Installing Ubuntu 18.04 LTS on separate hard drive a Windows 10 1809 but cannot create EFI partition
I have installed Ubuntu 18.04 LTS but it crashes at the start.
I suspect that I do not have a 1st partition /EFI
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Creating_an_EFI_System_Partition
but these may not be uptodate?
I have tried to follow the instructions
Dual Boot Windows 10 and Linux Ubuntu on Separate Hard Drives
1st Partition / EFI
Select your target drive (in my case /dev/sdc)
Select "Make New Partition Table"
Partition the target drive as follows:
Size: 650 MB
Type for the new partition: Primary
Location for the new partition: Beginning of this space
Use as: EFI (this will be listed as /dev/sdc1 efi in the partitioning tool once you create it)
from my target drive /dev/sdd, but when I get to the use-as stage EFI is not listed. Is Reserved for BIOS the right option here?
The result of this was a screen full of systemy errors that I was unable to capture. I have now used gparted from the USB install to try to set up all 4 partitions, but have not found an option EPI System partition. Is my gparted too old? It appears to install OK.
On booting I am now rewarded with a single unresponsive winking cursor :-(
I have some camera screen shots but have yet to find how to add to this post.
/dev/sdd
/dev/sdd1 16 MB
/dev/sdd2 fat32
/dev/sdd3 ext4
/dev/sdd4 swap mount / 50 GB
/dev/sdd5 ext4 mount /home
device for boost loader installation /dev/sdd2 (should this be /dev/sdd?)
/dev/ssd2 fath32 680 MB EFI
/
dual-boot windows-10
|
show 1 more comment
I have installed Ubuntu 18.04 LTS but it crashes at the start.
I suspect that I do not have a 1st partition /EFI
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Creating_an_EFI_System_Partition
but these may not be uptodate?
I have tried to follow the instructions
Dual Boot Windows 10 and Linux Ubuntu on Separate Hard Drives
1st Partition / EFI
Select your target drive (in my case /dev/sdc)
Select "Make New Partition Table"
Partition the target drive as follows:
Size: 650 MB
Type for the new partition: Primary
Location for the new partition: Beginning of this space
Use as: EFI (this will be listed as /dev/sdc1 efi in the partitioning tool once you create it)
from my target drive /dev/sdd, but when I get to the use-as stage EFI is not listed. Is Reserved for BIOS the right option here?
The result of this was a screen full of systemy errors that I was unable to capture. I have now used gparted from the USB install to try to set up all 4 partitions, but have not found an option EPI System partition. Is my gparted too old? It appears to install OK.
On booting I am now rewarded with a single unresponsive winking cursor :-(
I have some camera screen shots but have yet to find how to add to this post.
/dev/sdd
/dev/sdd1 16 MB
/dev/sdd2 fat32
/dev/sdd3 ext4
/dev/sdd4 swap mount / 50 GB
/dev/sdd5 ext4 mount /home
device for boost loader installation /dev/sdd2 (should this be /dev/sdd?)
/dev/ssd2 fath32 680 MB EFI
/
dual-boot windows-10
What do you mean by "It crashes"?
– Nonny Moose
Dec 20 '18 at 0:25
No, reserved BIOS boot area is not correct, should be EFI System Partiton
– Alvin Liang
Dec 20 '18 at 2:39
My first time produced a screen full of systemy message that I was unable to capture.
– Paul A. Bristow
Dec 21 '18 at 11:09
is uefi required ? why not install both in bios mode ?
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 11:54
"The major difference between the two is that MBR uses 32-bit entries in its table which limits the total physical partitons to only 4. Each partition can only be a maximum of 2TB in size"
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 12:00
|
show 1 more comment
I have installed Ubuntu 18.04 LTS but it crashes at the start.
I suspect that I do not have a 1st partition /EFI
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Creating_an_EFI_System_Partition
but these may not be uptodate?
I have tried to follow the instructions
Dual Boot Windows 10 and Linux Ubuntu on Separate Hard Drives
1st Partition / EFI
Select your target drive (in my case /dev/sdc)
Select "Make New Partition Table"
Partition the target drive as follows:
Size: 650 MB
Type for the new partition: Primary
Location for the new partition: Beginning of this space
Use as: EFI (this will be listed as /dev/sdc1 efi in the partitioning tool once you create it)
from my target drive /dev/sdd, but when I get to the use-as stage EFI is not listed. Is Reserved for BIOS the right option here?
The result of this was a screen full of systemy errors that I was unable to capture. I have now used gparted from the USB install to try to set up all 4 partitions, but have not found an option EPI System partition. Is my gparted too old? It appears to install OK.
On booting I am now rewarded with a single unresponsive winking cursor :-(
I have some camera screen shots but have yet to find how to add to this post.
/dev/sdd
/dev/sdd1 16 MB
/dev/sdd2 fat32
/dev/sdd3 ext4
/dev/sdd4 swap mount / 50 GB
/dev/sdd5 ext4 mount /home
device for boost loader installation /dev/sdd2 (should this be /dev/sdd?)
/dev/ssd2 fath32 680 MB EFI
/
dual-boot windows-10
I have installed Ubuntu 18.04 LTS but it crashes at the start.
I suspect that I do not have a 1st partition /EFI
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI#Creating_an_EFI_System_Partition
but these may not be uptodate?
I have tried to follow the instructions
Dual Boot Windows 10 and Linux Ubuntu on Separate Hard Drives
1st Partition / EFI
Select your target drive (in my case /dev/sdc)
Select "Make New Partition Table"
Partition the target drive as follows:
Size: 650 MB
Type for the new partition: Primary
Location for the new partition: Beginning of this space
Use as: EFI (this will be listed as /dev/sdc1 efi in the partitioning tool once you create it)
from my target drive /dev/sdd, but when I get to the use-as stage EFI is not listed. Is Reserved for BIOS the right option here?
The result of this was a screen full of systemy errors that I was unable to capture. I have now used gparted from the USB install to try to set up all 4 partitions, but have not found an option EPI System partition. Is my gparted too old? It appears to install OK.
On booting I am now rewarded with a single unresponsive winking cursor :-(
I have some camera screen shots but have yet to find how to add to this post.
/dev/sdd
/dev/sdd1 16 MB
/dev/sdd2 fat32
/dev/sdd3 ext4
/dev/sdd4 swap mount / 50 GB
/dev/sdd5 ext4 mount /home
device for boost loader installation /dev/sdd2 (should this be /dev/sdd?)
/dev/ssd2 fath32 680 MB EFI
/
dual-boot windows-10
dual-boot windows-10
edited Dec 21 '18 at 11:33
Paul A. Bristow
asked Dec 19 '18 at 19:32
Paul A. BristowPaul A. Bristow
12
12
What do you mean by "It crashes"?
– Nonny Moose
Dec 20 '18 at 0:25
No, reserved BIOS boot area is not correct, should be EFI System Partiton
– Alvin Liang
Dec 20 '18 at 2:39
My first time produced a screen full of systemy message that I was unable to capture.
– Paul A. Bristow
Dec 21 '18 at 11:09
is uefi required ? why not install both in bios mode ?
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 11:54
"The major difference between the two is that MBR uses 32-bit entries in its table which limits the total physical partitons to only 4. Each partition can only be a maximum of 2TB in size"
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 12:00
|
show 1 more comment
What do you mean by "It crashes"?
– Nonny Moose
Dec 20 '18 at 0:25
No, reserved BIOS boot area is not correct, should be EFI System Partiton
– Alvin Liang
Dec 20 '18 at 2:39
My first time produced a screen full of systemy message that I was unable to capture.
– Paul A. Bristow
Dec 21 '18 at 11:09
is uefi required ? why not install both in bios mode ?
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 11:54
"The major difference between the two is that MBR uses 32-bit entries in its table which limits the total physical partitons to only 4. Each partition can only be a maximum of 2TB in size"
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 12:00
What do you mean by "It crashes"?
– Nonny Moose
Dec 20 '18 at 0:25
What do you mean by "It crashes"?
– Nonny Moose
Dec 20 '18 at 0:25
No, reserved BIOS boot area is not correct, should be EFI System Partiton
– Alvin Liang
Dec 20 '18 at 2:39
No, reserved BIOS boot area is not correct, should be EFI System Partiton
– Alvin Liang
Dec 20 '18 at 2:39
My first time produced a screen full of systemy message that I was unable to capture.
– Paul A. Bristow
Dec 21 '18 at 11:09
My first time produced a screen full of systemy message that I was unable to capture.
– Paul A. Bristow
Dec 21 '18 at 11:09
is uefi required ? why not install both in bios mode ?
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 11:54
is uefi required ? why not install both in bios mode ?
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 11:54
"The major difference between the two is that MBR uses 32-bit entries in its table which limits the total physical partitons to only 4. Each partition can only be a maximum of 2TB in size"
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 12:00
"The major difference between the two is that MBR uses 32-bit entries in its table which limits the total physical partitons to only 4. Each partition can only be a maximum of 2TB in size"
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 12:00
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1103176%2finstalling-ubuntu-18-04-lts-on-separate-hard-drive-a-windows-10-1809-but-cannot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1103176%2finstalling-ubuntu-18-04-lts-on-separate-hard-drive-a-windows-10-1809-but-cannot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What do you mean by "It crashes"?
– Nonny Moose
Dec 20 '18 at 0:25
No, reserved BIOS boot area is not correct, should be EFI System Partiton
– Alvin Liang
Dec 20 '18 at 2:39
My first time produced a screen full of systemy message that I was unable to capture.
– Paul A. Bristow
Dec 21 '18 at 11:09
is uefi required ? why not install both in bios mode ?
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 11:54
"The major difference between the two is that MBR uses 32-bit entries in its table which limits the total physical partitons to only 4. Each partition can only be a maximum of 2TB in size"
– gingamann
Dec 21 '18 at 12:00