Projection of vector into an axis, along a direction












0












$begingroup$


I recently learned how I can project a vector $overline{a}$ onto another one $overline{b}$. I was wondering how I could achieve the same effect, but project the vector $overline{a}$ along a direction. For example, in this enter image description here, we can see that the direction of the projection is the axis $overline{b}$ normal. This I know how to do. What I really wanted to do, is that the projection was made in the direction of the vector $overline{a}$ normal.
While searching, I found something about Thales Theorem, but I have no clue of how I could use it to my advantage. If someone could enlighten me, I would be much appreciated.



Thank you.



EDIT: I want to get the vector $overline{a3}$:
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you know how to project a vector onto another vector, and you want to project a vector along a direction, why not just take a vector in that direction, and then project onto that vector?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 1:27
















0












$begingroup$


I recently learned how I can project a vector $overline{a}$ onto another one $overline{b}$. I was wondering how I could achieve the same effect, but project the vector $overline{a}$ along a direction. For example, in this enter image description here, we can see that the direction of the projection is the axis $overline{b}$ normal. This I know how to do. What I really wanted to do, is that the projection was made in the direction of the vector $overline{a}$ normal.
While searching, I found something about Thales Theorem, but I have no clue of how I could use it to my advantage. If someone could enlighten me, I would be much appreciated.



Thank you.



EDIT: I want to get the vector $overline{a3}$:
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you know how to project a vector onto another vector, and you want to project a vector along a direction, why not just take a vector in that direction, and then project onto that vector?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 1:27














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I recently learned how I can project a vector $overline{a}$ onto another one $overline{b}$. I was wondering how I could achieve the same effect, but project the vector $overline{a}$ along a direction. For example, in this enter image description here, we can see that the direction of the projection is the axis $overline{b}$ normal. This I know how to do. What I really wanted to do, is that the projection was made in the direction of the vector $overline{a}$ normal.
While searching, I found something about Thales Theorem, but I have no clue of how I could use it to my advantage. If someone could enlighten me, I would be much appreciated.



Thank you.



EDIT: I want to get the vector $overline{a3}$:
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I recently learned how I can project a vector $overline{a}$ onto another one $overline{b}$. I was wondering how I could achieve the same effect, but project the vector $overline{a}$ along a direction. For example, in this enter image description here, we can see that the direction of the projection is the axis $overline{b}$ normal. This I know how to do. What I really wanted to do, is that the projection was made in the direction of the vector $overline{a}$ normal.
While searching, I found something about Thales Theorem, but I have no clue of how I could use it to my advantage. If someone could enlighten me, I would be much appreciated.



Thank you.



EDIT: I want to get the vector $overline{a3}$:
enter image description here







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 11:02







jorgenoro

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:07









jorgenorojorgenoro

33




33












  • $begingroup$
    If you know how to project a vector onto another vector, and you want to project a vector along a direction, why not just take a vector in that direction, and then project onto that vector?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 1:27


















  • $begingroup$
    If you know how to project a vector onto another vector, and you want to project a vector along a direction, why not just take a vector in that direction, and then project onto that vector?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 1:27
















$begingroup$
If you know how to project a vector onto another vector, and you want to project a vector along a direction, why not just take a vector in that direction, and then project onto that vector?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 1:27




$begingroup$
If you know how to project a vector onto another vector, and you want to project a vector along a direction, why not just take a vector in that direction, and then project onto that vector?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 1:27










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

For the first projection, the one you know, you want the dot product $langle a_1, a_2rangle$ to be $0$, where $a_1 = lambda b$ and $a_2 = a-lambda b$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle b,arangle}{langle b,brangle}$ as you know.



In the second case, you want $langle c,arangle=0$, where $c=lambda b-a$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle a, arangle}{langle b,arangle}$ and hence
$$
a_3 = lambda b = frac{langle a,arangle}{langle b,arangle} , b.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:01



















0












$begingroup$

So the projection of a vector $overline{a}$ onto a vector $overline{b}$ is $frac{langle overline{a},overline{b}rangleoverline{b}}{|overline{b}|^2}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    OP says he/she already knows that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03



















0












$begingroup$

Note that $a_1 + a_2 = a$ so once you have the projection $a_1$ then $a_2=a-a_1$ and you can project onto that vector in the usual way.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:05



















0












$begingroup$

Projection of $bar a$ onto $bar b$ is $frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2} $ and if you want to project onto hyper plane perpendicular to $bar b$ then it is $bar a - frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2}$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:56










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 10:54












  • $begingroup$
    Updated post makes things clear thanks
    $endgroup$
    – zero
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:29



















0












$begingroup$

So, vectors $a$ and $b$ are given, and you want a vector $c$ such that $c$ is orthogonal to $a$ and such that $a+c$ is parallel to $b$. As equations, that's $acdot c=0$ and $a+c=kb$ for some real number $k$. So we get $acdot(a+c)=acdot kb$, which is $acdot a+acdot c=kacdot b$, which is $acdot a=kacdot b$, which is $k={acdot aover acdot b}$, so finally $$c=kb-a={acdot aover acdot b}b-a$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:59













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027898%2fprojection-of-vector-into-an-axis-along-a-direction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

For the first projection, the one you know, you want the dot product $langle a_1, a_2rangle$ to be $0$, where $a_1 = lambda b$ and $a_2 = a-lambda b$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle b,arangle}{langle b,brangle}$ as you know.



In the second case, you want $langle c,arangle=0$, where $c=lambda b-a$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle a, arangle}{langle b,arangle}$ and hence
$$
a_3 = lambda b = frac{langle a,arangle}{langle b,arangle} , b.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:01
















0












$begingroup$

For the first projection, the one you know, you want the dot product $langle a_1, a_2rangle$ to be $0$, where $a_1 = lambda b$ and $a_2 = a-lambda b$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle b,arangle}{langle b,brangle}$ as you know.



In the second case, you want $langle c,arangle=0$, where $c=lambda b-a$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle a, arangle}{langle b,arangle}$ and hence
$$
a_3 = lambda b = frac{langle a,arangle}{langle b,arangle} , b.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$

For the first projection, the one you know, you want the dot product $langle a_1, a_2rangle$ to be $0$, where $a_1 = lambda b$ and $a_2 = a-lambda b$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle b,arangle}{langle b,brangle}$ as you know.



In the second case, you want $langle c,arangle=0$, where $c=lambda b-a$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle a, arangle}{langle b,arangle}$ and hence
$$
a_3 = lambda b = frac{langle a,arangle}{langle b,arangle} , b.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



For the first projection, the one you know, you want the dot product $langle a_1, a_2rangle$ to be $0$, where $a_1 = lambda b$ and $a_2 = a-lambda b$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle b,arangle}{langle b,brangle}$ as you know.



In the second case, you want $langle c,arangle=0$, where $c=lambda b-a$. This yields $lambda = frac{langle a, arangle}{langle b,arangle}$ and hence
$$
a_3 = lambda b = frac{langle a,arangle}{langle b,arangle} , b.
$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 11:28









ChristophChristoph

11.9k1642




11.9k1642












  • $begingroup$
    I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:01


















  • $begingroup$
    I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:01
















$begingroup$
I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 12:01




$begingroup$
I look into this and try to figure this out. It will take me some time. I'll leave a comment if I am able to do this.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 12:01











0












$begingroup$

So the projection of a vector $overline{a}$ onto a vector $overline{b}$ is $frac{langle overline{a},overline{b}rangleoverline{b}}{|overline{b}|^2}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    OP says he/she already knows that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03
















0












$begingroup$

So the projection of a vector $overline{a}$ onto a vector $overline{b}$ is $frac{langle overline{a},overline{b}rangleoverline{b}}{|overline{b}|^2}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    OP says he/she already knows that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03














0












0








0





$begingroup$

So the projection of a vector $overline{a}$ onto a vector $overline{b}$ is $frac{langle overline{a},overline{b}rangleoverline{b}}{|overline{b}|^2}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



So the projection of a vector $overline{a}$ onto a vector $overline{b}$ is $frac{langle overline{a},overline{b}rangleoverline{b}}{|overline{b}|^2}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 1:37









nafhgoodnafhgood

1,797422




1,797422












  • $begingroup$
    OP says he/she already knows that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03


















  • $begingroup$
    OP says he/she already knows that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03
















$begingroup$
OP says he/she already knows that, right?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 5:58




$begingroup$
OP says he/she already knows that, right?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 5:58












$begingroup$
Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 11:03




$begingroup$
Yes, this I know. I edited the post to show exactly what I want.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 11:03











0












$begingroup$

Note that $a_1 + a_2 = a$ so once you have the projection $a_1$ then $a_2=a-a_1$ and you can project onto that vector in the usual way.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:05
















0












$begingroup$

Note that $a_1 + a_2 = a$ so once you have the projection $a_1$ then $a_2=a-a_1$ and you can project onto that vector in the usual way.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:05














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Note that $a_1 + a_2 = a$ so once you have the projection $a_1$ then $a_2=a-a_1$ and you can project onto that vector in the usual way.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Note that $a_1 + a_2 = a$ so once you have the projection $a_1$ then $a_2=a-a_1$ and you can project onto that vector in the usual way.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 1:58









CyclotomicFieldCyclotomicField

2,3481314




2,3481314












  • $begingroup$
    How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:05


















  • $begingroup$
    How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:05
















$begingroup$
How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 11:05




$begingroup$
How can this help me to get the vector $overline{c}$ (depicted in the edited post) ?
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 11:05











0












$begingroup$

Projection of $bar a$ onto $bar b$ is $frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2} $ and if you want to project onto hyper plane perpendicular to $bar b$ then it is $bar a - frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2}$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:56










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 10:54












  • $begingroup$
    Updated post makes things clear thanks
    $endgroup$
    – zero
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:29
















0












$begingroup$

Projection of $bar a$ onto $bar b$ is $frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2} $ and if you want to project onto hyper plane perpendicular to $bar b$ then it is $bar a - frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2}$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:56










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 10:54












  • $begingroup$
    Updated post makes things clear thanks
    $endgroup$
    – zero
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:29














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Projection of $bar a$ onto $bar b$ is $frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2} $ and if you want to project onto hyper plane perpendicular to $bar b$ then it is $bar a - frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2}$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Projection of $bar a$ onto $bar b$ is $frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2} $ and if you want to project onto hyper plane perpendicular to $bar b$ then it is $bar a - frac{<bar a, bar b> bar b}{|a|_2}$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 1:59









zerozero

708




708












  • $begingroup$
    But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:56










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 10:54












  • $begingroup$
    Updated post makes things clear thanks
    $endgroup$
    – zero
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:29


















  • $begingroup$
    But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 5:56










  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 10:54












  • $begingroup$
    Updated post makes things clear thanks
    $endgroup$
    – zero
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:29
















$begingroup$
But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 5:56




$begingroup$
But is that what OP wants to do? That's not at all clear to me.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 5:56












$begingroup$
I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 10:54






$begingroup$
I don't understand this answer either. It seems that you are explaining to me how I can achieve the projection shown on the image above. What I want to do, is to take $overline{a}$, project onto $overline{b}$, along the direction of a vector $overline{c}$, where $overline{c}$ is normal to $overline{a}$.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 10:54














$begingroup$
Updated post makes things clear thanks
$endgroup$
– zero
Dec 7 '18 at 22:29




$begingroup$
Updated post makes things clear thanks
$endgroup$
– zero
Dec 7 '18 at 22:29











0












$begingroup$

So, vectors $a$ and $b$ are given, and you want a vector $c$ such that $c$ is orthogonal to $a$ and such that $a+c$ is parallel to $b$. As equations, that's $acdot c=0$ and $a+c=kb$ for some real number $k$. So we get $acdot(a+c)=acdot kb$, which is $acdot a+acdot c=kacdot b$, which is $acdot a=kacdot b$, which is $k={acdot aover acdot b}$, so finally $$c=kb-a={acdot aover acdot b}b-a$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:59


















0












$begingroup$

So, vectors $a$ and $b$ are given, and you want a vector $c$ such that $c$ is orthogonal to $a$ and such that $a+c$ is parallel to $b$. As equations, that's $acdot c=0$ and $a+c=kb$ for some real number $k$. So we get $acdot(a+c)=acdot kb$, which is $acdot a+acdot c=kacdot b$, which is $acdot a=kacdot b$, which is $k={acdot aover acdot b}$, so finally $$c=kb-a={acdot aover acdot b}b-a$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:59
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

So, vectors $a$ and $b$ are given, and you want a vector $c$ such that $c$ is orthogonal to $a$ and such that $a+c$ is parallel to $b$. As equations, that's $acdot c=0$ and $a+c=kb$ for some real number $k$. So we get $acdot(a+c)=acdot kb$, which is $acdot a+acdot c=kacdot b$, which is $acdot a=kacdot b$, which is $k={acdot aover acdot b}$, so finally $$c=kb-a={acdot aover acdot b}b-a$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



So, vectors $a$ and $b$ are given, and you want a vector $c$ such that $c$ is orthogonal to $a$ and such that $a+c$ is parallel to $b$. As equations, that's $acdot c=0$ and $a+c=kb$ for some real number $k$. So we get $acdot(a+c)=acdot kb$, which is $acdot a+acdot c=kacdot b$, which is $acdot a=kacdot b$, which is $k={acdot aover acdot b}$, so finally $$c=kb-a={acdot aover acdot b}b-a$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 11:25









Gerry MyersonGerry Myerson

146k8147299




146k8147299












  • $begingroup$
    In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:59




















  • $begingroup$
    In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – jorgenoro
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:59


















$begingroup$
In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 11:30




$begingroup$
In a comment you write that you want $c$, which I've given, but in the question you say you want $a_3$, which is $a+c$, which is $kb$, which is ${acdot aover acdot b}b$.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 6 '18 at 11:30












$begingroup$
You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 11:59






$begingroup$
You are right, that comment is wrong. It shouldn't be $overline{c}$ but $overline{a3}$. I will chew on this and try to figure this out and the above answer by Cristoph as well. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jorgenoro
Dec 6 '18 at 11:59




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027898%2fprojection-of-vector-into-an-axis-along-a-direction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei