A measure zero uncountable set for the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu_F$.
$begingroup$
Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.
When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.
My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.
But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.
What can one do in this case?
measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.
When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.
My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.
But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.
What can one do in this case?
measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.
When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.
My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.
But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.
What can one do in this case?
measure-theory
$endgroup$
Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.
When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.
My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.
But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.
What can one do in this case?
measure-theory
measure-theory
asked Dec 21 '18 at 6:02
UserAUserA
540216
540216
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048226%2fa-measure-zero-uncountable-set-for-the-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure-mu-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.
$endgroup$
Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.
answered Dec 23 '18 at 4:59
Guacho PerezGuacho Perez
3,92911132
3,92911132
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
$begingroup$
(+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
$endgroup$
– r9m
Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048226%2fa-measure-zero-uncountable-set-for-the-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure-mu-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown