Should I say anything 'bad' about candidate(s) who'll be replacing me?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
38
down vote

favorite
1












I'm currently serving notice period in my current company and will be joining a new company in some time (a little over a month). So naturally my current company is looking for a replacement, and I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets and finalizes a candidate. I have worked for the company for a couple of years now, and don't want my/any projects to fail. I really hope they succeed with as little overhead as possible. Hence, I would really like to get someone settled in my position before leaving.



Recently, I met a candidate who is highly supported by our HR and looked good on paper but didn't answer most of my questions well. Hence, I didn't find the person suitable for the job. Having said that, my last day at work is approaching and we haven't found a replacement for my position yet. So, my question is "Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?"



I have had no issues with any of my colleagues, managers, etc including the said HR and I'd like to keep it that way if possible.



Side notes: As far as I know, my technical round is final, but our director also has exposure to the technical aspects and may ask some questions of his own (which kind of adds to my worry, as if he found I passed an unsuitable candidate, I may lose his trust).



FYI, even though I framed the question like I'm currently in the situation, I was short on time and had to give my answer yesterday evening. I rejected the candidate, citing some of the 'shaky' responses they gave (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset), but I would like to be prepared and act more cautiously in similar situations in the future. I don't know how else I could handle it better.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 14




    Keep in mind that downvotes must reflect the question itself, not OP's actions or beliefs. If you disagree with them, write an answer or take it to chat.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 15:16






  • 15




    @rath Downvotes "must" not reflect anything other than the downvoter's wish to use it.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 15:57






  • 30




    @pipe Please read the hover label over the vote down button: This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful. It doesn't say This question says something I disagree with. The premise of many questions can be seen as problematic, regardless, this is the place they come to get help.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 16:19








  • 5




    @rath That's the recommended way to use downvotes, yes.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 16:23






  • 2




    @WernerCD, I didn't focus on why I didn't find the candidate suitable as I thought it would take the question out of context. But if you need to know, The candidate couldn't elaborate well on most of the projects, s(he) worked on nor the technologies that were used in them (nor could show the working projects themselves cause they were taken down recently). Long story short all his responses were "I didn't study technology but I have used it".
    – Lifelong Scholar
    Nov 17 at 4:09



















up vote
38
down vote

favorite
1












I'm currently serving notice period in my current company and will be joining a new company in some time (a little over a month). So naturally my current company is looking for a replacement, and I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets and finalizes a candidate. I have worked for the company for a couple of years now, and don't want my/any projects to fail. I really hope they succeed with as little overhead as possible. Hence, I would really like to get someone settled in my position before leaving.



Recently, I met a candidate who is highly supported by our HR and looked good on paper but didn't answer most of my questions well. Hence, I didn't find the person suitable for the job. Having said that, my last day at work is approaching and we haven't found a replacement for my position yet. So, my question is "Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?"



I have had no issues with any of my colleagues, managers, etc including the said HR and I'd like to keep it that way if possible.



Side notes: As far as I know, my technical round is final, but our director also has exposure to the technical aspects and may ask some questions of his own (which kind of adds to my worry, as if he found I passed an unsuitable candidate, I may lose his trust).



FYI, even though I framed the question like I'm currently in the situation, I was short on time and had to give my answer yesterday evening. I rejected the candidate, citing some of the 'shaky' responses they gave (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset), but I would like to be prepared and act more cautiously in similar situations in the future. I don't know how else I could handle it better.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 14




    Keep in mind that downvotes must reflect the question itself, not OP's actions or beliefs. If you disagree with them, write an answer or take it to chat.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 15:16






  • 15




    @rath Downvotes "must" not reflect anything other than the downvoter's wish to use it.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 15:57






  • 30




    @pipe Please read the hover label over the vote down button: This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful. It doesn't say This question says something I disagree with. The premise of many questions can be seen as problematic, regardless, this is the place they come to get help.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 16:19








  • 5




    @rath That's the recommended way to use downvotes, yes.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 16:23






  • 2




    @WernerCD, I didn't focus on why I didn't find the candidate suitable as I thought it would take the question out of context. But if you need to know, The candidate couldn't elaborate well on most of the projects, s(he) worked on nor the technologies that were used in them (nor could show the working projects themselves cause they were taken down recently). Long story short all his responses were "I didn't study technology but I have used it".
    – Lifelong Scholar
    Nov 17 at 4:09















up vote
38
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
38
down vote

favorite
1






1





I'm currently serving notice period in my current company and will be joining a new company in some time (a little over a month). So naturally my current company is looking for a replacement, and I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets and finalizes a candidate. I have worked for the company for a couple of years now, and don't want my/any projects to fail. I really hope they succeed with as little overhead as possible. Hence, I would really like to get someone settled in my position before leaving.



Recently, I met a candidate who is highly supported by our HR and looked good on paper but didn't answer most of my questions well. Hence, I didn't find the person suitable for the job. Having said that, my last day at work is approaching and we haven't found a replacement for my position yet. So, my question is "Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?"



I have had no issues with any of my colleagues, managers, etc including the said HR and I'd like to keep it that way if possible.



Side notes: As far as I know, my technical round is final, but our director also has exposure to the technical aspects and may ask some questions of his own (which kind of adds to my worry, as if he found I passed an unsuitable candidate, I may lose his trust).



FYI, even though I framed the question like I'm currently in the situation, I was short on time and had to give my answer yesterday evening. I rejected the candidate, citing some of the 'shaky' responses they gave (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset), but I would like to be prepared and act more cautiously in similar situations in the future. I don't know how else I could handle it better.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm currently serving notice period in my current company and will be joining a new company in some time (a little over a month). So naturally my current company is looking for a replacement, and I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets and finalizes a candidate. I have worked for the company for a couple of years now, and don't want my/any projects to fail. I really hope they succeed with as little overhead as possible. Hence, I would really like to get someone settled in my position before leaving.



Recently, I met a candidate who is highly supported by our HR and looked good on paper but didn't answer most of my questions well. Hence, I didn't find the person suitable for the job. Having said that, my last day at work is approaching and we haven't found a replacement for my position yet. So, my question is "Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?"



I have had no issues with any of my colleagues, managers, etc including the said HR and I'd like to keep it that way if possible.



Side notes: As far as I know, my technical round is final, but our director also has exposure to the technical aspects and may ask some questions of his own (which kind of adds to my worry, as if he found I passed an unsuitable candidate, I may lose his trust).



FYI, even though I framed the question like I'm currently in the situation, I was short on time and had to give my answer yesterday evening. I rejected the candidate, citing some of the 'shaky' responses they gave (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset), but I would like to be prepared and act more cautiously in similar situations in the future. I don't know how else I could handle it better.







professionalism software-industry conflict






share|improve this question









New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 0:38









Sharlike

1174




1174






New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 16 at 9:12









Lifelong Scholar

31529




31529




New contributor




Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 14




    Keep in mind that downvotes must reflect the question itself, not OP's actions or beliefs. If you disagree with them, write an answer or take it to chat.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 15:16






  • 15




    @rath Downvotes "must" not reflect anything other than the downvoter's wish to use it.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 15:57






  • 30




    @pipe Please read the hover label over the vote down button: This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful. It doesn't say This question says something I disagree with. The premise of many questions can be seen as problematic, regardless, this is the place they come to get help.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 16:19








  • 5




    @rath That's the recommended way to use downvotes, yes.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 16:23






  • 2




    @WernerCD, I didn't focus on why I didn't find the candidate suitable as I thought it would take the question out of context. But if you need to know, The candidate couldn't elaborate well on most of the projects, s(he) worked on nor the technologies that were used in them (nor could show the working projects themselves cause they were taken down recently). Long story short all his responses were "I didn't study technology but I have used it".
    – Lifelong Scholar
    Nov 17 at 4:09
















  • 14




    Keep in mind that downvotes must reflect the question itself, not OP's actions or beliefs. If you disagree with them, write an answer or take it to chat.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 15:16






  • 15




    @rath Downvotes "must" not reflect anything other than the downvoter's wish to use it.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 15:57






  • 30




    @pipe Please read the hover label over the vote down button: This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful. It doesn't say This question says something I disagree with. The premise of many questions can be seen as problematic, regardless, this is the place they come to get help.
    – rath
    Nov 16 at 16:19








  • 5




    @rath That's the recommended way to use downvotes, yes.
    – pipe
    Nov 16 at 16:23






  • 2




    @WernerCD, I didn't focus on why I didn't find the candidate suitable as I thought it would take the question out of context. But if you need to know, The candidate couldn't elaborate well on most of the projects, s(he) worked on nor the technologies that were used in them (nor could show the working projects themselves cause they were taken down recently). Long story short all his responses were "I didn't study technology but I have used it".
    – Lifelong Scholar
    Nov 17 at 4:09










14




14




Keep in mind that downvotes must reflect the question itself, not OP's actions or beliefs. If you disagree with them, write an answer or take it to chat.
– rath
Nov 16 at 15:16




Keep in mind that downvotes must reflect the question itself, not OP's actions or beliefs. If you disagree with them, write an answer or take it to chat.
– rath
Nov 16 at 15:16




15




15




@rath Downvotes "must" not reflect anything other than the downvoter's wish to use it.
– pipe
Nov 16 at 15:57




@rath Downvotes "must" not reflect anything other than the downvoter's wish to use it.
– pipe
Nov 16 at 15:57




30




30




@pipe Please read the hover label over the vote down button: This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful. It doesn't say This question says something I disagree with. The premise of many questions can be seen as problematic, regardless, this is the place they come to get help.
– rath
Nov 16 at 16:19






@pipe Please read the hover label over the vote down button: This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful. It doesn't say This question says something I disagree with. The premise of many questions can be seen as problematic, regardless, this is the place they come to get help.
– rath
Nov 16 at 16:19






5




5




@rath That's the recommended way to use downvotes, yes.
– pipe
Nov 16 at 16:23




@rath That's the recommended way to use downvotes, yes.
– pipe
Nov 16 at 16:23




2




2




@WernerCD, I didn't focus on why I didn't find the candidate suitable as I thought it would take the question out of context. But if you need to know, The candidate couldn't elaborate well on most of the projects, s(he) worked on nor the technologies that were used in them (nor could show the working projects themselves cause they were taken down recently). Long story short all his responses were "I didn't study technology but I have used it".
– Lifelong Scholar
Nov 17 at 4:09






@WernerCD, I didn't focus on why I didn't find the candidate suitable as I thought it would take the question out of context. But if you need to know, The candidate couldn't elaborate well on most of the projects, s(he) worked on nor the technologies that were used in them (nor could show the working projects themselves cause they were taken down recently). Long story short all his responses were "I didn't study technology but I have used it".
– Lifelong Scholar
Nov 17 at 4:09












8 Answers
8






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
78
down vote














"I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets
and finalizes a candidate".




You were probably asked to do this because you have the best grasp of what the candidate will be doing and if he is able to perform that.



There are many candidates that look good in HR eyes but are terrible while doing their job.

I would say it's professional to share your concerns with the director so he may be aware and ask similar questions to dispel or confirm doubts.






share|improve this answer



















  • 16




    The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
    – delinear
    Nov 16 at 17:21






  • 33




    If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
    – cdkMoose
    Nov 16 at 17:22










  • I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
    – Lifelong Scholar
    2 days ago










  • As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
    – Lifelong Scholar
    2 days ago


















up vote
41
down vote













No, you did the right thing. The candidate wasn't good enough, so you said so. That's just simple honesty and professionalism, assuming that your judgement isn't being influenced by the fact you're leaving (and it very much sounds like it's not being influenced). You gave management the information they needed to make a decision. They're still at liberty to say "we'll hire this candidate anyway, even though our technical team has reservations about them".



In fact, I'd think worse of a leaving employee who just said "yes, they're great" to everybody they interviewed as their potential replacement because that's the "easy" thing to say.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
    – Logan Bertram
    Nov 16 at 22:01


















up vote
16
down vote













Don't think of it as speaking "badly" about the candidate.



You shouldn't be any more worried about giving negative feedback about a favored candidate as you would be about giving positive feedback about a unfavored candidate. You, HR, and your director are all involved in the hiring process for specific reasons, it's OK if you don't all agree.



The thing you need to worry about is giving accurate feedback. Make sure you understand what kind of feedback you're being asked to provide - in this case, it sounds clear that you're being asked to evaluate technical skills. So, do that.



Honestly, the fact that you're leaving soon, or that you're personally interested in these project succeeding, shouldn't play into it. You're still an employee of this company (for now), you've been given a task, and you can and should do your best to perform it.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
    – CPHPython
    Nov 16 at 15:39










  • I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
    – Lifelong Scholar
    2 days ago










  • If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
    – dwizum
    15 hours ago


















up vote
12
down vote













While you are still working at the company, you should work to the same standard as you would if you weren't currently serving your notice period (though you are only human, and motivation will probably slip towards the end).



Hiring / recruitment is a key part of any job, and arguably the most important thing any company can do. You have been asked to be a part of the recruitment process, so you should do it to the best of your ability.



If you believe that the best thing for the company would be to reject the candidate - then you should recommend that the candidate is rejected. That isn't "speaking bad about your replacement", that is doing your job on behalf of the company. It is the professional and proper thing to do. Conversely, a positive recommendation would be putting the company at risk of a bad hire, which is not a good outcome.



(If it helps you worry less: if the only answer it was acceptable for you to give was "yes", they wouldn't have bothered asking you at all...)






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I agree with other answers that say that you should provide a clear and thruthful feedback.



    Only I suggest that you make sure you and your director and HR all agree on what kind of a person they want to hire. For example, if your director and HR are OK with hiring a capable junior, and you asked some advanced technical questions, then probably it is not correct to outright reject the candidate. In any case, you should clearly state your doubts, but don't say that the candidate is not good for the position until you clearly understand what others expect from that position.



    In fact, I do not know how hiring process is organized in your company, but in some organisations you might have some kind of "veto right" to completely reject a candidate. In situations when you are not leaving, such a right is sensble, as you would work with a successfull candidate, and so you may have all rights to reject a candidate that did not suit your expectations.



    But you are leaving, so the candidate will work with your director, not you. So I think that you should not use such "veto right" in this case. State your doubts clearly, but make it clear that it is director and HR who should make the final decision.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Not telling them truthfully that you wouldn’t hire this candidate, that would be disloyal, damaging, not doing your job.



      How this can be seen wouldn’t matter to me. If they ask for my opinion and then don’t like it, that’s not my problem, that is someone else’s problem. But most likely your HR and hiring manager are reasonable people and will realise that they are getting good advise.






      share|improve this answer





















      • It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
        – Lifelong Scholar
        2 days ago


















      up vote
      0
      down vote














      Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as
      me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?




      It's possible speaking badly will be viewed this way. But you can't worry about that.



      If you are asked to aid in the transition process by helping interview potential replacements, you owe the company your honest feedback.



      Try to make sure you take a step back and pretend that is like any other interview. Since we tend to value ourselves highly, that can color our view of replacements such that nobody could measure up.



      In your feedback, don't speak badly about candidates. Just matter-of-factly mention the positives, mention the negatives, and if asked give your overall conclusion. In my opinion, you should not be asked to "accept" or "reject" the candidate - that is for others to do.



      Sticking to the facts should help minimize any potential negative views of you.






      share|improve this answer




























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        I have had candidates I recommended against hiring who ended up doing a great job, candidates I wanted to hire end up getting rejected, and candidates I recommended hiring who I ended up not enjoying working with. Your perspective is valuable, but it's difficult to judge a person from a single interview, which is why companies have multiple interviewers.



        So give your honest opinion, but keep in mind other interviewers have a different perspective, and it won't be just your fault if the candidate isn't ultimately accepted. Also keep in mind your perspective is a little skewed right now because no one you hire will be able to do your job exactly as you did. The other interviewers know this and will take it into account.






        share|improve this answer





















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "423"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: false,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122891%2fshould-i-say-anything-bad-about-candidates-wholl-be-replacing-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown




















          StackExchange.ready(function () {
          $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
          var showEditor = function() {
          $("#show-editor-button").hide();
          $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
          StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
          };

          var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
          if(useFancy == 'True') {
          var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
          var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
          var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

          $(this).loadPopup({
          url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
          loaded: function(popup) {
          var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
          var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
          var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

          pTitle.text(popupTitle);
          pBody.html(popupBody);
          pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
          }
          })
          } else{
          var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
          if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
          showEditor();
          }
          }
          });
          });






          8 Answers
          8






          active

          oldest

          votes








          8 Answers
          8






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          78
          down vote














          "I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets
          and finalizes a candidate".




          You were probably asked to do this because you have the best grasp of what the candidate will be doing and if he is able to perform that.



          There are many candidates that look good in HR eyes but are terrible while doing their job.

          I would say it's professional to share your concerns with the director so he may be aware and ask similar questions to dispel or confirm doubts.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 16




            The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
            – delinear
            Nov 16 at 17:21






          • 33




            If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
            – cdkMoose
            Nov 16 at 17:22










          • I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago















          up vote
          78
          down vote














          "I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets
          and finalizes a candidate".




          You were probably asked to do this because you have the best grasp of what the candidate will be doing and if he is able to perform that.



          There are many candidates that look good in HR eyes but are terrible while doing their job.

          I would say it's professional to share your concerns with the director so he may be aware and ask similar questions to dispel or confirm doubts.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 16




            The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
            – delinear
            Nov 16 at 17:21






          • 33




            If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
            – cdkMoose
            Nov 16 at 17:22










          • I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago













          up vote
          78
          down vote










          up vote
          78
          down vote










          "I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets
          and finalizes a candidate".




          You were probably asked to do this because you have the best grasp of what the candidate will be doing and if he is able to perform that.



          There are many candidates that look good in HR eyes but are terrible while doing their job.

          I would say it's professional to share your concerns with the director so he may be aware and ask similar questions to dispel or confirm doubts.






          share|improve this answer















          "I was asked to conduct a technical round before our director meets
          and finalizes a candidate".




          You were probably asked to do this because you have the best grasp of what the candidate will be doing and if he is able to perform that.



          There are many candidates that look good in HR eyes but are terrible while doing their job.

          I would say it's professional to share your concerns with the director so he may be aware and ask similar questions to dispel or confirm doubts.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 16 at 9:51









          Magellan

          32




          32










          answered Nov 16 at 9:28









          SZCZERZO KŁY

          2,003213




          2,003213








          • 16




            The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
            – delinear
            Nov 16 at 17:21






          • 33




            If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
            – cdkMoose
            Nov 16 at 17:22










          • I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago














          • 16




            The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
            – delinear
            Nov 16 at 17:21






          • 33




            If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
            – cdkMoose
            Nov 16 at 17:22










          • I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago








          16




          16




          The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
          – delinear
          Nov 16 at 17:21




          The key is to keep it as objective as possible. If there are weak areas, definitely highlight them, but similarly if they have any strengths or areas where you feel they have potential, absolutely add those too. You don't want it to appear that you're being deliberately unhelpful or trying to shoot down your replacement, but they asked for your opinion for a reason and they ignore your expertise at their own risk.
          – delinear
          Nov 16 at 17:21




          33




          33




          If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
          – cdkMoose
          Nov 16 at 17:22




          If OP was asked to do this when they were in their notice period, then someone respects/values OPs opinion on the issue and they deserve OPs best efforts
          – cdkMoose
          Nov 16 at 17:22












          I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
          – Lifelong Scholar
          2 days ago




          I know but the said HR is a friend to the director (they were colleagues even before this company was started), so he kind of has the director's ear. As for me and the director, he knows me professionally, he has seen and praised my works on multiple occasions and I believe we have mutual respect for each other. I was thinking if the same happened again and 'the company' starts seeing a pattern when there isn't, what should I do? But I think @delinear's advice to add positives will help.
          – Lifelong Scholar
          2 days ago












          As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
          – Lifelong Scholar
          2 days ago




          As this seems to be most favored answer, I'll accept it in a week so that there's ample time for others to register their answers.
          – Lifelong Scholar
          2 days ago












          up vote
          41
          down vote













          No, you did the right thing. The candidate wasn't good enough, so you said so. That's just simple honesty and professionalism, assuming that your judgement isn't being influenced by the fact you're leaving (and it very much sounds like it's not being influenced). You gave management the information they needed to make a decision. They're still at liberty to say "we'll hire this candidate anyway, even though our technical team has reservations about them".



          In fact, I'd think worse of a leaving employee who just said "yes, they're great" to everybody they interviewed as their potential replacement because that's the "easy" thing to say.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 4




            To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
            – Logan Bertram
            Nov 16 at 22:01















          up vote
          41
          down vote













          No, you did the right thing. The candidate wasn't good enough, so you said so. That's just simple honesty and professionalism, assuming that your judgement isn't being influenced by the fact you're leaving (and it very much sounds like it's not being influenced). You gave management the information they needed to make a decision. They're still at liberty to say "we'll hire this candidate anyway, even though our technical team has reservations about them".



          In fact, I'd think worse of a leaving employee who just said "yes, they're great" to everybody they interviewed as their potential replacement because that's the "easy" thing to say.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 4




            To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
            – Logan Bertram
            Nov 16 at 22:01













          up vote
          41
          down vote










          up vote
          41
          down vote









          No, you did the right thing. The candidate wasn't good enough, so you said so. That's just simple honesty and professionalism, assuming that your judgement isn't being influenced by the fact you're leaving (and it very much sounds like it's not being influenced). You gave management the information they needed to make a decision. They're still at liberty to say "we'll hire this candidate anyway, even though our technical team has reservations about them".



          In fact, I'd think worse of a leaving employee who just said "yes, they're great" to everybody they interviewed as their potential replacement because that's the "easy" thing to say.






          share|improve this answer












          No, you did the right thing. The candidate wasn't good enough, so you said so. That's just simple honesty and professionalism, assuming that your judgement isn't being influenced by the fact you're leaving (and it very much sounds like it's not being influenced). You gave management the information they needed to make a decision. They're still at liberty to say "we'll hire this candidate anyway, even though our technical team has reservations about them".



          In fact, I'd think worse of a leaving employee who just said "yes, they're great" to everybody they interviewed as their potential replacement because that's the "easy" thing to say.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 16 at 9:27









          Philip Kendall

          47.6k32118150




          47.6k32118150








          • 4




            To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
            – Logan Bertram
            Nov 16 at 22:01














          • 4




            To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
            – Logan Bertram
            Nov 16 at 22:01








          4




          4




          To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
          – Logan Bertram
          Nov 16 at 22:01




          To add to this as someone who has been on both ends of the technical interview process: Saying, "yes, they're great!" when the candidate is not capable of doing the job will reflect poorly on the interviewer in the future. It may signal that the interviewer is not a competent judge of skill and not a suitable team leader, and if they need to work with anyone from the company they're leaving in the future, that reputation may do a disservice.
          – Logan Bertram
          Nov 16 at 22:01










          up vote
          16
          down vote













          Don't think of it as speaking "badly" about the candidate.



          You shouldn't be any more worried about giving negative feedback about a favored candidate as you would be about giving positive feedback about a unfavored candidate. You, HR, and your director are all involved in the hiring process for specific reasons, it's OK if you don't all agree.



          The thing you need to worry about is giving accurate feedback. Make sure you understand what kind of feedback you're being asked to provide - in this case, it sounds clear that you're being asked to evaluate technical skills. So, do that.



          Honestly, the fact that you're leaving soon, or that you're personally interested in these project succeeding, shouldn't play into it. You're still an employee of this company (for now), you've been given a task, and you can and should do your best to perform it.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
            – CPHPython
            Nov 16 at 15:39










          • I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
            – dwizum
            15 hours ago















          up vote
          16
          down vote













          Don't think of it as speaking "badly" about the candidate.



          You shouldn't be any more worried about giving negative feedback about a favored candidate as you would be about giving positive feedback about a unfavored candidate. You, HR, and your director are all involved in the hiring process for specific reasons, it's OK if you don't all agree.



          The thing you need to worry about is giving accurate feedback. Make sure you understand what kind of feedback you're being asked to provide - in this case, it sounds clear that you're being asked to evaluate technical skills. So, do that.



          Honestly, the fact that you're leaving soon, or that you're personally interested in these project succeeding, shouldn't play into it. You're still an employee of this company (for now), you've been given a task, and you can and should do your best to perform it.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
            – CPHPython
            Nov 16 at 15:39










          • I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
            – dwizum
            15 hours ago













          up vote
          16
          down vote










          up vote
          16
          down vote









          Don't think of it as speaking "badly" about the candidate.



          You shouldn't be any more worried about giving negative feedback about a favored candidate as you would be about giving positive feedback about a unfavored candidate. You, HR, and your director are all involved in the hiring process for specific reasons, it's OK if you don't all agree.



          The thing you need to worry about is giving accurate feedback. Make sure you understand what kind of feedback you're being asked to provide - in this case, it sounds clear that you're being asked to evaluate technical skills. So, do that.



          Honestly, the fact that you're leaving soon, or that you're personally interested in these project succeeding, shouldn't play into it. You're still an employee of this company (for now), you've been given a task, and you can and should do your best to perform it.






          share|improve this answer












          Don't think of it as speaking "badly" about the candidate.



          You shouldn't be any more worried about giving negative feedback about a favored candidate as you would be about giving positive feedback about a unfavored candidate. You, HR, and your director are all involved in the hiring process for specific reasons, it's OK if you don't all agree.



          The thing you need to worry about is giving accurate feedback. Make sure you understand what kind of feedback you're being asked to provide - in this case, it sounds clear that you're being asked to evaluate technical skills. So, do that.



          Honestly, the fact that you're leaving soon, or that you're personally interested in these project succeeding, shouldn't play into it. You're still an employee of this company (for now), you've been given a task, and you can and should do your best to perform it.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 16 at 14:01









          dwizum

          8,16821938




          8,16821938








          • 1




            OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
            – CPHPython
            Nov 16 at 15:39










          • I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
            – dwizum
            15 hours ago














          • 1




            OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
            – CPHPython
            Nov 16 at 15:39










          • I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
            – Lifelong Scholar
            2 days ago










          • If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
            – dwizum
            15 hours ago








          1




          1




          OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
          – CPHPython
          Nov 16 at 15:39




          OP's edit: "I rejected the candidate citing some of the 'shaky' responses from the candidate (which clearly didn't convince our HR who seems upset)", so it seems it was exactly this accurate feedback that was needed and that the OP did not have time to prepare in advance. Lesson learned.
          – CPHPython
          Nov 16 at 15:39












          I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
          – Lifelong Scholar
          2 days ago




          I have rejected and accepted candidates for the same but they went smoothly, I never got the kind of push back that I did this time, so I got to thinking of how it's perceived by the company when I reject someone who seems valuable (at least to HR, who frankly speaking has more sway than me over the company matters).
          – Lifelong Scholar
          2 days ago












          If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
          – dwizum
          15 hours ago




          If you are ever in a situation where giving honest responses about a candidate for the factors you were asked to evaluate leads to a serious and impactful conflict between you and some other party (such as HR), you have to ask yourself: Is this an employer that's worth working for?
          – dwizum
          15 hours ago










          up vote
          12
          down vote













          While you are still working at the company, you should work to the same standard as you would if you weren't currently serving your notice period (though you are only human, and motivation will probably slip towards the end).



          Hiring / recruitment is a key part of any job, and arguably the most important thing any company can do. You have been asked to be a part of the recruitment process, so you should do it to the best of your ability.



          If you believe that the best thing for the company would be to reject the candidate - then you should recommend that the candidate is rejected. That isn't "speaking bad about your replacement", that is doing your job on behalf of the company. It is the professional and proper thing to do. Conversely, a positive recommendation would be putting the company at risk of a bad hire, which is not a good outcome.



          (If it helps you worry less: if the only answer it was acceptable for you to give was "yes", they wouldn't have bothered asking you at all...)






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            12
            down vote













            While you are still working at the company, you should work to the same standard as you would if you weren't currently serving your notice period (though you are only human, and motivation will probably slip towards the end).



            Hiring / recruitment is a key part of any job, and arguably the most important thing any company can do. You have been asked to be a part of the recruitment process, so you should do it to the best of your ability.



            If you believe that the best thing for the company would be to reject the candidate - then you should recommend that the candidate is rejected. That isn't "speaking bad about your replacement", that is doing your job on behalf of the company. It is the professional and proper thing to do. Conversely, a positive recommendation would be putting the company at risk of a bad hire, which is not a good outcome.



            (If it helps you worry less: if the only answer it was acceptable for you to give was "yes", they wouldn't have bothered asking you at all...)






            share|improve this answer























              up vote
              12
              down vote










              up vote
              12
              down vote









              While you are still working at the company, you should work to the same standard as you would if you weren't currently serving your notice period (though you are only human, and motivation will probably slip towards the end).



              Hiring / recruitment is a key part of any job, and arguably the most important thing any company can do. You have been asked to be a part of the recruitment process, so you should do it to the best of your ability.



              If you believe that the best thing for the company would be to reject the candidate - then you should recommend that the candidate is rejected. That isn't "speaking bad about your replacement", that is doing your job on behalf of the company. It is the professional and proper thing to do. Conversely, a positive recommendation would be putting the company at risk of a bad hire, which is not a good outcome.



              (If it helps you worry less: if the only answer it was acceptable for you to give was "yes", they wouldn't have bothered asking you at all...)






              share|improve this answer












              While you are still working at the company, you should work to the same standard as you would if you weren't currently serving your notice period (though you are only human, and motivation will probably slip towards the end).



              Hiring / recruitment is a key part of any job, and arguably the most important thing any company can do. You have been asked to be a part of the recruitment process, so you should do it to the best of your ability.



              If you believe that the best thing for the company would be to reject the candidate - then you should recommend that the candidate is rejected. That isn't "speaking bad about your replacement", that is doing your job on behalf of the company. It is the professional and proper thing to do. Conversely, a positive recommendation would be putting the company at risk of a bad hire, which is not a good outcome.



              (If it helps you worry less: if the only answer it was acceptable for you to give was "yes", they wouldn't have bothered asking you at all...)







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 16 at 16:53









              BittermanAndy

              1,562111




              1,562111






















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  I agree with other answers that say that you should provide a clear and thruthful feedback.



                  Only I suggest that you make sure you and your director and HR all agree on what kind of a person they want to hire. For example, if your director and HR are OK with hiring a capable junior, and you asked some advanced technical questions, then probably it is not correct to outright reject the candidate. In any case, you should clearly state your doubts, but don't say that the candidate is not good for the position until you clearly understand what others expect from that position.



                  In fact, I do not know how hiring process is organized in your company, but in some organisations you might have some kind of "veto right" to completely reject a candidate. In situations when you are not leaving, such a right is sensble, as you would work with a successfull candidate, and so you may have all rights to reject a candidate that did not suit your expectations.



                  But you are leaving, so the candidate will work with your director, not you. So I think that you should not use such "veto right" in this case. State your doubts clearly, but make it clear that it is director and HR who should make the final decision.






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote













                    I agree with other answers that say that you should provide a clear and thruthful feedback.



                    Only I suggest that you make sure you and your director and HR all agree on what kind of a person they want to hire. For example, if your director and HR are OK with hiring a capable junior, and you asked some advanced technical questions, then probably it is not correct to outright reject the candidate. In any case, you should clearly state your doubts, but don't say that the candidate is not good for the position until you clearly understand what others expect from that position.



                    In fact, I do not know how hiring process is organized in your company, but in some organisations you might have some kind of "veto right" to completely reject a candidate. In situations when you are not leaving, such a right is sensble, as you would work with a successfull candidate, and so you may have all rights to reject a candidate that did not suit your expectations.



                    But you are leaving, so the candidate will work with your director, not you. So I think that you should not use such "veto right" in this case. State your doubts clearly, but make it clear that it is director and HR who should make the final decision.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote









                      I agree with other answers that say that you should provide a clear and thruthful feedback.



                      Only I suggest that you make sure you and your director and HR all agree on what kind of a person they want to hire. For example, if your director and HR are OK with hiring a capable junior, and you asked some advanced technical questions, then probably it is not correct to outright reject the candidate. In any case, you should clearly state your doubts, but don't say that the candidate is not good for the position until you clearly understand what others expect from that position.



                      In fact, I do not know how hiring process is organized in your company, but in some organisations you might have some kind of "veto right" to completely reject a candidate. In situations when you are not leaving, such a right is sensble, as you would work with a successfull candidate, and so you may have all rights to reject a candidate that did not suit your expectations.



                      But you are leaving, so the candidate will work with your director, not you. So I think that you should not use such "veto right" in this case. State your doubts clearly, but make it clear that it is director and HR who should make the final decision.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      I agree with other answers that say that you should provide a clear and thruthful feedback.



                      Only I suggest that you make sure you and your director and HR all agree on what kind of a person they want to hire. For example, if your director and HR are OK with hiring a capable junior, and you asked some advanced technical questions, then probably it is not correct to outright reject the candidate. In any case, you should clearly state your doubts, but don't say that the candidate is not good for the position until you clearly understand what others expect from that position.



                      In fact, I do not know how hiring process is organized in your company, but in some organisations you might have some kind of "veto right" to completely reject a candidate. In situations when you are not leaving, such a right is sensble, as you would work with a successfull candidate, and so you may have all rights to reject a candidate that did not suit your expectations.



                      But you are leaving, so the candidate will work with your director, not you. So I think that you should not use such "veto right" in this case. State your doubts clearly, but make it clear that it is director and HR who should make the final decision.







                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited yesterday





















                      New contributor




                      Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered Nov 16 at 16:50









                      Petr

                      1314




                      1314




                      New contributor




                      Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      Petr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Not telling them truthfully that you wouldn’t hire this candidate, that would be disloyal, damaging, not doing your job.



                          How this can be seen wouldn’t matter to me. If they ask for my opinion and then don’t like it, that’s not my problem, that is someone else’s problem. But most likely your HR and hiring manager are reasonable people and will realise that they are getting good advise.






                          share|improve this answer





















                          • It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
                            – Lifelong Scholar
                            2 days ago















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Not telling them truthfully that you wouldn’t hire this candidate, that would be disloyal, damaging, not doing your job.



                          How this can be seen wouldn’t matter to me. If they ask for my opinion and then don’t like it, that’s not my problem, that is someone else’s problem. But most likely your HR and hiring manager are reasonable people and will realise that they are getting good advise.






                          share|improve this answer





















                          • It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
                            – Lifelong Scholar
                            2 days ago













                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          Not telling them truthfully that you wouldn’t hire this candidate, that would be disloyal, damaging, not doing your job.



                          How this can be seen wouldn’t matter to me. If they ask for my opinion and then don’t like it, that’s not my problem, that is someone else’s problem. But most likely your HR and hiring manager are reasonable people and will realise that they are getting good advise.






                          share|improve this answer












                          Not telling them truthfully that you wouldn’t hire this candidate, that would be disloyal, damaging, not doing your job.



                          How this can be seen wouldn’t matter to me. If they ask for my opinion and then don’t like it, that’s not my problem, that is someone else’s problem. But most likely your HR and hiring manager are reasonable people and will realise that they are getting good advise.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 16 at 9:55









                          gnasher729

                          79.1k34143249




                          79.1k34143249












                          • It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
                            – Lifelong Scholar
                            2 days ago


















                          • It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
                            – Lifelong Scholar
                            2 days ago
















                          It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
                          – Lifelong Scholar
                          2 days ago




                          It matters to me, this was my first job out of college and I worked here for a couple of years already, I have built a good relation with all my colleagues and I'd like to maintain it. I also wanted to handle it as professionally as possible.
                          – Lifelong Scholar
                          2 days ago










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote














                          Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as
                          me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?




                          It's possible speaking badly will be viewed this way. But you can't worry about that.



                          If you are asked to aid in the transition process by helping interview potential replacements, you owe the company your honest feedback.



                          Try to make sure you take a step back and pretend that is like any other interview. Since we tend to value ourselves highly, that can color our view of replacements such that nobody could measure up.



                          In your feedback, don't speak badly about candidates. Just matter-of-factly mention the positives, mention the negatives, and if asked give your overall conclusion. In my opinion, you should not be asked to "accept" or "reject" the candidate - that is for others to do.



                          Sticking to the facts should help minimize any potential negative views of you.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote














                            Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as
                            me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?




                            It's possible speaking badly will be viewed this way. But you can't worry about that.



                            If you are asked to aid in the transition process by helping interview potential replacements, you owe the company your honest feedback.



                            Try to make sure you take a step back and pretend that is like any other interview. Since we tend to value ourselves highly, that can color our view of replacements such that nobody could measure up.



                            In your feedback, don't speak badly about candidates. Just matter-of-factly mention the positives, mention the negatives, and if asked give your overall conclusion. In my opinion, you should not be asked to "accept" or "reject" the candidate - that is for others to do.



                            Sticking to the facts should help minimize any potential negative views of you.






                            share|improve this answer























                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as
                              me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?




                              It's possible speaking badly will be viewed this way. But you can't worry about that.



                              If you are asked to aid in the transition process by helping interview potential replacements, you owe the company your honest feedback.



                              Try to make sure you take a step back and pretend that is like any other interview. Since we tend to value ourselves highly, that can color our view of replacements such that nobody could measure up.



                              In your feedback, don't speak badly about candidates. Just matter-of-factly mention the positives, mention the negatives, and if asked give your overall conclusion. In my opinion, you should not be asked to "accept" or "reject" the candidate - that is for others to do.



                              Sticking to the facts should help minimize any potential negative views of you.






                              share|improve this answer













                              Will me speaking badly about a 'highly desired' candidate be viewed as
                              me being disloyal, damaging, etc in any way to the company?




                              It's possible speaking badly will be viewed this way. But you can't worry about that.



                              If you are asked to aid in the transition process by helping interview potential replacements, you owe the company your honest feedback.



                              Try to make sure you take a step back and pretend that is like any other interview. Since we tend to value ourselves highly, that can color our view of replacements such that nobody could measure up.



                              In your feedback, don't speak badly about candidates. Just matter-of-factly mention the positives, mention the negatives, and if asked give your overall conclusion. In my opinion, you should not be asked to "accept" or "reject" the candidate - that is for others to do.



                              Sticking to the facts should help minimize any potential negative views of you.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 2 days ago









                              Joe Strazzere

                              237k115693987




                              237k115693987






















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  I have had candidates I recommended against hiring who ended up doing a great job, candidates I wanted to hire end up getting rejected, and candidates I recommended hiring who I ended up not enjoying working with. Your perspective is valuable, but it's difficult to judge a person from a single interview, which is why companies have multiple interviewers.



                                  So give your honest opinion, but keep in mind other interviewers have a different perspective, and it won't be just your fault if the candidate isn't ultimately accepted. Also keep in mind your perspective is a little skewed right now because no one you hire will be able to do your job exactly as you did. The other interviewers know this and will take it into account.






                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    I have had candidates I recommended against hiring who ended up doing a great job, candidates I wanted to hire end up getting rejected, and candidates I recommended hiring who I ended up not enjoying working with. Your perspective is valuable, but it's difficult to judge a person from a single interview, which is why companies have multiple interviewers.



                                    So give your honest opinion, but keep in mind other interviewers have a different perspective, and it won't be just your fault if the candidate isn't ultimately accepted. Also keep in mind your perspective is a little skewed right now because no one you hire will be able to do your job exactly as you did. The other interviewers know this and will take it into account.






                                    share|improve this answer























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      I have had candidates I recommended against hiring who ended up doing a great job, candidates I wanted to hire end up getting rejected, and candidates I recommended hiring who I ended up not enjoying working with. Your perspective is valuable, but it's difficult to judge a person from a single interview, which is why companies have multiple interviewers.



                                      So give your honest opinion, but keep in mind other interviewers have a different perspective, and it won't be just your fault if the candidate isn't ultimately accepted. Also keep in mind your perspective is a little skewed right now because no one you hire will be able to do your job exactly as you did. The other interviewers know this and will take it into account.






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      I have had candidates I recommended against hiring who ended up doing a great job, candidates I wanted to hire end up getting rejected, and candidates I recommended hiring who I ended up not enjoying working with. Your perspective is valuable, but it's difficult to judge a person from a single interview, which is why companies have multiple interviewers.



                                      So give your honest opinion, but keep in mind other interviewers have a different perspective, and it won't be just your fault if the candidate isn't ultimately accepted. Also keep in mind your perspective is a little skewed right now because no one you hire will be able to do your job exactly as you did. The other interviewers know this and will take it into account.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 2 days ago









                                      Karl Bielefeldt

                                      10.6k31830




                                      10.6k31830






















                                          Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded


















                                          Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          Lifelong Scholar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122891%2fshould-i-say-anything-bad-about-candidates-wholl-be-replacing-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown











                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Ellipse (mathématiques)

                                          Quarter-circle Tiles

                                          Mont Emei