Compute the cardinality of a field $K$ and show that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1













Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.



(a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.



(b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.



(c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.




I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:



(a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,



$$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$



I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that



$$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$



I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and



$$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$



Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.



(b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.



(c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.



$textbf{EDIT:}$



Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:



(b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.



(c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.



    (a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.



    (b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.



    (c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.




    I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:



    (a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,



    $$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$



    I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that



    $$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$



    I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and



    $$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$



    Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.



    (b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.



    (c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.



    $textbf{EDIT:}$



    Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:



    (b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.



    (c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.



      (a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.



      (b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.



      (c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.




      I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:



      (a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,



      $$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$



      I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that



      $$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$



      I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and



      $$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$



      Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.



      (b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.



      (c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.



      $textbf{EDIT:}$



      Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:



      (b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.



      (c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.



      (a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.



      (b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.



      (c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.




      I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:



      (a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,



      $$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$



      I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that



      $$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$



      I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and



      $$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$



      Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.



      (b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.



      (c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.



      $textbf{EDIT:}$



      Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:



      (b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.



      (c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.







      abstract-algebra proof-verification splitting-field






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 at 22:09

























      asked Nov 15 at 14:04









      Math enthusiast

      1126




      1126






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
          $$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
          which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.



          For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.



          Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
            – Math enthusiast
            Nov 15 at 22:12






          • 1




            One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
            – Servaes
            Nov 16 at 12:26











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999744%2fcompute-the-cardinality-of-a-field-k-and-show-that-k-contains-a-splitting-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
          $$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
          which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.



          For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.



          Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
            – Math enthusiast
            Nov 15 at 22:12






          • 1




            One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
            – Servaes
            Nov 16 at 12:26















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
          $$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
          which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.



          For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.



          Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
            – Math enthusiast
            Nov 15 at 22:12






          • 1




            One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
            – Servaes
            Nov 16 at 12:26













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
          $$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
          which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.



          For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.



          Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?






          share|cite|improve this answer












          For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
          $$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
          which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.



          For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.



          Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 15 at 14:27









          Servaes

          20.5k33789




          20.5k33789












          • I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
            – Math enthusiast
            Nov 15 at 22:12






          • 1




            One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
            – Servaes
            Nov 16 at 12:26


















          • I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
            – Math enthusiast
            Nov 15 at 22:12






          • 1




            One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
            – Servaes
            Nov 16 at 12:26
















          I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
          – Math enthusiast
          Nov 15 at 22:12




          I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
          – Math enthusiast
          Nov 15 at 22:12




          1




          1




          One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
          – Servaes
          Nov 16 at 12:26




          One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
          – Servaes
          Nov 16 at 12:26


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999744%2fcompute-the-cardinality-of-a-field-k-and-show-that-k-contains-a-splitting-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei