Why does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$?
$begingroup$
A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:
'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'
Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.
.
.
Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?
complex-analysis convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:
'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'
Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.
.
.
Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?
complex-analysis convergence
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:
'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'
Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.
.
.
Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?
complex-analysis convergence
$endgroup$
A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:
'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'
Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.
.
.
Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?
complex-analysis convergence
complex-analysis convergence
edited Dec 15 '18 at 14:05
Idea Flux
asked Dec 15 '18 at 14:00
Idea FluxIdea Flux
86
86
$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041525%2fwhy-does-convergence-of-gammax-imply-convergence-of-gammaz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041525%2fwhy-does-convergence-of-gammax-imply-convergence-of-gammaz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20