simple combinatorics: product rule and number of ordered pairs












0












$begingroup$


Product rule: if $X,Y$ -- finite sets and $|X|=n$, $|Y|= m$ we can say, that the number of the ways to first extract an element from the first set and then an element from the second set $= nm$ -- direct product of sets $X$ and $Y$.



${n+m}choose{2}$$2!= frac{(n+m)!}{2! (n+m-2)!} = frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$ --the number of non-ordered pairs in set $Xcup Y$, where $|Xcup Y| = n + m$.



What the difference between these two formulas? I cannot see... Why $frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2} neq nm$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Product rule: if $X,Y$ -- finite sets and $|X|=n$, $|Y|= m$ we can say, that the number of the ways to first extract an element from the first set and then an element from the second set $= nm$ -- direct product of sets $X$ and $Y$.



    ${n+m}choose{2}$$2!= frac{(n+m)!}{2! (n+m-2)!} = frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$ --the number of non-ordered pairs in set $Xcup Y$, where $|Xcup Y| = n + m$.



    What the difference between these two formulas? I cannot see... Why $frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2} neq nm$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Product rule: if $X,Y$ -- finite sets and $|X|=n$, $|Y|= m$ we can say, that the number of the ways to first extract an element from the first set and then an element from the second set $= nm$ -- direct product of sets $X$ and $Y$.



      ${n+m}choose{2}$$2!= frac{(n+m)!}{2! (n+m-2)!} = frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$ --the number of non-ordered pairs in set $Xcup Y$, where $|Xcup Y| = n + m$.



      What the difference between these two formulas? I cannot see... Why $frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2} neq nm$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Product rule: if $X,Y$ -- finite sets and $|X|=n$, $|Y|= m$ we can say, that the number of the ways to first extract an element from the first set and then an element from the second set $= nm$ -- direct product of sets $X$ and $Y$.



      ${n+m}choose{2}$$2!= frac{(n+m)!}{2! (n+m-2)!} = frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$ --the number of non-ordered pairs in set $Xcup Y$, where $|Xcup Y| = n + m$.



      What the difference between these two formulas? I cannot see... Why $frac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2} neq nm$?







      combinatorics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 29 '18 at 0:02









      Just do itJust do it

      19618




      19618






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          In the first scenario, there is one case: One element from $X$, one element from $Y$. That's the only type of pair you're going to get.



          In the second scenario, there are three cases:




          • Two elements from $X$

          • Two elements from $Y$

          • One element from $X$, one element from $Y$


          This is why there are more pairs in the second scenario than the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:06






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:19












          • $begingroup$
            @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:46













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055411%2fsimple-combinatorics-product-rule-and-number-of-ordered-pairs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          In the first scenario, there is one case: One element from $X$, one element from $Y$. That's the only type of pair you're going to get.



          In the second scenario, there are three cases:




          • Two elements from $X$

          • Two elements from $Y$

          • One element from $X$, one element from $Y$


          This is why there are more pairs in the second scenario than the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:06






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:19












          • $begingroup$
            @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:46


















          1












          $begingroup$

          In the first scenario, there is one case: One element from $X$, one element from $Y$. That's the only type of pair you're going to get.



          In the second scenario, there are three cases:




          • Two elements from $X$

          • Two elements from $Y$

          • One element from $X$, one element from $Y$


          This is why there are more pairs in the second scenario than the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:06






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:19












          • $begingroup$
            @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:46
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          In the first scenario, there is one case: One element from $X$, one element from $Y$. That's the only type of pair you're going to get.



          In the second scenario, there are three cases:




          • Two elements from $X$

          • Two elements from $Y$

          • One element from $X$, one element from $Y$


          This is why there are more pairs in the second scenario than the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In the first scenario, there is one case: One element from $X$, one element from $Y$. That's the only type of pair you're going to get.



          In the second scenario, there are three cases:




          • Two elements from $X$

          • Two elements from $Y$

          • One element from $X$, one element from $Y$


          This is why there are more pairs in the second scenario than the first.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 29 '18 at 0:05









          Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

          15.3k1835




          15.3k1835












          • $begingroup$
            Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:06






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:19












          • $begingroup$
            @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:46




















          • $begingroup$
            Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:06






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:19












          • $begingroup$
            @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
            $endgroup$
            – Just do it
            Dec 29 '18 at 0:46


















          $begingroup$
          Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
          $endgroup$
          – Just do it
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:06




          $begingroup$
          Ou, oh, ye! Thx :D
          $endgroup$
          – Just do it
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:06




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
          $endgroup$
          – Henry
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:19






          $begingroup$
          It might be worth saying that $dfrac{n(n-1)}{2} +dfrac{m(m-1)}{2} +nm = dfrac{(n+m)(n+m-1)}{2}$
          $endgroup$
          – Henry
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:19














          $begingroup$
          @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
          $endgroup$
          – Just do it
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:38




          $begingroup$
          @Henry nice, $=$ ${n}choose{2}$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$ $+$ $nm$
          $endgroup$
          – Just do it
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:38












          $begingroup$
          @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
          $endgroup$
          – Just do it
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:46






          $begingroup$
          @Henry also clear, that if we use not direct product, but free product $X oplus X$, if $x_i in X$ we will be have two words in $Xoplus X$ $(x_i, x_i) neq (x_i, x_i)$ that equal in $X^2$ and in this formula we will be write ${n}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ ${m}choose{2}$$2!$ $+$ $nm$
          $endgroup$
          – Just do it
          Dec 29 '18 at 0:46




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055411%2fsimple-combinatorics-product-rule-and-number-of-ordered-pairs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ellipse (mathématiques)

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          Mont Emei