How to write “There is at least 2 Cars are not the same Colour” in logic
$begingroup$
I would like to know how to write “At least 2 Cars are not the same Colour” in logic.
I know that "at least two cars" can be defined as ∃x(C(x)∧∃y(C(x)∧y≠x))
. is that right? What's next then
Also, how to write "himself/herself" in logic? For example "nobody is better than himself/herself".
Appreciate for any help.
logic predicate-logic logic-translation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to know how to write “At least 2 Cars are not the same Colour” in logic.
I know that "at least two cars" can be defined as ∃x(C(x)∧∃y(C(x)∧y≠x))
. is that right? What's next then
Also, how to write "himself/herself" in logic? For example "nobody is better than himself/herself".
Appreciate for any help.
logic predicate-logic logic-translation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to know how to write “At least 2 Cars are not the same Colour” in logic.
I know that "at least two cars" can be defined as ∃x(C(x)∧∃y(C(x)∧y≠x))
. is that right? What's next then
Also, how to write "himself/herself" in logic? For example "nobody is better than himself/herself".
Appreciate for any help.
logic predicate-logic logic-translation
$endgroup$
I would like to know how to write “At least 2 Cars are not the same Colour” in logic.
I know that "at least two cars" can be defined as ∃x(C(x)∧∃y(C(x)∧y≠x))
. is that right? What's next then
Also, how to write "himself/herself" in logic? For example "nobody is better than himself/herself".
Appreciate for any help.
logic predicate-logic logic-translation
logic predicate-logic logic-translation
edited Dec 10 '18 at 18:18
Bram28
61.6k44793
61.6k44793
asked Dec 10 '18 at 11:02
BaivarasBaivaras
6
6
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $C(x)$ denotes the colour $C$ of a car $x$. To translate "At least 2 cars are not the same colour" we could say "there are cars $x$ and $y$ that are not identical such that $C(x) ne C(y)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$exists space x,y space left( (space x ne y) land (space C(x) ne C(y)) right)$
or, without using $ne$, as follows:
$exists space x,y space left( lnot (space x = y) land lnot(space C(x) = C(y)) right)$
In fact, the qualification $x ne y$ is redundant, since $C(x) ne C(y) Rightarrow x ne y$. So we can simplify this to:
$exists space x,y space left(lnot(C(x) = C(y)) right)$
For the second part, if $B(x,y)$ denotes "$x$ is better than $y$" then "nobody is better than himself/herself" can be expressed as "there is no person $x$ such that $B(x,x)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$nexists space x space B(x,x)$
or
$forall space x space lnot B(x,x)$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
1
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033776%2fhow-to-write-there-is-at-least-2-cars-are-not-the-same-colour-in-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $C(x)$ denotes the colour $C$ of a car $x$. To translate "At least 2 cars are not the same colour" we could say "there are cars $x$ and $y$ that are not identical such that $C(x) ne C(y)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$exists space x,y space left( (space x ne y) land (space C(x) ne C(y)) right)$
or, without using $ne$, as follows:
$exists space x,y space left( lnot (space x = y) land lnot(space C(x) = C(y)) right)$
In fact, the qualification $x ne y$ is redundant, since $C(x) ne C(y) Rightarrow x ne y$. So we can simplify this to:
$exists space x,y space left(lnot(C(x) = C(y)) right)$
For the second part, if $B(x,y)$ denotes "$x$ is better than $y$" then "nobody is better than himself/herself" can be expressed as "there is no person $x$ such that $B(x,x)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$nexists space x space B(x,x)$
or
$forall space x space lnot B(x,x)$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
1
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $C(x)$ denotes the colour $C$ of a car $x$. To translate "At least 2 cars are not the same colour" we could say "there are cars $x$ and $y$ that are not identical such that $C(x) ne C(y)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$exists space x,y space left( (space x ne y) land (space C(x) ne C(y)) right)$
or, without using $ne$, as follows:
$exists space x,y space left( lnot (space x = y) land lnot(space C(x) = C(y)) right)$
In fact, the qualification $x ne y$ is redundant, since $C(x) ne C(y) Rightarrow x ne y$. So we can simplify this to:
$exists space x,y space left(lnot(C(x) = C(y)) right)$
For the second part, if $B(x,y)$ denotes "$x$ is better than $y$" then "nobody is better than himself/herself" can be expressed as "there is no person $x$ such that $B(x,x)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$nexists space x space B(x,x)$
or
$forall space x space lnot B(x,x)$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
1
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $C(x)$ denotes the colour $C$ of a car $x$. To translate "At least 2 cars are not the same colour" we could say "there are cars $x$ and $y$ that are not identical such that $C(x) ne C(y)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$exists space x,y space left( (space x ne y) land (space C(x) ne C(y)) right)$
or, without using $ne$, as follows:
$exists space x,y space left( lnot (space x = y) land lnot(space C(x) = C(y)) right)$
In fact, the qualification $x ne y$ is redundant, since $C(x) ne C(y) Rightarrow x ne y$. So we can simplify this to:
$exists space x,y space left(lnot(C(x) = C(y)) right)$
For the second part, if $B(x,y)$ denotes "$x$ is better than $y$" then "nobody is better than himself/herself" can be expressed as "there is no person $x$ such that $B(x,x)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$nexists space x space B(x,x)$
or
$forall space x space lnot B(x,x)$
$endgroup$
Suppose $C(x)$ denotes the colour $C$ of a car $x$. To translate "At least 2 cars are not the same colour" we could say "there are cars $x$ and $y$ that are not identical such that $C(x) ne C(y)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$exists space x,y space left( (space x ne y) land (space C(x) ne C(y)) right)$
or, without using $ne$, as follows:
$exists space x,y space left( lnot (space x = y) land lnot(space C(x) = C(y)) right)$
In fact, the qualification $x ne y$ is redundant, since $C(x) ne C(y) Rightarrow x ne y$. So we can simplify this to:
$exists space x,y space left(lnot(C(x) = C(y)) right)$
For the second part, if $B(x,y)$ denotes "$x$ is better than $y$" then "nobody is better than himself/herself" can be expressed as "there is no person $x$ such that $B(x,x)$". In formal logic notation this is:
$nexists space x space B(x,x)$
or
$forall space x space lnot B(x,x)$
edited Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
answered Dec 10 '18 at 11:51
gandalf61gandalf61
8,481725
8,481725
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
1
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
1
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
$begingroup$
The answer is a bit misleading since you do not use boolean constants, but use colon and comma. This is at most just a suggestion how to write a correct formula, or an abbreviation of such. Yet not a formal logic notation.
$endgroup$
– Mad Hatter
Dec 10 '18 at 12:18
1
1
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@MadHatter I have changed the notation.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Dec 10 '18 at 13:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033776%2fhow-to-write-there-is-at-least-2-cars-are-not-the-same-colour-in-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown