$lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz$












1














Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.



I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.



Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.



    I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.



    Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      1





      Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.



      I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.



      Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.



      I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.



      Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?







      integration complex-analysis limits logarithms estimation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 26 at 1:55









      mathstackuser

      676112




      676112






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).



          You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-sigma}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-sigma}/logrho$ with $sigma=Relambda$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
          $$frac{2phirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013703%2flim-r-to-infty-int-c-ircirz-lambda-logz-1dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).



            You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-sigma}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-sigma}/logrho$ with $sigma=Relambda$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
            $$frac{2phirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              1














              Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).



              You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-sigma}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-sigma}/logrho$ with $sigma=Relambda$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
              $$frac{2phirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1






                Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).



                You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-sigma}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-sigma}/logrho$ with $sigma=Relambda$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
                $$frac{2phirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).



                You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-sigma}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-sigma}/logrho$ with $sigma=Relambda$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
                $$frac{2phirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-sigma}}{logrho}.$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 13 at 8:00

























                answered Dec 1 at 22:34









                metamorphy

                3,3671521




                3,3671521






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013703%2flim-r-to-infty-int-c-ircirz-lambda-logz-1dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei