Definition of the conditional expectation operator $E^Q_{t,z}$?












0












$begingroup$


I'm studying the book "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time" by Bjork, and the authore uses a lot the notation $E^Q_{t,z}$, where $Q$ is a probability measure and $z=Z_t$ a stochastic process, but he did not give the definition.



Form the exercise below (taken from the book) I guess that $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=E^Q(Z_u|Z_t)$. So for $u = t$ we should have $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, is this correct?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $E^Q_{t,z}$ must be $E^Q(cdot|Z_t=z)$. But that doesn't mean $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, which would be true if $Z$ were also a martingale. In any case, are you sure there's no definition in the book? I'd have another look at the section where the author first discusses Markov processes.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:30












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the help. So in the exercise $$int_t^T dlog Z_t^2=log Z_T^2-log Z_t^2,$$ but then $$E^Q_{t,z}(log Z_t^2)=E^Q(log Z_t^2|Z_t=z)=log z^2?$$
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sure. And yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks. To be rigorous, in the integral should I change the time letter of $Z$, i.e. writing $int_t^T dlog Z_s^2$ (with $s$ instead of $t$) ?
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:57








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. More like to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21
















0












$begingroup$


I'm studying the book "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time" by Bjork, and the authore uses a lot the notation $E^Q_{t,z}$, where $Q$ is a probability measure and $z=Z_t$ a stochastic process, but he did not give the definition.



Form the exercise below (taken from the book) I guess that $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=E^Q(Z_u|Z_t)$. So for $u = t$ we should have $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, is this correct?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $E^Q_{t,z}$ must be $E^Q(cdot|Z_t=z)$. But that doesn't mean $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, which would be true if $Z$ were also a martingale. In any case, are you sure there's no definition in the book? I'd have another look at the section where the author first discusses Markov processes.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:30












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the help. So in the exercise $$int_t^T dlog Z_t^2=log Z_T^2-log Z_t^2,$$ but then $$E^Q_{t,z}(log Z_t^2)=E^Q(log Z_t^2|Z_t=z)=log z^2?$$
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sure. And yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks. To be rigorous, in the integral should I change the time letter of $Z$, i.e. writing $int_t^T dlog Z_s^2$ (with $s$ instead of $t$) ?
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:57








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. More like to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm studying the book "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time" by Bjork, and the authore uses a lot the notation $E^Q_{t,z}$, where $Q$ is a probability measure and $z=Z_t$ a stochastic process, but he did not give the definition.



Form the exercise below (taken from the book) I guess that $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=E^Q(Z_u|Z_t)$. So for $u = t$ we should have $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, is this correct?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm studying the book "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time" by Bjork, and the authore uses a lot the notation $E^Q_{t,z}$, where $Q$ is a probability measure and $z=Z_t$ a stochastic process, but he did not give the definition.



Form the exercise below (taken from the book) I guess that $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=E^Q(Z_u|Z_t)$. So for $u = t$ we should have $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, is this correct?



enter image description here







stochastic-calculus expected-value






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 26 '18 at 13:22









sound wavesound wave

28619




28619








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $E^Q_{t,z}$ must be $E^Q(cdot|Z_t=z)$. But that doesn't mean $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, which would be true if $Z$ were also a martingale. In any case, are you sure there's no definition in the book? I'd have another look at the section where the author first discusses Markov processes.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:30












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the help. So in the exercise $$int_t^T dlog Z_t^2=log Z_T^2-log Z_t^2,$$ but then $$E^Q_{t,z}(log Z_t^2)=E^Q(log Z_t^2|Z_t=z)=log z^2?$$
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sure. And yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks. To be rigorous, in the integral should I change the time letter of $Z$, i.e. writing $int_t^T dlog Z_s^2$ (with $s$ instead of $t$) ?
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:57








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. More like to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $E^Q_{t,z}$ must be $E^Q(cdot|Z_t=z)$. But that doesn't mean $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, which would be true if $Z$ were also a martingale. In any case, are you sure there's no definition in the book? I'd have another look at the section where the author first discusses Markov processes.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:30












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the help. So in the exercise $$int_t^T dlog Z_t^2=log Z_T^2-log Z_t^2,$$ but then $$E^Q_{t,z}(log Z_t^2)=E^Q(log Z_t^2|Z_t=z)=log z^2?$$
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sure. And yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks. To be rigorous, in the integral should I change the time letter of $Z$, i.e. writing $int_t^T dlog Z_s^2$ (with $s$ instead of $t$) ?
    $endgroup$
    – sound wave
    Dec 26 '18 at 14:57








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. More like to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – AddSup
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21








1




1




$begingroup$
$E^Q_{t,z}$ must be $E^Q(cdot|Z_t=z)$. But that doesn't mean $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, which would be true if $Z$ were also a martingale. In any case, are you sure there's no definition in the book? I'd have another look at the section where the author first discusses Markov processes.
$endgroup$
– AddSup
Dec 26 '18 at 14:30






$begingroup$
$E^Q_{t,z}$ must be $E^Q(cdot|Z_t=z)$. But that doesn't mean $E^Q_{t,z}(Z_u)=Z_t$, which would be true if $Z$ were also a martingale. In any case, are you sure there's no definition in the book? I'd have another look at the section where the author first discusses Markov processes.
$endgroup$
– AddSup
Dec 26 '18 at 14:30














$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the help. So in the exercise $$int_t^T dlog Z_t^2=log Z_T^2-log Z_t^2,$$ but then $$E^Q_{t,z}(log Z_t^2)=E^Q(log Z_t^2|Z_t=z)=log z^2?$$
$endgroup$
– sound wave
Dec 26 '18 at 14:41




$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the help. So in the exercise $$int_t^T dlog Z_t^2=log Z_T^2-log Z_t^2,$$ but then $$E^Q_{t,z}(log Z_t^2)=E^Q(log Z_t^2|Z_t=z)=log z^2?$$
$endgroup$
– sound wave
Dec 26 '18 at 14:41




1




1




$begingroup$
Sure. And yes, that's correct.
$endgroup$
– AddSup
Dec 26 '18 at 14:44




$begingroup$
Sure. And yes, that's correct.
$endgroup$
– AddSup
Dec 26 '18 at 14:44












$begingroup$
Ok thanks. To be rigorous, in the integral should I change the time letter of $Z$, i.e. writing $int_t^T dlog Z_s^2$ (with $s$ instead of $t$) ?
$endgroup$
– sound wave
Dec 26 '18 at 14:57






$begingroup$
Ok thanks. To be rigorous, in the integral should I change the time letter of $Z$, i.e. writing $int_t^T dlog Z_s^2$ (with $s$ instead of $t$) ?
$endgroup$
– sound wave
Dec 26 '18 at 14:57






1




1




$begingroup$
Yes. More like to be correct.
$endgroup$
– AddSup
Dec 26 '18 at 18:21




$begingroup$
Yes. More like to be correct.
$endgroup$
– AddSup
Dec 26 '18 at 18:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The notation $mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_tbig]$, where $B$ a stochastic process, $Q$ is the probability measure, $sinmathbb R^+$ a given time, $ainmathbb R$ a given value for the process $B$, is a shortcut for the longer notation for the conditional expectation of the stochastic process $mathbb E^Qbig[B_t|B_s=abig]$.



If the two times coincide, i.e. $tequiv s$, then the result is:
$$mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_sbig]= mathbb E^Qbig[B_s|B_s=abig]=a.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – user636387
    Feb 2 at 12:48











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052937%2fdefinition-of-the-conditional-expectation-operator-eq-t-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

The notation $mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_tbig]$, where $B$ a stochastic process, $Q$ is the probability measure, $sinmathbb R^+$ a given time, $ainmathbb R$ a given value for the process $B$, is a shortcut for the longer notation for the conditional expectation of the stochastic process $mathbb E^Qbig[B_t|B_s=abig]$.



If the two times coincide, i.e. $tequiv s$, then the result is:
$$mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_sbig]= mathbb E^Qbig[B_s|B_s=abig]=a.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – user636387
    Feb 2 at 12:48
















0












$begingroup$

The notation $mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_tbig]$, where $B$ a stochastic process, $Q$ is the probability measure, $sinmathbb R^+$ a given time, $ainmathbb R$ a given value for the process $B$, is a shortcut for the longer notation for the conditional expectation of the stochastic process $mathbb E^Qbig[B_t|B_s=abig]$.



If the two times coincide, i.e. $tequiv s$, then the result is:
$$mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_sbig]= mathbb E^Qbig[B_s|B_s=abig]=a.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – user636387
    Feb 2 at 12:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$

The notation $mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_tbig]$, where $B$ a stochastic process, $Q$ is the probability measure, $sinmathbb R^+$ a given time, $ainmathbb R$ a given value for the process $B$, is a shortcut for the longer notation for the conditional expectation of the stochastic process $mathbb E^Qbig[B_t|B_s=abig]$.



If the two times coincide, i.e. $tequiv s$, then the result is:
$$mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_sbig]= mathbb E^Qbig[B_s|B_s=abig]=a.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The notation $mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_tbig]$, where $B$ a stochastic process, $Q$ is the probability measure, $sinmathbb R^+$ a given time, $ainmathbb R$ a given value for the process $B$, is a shortcut for the longer notation for the conditional expectation of the stochastic process $mathbb E^Qbig[B_t|B_s=abig]$.



If the two times coincide, i.e. $tequiv s$, then the result is:
$$mathbb E^Q_{s,a}big[B_sbig]= mathbb E^Qbig[B_s|B_s=abig]=a.$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 2 at 11:52







user636387















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – user636387
    Feb 2 at 12:48














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – user636387
    Feb 2 at 12:48








1




1




$begingroup$
You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
$endgroup$
– user636387
Feb 2 at 12:48




$begingroup$
You can find more about the notation here: stat.auckland.ac.nz/~fewster/325/notes/ch3.pdf
$endgroup$
– user636387
Feb 2 at 12:48


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052937%2fdefinition-of-the-conditional-expectation-operator-eq-t-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei