Compute $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$












0












$begingroup$


Compute $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$



We have $X_1, X_2$ are iid as Beta($a=3.3, b=4.2$)



I am asked to calculate $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$





This is just equal to $P(X_1 leq 2)P(X_2 geq 0.7)$, correct?



I am confused because usually I am never given this "and" word in between. When I am given it, I think of the intersection: $P(X_1 leq 2 cap X_2geq 0.7)=P(emptyset)=0$



Which is the correct answer here?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$ can also be written as $P({X_1 leq 2}cap{X_2 geq 0.7})$ or as $P(X_1 leq 2, X_2 geq 0.7)$. These are strictly equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 16 '18 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is just the product of the probabilities, since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Dua
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:33
















0












$begingroup$


Compute $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$



We have $X_1, X_2$ are iid as Beta($a=3.3, b=4.2$)



I am asked to calculate $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$





This is just equal to $P(X_1 leq 2)P(X_2 geq 0.7)$, correct?



I am confused because usually I am never given this "and" word in between. When I am given it, I think of the intersection: $P(X_1 leq 2 cap X_2geq 0.7)=P(emptyset)=0$



Which is the correct answer here?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$ can also be written as $P({X_1 leq 2}cap{X_2 geq 0.7})$ or as $P(X_1 leq 2, X_2 geq 0.7)$. These are strictly equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 16 '18 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is just the product of the probabilities, since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Dua
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:33














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Compute $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$



We have $X_1, X_2$ are iid as Beta($a=3.3, b=4.2$)



I am asked to calculate $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$





This is just equal to $P(X_1 leq 2)P(X_2 geq 0.7)$, correct?



I am confused because usually I am never given this "and" word in between. When I am given it, I think of the intersection: $P(X_1 leq 2 cap X_2geq 0.7)=P(emptyset)=0$



Which is the correct answer here?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Compute $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$



We have $X_1, X_2$ are iid as Beta($a=3.3, b=4.2$)



I am asked to calculate $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$





This is just equal to $P(X_1 leq 2)P(X_2 geq 0.7)$, correct?



I am confused because usually I am never given this "and" word in between. When I am given it, I think of the intersection: $P(X_1 leq 2 cap X_2geq 0.7)=P(emptyset)=0$



Which is the correct answer here?







probability-distributions notation random-variables






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 16 '18 at 22:21









Did

248k23223460




248k23223460










asked Dec 16 '18 at 21:30









K Split XK Split X

4,25811132




4,25811132












  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$ can also be written as $P({X_1 leq 2}cap{X_2 geq 0.7})$ or as $P(X_1 leq 2, X_2 geq 0.7)$. These are strictly equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 16 '18 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is just the product of the probabilities, since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Dua
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:33


















  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$ can also be written as $P({X_1 leq 2}cap{X_2 geq 0.7})$ or as $P(X_1 leq 2, X_2 geq 0.7)$. These are strictly equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 16 '18 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is just the product of the probabilities, since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Dua
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:33
















$begingroup$
Indeed, $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$ can also be written as $P({X_1 leq 2}cap{X_2 geq 0.7})$ or as $P(X_1 leq 2, X_2 geq 0.7)$. These are strictly equivalent.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:21




$begingroup$
Indeed, $P(X_1 leq 2 text { and } X_2 geq 0.7)$ can also be written as $P({X_1 leq 2}cap{X_2 geq 0.7})$ or as $P(X_1 leq 2, X_2 geq 0.7)$. These are strictly equivalent.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:21












$begingroup$
Yes, it is just the product of the probabilities, since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.
$endgroup$
– Aditya Dua
Dec 18 '18 at 0:33




$begingroup$
Yes, it is just the product of the probabilities, since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent.
$endgroup$
– Aditya Dua
Dec 18 '18 at 0:33










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043192%2fcompute-px-1-leq-2-text-and-x-2-geq-0-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043192%2fcompute-px-1-leq-2-text-and-x-2-geq-0-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mont Emei

Province de Neuquén

Soliste