Why $frac{dx}{|x|}$ is a Haar measure on $mathbb{R}setminus{0}$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is in "A course in the abstract harmonic analysis by G.B. Follan on page 45"
Why $frac{dx}{|x|}$ is a Haar measure on multiplicative group $mathbb{R}setminus{0}$
I've started as following
$frac{dax}{|ax|}=frac{adx}{|ax|}$
but I couldn't figure out the result
Any help will be greatly appreciated
measure-theory haar-measure
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is in "A course in the abstract harmonic analysis by G.B. Follan on page 45"
Why $frac{dx}{|x|}$ is a Haar measure on multiplicative group $mathbb{R}setminus{0}$
I've started as following
$frac{dax}{|ax|}=frac{adx}{|ax|}$
but I couldn't figure out the result
Any help will be greatly appreciated
measure-theory haar-measure
be careful, we using a change of variables the multiplicative factor you obtain is not the determinant of the jacobian (in this case $a$) but its absolute value (in this case $|a|$). In others words $d(ax)=|a| dx$.
– Delta-u
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is in "A course in the abstract harmonic analysis by G.B. Follan on page 45"
Why $frac{dx}{|x|}$ is a Haar measure on multiplicative group $mathbb{R}setminus{0}$
I've started as following
$frac{dax}{|ax|}=frac{adx}{|ax|}$
but I couldn't figure out the result
Any help will be greatly appreciated
measure-theory haar-measure
This is in "A course in the abstract harmonic analysis by G.B. Follan on page 45"
Why $frac{dx}{|x|}$ is a Haar measure on multiplicative group $mathbb{R}setminus{0}$
I've started as following
$frac{dax}{|ax|}=frac{adx}{|ax|}$
but I couldn't figure out the result
Any help will be greatly appreciated
measure-theory haar-measure
measure-theory haar-measure
asked 2 days ago
user62498
1,878613
1,878613
be careful, we using a change of variables the multiplicative factor you obtain is not the determinant of the jacobian (in this case $a$) but its absolute value (in this case $|a|$). In others words $d(ax)=|a| dx$.
– Delta-u
2 days ago
add a comment |
be careful, we using a change of variables the multiplicative factor you obtain is not the determinant of the jacobian (in this case $a$) but its absolute value (in this case $|a|$). In others words $d(ax)=|a| dx$.
– Delta-u
2 days ago
be careful, we using a change of variables the multiplicative factor you obtain is not the determinant of the jacobian (in this case $a$) but its absolute value (in this case $|a|$). In others words $d(ax)=|a| dx$.
– Delta-u
2 days ago
be careful, we using a change of variables the multiplicative factor you obtain is not the determinant of the jacobian (in this case $a$) but its absolute value (in this case $|a|$). In others words $d(ax)=|a| dx$.
– Delta-u
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx =int_{E} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ for all Borel sets $E$ in $mathbb Rsetminus {0}$ and all $a neq 0$ (by an obvious change of variable). This is the definition of Haar measure.
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx =int_{E} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ for all Borel sets $E$ in $mathbb Rsetminus {0}$ and all $a neq 0$ (by an obvious change of variable). This is the definition of Haar measure.
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx =int_{E} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ for all Borel sets $E$ in $mathbb Rsetminus {0}$ and all $a neq 0$ (by an obvious change of variable). This is the definition of Haar measure.
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
$int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx =int_{E} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ for all Borel sets $E$ in $mathbb Rsetminus {0}$ and all $a neq 0$ (by an obvious change of variable). This is the definition of Haar measure.
$int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx =int_{E} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ for all Borel sets $E$ in $mathbb Rsetminus {0}$ and all $a neq 0$ (by an obvious change of variable). This is the definition of Haar measure.
answered 2 days ago
Kavi Rama Murthy
39.3k31748
39.3k31748
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
add a comment |
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
@Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I have a problem with $frac{1}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
What exactly is the problem?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
$frac{ads}{|a||x|}=frac{ds}{|x|}$
– user62498
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
You can understand what is happening by taking a special case. Take $E=(1,2)$ and $a=-1$. See what $int_{aE} frac 1 {|x|} , dx$ is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999389%2fwhy-fracdxx-is-a-haar-measure-on-mathbbr-setminus-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
be careful, we using a change of variables the multiplicative factor you obtain is not the determinant of the jacobian (in this case $a$) but its absolute value (in this case $|a|$). In others words $d(ax)=|a| dx$.
– Delta-u
2 days ago