How to solve a recurrence relation with generating functions?












2












$begingroup$


I don't really understand how to solve (with generating functions) for the recurrence relation of $$a_n = a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$$ with initial conditions of $a_1 = 2$ when $n geq 2$



This is what I was thinking,
begin{align*}
g(x) &= a_0x^0+a_1x^1+a_2x^2+...+a_rx^r+...\
g(x) &= a_0 + a_1x^1 + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_nx^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}{(a_{n-1}+2(n-1))x^n}\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_{n-1}x^n + sum^{infty}_{n=2}(2n-2)x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{n=1}a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2n x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{m=1}a_{m}x^{m} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + x(g(x) - a_0) + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
end{align*}










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A linear recurrence relation and two initial conditions? That's strange, but easily fixable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    Fixed it -- thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:22
















2












$begingroup$


I don't really understand how to solve (with generating functions) for the recurrence relation of $$a_n = a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$$ with initial conditions of $a_1 = 2$ when $n geq 2$



This is what I was thinking,
begin{align*}
g(x) &= a_0x^0+a_1x^1+a_2x^2+...+a_rx^r+...\
g(x) &= a_0 + a_1x^1 + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_nx^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}{(a_{n-1}+2(n-1))x^n}\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_{n-1}x^n + sum^{infty}_{n=2}(2n-2)x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{n=1}a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2n x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{m=1}a_{m}x^{m} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + x(g(x) - a_0) + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
end{align*}










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A linear recurrence relation and two initial conditions? That's strange, but easily fixable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    Fixed it -- thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:22














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I don't really understand how to solve (with generating functions) for the recurrence relation of $$a_n = a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$$ with initial conditions of $a_1 = 2$ when $n geq 2$



This is what I was thinking,
begin{align*}
g(x) &= a_0x^0+a_1x^1+a_2x^2+...+a_rx^r+...\
g(x) &= a_0 + a_1x^1 + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_nx^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}{(a_{n-1}+2(n-1))x^n}\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_{n-1}x^n + sum^{infty}_{n=2}(2n-2)x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{n=1}a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2n x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{m=1}a_{m}x^{m} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + x(g(x) - a_0) + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
end{align*}










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I don't really understand how to solve (with generating functions) for the recurrence relation of $$a_n = a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$$ with initial conditions of $a_1 = 2$ when $n geq 2$



This is what I was thinking,
begin{align*}
g(x) &= a_0x^0+a_1x^1+a_2x^2+...+a_rx^r+...\
g(x) &= a_0 + a_1x^1 + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_nx^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}{(a_{n-1}+2(n-1))x^n}\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + sum^{infty}_{n=2}a_{n-1}x^n + sum^{infty}_{n=2}(2n-2)x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{n=1}a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2n x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + xsum^{infty}_{m=1}a_{m}x^{m} + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
g(x) &= 1 + 2x + x(g(x) - a_0) + sum^{infty}_{n=2}2 binom{n}{1}x^n - sum^{infty}_{n=2}2x^n\
end{align*}







combinatorics recurrence-relations relations generating-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 3:21







Math Newbie

















asked Dec 12 '18 at 2:55









Math NewbieMath Newbie

428




428












  • $begingroup$
    A linear recurrence relation and two initial conditions? That's strange, but easily fixable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    Fixed it -- thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:22


















  • $begingroup$
    A linear recurrence relation and two initial conditions? That's strange, but easily fixable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    Fixed it -- thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:22
















$begingroup$
A linear recurrence relation and two initial conditions? That's strange, but easily fixable.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 12 '18 at 3:09




$begingroup$
A linear recurrence relation and two initial conditions? That's strange, but easily fixable.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 12 '18 at 3:09












$begingroup$
Fixed it -- thanks!
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:22




$begingroup$
Fixed it -- thanks!
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You certainly do not need generating functions for solving $a_n-a_{n-1}=2(n-1)$: it is enough to sum both sides on $n=1,2,ldots,N$ to get that $a_n$ depends on $sum_{k=1}^{n}2(k-1)$. The only issue in your case is that the given values of $a_0$ and $a_1$ do not agree with the given recurrence relation. So, let us assume $a_0=color{red}{2}$ and $a_{n}=a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$ for any $ngeq 1$. By denoting as $f(x)$ the following generating function
$$ f(x)=sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^n = 2+sum_{ngeq 1}a_n x^n$$
we have
$$ xcdot f(x) = sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^{n+1} = sum_{ngeq 1} a_{n-1} x^n $$
hence by the recurrence relation
$$ (1-x) f(x) = 2+2sum_{ngeq 1}(n-1)x^n = 2+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^2}$$
where the last identity follows from stars and bars in the form
$$ frac{1}{(1-x)^{m+1}}=sum_{ngeq 0}binom{n+m}{m}x^n.$$
Since we have
$$ f(x) = frac{2}{1-x}+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^3} $$
stars and bars also gives
$$ a_n = [x^n]f(x) = 2-n+n^2. $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:18










  • $begingroup$
    makes sense - thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    $a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036180%2fhow-to-solve-a-recurrence-relation-with-generating-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

You certainly do not need generating functions for solving $a_n-a_{n-1}=2(n-1)$: it is enough to sum both sides on $n=1,2,ldots,N$ to get that $a_n$ depends on $sum_{k=1}^{n}2(k-1)$. The only issue in your case is that the given values of $a_0$ and $a_1$ do not agree with the given recurrence relation. So, let us assume $a_0=color{red}{2}$ and $a_{n}=a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$ for any $ngeq 1$. By denoting as $f(x)$ the following generating function
$$ f(x)=sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^n = 2+sum_{ngeq 1}a_n x^n$$
we have
$$ xcdot f(x) = sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^{n+1} = sum_{ngeq 1} a_{n-1} x^n $$
hence by the recurrence relation
$$ (1-x) f(x) = 2+2sum_{ngeq 1}(n-1)x^n = 2+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^2}$$
where the last identity follows from stars and bars in the form
$$ frac{1}{(1-x)^{m+1}}=sum_{ngeq 0}binom{n+m}{m}x^n.$$
Since we have
$$ f(x) = frac{2}{1-x}+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^3} $$
stars and bars also gives
$$ a_n = [x^n]f(x) = 2-n+n^2. $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:18










  • $begingroup$
    makes sense - thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    $a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29
















1












$begingroup$

You certainly do not need generating functions for solving $a_n-a_{n-1}=2(n-1)$: it is enough to sum both sides on $n=1,2,ldots,N$ to get that $a_n$ depends on $sum_{k=1}^{n}2(k-1)$. The only issue in your case is that the given values of $a_0$ and $a_1$ do not agree with the given recurrence relation. So, let us assume $a_0=color{red}{2}$ and $a_{n}=a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$ for any $ngeq 1$. By denoting as $f(x)$ the following generating function
$$ f(x)=sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^n = 2+sum_{ngeq 1}a_n x^n$$
we have
$$ xcdot f(x) = sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^{n+1} = sum_{ngeq 1} a_{n-1} x^n $$
hence by the recurrence relation
$$ (1-x) f(x) = 2+2sum_{ngeq 1}(n-1)x^n = 2+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^2}$$
where the last identity follows from stars and bars in the form
$$ frac{1}{(1-x)^{m+1}}=sum_{ngeq 0}binom{n+m}{m}x^n.$$
Since we have
$$ f(x) = frac{2}{1-x}+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^3} $$
stars and bars also gives
$$ a_n = [x^n]f(x) = 2-n+n^2. $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:18










  • $begingroup$
    makes sense - thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    $a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29














1












1








1





$begingroup$

You certainly do not need generating functions for solving $a_n-a_{n-1}=2(n-1)$: it is enough to sum both sides on $n=1,2,ldots,N$ to get that $a_n$ depends on $sum_{k=1}^{n}2(k-1)$. The only issue in your case is that the given values of $a_0$ and $a_1$ do not agree with the given recurrence relation. So, let us assume $a_0=color{red}{2}$ and $a_{n}=a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$ for any $ngeq 1$. By denoting as $f(x)$ the following generating function
$$ f(x)=sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^n = 2+sum_{ngeq 1}a_n x^n$$
we have
$$ xcdot f(x) = sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^{n+1} = sum_{ngeq 1} a_{n-1} x^n $$
hence by the recurrence relation
$$ (1-x) f(x) = 2+2sum_{ngeq 1}(n-1)x^n = 2+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^2}$$
where the last identity follows from stars and bars in the form
$$ frac{1}{(1-x)^{m+1}}=sum_{ngeq 0}binom{n+m}{m}x^n.$$
Since we have
$$ f(x) = frac{2}{1-x}+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^3} $$
stars and bars also gives
$$ a_n = [x^n]f(x) = 2-n+n^2. $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You certainly do not need generating functions for solving $a_n-a_{n-1}=2(n-1)$: it is enough to sum both sides on $n=1,2,ldots,N$ to get that $a_n$ depends on $sum_{k=1}^{n}2(k-1)$. The only issue in your case is that the given values of $a_0$ and $a_1$ do not agree with the given recurrence relation. So, let us assume $a_0=color{red}{2}$ and $a_{n}=a_{n-1}+2(n-1)$ for any $ngeq 1$. By denoting as $f(x)$ the following generating function
$$ f(x)=sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^n = 2+sum_{ngeq 1}a_n x^n$$
we have
$$ xcdot f(x) = sum_{ngeq 0} a_n x^{n+1} = sum_{ngeq 1} a_{n-1} x^n $$
hence by the recurrence relation
$$ (1-x) f(x) = 2+2sum_{ngeq 1}(n-1)x^n = 2+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^2}$$
where the last identity follows from stars and bars in the form
$$ frac{1}{(1-x)^{m+1}}=sum_{ngeq 0}binom{n+m}{m}x^n.$$
Since we have
$$ f(x) = frac{2}{1-x}+frac{2x^2}{(1-x)^3} $$
stars and bars also gives
$$ a_n = [x^n]f(x) = 2-n+n^2. $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 12 '18 at 3:08









Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

289k33281661




289k33281661












  • $begingroup$
    I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:18










  • $begingroup$
    makes sense - thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    $a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29


















  • $begingroup$
    I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:18










  • $begingroup$
    makes sense - thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    $a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Math Newbie
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:29
















$begingroup$
I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:15




$begingroup$
I was solving the question to "Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of regions created by n mutually intersecting circles on a piece of paper (no three circles have a common intersection point)." so I incorrectly "set" the initial values. sorry! Do you have any recommendations for what the initial conditions should be?
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:15












$begingroup$
@MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 12 '18 at 3:18




$begingroup$
@MathNewbie: you may just start with $a_1=2$, the linear recurrence relation and the generating function defined as a sum over $ngeq 1$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 12 '18 at 3:18












$begingroup$
makes sense - thank you.
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:21




$begingroup$
makes sense - thank you.
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:21












$begingroup$
$a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 12 '18 at 3:29




$begingroup$
$a_1=2$ makes sense: a circle (simple closed curve) divides the plane into two connected components (Jordan's theorem). What is debatable is to assign a value to $a_0$.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 12 '18 at 3:29












$begingroup$
Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:29




$begingroup$
Sorry, understand that now. Thanks for the clarification
$endgroup$
– Math Newbie
Dec 12 '18 at 3:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036180%2fhow-to-solve-a-recurrence-relation-with-generating-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mont Emei

Province de Neuquén

Journaliste