Conditional Probability of multiple independent events.












0














This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.



The problem is in the context of trapping rats.
problem



I agree with my teacher for the answer in part A as that is just $$P(R=1)=3(0.3cdot0.7cdot0.7)=0.441$$



I do not agree with my teacher for the answer in part B. The answer my teacher gave me was equal to 0.63 using the probability tree below.
enter image description here



I found an alternate answer using this equality given to me.



$$P(X|Y)=frac{P(Xcap{Y})}{P(Y)}$$



The question wants



$$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{{P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})}}{P(text{rat is caught in first trap})}$$



So by using substitution



$P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})=2cdot0.63=0.126$



$P(text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.3$



$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{0.126}{0.3}=0.42$



I belive that my teacher incorrectly added the third possibility of 2 rats being caught which does not satisfy the fact that a rat was caught in the first trap. This leads to $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.189$ instead of $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.126$



After I asked about the answer to this question, my teacher checked the answer with another teacher and they insist that they are correct.



Am I missing something obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I think you are right & the teachers wrong.
    – kimchi lover
    Nov 26 at 1:31
















0














This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.



The problem is in the context of trapping rats.
problem



I agree with my teacher for the answer in part A as that is just $$P(R=1)=3(0.3cdot0.7cdot0.7)=0.441$$



I do not agree with my teacher for the answer in part B. The answer my teacher gave me was equal to 0.63 using the probability tree below.
enter image description here



I found an alternate answer using this equality given to me.



$$P(X|Y)=frac{P(Xcap{Y})}{P(Y)}$$



The question wants



$$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{{P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})}}{P(text{rat is caught in first trap})}$$



So by using substitution



$P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})=2cdot0.63=0.126$



$P(text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.3$



$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{0.126}{0.3}=0.42$



I belive that my teacher incorrectly added the third possibility of 2 rats being caught which does not satisfy the fact that a rat was caught in the first trap. This leads to $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.189$ instead of $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.126$



After I asked about the answer to this question, my teacher checked the answer with another teacher and they insist that they are correct.



Am I missing something obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I think you are right & the teachers wrong.
    – kimchi lover
    Nov 26 at 1:31














0












0








0







This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.



The problem is in the context of trapping rats.
problem



I agree with my teacher for the answer in part A as that is just $$P(R=1)=3(0.3cdot0.7cdot0.7)=0.441$$



I do not agree with my teacher for the answer in part B. The answer my teacher gave me was equal to 0.63 using the probability tree below.
enter image description here



I found an alternate answer using this equality given to me.



$$P(X|Y)=frac{P(Xcap{Y})}{P(Y)}$$



The question wants



$$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{{P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})}}{P(text{rat is caught in first trap})}$$



So by using substitution



$P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})=2cdot0.63=0.126$



$P(text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.3$



$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{0.126}{0.3}=0.42$



I belive that my teacher incorrectly added the third possibility of 2 rats being caught which does not satisfy the fact that a rat was caught in the first trap. This leads to $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.189$ instead of $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.126$



After I asked about the answer to this question, my teacher checked the answer with another teacher and they insist that they are correct.



Am I missing something obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?










share|cite|improve this question















This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.



The problem is in the context of trapping rats.
problem



I agree with my teacher for the answer in part A as that is just $$P(R=1)=3(0.3cdot0.7cdot0.7)=0.441$$



I do not agree with my teacher for the answer in part B. The answer my teacher gave me was equal to 0.63 using the probability tree below.
enter image description here



I found an alternate answer using this equality given to me.



$$P(X|Y)=frac{P(Xcap{Y})}{P(Y)}$$



The question wants



$$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{{P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})}}{P(text{rat is caught in first trap})}$$



So by using substitution



$P(text{2 rats }cap{text{ rat is caught in first trap}})=2cdot0.63=0.126$



$P(text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.3$



$P(text{2 rats, given rat is caught in first trap})=frac{0.126}{0.3}=0.42$



I belive that my teacher incorrectly added the third possibility of 2 rats being caught which does not satisfy the fact that a rat was caught in the first trap. This leads to $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.189$ instead of $P(text{2 rats} cap text{rat is caught in first trap})=0.126$



After I asked about the answer to this question, my teacher checked the answer with another teacher and they insist that they are correct.



Am I missing something obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?







conditional-probability






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 at 1:30

























asked Nov 26 at 1:15









Zavier

185




185












  • I think you are right & the teachers wrong.
    – kimchi lover
    Nov 26 at 1:31


















  • I think you are right & the teachers wrong.
    – kimchi lover
    Nov 26 at 1:31
















I think you are right & the teachers wrong.
– kimchi lover
Nov 26 at 1:31




I think you are right & the teachers wrong.
– kimchi lover
Nov 26 at 1:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














You identified correctly the mistake your teacher made.



You can derive your result using the values of your teacher by correctly restricting the consideration to the upper branch of the depicted tree:




  • $P(R=2) = 0.189$


  • $color{red}{P(R'RR) = 0.063}$ does not belong to the event $1st, R$
    $$P(R=2, | , 1st, R)= frac{(R=2) cap (1st, R)}{P(1st ,R)} = frac{0.189 color{red}{- 0.063}}{0.3} = 0.42$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013668%2fconditional-probability-of-multiple-independent-events%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    You identified correctly the mistake your teacher made.



    You can derive your result using the values of your teacher by correctly restricting the consideration to the upper branch of the depicted tree:




    • $P(R=2) = 0.189$


    • $color{red}{P(R'RR) = 0.063}$ does not belong to the event $1st, R$
      $$P(R=2, | , 1st, R)= frac{(R=2) cap (1st, R)}{P(1st ,R)} = frac{0.189 color{red}{- 0.063}}{0.3} = 0.42$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      You identified correctly the mistake your teacher made.



      You can derive your result using the values of your teacher by correctly restricting the consideration to the upper branch of the depicted tree:




      • $P(R=2) = 0.189$


      • $color{red}{P(R'RR) = 0.063}$ does not belong to the event $1st, R$
        $$P(R=2, | , 1st, R)= frac{(R=2) cap (1st, R)}{P(1st ,R)} = frac{0.189 color{red}{- 0.063}}{0.3} = 0.42$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        You identified correctly the mistake your teacher made.



        You can derive your result using the values of your teacher by correctly restricting the consideration to the upper branch of the depicted tree:




        • $P(R=2) = 0.189$


        • $color{red}{P(R'RR) = 0.063}$ does not belong to the event $1st, R$
          $$P(R=2, | , 1st, R)= frac{(R=2) cap (1st, R)}{P(1st ,R)} = frac{0.189 color{red}{- 0.063}}{0.3} = 0.42$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        You identified correctly the mistake your teacher made.



        You can derive your result using the values of your teacher by correctly restricting the consideration to the upper branch of the depicted tree:




        • $P(R=2) = 0.189$


        • $color{red}{P(R'RR) = 0.063}$ does not belong to the event $1st, R$
          $$P(R=2, | , 1st, R)= frac{(R=2) cap (1st, R)}{P(1st ,R)} = frac{0.189 color{red}{- 0.063}}{0.3} = 0.42$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 26 at 3:48









        trancelocation

        9,0751521




        9,0751521






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013668%2fconditional-probability-of-multiple-independent-events%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei