Exercise in Hahn-Banach Theorem; Finding linear functional $-p(-x)leq f(x)leq p(x)$
$begingroup$
(The following exercises are in
Kreyszig's book 218 page; EXE 10) I want to solve the following
exercise : If $X=l^infty$, let $p(x)=limsup x_i $, which is
sublinear. Then find a linear functional $f(x)$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq
f(x) leq p(x)$$
Background : If $p$ is a sublinear function on
a real vector space, i.e.,
$$ p(x+y)leq p(x) + p(y), p(cx)=cp(x), cgeq 0 $$
then there exists linear functional $f$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq
p(x) $$
Proof : By Hahn-Banach theorem we have $f(x)leq p(x)
$ so that $$ f(-x)leq p(-x)$$
That is $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq f(x)$$
Now, we return to original question : $X=l^infty$, let
$p(x)=limsup x_i $. So
$$-p(-x)=-limsup (-x_i)=liminf x_i$$ Hence if such functional $f$ exists, then
$f(x)=lim x_i$ when $lim x_i$ exists. If $x_{2i+1}=2, x_{2i}=1$
then $v_{2i+1}=1, v_{2i}=2$ then $ f(x+v)=3 $. That is, the problem
is how determine $f$ on $x$ where $lim x_i$ does not exist.
Try : If we let $f(x)=frac{liminf x_i + limsup x_i}{2} $, then note
that $f(x+v)neq f(x)+f(v)$. Thank you in advance.
functional-analysis normed-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(The following exercises are in
Kreyszig's book 218 page; EXE 10) I want to solve the following
exercise : If $X=l^infty$, let $p(x)=limsup x_i $, which is
sublinear. Then find a linear functional $f(x)$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq
f(x) leq p(x)$$
Background : If $p$ is a sublinear function on
a real vector space, i.e.,
$$ p(x+y)leq p(x) + p(y), p(cx)=cp(x), cgeq 0 $$
then there exists linear functional $f$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq
p(x) $$
Proof : By Hahn-Banach theorem we have $f(x)leq p(x)
$ so that $$ f(-x)leq p(-x)$$
That is $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq f(x)$$
Now, we return to original question : $X=l^infty$, let
$p(x)=limsup x_i $. So
$$-p(-x)=-limsup (-x_i)=liminf x_i$$ Hence if such functional $f$ exists, then
$f(x)=lim x_i$ when $lim x_i$ exists. If $x_{2i+1}=2, x_{2i}=1$
then $v_{2i+1}=1, v_{2i}=2$ then $ f(x+v)=3 $. That is, the problem
is how determine $f$ on $x$ where $lim x_i$ does not exist.
Try : If we let $f(x)=frac{liminf x_i + limsup x_i}{2} $, then note
that $f(x+v)neq f(x)+f(v)$. Thank you in advance.
functional-analysis normed-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(The following exercises are in
Kreyszig's book 218 page; EXE 10) I want to solve the following
exercise : If $X=l^infty$, let $p(x)=limsup x_i $, which is
sublinear. Then find a linear functional $f(x)$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq
f(x) leq p(x)$$
Background : If $p$ is a sublinear function on
a real vector space, i.e.,
$$ p(x+y)leq p(x) + p(y), p(cx)=cp(x), cgeq 0 $$
then there exists linear functional $f$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq
p(x) $$
Proof : By Hahn-Banach theorem we have $f(x)leq p(x)
$ so that $$ f(-x)leq p(-x)$$
That is $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq f(x)$$
Now, we return to original question : $X=l^infty$, let
$p(x)=limsup x_i $. So
$$-p(-x)=-limsup (-x_i)=liminf x_i$$ Hence if such functional $f$ exists, then
$f(x)=lim x_i$ when $lim x_i$ exists. If $x_{2i+1}=2, x_{2i}=1$
then $v_{2i+1}=1, v_{2i}=2$ then $ f(x+v)=3 $. That is, the problem
is how determine $f$ on $x$ where $lim x_i$ does not exist.
Try : If we let $f(x)=frac{liminf x_i + limsup x_i}{2} $, then note
that $f(x+v)neq f(x)+f(v)$. Thank you in advance.
functional-analysis normed-spaces
$endgroup$
(The following exercises are in
Kreyszig's book 218 page; EXE 10) I want to solve the following
exercise : If $X=l^infty$, let $p(x)=limsup x_i $, which is
sublinear. Then find a linear functional $f(x)$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq
f(x) leq p(x)$$
Background : If $p$ is a sublinear function on
a real vector space, i.e.,
$$ p(x+y)leq p(x) + p(y), p(cx)=cp(x), cgeq 0 $$
then there exists linear functional $f$ s.t. $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq
p(x) $$
Proof : By Hahn-Banach theorem we have $f(x)leq p(x)
$ so that $$ f(-x)leq p(-x)$$
That is $$ -p(-x)leq f(x) leq f(x)$$
Now, we return to original question : $X=l^infty$, let
$p(x)=limsup x_i $. So
$$-p(-x)=-limsup (-x_i)=liminf x_i$$ Hence if such functional $f$ exists, then
$f(x)=lim x_i$ when $lim x_i$ exists. If $x_{2i+1}=2, x_{2i}=1$
then $v_{2i+1}=1, v_{2i}=2$ then $ f(x+v)=3 $. That is, the problem
is how determine $f$ on $x$ where $lim x_i$ does not exist.
Try : If we let $f(x)=frac{liminf x_i + limsup x_i}{2} $, then note
that $f(x+v)neq f(x)+f(v)$. Thank you in advance.
functional-analysis normed-spaces
functional-analysis normed-spaces
edited Dec 10 '18 at 12:08
Martin Sleziak
44.8k9118272
44.8k9118272
asked Mar 5 '15 at 0:04
HK LeeHK Lee
13.9k52159
13.9k52159
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think that the exercise is expecting you to do exactly what you did - to prove that there exists a functional with the given properties. (Not to explicitly write down such $f$.)
You can notice that in this way you get a functional $fin ell_infty^* setminus ell_1$. (A few proofs of the fact that $ell_infty^*neell_1$ are also collected here: Dual of $l^infty$ is not $l^1$.) Existence of such functional cannot be proved in ZF, so any proof has to use some non-constructive step at some point. Some posts where the fact that this is not provable in ZF is mentioned: Nonnegative linear functionals over $l^infty$ and $ell^1$ vs. continuous dual of $ell^{infty}$ in ZF+AD.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1175922%2fexercise-in-hahn-banach-theorem-finding-linear-functional-p-x-leq-fx-leq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think that the exercise is expecting you to do exactly what you did - to prove that there exists a functional with the given properties. (Not to explicitly write down such $f$.)
You can notice that in this way you get a functional $fin ell_infty^* setminus ell_1$. (A few proofs of the fact that $ell_infty^*neell_1$ are also collected here: Dual of $l^infty$ is not $l^1$.) Existence of such functional cannot be proved in ZF, so any proof has to use some non-constructive step at some point. Some posts where the fact that this is not provable in ZF is mentioned: Nonnegative linear functionals over $l^infty$ and $ell^1$ vs. continuous dual of $ell^{infty}$ in ZF+AD.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that the exercise is expecting you to do exactly what you did - to prove that there exists a functional with the given properties. (Not to explicitly write down such $f$.)
You can notice that in this way you get a functional $fin ell_infty^* setminus ell_1$. (A few proofs of the fact that $ell_infty^*neell_1$ are also collected here: Dual of $l^infty$ is not $l^1$.) Existence of such functional cannot be proved in ZF, so any proof has to use some non-constructive step at some point. Some posts where the fact that this is not provable in ZF is mentioned: Nonnegative linear functionals over $l^infty$ and $ell^1$ vs. continuous dual of $ell^{infty}$ in ZF+AD.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that the exercise is expecting you to do exactly what you did - to prove that there exists a functional with the given properties. (Not to explicitly write down such $f$.)
You can notice that in this way you get a functional $fin ell_infty^* setminus ell_1$. (A few proofs of the fact that $ell_infty^*neell_1$ are also collected here: Dual of $l^infty$ is not $l^1$.) Existence of such functional cannot be proved in ZF, so any proof has to use some non-constructive step at some point. Some posts where the fact that this is not provable in ZF is mentioned: Nonnegative linear functionals over $l^infty$ and $ell^1$ vs. continuous dual of $ell^{infty}$ in ZF+AD.
$endgroup$
I think that the exercise is expecting you to do exactly what you did - to prove that there exists a functional with the given properties. (Not to explicitly write down such $f$.)
You can notice that in this way you get a functional $fin ell_infty^* setminus ell_1$. (A few proofs of the fact that $ell_infty^*neell_1$ are also collected here: Dual of $l^infty$ is not $l^1$.) Existence of such functional cannot be proved in ZF, so any proof has to use some non-constructive step at some point. Some posts where the fact that this is not provable in ZF is mentioned: Nonnegative linear functionals over $l^infty$ and $ell^1$ vs. continuous dual of $ell^{infty}$ in ZF+AD.
edited Dec 10 '18 at 17:47
answered Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
Martin SleziakMartin Sleziak
44.8k9118272
44.8k9118272
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1175922%2fexercise-in-hahn-banach-theorem-finding-linear-functional-p-x-leq-fx-leq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown