A measure zero uncountable set for the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu_F$.












3












$begingroup$


Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.



When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.



My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.



But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.



What can one do in this case?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.



    When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.



    My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.



    But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.



    What can one do in this case?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      2



      $begingroup$


      Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.



      When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.



      My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.



      But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.



      What can one do in this case?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $mu_F$ be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on $Bbb R$ associated with the increasing function $F:Bbb Rto Bbb R$. Construct an uncountable set of measure 0 for $mu_F$.



      When $F(x)=x$ and we get the Lebesgue measure on $Bbb R$ and the Cantor set in the interval $[0,1]$ is an example.



      My guess is that the same argument can be repeated for $mu_F$, if there is an interval $[a,b]$ where $F$ is continuous (hence making sure that any singleton set has measure 0), and construct a "Cantor set" there.



      But an increasing function can have a dense set of discontinuities as shown in here.



      What can one do in this case?







      measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 21 '18 at 6:02









      UserAUserA

      540216




      540216






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – r9m
            Dec 23 '18 at 7:14













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048226%2fa-measure-zero-uncountable-set-for-the-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure-mu-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – r9m
            Dec 23 '18 at 7:14


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – r9m
            Dec 23 '18 at 7:14
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Radon-Nikodym ensures that for the Lebesgue measure $m$, one can express $mu_F=lambda+nu$ where $lambdaperp m$ on some set $E$ with $m(E^c)=0=lambda(E)$ and $null m$. By regularity, there exists a compact $Ksubset E$ with $m(K)>0$. Define $f(x)=m(Kcap (-infty,x])$ and notice that for $x<y$, $f(y)-f(x)=m(Kcap (x,y])le y-x$ so $f$ is continuous. Since $K$ is compact, $f(x)=0$ for large negative $x$ and $f(x)=m(K)$ for large positive $x$. By the IVT, there exist $a<b$ s.t. $f(a)=frac{m(K)}3$ and $f(b)=frac{2m(K)}3$, in particular, $m(Kcap(-infty,a])=m(Kcap[b,infty))=frac{m(K)}3$. Thus $Kcap (-infty,a]$ and $Kcap [b,infty)$ are compact with positive measure. Repeating this process inductively yields a $Csubset E$ analogous to the Cantor set (uncountable Lebesgue null set) and therefore $mu_F(C)le lambda(E)+nu(C)=0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 23 '18 at 4:59









          Guacho PerezGuacho Perez

          3,92911132




          3,92911132












          • $begingroup$
            (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – r9m
            Dec 23 '18 at 7:14




















          • $begingroup$
            (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – r9m
            Dec 23 '18 at 7:14


















          $begingroup$
          (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
          $endgroup$
          – r9m
          Dec 23 '18 at 7:14






          $begingroup$
          (+1) In particular, $lambda$ is the measure supported on the set of (countable) discontinuities $D$ of $F$ and $nu$ is the continuous part. For any Borel set $A in mathcal{B}(mathbb{R})$ we have $mu_F(A) = m^ast(F(A)) + underbrace{sumlimits_{p in A cap D} mu_F({p})}_{ = lambda(A)}$.
          $endgroup$
          – r9m
          Dec 23 '18 at 7:14




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048226%2fa-measure-zero-uncountable-set-for-the-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure-mu-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mont Emei

          Province de Neuquén

          Journaliste