Linear map over complex vector spaces












2












$begingroup$


I'm currently studying for my Linear Algebra exams coming up in January, thus going through some previous exam questions and I'm at the following.



Let $T:V_1rightarrow V_2$ denote a linear transformation between two complex vectorspaces with, $dim V_1=3,: dim V_2=4$. Furthermore there are two subspaces $U_1subseteq V_1$ and $U_2subseteq V_2$, both of dimension $1$, such that $T(U_1)=U_2$.




  • A. Determine the possible values of $dim null: T$

  • B. Determine the possible values of $dim ran : T$

  • C. Determine whether $T$ is always injective, always non-injective, or both options can occur.

  • D. Determine whether $T$ is always surjective, always non-surjective, or both options can occur.

  • E. Define $S:U_1rightarrow U_2$ by $Su=Tu$ for all $uin U_1$. Determine whether $S$ is injective, surjective, invertible or not; or if different combinations can occur.


I've tried to get through the questions and my answer are.



A. and B. By the theorem $dim V=dim ran : T + dim null : T$, I should be able to answer both A and B by answering just one of them knowing $dim V_1=3$.
I choose to find $dim ran : T$.
Knowing that there are some subspaces of $V_1$ that are mapped to a subspace of $V_2$ with a dimension $>0$, gives that $dim ran : T>0$.
By the stated theorem, $dim ran : T$ can be either $1,2,3$, thus $dim null : T$ can be $0,1,2$.



C. The linear map is injective iff. $ null : T={0}$, so it can be both.



D. Mapping from a dimension to a higher dimension rejects the possibility of surjectivity. So it is never surjective.



E. I'm really not sure about this answer, but knowing that both subspaces $U_1,U_2$ are of the same dimension, I guess it makes the linear map an operator, which means that it is either surjective and injective thus invertible OR none of the statements. From the assumptions, $Su=Tu$ which implies $T=S$ or that they are isometric atleast? I think this means that $u=u$, thus making it injective, thus surjective and invertible?



I'm really not sure about my answers, and I hope i got some parts of it right. I hoping to get some tips or corrections. Thank you in advance!



Best regards
Jens.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I'm currently studying for my Linear Algebra exams coming up in January, thus going through some previous exam questions and I'm at the following.



    Let $T:V_1rightarrow V_2$ denote a linear transformation between two complex vectorspaces with, $dim V_1=3,: dim V_2=4$. Furthermore there are two subspaces $U_1subseteq V_1$ and $U_2subseteq V_2$, both of dimension $1$, such that $T(U_1)=U_2$.




    • A. Determine the possible values of $dim null: T$

    • B. Determine the possible values of $dim ran : T$

    • C. Determine whether $T$ is always injective, always non-injective, or both options can occur.

    • D. Determine whether $T$ is always surjective, always non-surjective, or both options can occur.

    • E. Define $S:U_1rightarrow U_2$ by $Su=Tu$ for all $uin U_1$. Determine whether $S$ is injective, surjective, invertible or not; or if different combinations can occur.


    I've tried to get through the questions and my answer are.



    A. and B. By the theorem $dim V=dim ran : T + dim null : T$, I should be able to answer both A and B by answering just one of them knowing $dim V_1=3$.
    I choose to find $dim ran : T$.
    Knowing that there are some subspaces of $V_1$ that are mapped to a subspace of $V_2$ with a dimension $>0$, gives that $dim ran : T>0$.
    By the stated theorem, $dim ran : T$ can be either $1,2,3$, thus $dim null : T$ can be $0,1,2$.



    C. The linear map is injective iff. $ null : T={0}$, so it can be both.



    D. Mapping from a dimension to a higher dimension rejects the possibility of surjectivity. So it is never surjective.



    E. I'm really not sure about this answer, but knowing that both subspaces $U_1,U_2$ are of the same dimension, I guess it makes the linear map an operator, which means that it is either surjective and injective thus invertible OR none of the statements. From the assumptions, $Su=Tu$ which implies $T=S$ or that they are isometric atleast? I think this means that $u=u$, thus making it injective, thus surjective and invertible?



    I'm really not sure about my answers, and I hope i got some parts of it right. I hoping to get some tips or corrections. Thank you in advance!



    Best regards
    Jens.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I'm currently studying for my Linear Algebra exams coming up in January, thus going through some previous exam questions and I'm at the following.



      Let $T:V_1rightarrow V_2$ denote a linear transformation between two complex vectorspaces with, $dim V_1=3,: dim V_2=4$. Furthermore there are two subspaces $U_1subseteq V_1$ and $U_2subseteq V_2$, both of dimension $1$, such that $T(U_1)=U_2$.




      • A. Determine the possible values of $dim null: T$

      • B. Determine the possible values of $dim ran : T$

      • C. Determine whether $T$ is always injective, always non-injective, or both options can occur.

      • D. Determine whether $T$ is always surjective, always non-surjective, or both options can occur.

      • E. Define $S:U_1rightarrow U_2$ by $Su=Tu$ for all $uin U_1$. Determine whether $S$ is injective, surjective, invertible or not; or if different combinations can occur.


      I've tried to get through the questions and my answer are.



      A. and B. By the theorem $dim V=dim ran : T + dim null : T$, I should be able to answer both A and B by answering just one of them knowing $dim V_1=3$.
      I choose to find $dim ran : T$.
      Knowing that there are some subspaces of $V_1$ that are mapped to a subspace of $V_2$ with a dimension $>0$, gives that $dim ran : T>0$.
      By the stated theorem, $dim ran : T$ can be either $1,2,3$, thus $dim null : T$ can be $0,1,2$.



      C. The linear map is injective iff. $ null : T={0}$, so it can be both.



      D. Mapping from a dimension to a higher dimension rejects the possibility of surjectivity. So it is never surjective.



      E. I'm really not sure about this answer, but knowing that both subspaces $U_1,U_2$ are of the same dimension, I guess it makes the linear map an operator, which means that it is either surjective and injective thus invertible OR none of the statements. From the assumptions, $Su=Tu$ which implies $T=S$ or that they are isometric atleast? I think this means that $u=u$, thus making it injective, thus surjective and invertible?



      I'm really not sure about my answers, and I hope i got some parts of it right. I hoping to get some tips or corrections. Thank you in advance!



      Best regards
      Jens.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm currently studying for my Linear Algebra exams coming up in January, thus going through some previous exam questions and I'm at the following.



      Let $T:V_1rightarrow V_2$ denote a linear transformation between two complex vectorspaces with, $dim V_1=3,: dim V_2=4$. Furthermore there are two subspaces $U_1subseteq V_1$ and $U_2subseteq V_2$, both of dimension $1$, such that $T(U_1)=U_2$.




      • A. Determine the possible values of $dim null: T$

      • B. Determine the possible values of $dim ran : T$

      • C. Determine whether $T$ is always injective, always non-injective, or both options can occur.

      • D. Determine whether $T$ is always surjective, always non-surjective, or both options can occur.

      • E. Define $S:U_1rightarrow U_2$ by $Su=Tu$ for all $uin U_1$. Determine whether $S$ is injective, surjective, invertible or not; or if different combinations can occur.


      I've tried to get through the questions and my answer are.



      A. and B. By the theorem $dim V=dim ran : T + dim null : T$, I should be able to answer both A and B by answering just one of them knowing $dim V_1=3$.
      I choose to find $dim ran : T$.
      Knowing that there are some subspaces of $V_1$ that are mapped to a subspace of $V_2$ with a dimension $>0$, gives that $dim ran : T>0$.
      By the stated theorem, $dim ran : T$ can be either $1,2,3$, thus $dim null : T$ can be $0,1,2$.



      C. The linear map is injective iff. $ null : T={0}$, so it can be both.



      D. Mapping from a dimension to a higher dimension rejects the possibility of surjectivity. So it is never surjective.



      E. I'm really not sure about this answer, but knowing that both subspaces $U_1,U_2$ are of the same dimension, I guess it makes the linear map an operator, which means that it is either surjective and injective thus invertible OR none of the statements. From the assumptions, $Su=Tu$ which implies $T=S$ or that they are isometric atleast? I think this means that $u=u$, thus making it injective, thus surjective and invertible?



      I'm really not sure about my answers, and I hope i got some parts of it right. I hoping to get some tips or corrections. Thank you in advance!



      Best regards
      Jens.







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 28 '18 at 20:37







      Jens Kramer

















      asked Dec 28 '18 at 20:26









      Jens KramerJens Kramer

      557




      557






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Parts A-D look good, but I think you misunderstood part E.



          Part E is saying "let's take $T$ and restrict its domain to $U_1$." In other words, $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, but is undefined for any $u in V$ outside of $U_1$.



          Now, we are given that $T(U_1)=U_2$, so since $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, this means that $S(U_1)=U_2$, as well. Thus, $S$ is surjective.



          Furthermore, this means $S$ has image $U_2$, which has dimension 1, so the rank of $S$ is also $1$. By rank-nullity theorem:



          $$text{rank } S+text{nullity }S=text{dim }U_1rightarrow 1+text{nullity }S=1rightarrowtext{nullity }S=0$$



          Thus, since $S$ has nullity of $0$, it is also injective.



          In short, $S$ is both surjective, because $S(U_1)=U_2$, and injective, because it has a nullity of $0$. Therefore, it is a bijection and thus invertible.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
            $endgroup$
            – Jens Kramer
            Dec 28 '18 at 20:46













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055259%2flinear-map-over-complex-vector-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Parts A-D look good, but I think you misunderstood part E.



          Part E is saying "let's take $T$ and restrict its domain to $U_1$." In other words, $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, but is undefined for any $u in V$ outside of $U_1$.



          Now, we are given that $T(U_1)=U_2$, so since $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, this means that $S(U_1)=U_2$, as well. Thus, $S$ is surjective.



          Furthermore, this means $S$ has image $U_2$, which has dimension 1, so the rank of $S$ is also $1$. By rank-nullity theorem:



          $$text{rank } S+text{nullity }S=text{dim }U_1rightarrow 1+text{nullity }S=1rightarrowtext{nullity }S=0$$



          Thus, since $S$ has nullity of $0$, it is also injective.



          In short, $S$ is both surjective, because $S(U_1)=U_2$, and injective, because it has a nullity of $0$. Therefore, it is a bijection and thus invertible.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
            $endgroup$
            – Jens Kramer
            Dec 28 '18 at 20:46


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Parts A-D look good, but I think you misunderstood part E.



          Part E is saying "let's take $T$ and restrict its domain to $U_1$." In other words, $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, but is undefined for any $u in V$ outside of $U_1$.



          Now, we are given that $T(U_1)=U_2$, so since $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, this means that $S(U_1)=U_2$, as well. Thus, $S$ is surjective.



          Furthermore, this means $S$ has image $U_2$, which has dimension 1, so the rank of $S$ is also $1$. By rank-nullity theorem:



          $$text{rank } S+text{nullity }S=text{dim }U_1rightarrow 1+text{nullity }S=1rightarrowtext{nullity }S=0$$



          Thus, since $S$ has nullity of $0$, it is also injective.



          In short, $S$ is both surjective, because $S(U_1)=U_2$, and injective, because it has a nullity of $0$. Therefore, it is a bijection and thus invertible.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
            $endgroup$
            – Jens Kramer
            Dec 28 '18 at 20:46
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Parts A-D look good, but I think you misunderstood part E.



          Part E is saying "let's take $T$ and restrict its domain to $U_1$." In other words, $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, but is undefined for any $u in V$ outside of $U_1$.



          Now, we are given that $T(U_1)=U_2$, so since $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, this means that $S(U_1)=U_2$, as well. Thus, $S$ is surjective.



          Furthermore, this means $S$ has image $U_2$, which has dimension 1, so the rank of $S$ is also $1$. By rank-nullity theorem:



          $$text{rank } S+text{nullity }S=text{dim }U_1rightarrow 1+text{nullity }S=1rightarrowtext{nullity }S=0$$



          Thus, since $S$ has nullity of $0$, it is also injective.



          In short, $S$ is both surjective, because $S(U_1)=U_2$, and injective, because it has a nullity of $0$. Therefore, it is a bijection and thus invertible.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Parts A-D look good, but I think you misunderstood part E.



          Part E is saying "let's take $T$ and restrict its domain to $U_1$." In other words, $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, but is undefined for any $u in V$ outside of $U_1$.



          Now, we are given that $T(U_1)=U_2$, so since $S(u)=T(u)$ for all $u in U_1$, this means that $S(U_1)=U_2$, as well. Thus, $S$ is surjective.



          Furthermore, this means $S$ has image $U_2$, which has dimension 1, so the rank of $S$ is also $1$. By rank-nullity theorem:



          $$text{rank } S+text{nullity }S=text{dim }U_1rightarrow 1+text{nullity }S=1rightarrowtext{nullity }S=0$$



          Thus, since $S$ has nullity of $0$, it is also injective.



          In short, $S$ is both surjective, because $S(U_1)=U_2$, and injective, because it has a nullity of $0$. Therefore, it is a bijection and thus invertible.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 28 '18 at 20:43

























          answered Dec 28 '18 at 20:35









          Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

          15.3k1835




          15.3k1835












          • $begingroup$
            This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
            $endgroup$
            – Jens Kramer
            Dec 28 '18 at 20:46




















          • $begingroup$
            This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
            $endgroup$
            – Jens Kramer
            Dec 28 '18 at 20:46


















          $begingroup$
          This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
          $endgroup$
          – Jens Kramer
          Dec 28 '18 at 20:46






          $begingroup$
          This makes a lot of sense, thank you. Happy holidays! :)
          $endgroup$
          – Jens Kramer
          Dec 28 '18 at 20:46




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055259%2flinear-map-over-complex-vector-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ellipse (mathématiques)

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          Mont Emei