Guaranteed Winning Strategy on Horse Betting Odds












3












$begingroup$


Suppose four horses - $A, B, C$, and $D$ - are entered in a race and the odds on them, respectively, are $5$ to $1$, $4$ to $1$, $3$ to $1$, and $2$ to $1.$ If you bet $$1$ on $A$, then you receive $$6$ if $A$ wins, or you realize a net gain of $$5$. You lose your dollar if $A$ loses. How should you bet your money to guarantee that you can always make money no matter which horse wins?



I found this question from Horse Betting Odds - But Guaranteed Win! and made some revision.



I think if I bet my money on A, B, C, and D under the following scenario, such as A:B:C:D = 20:15:12:10. I can always make money. These numbers come from the ratios 1/3 : 1/4 : 1/5 : 1/6 multiplied by 60, where 60 is the lowest common multiple for 3,4,5, and 6.



However, I wonder if there is a formal mathematical way to derive this solution. Is this question related to solving the linear inequality system or the probability?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Suppose four horses - $A, B, C$, and $D$ - are entered in a race and the odds on them, respectively, are $5$ to $1$, $4$ to $1$, $3$ to $1$, and $2$ to $1.$ If you bet $$1$ on $A$, then you receive $$6$ if $A$ wins, or you realize a net gain of $$5$. You lose your dollar if $A$ loses. How should you bet your money to guarantee that you can always make money no matter which horse wins?



    I found this question from Horse Betting Odds - But Guaranteed Win! and made some revision.



    I think if I bet my money on A, B, C, and D under the following scenario, such as A:B:C:D = 20:15:12:10. I can always make money. These numbers come from the ratios 1/3 : 1/4 : 1/5 : 1/6 multiplied by 60, where 60 is the lowest common multiple for 3,4,5, and 6.



    However, I wonder if there is a formal mathematical way to derive this solution. Is this question related to solving the linear inequality system or the probability?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose four horses - $A, B, C$, and $D$ - are entered in a race and the odds on them, respectively, are $5$ to $1$, $4$ to $1$, $3$ to $1$, and $2$ to $1.$ If you bet $$1$ on $A$, then you receive $$6$ if $A$ wins, or you realize a net gain of $$5$. You lose your dollar if $A$ loses. How should you bet your money to guarantee that you can always make money no matter which horse wins?



      I found this question from Horse Betting Odds - But Guaranteed Win! and made some revision.



      I think if I bet my money on A, B, C, and D under the following scenario, such as A:B:C:D = 20:15:12:10. I can always make money. These numbers come from the ratios 1/3 : 1/4 : 1/5 : 1/6 multiplied by 60, where 60 is the lowest common multiple for 3,4,5, and 6.



      However, I wonder if there is a formal mathematical way to derive this solution. Is this question related to solving the linear inequality system or the probability?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose four horses - $A, B, C$, and $D$ - are entered in a race and the odds on them, respectively, are $5$ to $1$, $4$ to $1$, $3$ to $1$, and $2$ to $1.$ If you bet $$1$ on $A$, then you receive $$6$ if $A$ wins, or you realize a net gain of $$5$. You lose your dollar if $A$ loses. How should you bet your money to guarantee that you can always make money no matter which horse wins?



      I found this question from Horse Betting Odds - But Guaranteed Win! and made some revision.



      I think if I bet my money on A, B, C, and D under the following scenario, such as A:B:C:D = 20:15:12:10. I can always make money. These numbers come from the ratios 1/3 : 1/4 : 1/5 : 1/6 multiplied by 60, where 60 is the lowest common multiple for 3,4,5, and 6.



      However, I wonder if there is a formal mathematical way to derive this solution. Is this question related to solving the linear inequality system or the probability?







      probability algebra-precalculus systems-of-equations linear-programming






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 4 at 11:34









      user1551

      73.4k566128




      73.4k566128










      asked Jan 4 at 9:07









      Bratt SwanBratt Swan

      1234




      1234






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Each of the horses has a certain return when they win, A is a $6times$ return, B is $5times$, C $4times$, and D $3times$. In general say you have a set of horses $H_i$ that each have a return $r_i$, and you bet some total amount $B$ with $B_i$ on each horse $H_i$. As long as $B_i ge frac{B}{r_i}$ for all $i$, you will not lose money. That is because one of the $H_i$ will win, and that bet will give you $B_ir_i ge B$, so you end up with at least as much as you started. To maximize your guaranteed winnings, you want to maximize the minimum $B_ir_i$, as $B_ir_i-B$ is your net profit. This will happen when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, which occurs when
          $$B_i = frac{frac{B}{r_i}}{sum frac{1}{r_i}}$$
          and your guaranteed profit is
          $$frac{B}{sum frac{1}{r_i}} - B$$
          This is why in a real horse race $sum frac{1}{r_i}$ will always be greater than $1$ (if for some reason it's not go make a big bet!). In this question it was only $.95$ allowing you to make a nice little profit!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
            $endgroup$
            – Bratt Swan
            Jan 4 at 10:51










          • $begingroup$
            @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
            $endgroup$
            – Erik Parkinson
            Jan 4 at 11:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:14











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061446%2fguaranteed-winning-strategy-on-horse-betting-odds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Each of the horses has a certain return when they win, A is a $6times$ return, B is $5times$, C $4times$, and D $3times$. In general say you have a set of horses $H_i$ that each have a return $r_i$, and you bet some total amount $B$ with $B_i$ on each horse $H_i$. As long as $B_i ge frac{B}{r_i}$ for all $i$, you will not lose money. That is because one of the $H_i$ will win, and that bet will give you $B_ir_i ge B$, so you end up with at least as much as you started. To maximize your guaranteed winnings, you want to maximize the minimum $B_ir_i$, as $B_ir_i-B$ is your net profit. This will happen when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, which occurs when
          $$B_i = frac{frac{B}{r_i}}{sum frac{1}{r_i}}$$
          and your guaranteed profit is
          $$frac{B}{sum frac{1}{r_i}} - B$$
          This is why in a real horse race $sum frac{1}{r_i}$ will always be greater than $1$ (if for some reason it's not go make a big bet!). In this question it was only $.95$ allowing you to make a nice little profit!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
            $endgroup$
            – Bratt Swan
            Jan 4 at 10:51










          • $begingroup$
            @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
            $endgroup$
            – Erik Parkinson
            Jan 4 at 11:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:14
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Each of the horses has a certain return when they win, A is a $6times$ return, B is $5times$, C $4times$, and D $3times$. In general say you have a set of horses $H_i$ that each have a return $r_i$, and you bet some total amount $B$ with $B_i$ on each horse $H_i$. As long as $B_i ge frac{B}{r_i}$ for all $i$, you will not lose money. That is because one of the $H_i$ will win, and that bet will give you $B_ir_i ge B$, so you end up with at least as much as you started. To maximize your guaranteed winnings, you want to maximize the minimum $B_ir_i$, as $B_ir_i-B$ is your net profit. This will happen when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, which occurs when
          $$B_i = frac{frac{B}{r_i}}{sum frac{1}{r_i}}$$
          and your guaranteed profit is
          $$frac{B}{sum frac{1}{r_i}} - B$$
          This is why in a real horse race $sum frac{1}{r_i}$ will always be greater than $1$ (if for some reason it's not go make a big bet!). In this question it was only $.95$ allowing you to make a nice little profit!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
            $endgroup$
            – Bratt Swan
            Jan 4 at 10:51










          • $begingroup$
            @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
            $endgroup$
            – Erik Parkinson
            Jan 4 at 11:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:14














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Each of the horses has a certain return when they win, A is a $6times$ return, B is $5times$, C $4times$, and D $3times$. In general say you have a set of horses $H_i$ that each have a return $r_i$, and you bet some total amount $B$ with $B_i$ on each horse $H_i$. As long as $B_i ge frac{B}{r_i}$ for all $i$, you will not lose money. That is because one of the $H_i$ will win, and that bet will give you $B_ir_i ge B$, so you end up with at least as much as you started. To maximize your guaranteed winnings, you want to maximize the minimum $B_ir_i$, as $B_ir_i-B$ is your net profit. This will happen when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, which occurs when
          $$B_i = frac{frac{B}{r_i}}{sum frac{1}{r_i}}$$
          and your guaranteed profit is
          $$frac{B}{sum frac{1}{r_i}} - B$$
          This is why in a real horse race $sum frac{1}{r_i}$ will always be greater than $1$ (if for some reason it's not go make a big bet!). In this question it was only $.95$ allowing you to make a nice little profit!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Each of the horses has a certain return when they win, A is a $6times$ return, B is $5times$, C $4times$, and D $3times$. In general say you have a set of horses $H_i$ that each have a return $r_i$, and you bet some total amount $B$ with $B_i$ on each horse $H_i$. As long as $B_i ge frac{B}{r_i}$ for all $i$, you will not lose money. That is because one of the $H_i$ will win, and that bet will give you $B_ir_i ge B$, so you end up with at least as much as you started. To maximize your guaranteed winnings, you want to maximize the minimum $B_ir_i$, as $B_ir_i-B$ is your net profit. This will happen when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, which occurs when
          $$B_i = frac{frac{B}{r_i}}{sum frac{1}{r_i}}$$
          and your guaranteed profit is
          $$frac{B}{sum frac{1}{r_i}} - B$$
          This is why in a real horse race $sum frac{1}{r_i}$ will always be greater than $1$ (if for some reason it's not go make a big bet!). In this question it was only $.95$ allowing you to make a nice little profit!







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 4 at 9:42









          Erik ParkinsonErik Parkinson

          1,16519




          1,16519












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
            $endgroup$
            – Bratt Swan
            Jan 4 at 10:51










          • $begingroup$
            @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
            $endgroup$
            – Erik Parkinson
            Jan 4 at 11:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:14


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
            $endgroup$
            – Bratt Swan
            Jan 4 at 10:51










          • $begingroup$
            @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
            $endgroup$
            – Erik Parkinson
            Jan 4 at 11:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
            $endgroup$
            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:14
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
          $endgroup$
          – Bratt Swan
          Jan 4 at 10:51




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your explanation. One more question is that why when each $B_ir_i$ is equal, then the profit is maximized?
          $endgroup$
          – Bratt Swan
          Jan 4 at 10:51












          $begingroup$
          @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
          $endgroup$
          – Erik Parkinson
          Jan 4 at 11:07




          $begingroup$
          @BrattSwan If they are not equal, say $B_ir_i >B_jr_j$, then you make more money if $H_i$ wins and less if $H_j$ does. So to maximize your guaranteed winnings no matter what the outcome it, you would want to move some of that $B_i$ money into $B_j$.
          $endgroup$
          – Erik Parkinson
          Jan 4 at 11:07




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
          $endgroup$
          – Henry
          Jan 4 at 23:14




          $begingroup$
          I.e. this maximises the minimum possible return for a given total bet.
          $endgroup$
          – Henry
          Jan 4 at 23:14


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061446%2fguaranteed-winning-strategy-on-horse-betting-odds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei