LCM and GCD polynomial relationship












0












$begingroup$


I need some help with constructing a proof for the following statement,$ frac{P_1 P_2}{hcf(m,n)} = lcm(P_1,P_2)$ where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are polynomials with real coefficients.



I know how to do the same for integers using prime factors and their exponents but not sure where to go with polynomials.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I need some help with constructing a proof for the following statement,$ frac{P_1 P_2}{hcf(m,n)} = lcm(P_1,P_2)$ where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are polynomials with real coefficients.



    I know how to do the same for integers using prime factors and their exponents but not sure where to go with polynomials.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I need some help with constructing a proof for the following statement,$ frac{P_1 P_2}{hcf(m,n)} = lcm(P_1,P_2)$ where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are polynomials with real coefficients.



      I know how to do the same for integers using prime factors and their exponents but not sure where to go with polynomials.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I need some help with constructing a proof for the following statement,$ frac{P_1 P_2}{hcf(m,n)} = lcm(P_1,P_2)$ where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are polynomials with real coefficients.



      I know how to do the same for integers using prime factors and their exponents but not sure where to go with polynomials.







      polynomials proof-explanation greatest-common-divisor least-common-multiple






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 21:51









      forward_behind1forward_behind1

      32




      32






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Do it the exact same way. Suppose that the hcf/gcd of $P_1$ and $P_2$ is $G$. Because $G$ is a factor of $P_1$, there exists an $R_1$ such that $P_1$ is equal to $R_1G$, and likewise $P_2$ equals some $R_2G$.



          $P_1P_2 = R_1R_2GG$



          ${P_1P_2 over G} = R_1R_2G$



          $R_1$ and $R_2$ can have no factors in common as any factor $H$ could be multiplied by $G$ to obtain a new GCD.



          Because $R_1R_2G$ is a multiple of $R_1G$, it is a multiple of $P_1$, and likewise for $P_2$. It is a multiple of both, and no factor can be removed which would preserve its multiplicity. Therefore, it is the Least Common Multiple.



          Q.E.D.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            This proof works in any gcd domain. We use the $,overbrace{{rm involution}, x' :=, ab/x}^{rmlarge cofactor duality } $ on the divisors of $rm:ab,,$ which exposes $ $ cofactor reflection $,rm xmid ycolor{#c00}iff y'mid x', $ by ${, rmdfrac{y}x = dfrac{x'}{y'} }$ by $rm, yy'! = ab = xx'., $ Thus



            $$begin{align}rm cmidgcd(a,b)!iff&rm cmid a,b\[3px]
            color{#c00}iff& rm b',a'mid c'\[3px]
            iff & rm lcm(b',a')mid c'\[3px]
            color{#c00}iff & rm cmid lcm(b',a')' \
            {rm Thus}rmquad gcd(a,b), cong &rm , lcm(b',a')'= dfrac{ab}{lcm(a,b)}
            end{align}quad $$



            Above the black arrows are the definition of gcd and lcm, and the red arrows are cofactor reflections, and $,acong b,$ means $,a,b,$ are associates, i.e. $,amid bmid a$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              It works pretty much the same for integers if you modify the argument a little. Let $L = lcm(P_1, P_2)$ and $G=gcd(P_1, P_2)$. Then
              $$P_1 = Gh_1, P_2 = Gh_2,$$
              with $gcd(h_1, h_2) = 1$. It's easy to see that $P_1$ and $P_2$ both divides $Gh_1h_2$ so $L$ also divides $Gh_1h_2$. Assume that
              $$ Gh_1h_2 = Lh,$$
              then $P_1 h_2 = L h$, or $h_2 = frac{L}{P_1} h$. That is, $h$ divides $h_2$. Similarly $h$ divides $h_1$. Since $gcd(h_1,h_2)=1$, $h$ must be as scalar as well. In other words
              $$L= Gh_1h_2 = frac{P_1P_2}{G}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                0












                $begingroup$

                Think of the irreducible factors of P$_1$ and P$_2$ as your prime factors. Suppose P$_1$ = gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($q_1q_2ldots q_n$) and P$_2$=gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($r_1r_2ldots r_m$).
                Thus
                $$frac{P_1P_2}{gcd(P_1,P_2)}=gcd(P_1,P_2)(q_1ldots q_n)(r_1 ldots r_m).$$
                Note that the numerator has [gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)]$^2$ as a factor.



                So the RHS is a common multiple of P$_1$ and P$_2$. You should be able to show that if there is a "smaller" lcm, then we can get a "larger" gcd.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  });
                  });
                  }, "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function() {
                  var channelOptions = {
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "69"
                  };
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                  createEditor();
                  });
                  }
                  else {
                  createEditor();
                  }
                  });

                  function createEditor() {
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader: {
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  },
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  });


                  }
                  });














                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function () {
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055324%2flcm-and-gcd-polynomial-relationship%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                  }
                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Do it the exact same way. Suppose that the hcf/gcd of $P_1$ and $P_2$ is $G$. Because $G$ is a factor of $P_1$, there exists an $R_1$ such that $P_1$ is equal to $R_1G$, and likewise $P_2$ equals some $R_2G$.



                  $P_1P_2 = R_1R_2GG$



                  ${P_1P_2 over G} = R_1R_2G$



                  $R_1$ and $R_2$ can have no factors in common as any factor $H$ could be multiplied by $G$ to obtain a new GCD.



                  Because $R_1R_2G$ is a multiple of $R_1G$, it is a multiple of $P_1$, and likewise for $P_2$. It is a multiple of both, and no factor can be removed which would preserve its multiplicity. Therefore, it is the Least Common Multiple.



                  Q.E.D.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    Do it the exact same way. Suppose that the hcf/gcd of $P_1$ and $P_2$ is $G$. Because $G$ is a factor of $P_1$, there exists an $R_1$ such that $P_1$ is equal to $R_1G$, and likewise $P_2$ equals some $R_2G$.



                    $P_1P_2 = R_1R_2GG$



                    ${P_1P_2 over G} = R_1R_2G$



                    $R_1$ and $R_2$ can have no factors in common as any factor $H$ could be multiplied by $G$ to obtain a new GCD.



                    Because $R_1R_2G$ is a multiple of $R_1G$, it is a multiple of $P_1$, and likewise for $P_2$. It is a multiple of both, and no factor can be removed which would preserve its multiplicity. Therefore, it is the Least Common Multiple.



                    Q.E.D.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      Do it the exact same way. Suppose that the hcf/gcd of $P_1$ and $P_2$ is $G$. Because $G$ is a factor of $P_1$, there exists an $R_1$ such that $P_1$ is equal to $R_1G$, and likewise $P_2$ equals some $R_2G$.



                      $P_1P_2 = R_1R_2GG$



                      ${P_1P_2 over G} = R_1R_2G$



                      $R_1$ and $R_2$ can have no factors in common as any factor $H$ could be multiplied by $G$ to obtain a new GCD.



                      Because $R_1R_2G$ is a multiple of $R_1G$, it is a multiple of $P_1$, and likewise for $P_2$. It is a multiple of both, and no factor can be removed which would preserve its multiplicity. Therefore, it is the Least Common Multiple.



                      Q.E.D.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Do it the exact same way. Suppose that the hcf/gcd of $P_1$ and $P_2$ is $G$. Because $G$ is a factor of $P_1$, there exists an $R_1$ such that $P_1$ is equal to $R_1G$, and likewise $P_2$ equals some $R_2G$.



                      $P_1P_2 = R_1R_2GG$



                      ${P_1P_2 over G} = R_1R_2G$



                      $R_1$ and $R_2$ can have no factors in common as any factor $H$ could be multiplied by $G$ to obtain a new GCD.



                      Because $R_1R_2G$ is a multiple of $R_1G$, it is a multiple of $P_1$, and likewise for $P_2$. It is a multiple of both, and no factor can be removed which would preserve its multiplicity. Therefore, it is the Least Common Multiple.



                      Q.E.D.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 28 '18 at 22:25









                      William GrannisWilliam Grannis

                      998521




                      998521























                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          This proof works in any gcd domain. We use the $,overbrace{{rm involution}, x' :=, ab/x}^{rmlarge cofactor duality } $ on the divisors of $rm:ab,,$ which exposes $ $ cofactor reflection $,rm xmid ycolor{#c00}iff y'mid x', $ by ${, rmdfrac{y}x = dfrac{x'}{y'} }$ by $rm, yy'! = ab = xx'., $ Thus



                          $$begin{align}rm cmidgcd(a,b)!iff&rm cmid a,b\[3px]
                          color{#c00}iff& rm b',a'mid c'\[3px]
                          iff & rm lcm(b',a')mid c'\[3px]
                          color{#c00}iff & rm cmid lcm(b',a')' \
                          {rm Thus}rmquad gcd(a,b), cong &rm , lcm(b',a')'= dfrac{ab}{lcm(a,b)}
                          end{align}quad $$



                          Above the black arrows are the definition of gcd and lcm, and the red arrows are cofactor reflections, and $,acong b,$ means $,a,b,$ are associates, i.e. $,amid bmid a$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$


















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            This proof works in any gcd domain. We use the $,overbrace{{rm involution}, x' :=, ab/x}^{rmlarge cofactor duality } $ on the divisors of $rm:ab,,$ which exposes $ $ cofactor reflection $,rm xmid ycolor{#c00}iff y'mid x', $ by ${, rmdfrac{y}x = dfrac{x'}{y'} }$ by $rm, yy'! = ab = xx'., $ Thus



                            $$begin{align}rm cmidgcd(a,b)!iff&rm cmid a,b\[3px]
                            color{#c00}iff& rm b',a'mid c'\[3px]
                            iff & rm lcm(b',a')mid c'\[3px]
                            color{#c00}iff & rm cmid lcm(b',a')' \
                            {rm Thus}rmquad gcd(a,b), cong &rm , lcm(b',a')'= dfrac{ab}{lcm(a,b)}
                            end{align}quad $$



                            Above the black arrows are the definition of gcd and lcm, and the red arrows are cofactor reflections, and $,acong b,$ means $,a,b,$ are associates, i.e. $,amid bmid a$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$
















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              This proof works in any gcd domain. We use the $,overbrace{{rm involution}, x' :=, ab/x}^{rmlarge cofactor duality } $ on the divisors of $rm:ab,,$ which exposes $ $ cofactor reflection $,rm xmid ycolor{#c00}iff y'mid x', $ by ${, rmdfrac{y}x = dfrac{x'}{y'} }$ by $rm, yy'! = ab = xx'., $ Thus



                              $$begin{align}rm cmidgcd(a,b)!iff&rm cmid a,b\[3px]
                              color{#c00}iff& rm b',a'mid c'\[3px]
                              iff & rm lcm(b',a')mid c'\[3px]
                              color{#c00}iff & rm cmid lcm(b',a')' \
                              {rm Thus}rmquad gcd(a,b), cong &rm , lcm(b',a')'= dfrac{ab}{lcm(a,b)}
                              end{align}quad $$



                              Above the black arrows are the definition of gcd and lcm, and the red arrows are cofactor reflections, and $,acong b,$ means $,a,b,$ are associates, i.e. $,amid bmid a$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              This proof works in any gcd domain. We use the $,overbrace{{rm involution}, x' :=, ab/x}^{rmlarge cofactor duality } $ on the divisors of $rm:ab,,$ which exposes $ $ cofactor reflection $,rm xmid ycolor{#c00}iff y'mid x', $ by ${, rmdfrac{y}x = dfrac{x'}{y'} }$ by $rm, yy'! = ab = xx'., $ Thus



                              $$begin{align}rm cmidgcd(a,b)!iff&rm cmid a,b\[3px]
                              color{#c00}iff& rm b',a'mid c'\[3px]
                              iff & rm lcm(b',a')mid c'\[3px]
                              color{#c00}iff & rm cmid lcm(b',a')' \
                              {rm Thus}rmquad gcd(a,b), cong &rm , lcm(b',a')'= dfrac{ab}{lcm(a,b)}
                              end{align}quad $$



                              Above the black arrows are the definition of gcd and lcm, and the red arrows are cofactor reflections, and $,acong b,$ means $,a,b,$ are associates, i.e. $,amid bmid a$.







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Dec 28 '18 at 23:08

























                              answered Dec 28 '18 at 22:56









                              Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

                              211k29194648




                              211k29194648























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  It works pretty much the same for integers if you modify the argument a little. Let $L = lcm(P_1, P_2)$ and $G=gcd(P_1, P_2)$. Then
                                  $$P_1 = Gh_1, P_2 = Gh_2,$$
                                  with $gcd(h_1, h_2) = 1$. It's easy to see that $P_1$ and $P_2$ both divides $Gh_1h_2$ so $L$ also divides $Gh_1h_2$. Assume that
                                  $$ Gh_1h_2 = Lh,$$
                                  then $P_1 h_2 = L h$, or $h_2 = frac{L}{P_1} h$. That is, $h$ divides $h_2$. Similarly $h$ divides $h_1$. Since $gcd(h_1,h_2)=1$, $h$ must be as scalar as well. In other words
                                  $$L= Gh_1h_2 = frac{P_1P_2}{G}.$$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    It works pretty much the same for integers if you modify the argument a little. Let $L = lcm(P_1, P_2)$ and $G=gcd(P_1, P_2)$. Then
                                    $$P_1 = Gh_1, P_2 = Gh_2,$$
                                    with $gcd(h_1, h_2) = 1$. It's easy to see that $P_1$ and $P_2$ both divides $Gh_1h_2$ so $L$ also divides $Gh_1h_2$. Assume that
                                    $$ Gh_1h_2 = Lh,$$
                                    then $P_1 h_2 = L h$, or $h_2 = frac{L}{P_1} h$. That is, $h$ divides $h_2$. Similarly $h$ divides $h_1$. Since $gcd(h_1,h_2)=1$, $h$ must be as scalar as well. In other words
                                    $$L= Gh_1h_2 = frac{P_1P_2}{G}.$$






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      It works pretty much the same for integers if you modify the argument a little. Let $L = lcm(P_1, P_2)$ and $G=gcd(P_1, P_2)$. Then
                                      $$P_1 = Gh_1, P_2 = Gh_2,$$
                                      with $gcd(h_1, h_2) = 1$. It's easy to see that $P_1$ and $P_2$ both divides $Gh_1h_2$ so $L$ also divides $Gh_1h_2$. Assume that
                                      $$ Gh_1h_2 = Lh,$$
                                      then $P_1 h_2 = L h$, or $h_2 = frac{L}{P_1} h$. That is, $h$ divides $h_2$. Similarly $h$ divides $h_1$. Since $gcd(h_1,h_2)=1$, $h$ must be as scalar as well. In other words
                                      $$L= Gh_1h_2 = frac{P_1P_2}{G}.$$






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      It works pretty much the same for integers if you modify the argument a little. Let $L = lcm(P_1, P_2)$ and $G=gcd(P_1, P_2)$. Then
                                      $$P_1 = Gh_1, P_2 = Gh_2,$$
                                      with $gcd(h_1, h_2) = 1$. It's easy to see that $P_1$ and $P_2$ both divides $Gh_1h_2$ so $L$ also divides $Gh_1h_2$. Assume that
                                      $$ Gh_1h_2 = Lh,$$
                                      then $P_1 h_2 = L h$, or $h_2 = frac{L}{P_1} h$. That is, $h$ divides $h_2$. Similarly $h$ divides $h_1$. Since $gcd(h_1,h_2)=1$, $h$ must be as scalar as well. In other words
                                      $$L= Gh_1h_2 = frac{P_1P_2}{G}.$$







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 28 '18 at 22:17









                                      Quang HoangQuang Hoang

                                      13.2k1233




                                      13.2k1233























                                          0












                                          $begingroup$

                                          Think of the irreducible factors of P$_1$ and P$_2$ as your prime factors. Suppose P$_1$ = gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($q_1q_2ldots q_n$) and P$_2$=gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($r_1r_2ldots r_m$).
                                          Thus
                                          $$frac{P_1P_2}{gcd(P_1,P_2)}=gcd(P_1,P_2)(q_1ldots q_n)(r_1 ldots r_m).$$
                                          Note that the numerator has [gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)]$^2$ as a factor.



                                          So the RHS is a common multiple of P$_1$ and P$_2$. You should be able to show that if there is a "smaller" lcm, then we can get a "larger" gcd.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$


















                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            Think of the irreducible factors of P$_1$ and P$_2$ as your prime factors. Suppose P$_1$ = gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($q_1q_2ldots q_n$) and P$_2$=gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($r_1r_2ldots r_m$).
                                            Thus
                                            $$frac{P_1P_2}{gcd(P_1,P_2)}=gcd(P_1,P_2)(q_1ldots q_n)(r_1 ldots r_m).$$
                                            Note that the numerator has [gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)]$^2$ as a factor.



                                            So the RHS is a common multiple of P$_1$ and P$_2$. You should be able to show that if there is a "smaller" lcm, then we can get a "larger" gcd.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$
















                                              0












                                              0








                                              0





                                              $begingroup$

                                              Think of the irreducible factors of P$_1$ and P$_2$ as your prime factors. Suppose P$_1$ = gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($q_1q_2ldots q_n$) and P$_2$=gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($r_1r_2ldots r_m$).
                                              Thus
                                              $$frac{P_1P_2}{gcd(P_1,P_2)}=gcd(P_1,P_2)(q_1ldots q_n)(r_1 ldots r_m).$$
                                              Note that the numerator has [gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)]$^2$ as a factor.



                                              So the RHS is a common multiple of P$_1$ and P$_2$. You should be able to show that if there is a "smaller" lcm, then we can get a "larger" gcd.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$



                                              Think of the irreducible factors of P$_1$ and P$_2$ as your prime factors. Suppose P$_1$ = gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($q_1q_2ldots q_n$) and P$_2$=gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)($r_1r_2ldots r_m$).
                                              Thus
                                              $$frac{P_1P_2}{gcd(P_1,P_2)}=gcd(P_1,P_2)(q_1ldots q_n)(r_1 ldots r_m).$$
                                              Note that the numerator has [gcd(P$_1$,P$_2$)]$^2$ as a factor.



                                              So the RHS is a common multiple of P$_1$ and P$_2$. You should be able to show that if there is a "smaller" lcm, then we can get a "larger" gcd.







                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              answered Dec 28 '18 at 22:19









                                              Joel PereiraJoel Pereira

                                              75919




                                              75919






























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded




















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid



                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function () {
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055324%2flcm-and-gcd-polynomial-relationship%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                  }
                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Quarter-circle Tiles

                                                  build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                                                  Mont Emei