Finding determinant of $3times3$ matrix












3












$begingroup$


$$A = left(begin{matrix}
lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
-3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
end{matrix}right)$$



$$det A = begin{vmatrix}Aend{vmatrix} =
(lambda - 1) begin{vmatrix}
lambda - 3 & 1 \
1 & lambda + 1 \
end{vmatrix} + 1begin{vmatrix}
1 & 1 \
-3 & lambda + 1 \
end{vmatrix} -
1begin{vmatrix}
1 & lambda - 3 \
-3 & 1 \
end{vmatrix}\
= ((lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)) - (1 + (lambda + 1) + 3) + (1 +3lambda - 9) \
= (lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1) + (lambda + 1) + 2(lambda - 3)$$



The solution says that it is $(lambda - 2)(lambda + 2)(lambda - 3)$. I feel like I am so close, but I don't get what I am supposed to do to get to the solution.






linear-algebra determinant







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    $$A = left(begin{matrix}
    lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
    1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
    -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
    end{matrix}right)$$



    $$det A = begin{vmatrix}Aend{vmatrix} =
    (lambda - 1) begin{vmatrix}
    lambda - 3 & 1 \
    1 & lambda + 1 \
    end{vmatrix} + 1begin{vmatrix}
    1 & 1 \
    -3 & lambda + 1 \
    end{vmatrix} -
    1begin{vmatrix}
    1 & lambda - 3 \
    -3 & 1 \
    end{vmatrix}\
    = ((lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)) - (1 + (lambda + 1) + 3) + (1 +3lambda - 9) \
    = (lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1) + (lambda + 1) + 2(lambda - 3)$$



    The solution says that it is $(lambda - 2)(lambda + 2)(lambda - 3)$. I feel like I am so close, but I don't get what I am supposed to do to get to the solution.






    linear-algebra determinant







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      $$A = left(begin{matrix}
      lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
      1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
      -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
      end{matrix}right)$$



      $$det A = begin{vmatrix}Aend{vmatrix} =
      (lambda - 1) begin{vmatrix}
      lambda - 3 & 1 \
      1 & lambda + 1 \
      end{vmatrix} + 1begin{vmatrix}
      1 & 1 \
      -3 & lambda + 1 \
      end{vmatrix} -
      1begin{vmatrix}
      1 & lambda - 3 \
      -3 & 1 \
      end{vmatrix}\
      = ((lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)) - (1 + (lambda + 1) + 3) + (1 +3lambda - 9) \
      = (lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1) + (lambda + 1) + 2(lambda - 3)$$



      The solution says that it is $(lambda - 2)(lambda + 2)(lambda - 3)$. I feel like I am so close, but I don't get what I am supposed to do to get to the solution.






      linear-algebra determinant







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      $$A = left(begin{matrix}
      lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
      1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
      -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
      end{matrix}right)$$



      $$det A = begin{vmatrix}Aend{vmatrix} =
      (lambda - 1) begin{vmatrix}
      lambda - 3 & 1 \
      1 & lambda + 1 \
      end{vmatrix} + 1begin{vmatrix}
      1 & 1 \
      -3 & lambda + 1 \
      end{vmatrix} -
      1begin{vmatrix}
      1 & lambda - 3 \
      -3 & 1 \
      end{vmatrix}\
      = ((lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)) - (1 + (lambda + 1) + 3) + (1 +3lambda - 9) \
      = (lambda - 1)(lambda - 3)(lambda + 1) + (lambda + 1) + 2(lambda - 3)$$



      The solution says that it is $(lambda - 2)(lambda + 2)(lambda - 3)$. I feel like I am so close, but I don't get what I am supposed to do to get to the solution.






      linear-algebra determinant




      linear-algebra determinant






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 5 '18 at 22:37









      Jean-Claude Arbaut

      14.7k63464




      14.7k63464










      asked Dec 5 '18 at 21:06









      Evan KimEvan Kim

      998




      998






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          What is wrong with this solution? Here we line the two copy of the same matrix side by side and draw blue and red lines and add all products of numbers on the blue lines and substract products of numbers on the red lines. The solution is off by 4.



          enter image description here



          The determinant is thus



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)\+(-3)(1)(-1)\+(-1)(1)(1)\-(-1)(lambda-3)(-3)\-(-1)(1)(lambda+1)\-(lambda-1)(1)(1)$$



          That is



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+3-1-3(lambda-3)+(lambda+1)-(lambda-1)\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+2-3(lambda-3)+2\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+4-3(lambda-3)\
          =(lambda-3)left[(lambda-1)(lambda+1)-3right]+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-1-3)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-4)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda-2)(lambda+2)+4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:57












          • $begingroup$
            Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:20






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:27












          • $begingroup$
            Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
            $endgroup$
            – nafhgood
            Dec 6 '18 at 2:17



















          4












          $begingroup$

          $$=(lambda - 1)Big((lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)-1Big) + ((lambda + 1) + 3) -(1 +3lambda - 9) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) + (lambda + 4) -(3lambda - 8) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -2lambda +4 - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -4lambda +16$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:21












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
            $endgroup$
            – Rebellos
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:36










          • $begingroup$
            so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:47












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07



















          1












          $begingroup$

          HINT



          We can simplify a little bit summing the third to the first row



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}= begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          and using Laplace expansion in the first row to obtain



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          =(lambda -4) cdot begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 3 & 1 \
          1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          +lambdacdot begin{vmatrix}
          1 & lambda - 3 \
          -3 & 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          Can you proceed from here?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:52






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:59












          • $begingroup$
            Why the downvote for a correct answer?
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 7 '18 at 13:02











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027647%2ffinding-determinant-of-3-times3-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          What is wrong with this solution? Here we line the two copy of the same matrix side by side and draw blue and red lines and add all products of numbers on the blue lines and substract products of numbers on the red lines. The solution is off by 4.



          enter image description here



          The determinant is thus



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)\+(-3)(1)(-1)\+(-1)(1)(1)\-(-1)(lambda-3)(-3)\-(-1)(1)(lambda+1)\-(lambda-1)(1)(1)$$



          That is



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+3-1-3(lambda-3)+(lambda+1)-(lambda-1)\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+2-3(lambda-3)+2\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+4-3(lambda-3)\
          =(lambda-3)left[(lambda-1)(lambda+1)-3right]+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-1-3)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-4)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda-2)(lambda+2)+4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:57












          • $begingroup$
            Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:20






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:27












          • $begingroup$
            Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
            $endgroup$
            – nafhgood
            Dec 6 '18 at 2:17
















          3












          $begingroup$

          What is wrong with this solution? Here we line the two copy of the same matrix side by side and draw blue and red lines and add all products of numbers on the blue lines and substract products of numbers on the red lines. The solution is off by 4.



          enter image description here



          The determinant is thus



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)\+(-3)(1)(-1)\+(-1)(1)(1)\-(-1)(lambda-3)(-3)\-(-1)(1)(lambda+1)\-(lambda-1)(1)(1)$$



          That is



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+3-1-3(lambda-3)+(lambda+1)-(lambda-1)\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+2-3(lambda-3)+2\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+4-3(lambda-3)\
          =(lambda-3)left[(lambda-1)(lambda+1)-3right]+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-1-3)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-4)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda-2)(lambda+2)+4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:57












          • $begingroup$
            Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:20






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:27












          • $begingroup$
            Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
            $endgroup$
            – nafhgood
            Dec 6 '18 at 2:17














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          What is wrong with this solution? Here we line the two copy of the same matrix side by side and draw blue and red lines and add all products of numbers on the blue lines and substract products of numbers on the red lines. The solution is off by 4.



          enter image description here



          The determinant is thus



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)\+(-3)(1)(-1)\+(-1)(1)(1)\-(-1)(lambda-3)(-3)\-(-1)(1)(lambda+1)\-(lambda-1)(1)(1)$$



          That is



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+3-1-3(lambda-3)+(lambda+1)-(lambda-1)\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+2-3(lambda-3)+2\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+4-3(lambda-3)\
          =(lambda-3)left[(lambda-1)(lambda+1)-3right]+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-1-3)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-4)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda-2)(lambda+2)+4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          What is wrong with this solution? Here we line the two copy of the same matrix side by side and draw blue and red lines and add all products of numbers on the blue lines and substract products of numbers on the red lines. The solution is off by 4.



          enter image description here



          The determinant is thus



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)\+(-3)(1)(-1)\+(-1)(1)(1)\-(-1)(lambda-3)(-3)\-(-1)(1)(lambda+1)\-(lambda-1)(1)(1)$$



          That is



          $$(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+3-1-3(lambda-3)+(lambda+1)-(lambda-1)\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+2-3(lambda-3)+2\
          =(lambda-1)(lambda-3)(lambda+1)+4-3(lambda-3)\
          =(lambda-3)left[(lambda-1)(lambda+1)-3right]+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-1-3)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda^2-4)+4\
          =(lambda-3)(lambda-2)(lambda+2)+4$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 5 '18 at 22:26









          Jean-Claude Arbaut

          14.7k63464




          14.7k63464










          answered Dec 5 '18 at 21:39









          nafhgoodnafhgood

          1,797422




          1,797422












          • $begingroup$
            You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:57












          • $begingroup$
            Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:20






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:27












          • $begingroup$
            Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
            $endgroup$
            – nafhgood
            Dec 6 '18 at 2:17


















          • $begingroup$
            You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:57












          • $begingroup$
            Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:20






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:27












          • $begingroup$
            Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
            $endgroup$
            – nafhgood
            Dec 6 '18 at 2:17
















          $begingroup$
          You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:57






          $begingroup$
          You are using the rule of Sarrus, and your solution is actually correct. But you should write this in LaTeX.
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:57














          $begingroup$
          Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
          $endgroup$
          – gimusi
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:07






          $begingroup$
          Really nice, maybe it is difficult make the lines with MathJax! I don't know how to obtain that :(
          $endgroup$
          – gimusi
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:07














          $begingroup$
          Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
          $endgroup$
          – Evan Kim
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:20




          $begingroup$
          Yes, very nice. This was very painful to keep track of, but I got the same answer and was able to follow along the math.
          $endgroup$
          – Evan Kim
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:20




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:27






          $begingroup$
          I reworked your answer in LaTeX (except the matrices, made with Excel), can you check and confirm it's ok?
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:27














          $begingroup$
          Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
          $endgroup$
          – nafhgood
          Dec 6 '18 at 2:17




          $begingroup$
          Great! thank you soo much! The red line is not correct there should be one for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3) and there is none for (-1)(lambda-3)(-3).
          $endgroup$
          – nafhgood
          Dec 6 '18 at 2:17











          4












          $begingroup$

          $$=(lambda - 1)Big((lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)-1Big) + ((lambda + 1) + 3) -(1 +3lambda - 9) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) + (lambda + 4) -(3lambda - 8) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -2lambda +4 - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -4lambda +16$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:21












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
            $endgroup$
            – Rebellos
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:36










          • $begingroup$
            so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:47












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07
















          4












          $begingroup$

          $$=(lambda - 1)Big((lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)-1Big) + ((lambda + 1) + 3) -(1 +3lambda - 9) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) + (lambda + 4) -(3lambda - 8) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -2lambda +4 - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -4lambda +16$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:21












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
            $endgroup$
            – Rebellos
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:36










          • $begingroup$
            so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:47












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          $$=(lambda - 1)Big((lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)-1Big) + ((lambda + 1) + 3) -(1 +3lambda - 9) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) + (lambda + 4) -(3lambda - 8) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -2lambda +4 - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -4lambda +16$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big((lambda - 3)(lambda + 1)-1Big) + ((lambda + 1) + 3) -(1 +3lambda - 9) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) + (lambda + 4) -(3lambda - 8) $$



          $$=(lambda - 1)Big(lambda ^2 - 2lambda -4Big) - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -2lambda +4 - 2lambda +12 $$



          $$=lambda ^3 - 3lambda^2 -4lambda +16$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 5 '18 at 21:23

























          answered Dec 5 '18 at 21:09









          greedoidgreedoid

          39.7k114798




          39.7k114798












          • $begingroup$
            I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:21












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
            $endgroup$
            – Rebellos
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:36










          • $begingroup$
            so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:47












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07


















          • $begingroup$
            I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:21












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
            $endgroup$
            – Rebellos
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:36










          • $begingroup$
            so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
            $endgroup$
            – Evan Kim
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:47












          • $begingroup$
            @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            Dec 5 '18 at 22:07
















          $begingroup$
          I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
          $endgroup$
          – Evan Kim
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:21






          $begingroup$
          I am trying to find the characteristic polynomial of A. I just posted this part of the problem because I thought the characteristic polynomial was just finding the determinant. I think I did |lambda I - A| wrong...let me check
          $endgroup$
          – Evan Kim
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:21














          $begingroup$
          @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
          $endgroup$
          – Rebellos
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:36




          $begingroup$
          @EvanKim Thanks for your kind inputs in your question post and here. Just to let you know, it's good to contain any questions on the initial question form. Regarding to your questions, the eigenvalues are given by the $lambda$s that nullify the determinant, simply meaning that you have to find the solutions to the equation $det(lambda I - A) = 0$. On the initial question, greedoid's answer follows exactly where you were mistaken.
          $endgroup$
          – Rebellos
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:36












          $begingroup$
          so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
          $endgroup$
          – Evan Kim
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:47






          $begingroup$
          so $λ^3−3λ^2−4λ+16$ is in fact $(λ−2)(λ+2)(λ−3)?$
          $endgroup$
          – Evan Kim
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:47














          $begingroup$
          @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:07




          $begingroup$
          @EvanKim No, if only because the constant term of your expression after expansion is obviously $12$.
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          Dec 5 '18 at 22:07











          1












          $begingroup$

          HINT



          We can simplify a little bit summing the third to the first row



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}= begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          and using Laplace expansion in the first row to obtain



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          =(lambda -4) cdot begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 3 & 1 \
          1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          +lambdacdot begin{vmatrix}
          1 & lambda - 3 \
          -3 & 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          Can you proceed from here?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:52






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:59












          • $begingroup$
            Why the downvote for a correct answer?
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
















          1












          $begingroup$

          HINT



          We can simplify a little bit summing the third to the first row



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}= begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          and using Laplace expansion in the first row to obtain



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          =(lambda -4) cdot begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 3 & 1 \
          1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          +lambdacdot begin{vmatrix}
          1 & lambda - 3 \
          -3 & 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          Can you proceed from here?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:52






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:59












          • $begingroup$
            Why the downvote for a correct answer?
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 7 '18 at 13:02














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          HINT



          We can simplify a little bit summing the third to the first row



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}= begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          and using Laplace expansion in the first row to obtain



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          =(lambda -4) cdot begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 3 & 1 \
          1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          +lambdacdot begin{vmatrix}
          1 & lambda - 3 \
          -3 & 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          Can you proceed from here?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          HINT



          We can simplify a little bit summing the third to the first row



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 1 & -1 & -1 \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}= begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          and using Laplace expansion in the first row to obtain



          $$begin{vmatrix}
          lambda -4 & 0 & lambda \
          1 & lambda - 3 & 1 \
          -3 & 1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          =(lambda -4) cdot begin{vmatrix}
          lambda - 3 & 1 \
          1 & lambda + 1 \
          end{vmatrix}
          +lambdacdot begin{vmatrix}
          1 & lambda - 3 \
          -3 & 1 \
          end{vmatrix}$$



          Can you proceed from here?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 5 '18 at 21:19

























          answered Dec 5 '18 at 21:11









          gimusigimusi

          92.8k84494




          92.8k84494








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:52






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:59












          • $begingroup$
            Why the downvote for a correct answer?
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 7 '18 at 13:02














          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:52






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
            $endgroup$
            – quid♦
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:59












          • $begingroup$
            Why the downvote for a correct answer?
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 7 '18 at 13:02








          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
          $endgroup$
          – quid♦
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:52




          $begingroup$
          Posts should be posted in final form. Comments should be limited to giving information relevant to the post. Discussions about votes are mostly off-topic. Excessive "+1 great posts" as a matter of fact can lead to suspensions.
          $endgroup$
          – quid♦
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:52




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
          $endgroup$
          – quid♦
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:59






          $begingroup$
          The text in the comment box explicitly says that these comments should be avoided and they are also discouraged in other ways. To do it sometimes will not cause issues, to do it all the time/often can lead to problems.
          $endgroup$
          – quid♦
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:59














          $begingroup$
          Why the downvote for a correct answer?
          $endgroup$
          – gimusi
          Dec 7 '18 at 13:02




          $begingroup$
          Why the downvote for a correct answer?
          $endgroup$
          – gimusi
          Dec 7 '18 at 13:02


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027647%2ffinding-determinant-of-3-times3-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          Image
          up vote 0 down vote favorite I have $99$ identical square tiles, each with a quarter-circle drawn on it like this: [asy] size(1.5cm); draw(Arc((2,0),1,90,180),red+1); draw((0,0)--(2,0)--(2,2)--(0,2)--(0,0)); [/asy] When I arrange the tiles in a $9times 11$ rectangular grid, each with a random orientation, what is the expected value of the number of full circles I form? I think this problem has to do with finding the chance any given 2x2 square has a circle, but I can't find it. expected-value share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 20 at 15:03 6minecraftninja 1 2
          Read more

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Image
          0 I think it's similiar to NFAs. I replace the finite states of the given automaton for start-states for my new automaton. I do it with $epsilon$ -transition from the start state to the actual finite states of the given automaton. The start state of the given automaton will be my accepting(finite) state of my new one. All transitions will be reversed of course to recognize the reversed word. But how do I have to change the stack of the pushdown automaton? That's tricky. formal-languages automata context-free-grammar share | cite | improve this question edited Nov 29 '18 at 14:20 joee
          Read more

          Mont Emei

          Image
          Mont Emei.mw-parser-output .entete.map{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png")} Vue du sommet Wanfo du mont Emei Géographie Altitude 3 099  m , Wanfo Coordonnées 29° 31′ 11″ nord, 103° 19′ 57″ est Administration Pays   Chine Province Sichuan Ville-préfecture Leshan Géolocalisation sur la carte : Sichuan Mont Emei Géolocalisation sur la carte : Chine Mont Emei modifier   Paysage panoramique du mont Emei, incluant le paysage panoramique du grand Bouddha de Leshan *   Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Passerelle en bois sur le versant ouest Pays   Chine Subdivision Sichuan Type Mixte Critères (iv) (vi) (x) Superficie 15 400 ha Numéro d’identification 779 Zone géographique Asie et Pacifique  ** Année d’inscription 1996 (20 e session) * Descriptif officiel UNESCO ** Classification géog
          Read more