Why does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$?












0












$begingroup$


A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:



'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'



Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.



.



.



Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:48










  • $begingroup$
    @Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:13












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:25












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
















0












$begingroup$


A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:



'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'



Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.



.



.



Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:48










  • $begingroup$
    @Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:13












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:25












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 16 '18 at 8:20














0












0








0





$begingroup$


A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:



'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'



Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.



.



.



Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A while ago I asked a question (link at the bottom) about the gamma function. It was answered with:



'$intlimits_a^b e^{-t} t^{x-1}dt=intlimits_a^b |e^{-t} t^{z-1}|dt$ with $xinmathbb{R}_{>0}$ and $zinmathbb{C}_{Re(z)>0}$. Since the LHS converges, we have that $intlimits_a^b e^t t^{z-1} dt$ converges.'



Why can we draw this conclusion? In my mind we can only draw conclusions about $int|f(z)|dt$ and not about $int f(z) dt$.



.



.



Link: Does convergence of $Gamma(x)$ imply convergence of $Gamma(z)$? Is it generalisable?







complex-analysis convergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 15 '18 at 14:05







Idea Flux

















asked Dec 15 '18 at 14:00









Idea FluxIdea Flux

86




86












  • $begingroup$
    If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:48










  • $begingroup$
    @Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:13












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:25












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 16 '18 at 8:20


















  • $begingroup$
    If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:48










  • $begingroup$
    @Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:13












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
    $endgroup$
    – Idea Flux
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:25












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 16 '18 at 8:20
















$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48




$begingroup$
If $int_a^b|f(u)|,du$ is finite (and $f$ measurable) then $int_a^bf(u),du$ exists (and is finite).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 15 '18 at 14:48












$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13






$begingroup$
@Did But if $b=infty$, mayhaps $intlimits_a^b f(u)du$ becomes finite yet not convergent. In context of the Gamma function: we expect to get $int f = cinmathbb{C}$ and thus can write $c=re^{ivarphi}$. Can't it be that as we take the limit $btoinfty$ we have that $|c|$ converges, but $varphi$ does not which means that c becomes finite yet does not converge?
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:13














$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25






$begingroup$
@Did I think I cannot express myself more clearly, but the idea is that the "answer" to the integral could converge to the line $d(0,z) = 10$, but not a specific point on this line. This due to the fact that $|c|=|re^{ivarphi}|=r$ converges but $c=re^{ivarphi}$ does not since $varphi$ does not converge as $btoinfty$
$endgroup$
– Idea Flux
Dec 15 '18 at 15:25














$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Absolutely improper integrability implies improper integrability
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 16 '18 at 8:20










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041525%2fwhy-does-convergence-of-gammax-imply-convergence-of-gammaz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041525%2fwhy-does-convergence-of-gammax-imply-convergence-of-gammaz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei