Given that $G$ is a finite group, prove that $F(G/Z(G))$ = $F(G) / Z(G)$.












2












$begingroup$


I have seen the equation in the title while reading about the Fitting subgroup, but I can't work out why those two quantities are equal.




Could anyone please explain the proof?




Thank you very much.



I know that $F(G)$ is the product of all $O_p(G)$ for all primes $p$.




Is it true that $O_p(G)/Z(G)$ = $O_p(G/Z)$ for each prime $p$?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by $O_p(G)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Here's a question concerning the notation $O_p(G)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 6:20
















2












$begingroup$


I have seen the equation in the title while reading about the Fitting subgroup, but I can't work out why those two quantities are equal.




Could anyone please explain the proof?




Thank you very much.



I know that $F(G)$ is the product of all $O_p(G)$ for all primes $p$.




Is it true that $O_p(G)/Z(G)$ = $O_p(G/Z)$ for each prime $p$?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by $O_p(G)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Here's a question concerning the notation $O_p(G)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 6:20














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have seen the equation in the title while reading about the Fitting subgroup, but I can't work out why those two quantities are equal.




Could anyone please explain the proof?




Thank you very much.



I know that $F(G)$ is the product of all $O_p(G)$ for all primes $p$.




Is it true that $O_p(G)/Z(G)$ = $O_p(G/Z)$ for each prime $p$?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have seen the equation in the title while reading about the Fitting subgroup, but I can't work out why those two quantities are equal.




Could anyone please explain the proof?




Thank you very much.



I know that $F(G)$ is the product of all $O_p(G)$ for all primes $p$.




Is it true that $O_p(G)/Z(G)$ = $O_p(G/Z)$ for each prime $p$?








group-theory finite-groups proof-explanation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 29 '18 at 3:09









the_fox

2,89021537




2,89021537










asked Apr 7 '17 at 3:09









K.OK.O

114




114












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by $O_p(G)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Here's a question concerning the notation $O_p(G)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 6:20


















  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by $O_p(G)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Here's a question concerning the notation $O_p(G)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Dec 22 '18 at 6:20
















$begingroup$
What do you mean by $O_p(G)$?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 22 '18 at 5:17




$begingroup$
What do you mean by $O_p(G)$?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 22 '18 at 5:17












$begingroup$
Here's a question concerning the notation $O_p(G)$.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 22 '18 at 6:20




$begingroup$
Here's a question concerning the notation $O_p(G)$.
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Dec 22 '18 at 6:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The group $F(G)/Z(G)$ is a nilpotent normal subgroup of $G/Z(G)$, so $F(G)/Z(G)$ is contained in $F(G/Z(G))$. What about the other direction? Write $F(G/Z(G))=H/Z(G)$. Since $H/Z(G)$ is nilpotent (because it is the Fitting subgroup of some group), it follows that $H$ is nilpotent (do you understand why?). Then $H leq F(G)$, which proves the other direction we wanted.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2221796%2fgiven-that-g-is-a-finite-group-prove-that-fg-zg-fg-zg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    The group $F(G)/Z(G)$ is a nilpotent normal subgroup of $G/Z(G)$, so $F(G)/Z(G)$ is contained in $F(G/Z(G))$. What about the other direction? Write $F(G/Z(G))=H/Z(G)$. Since $H/Z(G)$ is nilpotent (because it is the Fitting subgroup of some group), it follows that $H$ is nilpotent (do you understand why?). Then $H leq F(G)$, which proves the other direction we wanted.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      The group $F(G)/Z(G)$ is a nilpotent normal subgroup of $G/Z(G)$, so $F(G)/Z(G)$ is contained in $F(G/Z(G))$. What about the other direction? Write $F(G/Z(G))=H/Z(G)$. Since $H/Z(G)$ is nilpotent (because it is the Fitting subgroup of some group), it follows that $H$ is nilpotent (do you understand why?). Then $H leq F(G)$, which proves the other direction we wanted.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        The group $F(G)/Z(G)$ is a nilpotent normal subgroup of $G/Z(G)$, so $F(G)/Z(G)$ is contained in $F(G/Z(G))$. What about the other direction? Write $F(G/Z(G))=H/Z(G)$. Since $H/Z(G)$ is nilpotent (because it is the Fitting subgroup of some group), it follows that $H$ is nilpotent (do you understand why?). Then $H leq F(G)$, which proves the other direction we wanted.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The group $F(G)/Z(G)$ is a nilpotent normal subgroup of $G/Z(G)$, so $F(G)/Z(G)$ is contained in $F(G/Z(G))$. What about the other direction? Write $F(G/Z(G))=H/Z(G)$. Since $H/Z(G)$ is nilpotent (because it is the Fitting subgroup of some group), it follows that $H$ is nilpotent (do you understand why?). Then $H leq F(G)$, which proves the other direction we wanted.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 22 '18 at 5:35









        the_foxthe_fox

        2,89021537




        2,89021537






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2221796%2fgiven-that-g-is-a-finite-group-prove-that-fg-zg-fg-zg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei