Does an endpoint of a function have a slope?












2












$begingroup$


Say I have the following function which is defined for $0 leq x leq 1$:



enter image description here



If you would derive this function and substitute $y = 0$, you would get $x = 0.5$ and $x = 0.75$ for the respective as the maximum and minimum point respectively.



Now, what if I ask for which range of $x$ does this function rise? Well, I know that it's:



$$0 < x < 0.5$$
$$0.75 < x < 1$$



What confuses me is: why don't we include the endpoints and make the inequality inclusive? The explanation I have been given is that a slope is determined between two points, but then why is it when you substitute the $x$ coordinate of the endpoints in the derivative, you get a value?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Say I have the following function which is defined for $0 leq x leq 1$:



    enter image description here



    If you would derive this function and substitute $y = 0$, you would get $x = 0.5$ and $x = 0.75$ for the respective as the maximum and minimum point respectively.



    Now, what if I ask for which range of $x$ does this function rise? Well, I know that it's:



    $$0 < x < 0.5$$
    $$0.75 < x < 1$$



    What confuses me is: why don't we include the endpoints and make the inequality inclusive? The explanation I have been given is that a slope is determined between two points, but then why is it when you substitute the $x$ coordinate of the endpoints in the derivative, you get a value?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Say I have the following function which is defined for $0 leq x leq 1$:



      enter image description here



      If you would derive this function and substitute $y = 0$, you would get $x = 0.5$ and $x = 0.75$ for the respective as the maximum and minimum point respectively.



      Now, what if I ask for which range of $x$ does this function rise? Well, I know that it's:



      $$0 < x < 0.5$$
      $$0.75 < x < 1$$



      What confuses me is: why don't we include the endpoints and make the inequality inclusive? The explanation I have been given is that a slope is determined between two points, but then why is it when you substitute the $x$ coordinate of the endpoints in the derivative, you get a value?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Say I have the following function which is defined for $0 leq x leq 1$:



      enter image description here



      If you would derive this function and substitute $y = 0$, you would get $x = 0.5$ and $x = 0.75$ for the respective as the maximum and minimum point respectively.



      Now, what if I ask for which range of $x$ does this function rise? Well, I know that it's:



      $$0 < x < 0.5$$
      $$0.75 < x < 1$$



      What confuses me is: why don't we include the endpoints and make the inequality inclusive? The explanation I have been given is that a slope is determined between two points, but then why is it when you substitute the $x$ coordinate of the endpoints in the derivative, you get a value?







      real-analysis calculus derivatives slope






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 15 '18 at 12:28









      daedsidogdaedsidog

      29017




      29017






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          For example, the derivative at the left endpoint is indeed the slope to the right, but there are multiple tangent lines. Therefore the derivative loses its interpretation as the slope of the tangent.



          Some reasons other than this are that in some theorems knowing the derivative at the boundary is not necessary in the statement of the theorem, only on the interior. It's not that the derivative on the boundary is meaningless, it's just not needed in, for example, the mean value theorem. In general the derivative is the one sided limit on the boundary, and is perfectly well defined.



          In more advanced calculus/differential geometry/differential equations, the derivative at the boundary is used just as much as in the interior. In differential equations we may constrain the derivative at the boundary in our solution, for example.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040459%2fdoes-an-endpoint-of-a-function-have-a-slope%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            For example, the derivative at the left endpoint is indeed the slope to the right, but there are multiple tangent lines. Therefore the derivative loses its interpretation as the slope of the tangent.



            Some reasons other than this are that in some theorems knowing the derivative at the boundary is not necessary in the statement of the theorem, only on the interior. It's not that the derivative on the boundary is meaningless, it's just not needed in, for example, the mean value theorem. In general the derivative is the one sided limit on the boundary, and is perfectly well defined.



            In more advanced calculus/differential geometry/differential equations, the derivative at the boundary is used just as much as in the interior. In differential equations we may constrain the derivative at the boundary in our solution, for example.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              For example, the derivative at the left endpoint is indeed the slope to the right, but there are multiple tangent lines. Therefore the derivative loses its interpretation as the slope of the tangent.



              Some reasons other than this are that in some theorems knowing the derivative at the boundary is not necessary in the statement of the theorem, only on the interior. It's not that the derivative on the boundary is meaningless, it's just not needed in, for example, the mean value theorem. In general the derivative is the one sided limit on the boundary, and is perfectly well defined.



              In more advanced calculus/differential geometry/differential equations, the derivative at the boundary is used just as much as in the interior. In differential equations we may constrain the derivative at the boundary in our solution, for example.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                For example, the derivative at the left endpoint is indeed the slope to the right, but there are multiple tangent lines. Therefore the derivative loses its interpretation as the slope of the tangent.



                Some reasons other than this are that in some theorems knowing the derivative at the boundary is not necessary in the statement of the theorem, only on the interior. It's not that the derivative on the boundary is meaningless, it's just not needed in, for example, the mean value theorem. In general the derivative is the one sided limit on the boundary, and is perfectly well defined.



                In more advanced calculus/differential geometry/differential equations, the derivative at the boundary is used just as much as in the interior. In differential equations we may constrain the derivative at the boundary in our solution, for example.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                For example, the derivative at the left endpoint is indeed the slope to the right, but there are multiple tangent lines. Therefore the derivative loses its interpretation as the slope of the tangent.



                Some reasons other than this are that in some theorems knowing the derivative at the boundary is not necessary in the statement of the theorem, only on the interior. It's not that the derivative on the boundary is meaningless, it's just not needed in, for example, the mean value theorem. In general the derivative is the one sided limit on the boundary, and is perfectly well defined.



                In more advanced calculus/differential geometry/differential equations, the derivative at the boundary is used just as much as in the interior. In differential equations we may constrain the derivative at the boundary in our solution, for example.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 15 '18 at 13:13

























                answered Dec 15 '18 at 12:50









                Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

                38.3k63768




                38.3k63768






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040459%2fdoes-an-endpoint-of-a-function-have-a-slope%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei