Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4
module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10
and Vlan11
:
Router#show ip interface brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up
I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?
If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10
to GigabitEthernet0/1/0
, the Vlan11
to GigabitEthernet0/1/1
, all are access
mode.
but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2
to ping 10.10.20.1
:
Router>ping 10.10.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:
Router#show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11
So my questions are:
- Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?
- Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?
cisco routing router vlan
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4
module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10
and Vlan11
:
Router#show ip interface brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up
I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?
If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10
to GigabitEthernet0/1/0
, the Vlan11
to GigabitEthernet0/1/1
, all are access
mode.
but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2
to ping 10.10.20.1
:
Router>ping 10.10.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:
Router#show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11
So my questions are:
- Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?
- Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?
cisco routing router vlan
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4
module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10
and Vlan11
:
Router#show ip interface brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up
I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?
If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10
to GigabitEthernet0/1/0
, the Vlan11
to GigabitEthernet0/1/1
, all are access
mode.
but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2
to ping 10.10.20.1
:
Router>ping 10.10.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:
Router#show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11
So my questions are:
- Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?
- Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?
cisco routing router vlan
I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4
module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10
and Vlan11
:
Router#show ip interface brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up
I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?
If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10
to GigabitEthernet0/1/0
, the Vlan11
to GigabitEthernet0/1/1
, all are access
mode.
but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2
to ping 10.10.20.1
:
Router>ping 10.10.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:
Router#show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11
So my questions are:
- Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?
- Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?
cisco routing router vlan
cisco routing router vlan
edited Nov 16 at 7:59
Cown
5,2153930
5,2153930
asked Nov 16 at 7:35
three-blocks
1706
1706
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
- Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.
- Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
Add route to Router10 configuration:
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
1
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
- Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.
- Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
Add route to Router10 configuration:
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
1
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
- Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.
- Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
Add route to Router10 configuration:
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
1
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
- Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.
- Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
Add route to Router10 configuration:
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1
- Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.
- Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
Add route to Router10 configuration:
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1
answered Nov 16 at 7:45
Andrey Prokhorov
1,500314
1,500314
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
1
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
add a comment |
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
1
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 7:57
1
1
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
@three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4
#(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
– Andrey Prokhorov
Nov 16 at 7:59
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
– three-blocks
Nov 16 at 8:01
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54767%2fwhether-the-vlan10-and-vlan20-in-the-center-router-are-two-virtual-router-interf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown