Integration of closed 2-form over $S^2$ independent of radius












0












$begingroup$


I have this 2-form on $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$:



$$ sigma = frac{ x_1 dx_2 wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 wedge dx_3 + x_3 dx_1 wedge dx_2}{|| x||^3}$$ where $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ are the standard coordinates on $mathbb{R}^3$ and $||x|| = sqrt{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2}$ is the norm. I have shown that $d sigma = 0$ i.e. that the two-form is closed.



I also computed the integral $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma $$ where $j_r$ is the inclusion of the two-sphere $S^2 (r)$ into $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$.



I did this in the standard way by defining $$ F : mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right} rightarrow S^2 (r) : (x_1, x_2, x_3) mapsto (r sin phi cos theta, r sin phi sin theta, r cos phi)$$ where $0 leq phi leq pi$ and $0 leq theta leq 2 pi$ and then working with the pullback $F^{*}$.



I got the result $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma = 4 pi. $$



I think this is correct, because the problem asks to me argue why the result of the integration is independent of the radius . I should use for this the fact that $sigma$ is a closed two-form.



However, I don't know the answer to this, and was hoping for some help. Why is the integral independent of the radius, given that the two-form is closed? Someone has an explanation for this, maybe using Stoke's?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Apply Stokes to the $3$-dimensional "annulus" bounded by two spheres of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$ centred at the origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:41
















0












$begingroup$


I have this 2-form on $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$:



$$ sigma = frac{ x_1 dx_2 wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 wedge dx_3 + x_3 dx_1 wedge dx_2}{|| x||^3}$$ where $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ are the standard coordinates on $mathbb{R}^3$ and $||x|| = sqrt{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2}$ is the norm. I have shown that $d sigma = 0$ i.e. that the two-form is closed.



I also computed the integral $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma $$ where $j_r$ is the inclusion of the two-sphere $S^2 (r)$ into $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$.



I did this in the standard way by defining $$ F : mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right} rightarrow S^2 (r) : (x_1, x_2, x_3) mapsto (r sin phi cos theta, r sin phi sin theta, r cos phi)$$ where $0 leq phi leq pi$ and $0 leq theta leq 2 pi$ and then working with the pullback $F^{*}$.



I got the result $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma = 4 pi. $$



I think this is correct, because the problem asks to me argue why the result of the integration is independent of the radius . I should use for this the fact that $sigma$ is a closed two-form.



However, I don't know the answer to this, and was hoping for some help. Why is the integral independent of the radius, given that the two-form is closed? Someone has an explanation for this, maybe using Stoke's?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Apply Stokes to the $3$-dimensional "annulus" bounded by two spheres of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$ centred at the origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:41














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have this 2-form on $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$:



$$ sigma = frac{ x_1 dx_2 wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 wedge dx_3 + x_3 dx_1 wedge dx_2}{|| x||^3}$$ where $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ are the standard coordinates on $mathbb{R}^3$ and $||x|| = sqrt{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2}$ is the norm. I have shown that $d sigma = 0$ i.e. that the two-form is closed.



I also computed the integral $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma $$ where $j_r$ is the inclusion of the two-sphere $S^2 (r)$ into $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$.



I did this in the standard way by defining $$ F : mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right} rightarrow S^2 (r) : (x_1, x_2, x_3) mapsto (r sin phi cos theta, r sin phi sin theta, r cos phi)$$ where $0 leq phi leq pi$ and $0 leq theta leq 2 pi$ and then working with the pullback $F^{*}$.



I got the result $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma = 4 pi. $$



I think this is correct, because the problem asks to me argue why the result of the integration is independent of the radius . I should use for this the fact that $sigma$ is a closed two-form.



However, I don't know the answer to this, and was hoping for some help. Why is the integral independent of the radius, given that the two-form is closed? Someone has an explanation for this, maybe using Stoke's?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have this 2-form on $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$:



$$ sigma = frac{ x_1 dx_2 wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 wedge dx_3 + x_3 dx_1 wedge dx_2}{|| x||^3}$$ where $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ are the standard coordinates on $mathbb{R}^3$ and $||x|| = sqrt{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2}$ is the norm. I have shown that $d sigma = 0$ i.e. that the two-form is closed.



I also computed the integral $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma $$ where $j_r$ is the inclusion of the two-sphere $S^2 (r)$ into $mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right}$.



I did this in the standard way by defining $$ F : mathbb{R}^3 setminus left{0 right} rightarrow S^2 (r) : (x_1, x_2, x_3) mapsto (r sin phi cos theta, r sin phi sin theta, r cos phi)$$ where $0 leq phi leq pi$ and $0 leq theta leq 2 pi$ and then working with the pullback $F^{*}$.



I got the result $$ int_{S^2 (r)} j_r^{*} sigma = 4 pi. $$



I think this is correct, because the problem asks to me argue why the result of the integration is independent of the radius . I should use for this the fact that $sigma$ is a closed two-form.



However, I don't know the answer to this, and was hoping for some help. Why is the integral independent of the radius, given that the two-form is closed? Someone has an explanation for this, maybe using Stoke's?







integration differential-geometry differential-forms






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 2 at 11:29









KamilKamil

2,03521548




2,03521548








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Apply Stokes to the $3$-dimensional "annulus" bounded by two spheres of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$ centred at the origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:41














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Apply Stokes to the $3$-dimensional "annulus" bounded by two spheres of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$ centred at the origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:41








3




3




$begingroup$
Apply Stokes to the $3$-dimensional "annulus" bounded by two spheres of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$ centred at the origin.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 2 at 11:41




$begingroup$
Apply Stokes to the $3$-dimensional "annulus" bounded by two spheres of radii $r_1$ and $r_2$ centred at the origin.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 2 at 11:41










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059367%2fintegration-of-closed-2-form-over-s2-independent-of-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059367%2fintegration-of-closed-2-form-over-s2-independent-of-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei