3k25190414
98.3k25190414
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132514%2fwhat-is-the-utilitarian-purpose-of-artificial-waterfalls%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
22
Waterfalls make mist, and mist makes your dwarves happy... No one wants unhappy dwarves
– adaliabooks
12 hours ago
1
waterfalls can be used to generate energy, water can clear the air and i assume that waterfalls are good for the mental health
– Julian Egner
12 hours ago
5
@adaliabooks Sure you do. Unhappy dwarves is FUN.
– Stian Yttervik
11 hours ago
3
In Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971), a waterfall mixed the chocolate.
– user535733
10 hours ago
2
Not an answer as it seems you're looking for something more industrial rather than built for human well-being, but waterfalls to keep people happy isn't just an aesthetic or relaxation thing: there have been studies suggesting that depression is reduced by air with a high density of negative ions, and waterfalls are one natural source of negative ions in the air. Here's a summary study: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598548
– trichoplax
3 hours ago