Show $mathcal{B}( mathbb R)$ contains all countable subsets of $mathbb R$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












We defined $mathcal{B}(mathbb R):=sigma({[a,b[}),$ where $a < b in mathbb R.$



I have been able to prove:



i) for any $b in mathbb R$, ${b} inmathcal{B}(mathbb R)$



and subsequently ii) $[a,b] in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



iii) $]a,b[ in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



Now for my problem, how can I prove that $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ contains all countable subsets of $mathbb R$?



My idea was to take any countable subset $C$ of $mathbb R$,



it can be written as $C = bigcup_{n in mathbb N}{a_{n}}$. Since we were able to prove (i), $C$ is immediately as the countable union $in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$. Is this ok? Does not seem clean enough to me?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    We defined $mathcal{B}(mathbb R):=sigma({[a,b[}),$ where $a < b in mathbb R.$



    I have been able to prove:



    i) for any $b in mathbb R$, ${b} inmathcal{B}(mathbb R)$



    and subsequently ii) $[a,b] in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



    iii) $]a,b[ in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



    Now for my problem, how can I prove that $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ contains all countable subsets of $mathbb R$?



    My idea was to take any countable subset $C$ of $mathbb R$,



    it can be written as $C = bigcup_{n in mathbb N}{a_{n}}$. Since we were able to prove (i), $C$ is immediately as the countable union $in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$. Is this ok? Does not seem clean enough to me?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      We defined $mathcal{B}(mathbb R):=sigma({[a,b[}),$ where $a < b in mathbb R.$



      I have been able to prove:



      i) for any $b in mathbb R$, ${b} inmathcal{B}(mathbb R)$



      and subsequently ii) $[a,b] in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



      iii) $]a,b[ in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



      Now for my problem, how can I prove that $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ contains all countable subsets of $mathbb R$?



      My idea was to take any countable subset $C$ of $mathbb R$,



      it can be written as $C = bigcup_{n in mathbb N}{a_{n}}$. Since we were able to prove (i), $C$ is immediately as the countable union $in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$. Is this ok? Does not seem clean enough to me?










      share|cite|improve this question















      We defined $mathcal{B}(mathbb R):=sigma({[a,b[}),$ where $a < b in mathbb R.$



      I have been able to prove:



      i) for any $b in mathbb R$, ${b} inmathcal{B}(mathbb R)$



      and subsequently ii) $[a,b] in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



      iii) $]a,b[ in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ for any $a, b in mathbb R$



      Now for my problem, how can I prove that $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$ contains all countable subsets of $mathbb R$?



      My idea was to take any countable subset $C$ of $mathbb R$,



      it can be written as $C = bigcup_{n in mathbb N}{a_{n}}$. Since we were able to prove (i), $C$ is immediately as the countable union $in mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$. Is this ok? Does not seem clean enough to me?







      real-analysis measure-theory borel-sets borel-measures






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 21 at 20:32









      Lord Shark the Unknown

      99.1k958131




      99.1k958131










      asked Nov 21 at 20:29









      SABOY

      500311




      500311






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          The usual definition of a sigma-algebra requires that it be closed under countable unions. Once that you have that every singleton is in $mathcal{B}( mathbb R)$, every countable subset of $Bbb R$ is a countable union of singletons.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • So my version is correct?
            – SABOY
            Nov 21 at 20:37










          • Yes, it is fine.
            – Ross Millikan
            Nov 21 at 20:50


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Your answer is entirely correct, since $sigma$-algebras are closed under countable unions and singeltons are in this $sigma$-algebra:



          Indeed, if $ain mathbb{R}$, then $${a} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n[} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n]}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008311%2fshow-mathcalb-mathbb-r-contains-all-countable-subsets-of-mathbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            The usual definition of a sigma-algebra requires that it be closed under countable unions. Once that you have that every singleton is in $mathcal{B}( mathbb R)$, every countable subset of $Bbb R$ is a countable union of singletons.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • So my version is correct?
              – SABOY
              Nov 21 at 20:37










            • Yes, it is fine.
              – Ross Millikan
              Nov 21 at 20:50















            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            The usual definition of a sigma-algebra requires that it be closed under countable unions. Once that you have that every singleton is in $mathcal{B}( mathbb R)$, every countable subset of $Bbb R$ is a countable union of singletons.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • So my version is correct?
              – SABOY
              Nov 21 at 20:37










            • Yes, it is fine.
              – Ross Millikan
              Nov 21 at 20:50













            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted






            The usual definition of a sigma-algebra requires that it be closed under countable unions. Once that you have that every singleton is in $mathcal{B}( mathbb R)$, every countable subset of $Bbb R$ is a countable union of singletons.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            The usual definition of a sigma-algebra requires that it be closed under countable unions. Once that you have that every singleton is in $mathcal{B}( mathbb R)$, every countable subset of $Bbb R$ is a countable union of singletons.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 21 at 20:35









            Ross Millikan

            289k23195367




            289k23195367












            • So my version is correct?
              – SABOY
              Nov 21 at 20:37










            • Yes, it is fine.
              – Ross Millikan
              Nov 21 at 20:50


















            • So my version is correct?
              – SABOY
              Nov 21 at 20:37










            • Yes, it is fine.
              – Ross Millikan
              Nov 21 at 20:50
















            So my version is correct?
            – SABOY
            Nov 21 at 20:37




            So my version is correct?
            – SABOY
            Nov 21 at 20:37












            Yes, it is fine.
            – Ross Millikan
            Nov 21 at 20:50




            Yes, it is fine.
            – Ross Millikan
            Nov 21 at 20:50










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Your answer is entirely correct, since $sigma$-algebras are closed under countable unions and singeltons are in this $sigma$-algebra:



            Indeed, if $ain mathbb{R}$, then $${a} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n[} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n]}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Your answer is entirely correct, since $sigma$-algebras are closed under countable unions and singeltons are in this $sigma$-algebra:



              Indeed, if $ain mathbb{R}$, then $${a} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n[} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n]}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Your answer is entirely correct, since $sigma$-algebras are closed under countable unions and singeltons are in this $sigma$-algebra:



                Indeed, if $ain mathbb{R}$, then $${a} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n[} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n]}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Your answer is entirely correct, since $sigma$-algebras are closed under countable unions and singeltons are in this $sigma$-algebra:



                Indeed, if $ain mathbb{R}$, then $${a} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n[} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty{[a,a + 1/n]}$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 21 at 20:43









                Math_QED

                6,88931449




                6,88931449






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008311%2fshow-mathcalb-mathbb-r-contains-all-countable-subsets-of-mathbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei