trace and operator norm of $exp^A$
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
If $A$ is an n by n complex matrix,
1.How to compute $tr(exp^A)$ .Can we use the Taylor expansion as following:
$exp^A=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{A^k}{k!},$then $tr(exp^A)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}tr(frac{A^k}{k!})$.
2.How to compute the operator norm of $exp^A$?
linear-algebra complex-analysis operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
If $A$ is an n by n complex matrix,
1.How to compute $tr(exp^A)$ .Can we use the Taylor expansion as following:
$exp^A=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{A^k}{k!},$then $tr(exp^A)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}tr(frac{A^k}{k!})$.
2.How to compute the operator norm of $exp^A$?
linear-algebra complex-analysis operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
If $A$ is an n by n complex matrix,
1.How to compute $tr(exp^A)$ .Can we use the Taylor expansion as following:
$exp^A=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{A^k}{k!},$then $tr(exp^A)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}tr(frac{A^k}{k!})$.
2.How to compute the operator norm of $exp^A$?
linear-algebra complex-analysis operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
If $A$ is an n by n complex matrix,
1.How to compute $tr(exp^A)$ .Can we use the Taylor expansion as following:
$exp^A=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{A^k}{k!},$then $tr(exp^A)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}tr(frac{A^k}{k!})$.
2.How to compute the operator norm of $exp^A$?
linear-algebra complex-analysis operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras
linear-algebra complex-analysis operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
asked Nov 17 at 17:26
mathrookie
711512
711512
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The trace of an finite-dimensional operator is defined the sum of its diagonal elements, which in turn equals the sum of its eigenvalues. So let ${lambda_j in mathbb{C} | jin{1,ldots,n}}$ the set of eigenvalues of $A$ then we have
$$mathrm{tr}{A}=sum_{j=1}^n A_{jj} = sum_{j=1}^n lambda_{j}$$. Because the trace is invariant w.r.t. similarity transforms of $A$, we have $$mathrm{tr}{(exp{A})} = sum_{j=1}^n exp{lambda_{j}} .$$
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The trace of an finite-dimensional operator is defined the sum of its diagonal elements, which in turn equals the sum of its eigenvalues. So let ${lambda_j in mathbb{C} | jin{1,ldots,n}}$ the set of eigenvalues of $A$ then we have
$$mathrm{tr}{A}=sum_{j=1}^n A_{jj} = sum_{j=1}^n lambda_{j}$$. Because the trace is invariant w.r.t. similarity transforms of $A$, we have $$mathrm{tr}{(exp{A})} = sum_{j=1}^n exp{lambda_{j}} .$$
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The trace of an finite-dimensional operator is defined the sum of its diagonal elements, which in turn equals the sum of its eigenvalues. So let ${lambda_j in mathbb{C} | jin{1,ldots,n}}$ the set of eigenvalues of $A$ then we have
$$mathrm{tr}{A}=sum_{j=1}^n A_{jj} = sum_{j=1}^n lambda_{j}$$. Because the trace is invariant w.r.t. similarity transforms of $A$, we have $$mathrm{tr}{(exp{A})} = sum_{j=1}^n exp{lambda_{j}} .$$
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The trace of an finite-dimensional operator is defined the sum of its diagonal elements, which in turn equals the sum of its eigenvalues. So let ${lambda_j in mathbb{C} | jin{1,ldots,n}}$ the set of eigenvalues of $A$ then we have
$$mathrm{tr}{A}=sum_{j=1}^n A_{jj} = sum_{j=1}^n lambda_{j}$$. Because the trace is invariant w.r.t. similarity transforms of $A$, we have $$mathrm{tr}{(exp{A})} = sum_{j=1}^n exp{lambda_{j}} .$$
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
The trace of an finite-dimensional operator is defined the sum of its diagonal elements, which in turn equals the sum of its eigenvalues. So let ${lambda_j in mathbb{C} | jin{1,ldots,n}}$ the set of eigenvalues of $A$ then we have
$$mathrm{tr}{A}=sum_{j=1}^n A_{jj} = sum_{j=1}^n lambda_{j}$$. Because the trace is invariant w.r.t. similarity transforms of $A$, we have $$mathrm{tr}{(exp{A})} = sum_{j=1}^n exp{lambda_{j}} .$$
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
answered Nov 17 at 17:52
M1183
943
943
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002601%2ftrace-and-operator-norm-of-expa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
