Extension Degree of Fields Composite












0












$begingroup$


Let $K/F$ be a field extension, $L/F$ and $M/F$ finite subextensions of $K/F$ and $LM$ the composite of $L$ and $M$. I'm trying to prove that $[LM:F] = [L:F][M:F]$ implies the trivial intersection $Lcap M=F$, and that the converse holds when $[L:F]=2$ or $[M:F]=2$.



In order to prove the trivial intersection of the fields, I want to show that $[Lcap M:F]=1$. From the hypothesis, we can obtain
$$[LM:L] = [M:F] = [M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
and
$$[LM:M] = [L:F] = [L:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
but I don't if that is usefull for what I'm trying to prove. And I don't know how to prove the converse part. I would appreciate any help you can give me.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $K/F$ be a field extension, $L/F$ and $M/F$ finite subextensions of $K/F$ and $LM$ the composite of $L$ and $M$. I'm trying to prove that $[LM:F] = [L:F][M:F]$ implies the trivial intersection $Lcap M=F$, and that the converse holds when $[L:F]=2$ or $[M:F]=2$.



    In order to prove the trivial intersection of the fields, I want to show that $[Lcap M:F]=1$. From the hypothesis, we can obtain
    $$[LM:L] = [M:F] = [M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
    and
    $$[LM:M] = [L:F] = [L:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
    but I don't if that is usefull for what I'm trying to prove. And I don't know how to prove the converse part. I would appreciate any help you can give me.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $K/F$ be a field extension, $L/F$ and $M/F$ finite subextensions of $K/F$ and $LM$ the composite of $L$ and $M$. I'm trying to prove that $[LM:F] = [L:F][M:F]$ implies the trivial intersection $Lcap M=F$, and that the converse holds when $[L:F]=2$ or $[M:F]=2$.



      In order to prove the trivial intersection of the fields, I want to show that $[Lcap M:F]=1$. From the hypothesis, we can obtain
      $$[LM:L] = [M:F] = [M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
      and
      $$[LM:M] = [L:F] = [L:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
      but I don't if that is usefull for what I'm trying to prove. And I don't know how to prove the converse part. I would appreciate any help you can give me.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $K/F$ be a field extension, $L/F$ and $M/F$ finite subextensions of $K/F$ and $LM$ the composite of $L$ and $M$. I'm trying to prove that $[LM:F] = [L:F][M:F]$ implies the trivial intersection $Lcap M=F$, and that the converse holds when $[L:F]=2$ or $[M:F]=2$.



      In order to prove the trivial intersection of the fields, I want to show that $[Lcap M:F]=1$. From the hypothesis, we can obtain
      $$[LM:L] = [M:F] = [M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
      and
      $$[LM:M] = [L:F] = [L:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
      but I don't if that is usefull for what I'm trying to prove. And I don't know how to prove the converse part. I would appreciate any help you can give me.







      abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 22:46









      Juan David SamboníJuan David Samboní

      917




      917






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I'll draw this diagram of fields in a slightly odd manner, since I'm limited by the MathJax.



          $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}LM @<<< L \ @AAA @AAA\M @<<<Lcap M @<<< Fend{CD}$$



          Now we have
          $$[LM:L]=[M:F]=[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
          as you've already noted.
          Note now that $[LM:L]le [M:Lcap M]$, so that
          $$[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F]le [M:Lcap M],$$
          or
          $$[Lcap M:F]le 1,$$
          which of course implies that $Lcap M=F$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Juan David Samboní
            Dec 29 '18 at 21:15











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055356%2fextension-degree-of-fields-composite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          I'll draw this diagram of fields in a slightly odd manner, since I'm limited by the MathJax.



          $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}LM @<<< L \ @AAA @AAA\M @<<<Lcap M @<<< Fend{CD}$$



          Now we have
          $$[LM:L]=[M:F]=[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
          as you've already noted.
          Note now that $[LM:L]le [M:Lcap M]$, so that
          $$[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F]le [M:Lcap M],$$
          or
          $$[Lcap M:F]le 1,$$
          which of course implies that $Lcap M=F$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Juan David Samboní
            Dec 29 '18 at 21:15
















          0












          $begingroup$

          I'll draw this diagram of fields in a slightly odd manner, since I'm limited by the MathJax.



          $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}LM @<<< L \ @AAA @AAA\M @<<<Lcap M @<<< Fend{CD}$$



          Now we have
          $$[LM:L]=[M:F]=[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
          as you've already noted.
          Note now that $[LM:L]le [M:Lcap M]$, so that
          $$[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F]le [M:Lcap M],$$
          or
          $$[Lcap M:F]le 1,$$
          which of course implies that $Lcap M=F$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Juan David Samboní
            Dec 29 '18 at 21:15














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          I'll draw this diagram of fields in a slightly odd manner, since I'm limited by the MathJax.



          $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}LM @<<< L \ @AAA @AAA\M @<<<Lcap M @<<< Fend{CD}$$



          Now we have
          $$[LM:L]=[M:F]=[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
          as you've already noted.
          Note now that $[LM:L]le [M:Lcap M]$, so that
          $$[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F]le [M:Lcap M],$$
          or
          $$[Lcap M:F]le 1,$$
          which of course implies that $Lcap M=F$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I'll draw this diagram of fields in a slightly odd manner, since I'm limited by the MathJax.



          $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}LM @<<< L \ @AAA @AAA\M @<<<Lcap M @<<< Fend{CD}$$



          Now we have
          $$[LM:L]=[M:F]=[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F],$$
          as you've already noted.
          Note now that $[LM:L]le [M:Lcap M]$, so that
          $$[M:Lcap M][Lcap M:F]le [M:Lcap M],$$
          or
          $$[Lcap M:F]le 1,$$
          which of course implies that $Lcap M=F$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 29 '18 at 2:58









          jgonjgon

          14.7k22042




          14.7k22042












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Juan David Samboní
            Dec 29 '18 at 21:15


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Juan David Samboní
            Dec 29 '18 at 21:15
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
          $endgroup$
          – Juan David Samboní
          Dec 29 '18 at 21:15




          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much! That was very helpful.
          $endgroup$
          – Juan David Samboní
          Dec 29 '18 at 21:15


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055356%2fextension-degree-of-fields-composite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei