Taylor expansion on PRML(5.28)












0












$begingroup$


I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.

So, please anyone help me.



PRML





Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $



$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$





Taylor series



$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:00












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:01












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Eiji
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:45












  • $begingroup$
    That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:48












  • $begingroup$
    Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
















0












$begingroup$


I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.

So, please anyone help me.



PRML





Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $



$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$





Taylor series



$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:00












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:01












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Eiji
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:45












  • $begingroup$
    That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:48












  • $begingroup$
    Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:51














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.

So, please anyone help me.



PRML





Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $



$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$





Taylor series



$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.

So, please anyone help me.



PRML





Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$



$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $



$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$





Taylor series



$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$







optimization machine-learning hessian-matrix






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 22 '18 at 8:36







Eiji

















asked Dec 22 '18 at 7:29









EijiEiji

11




11












  • $begingroup$
    A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:00












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:01












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Eiji
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:45












  • $begingroup$
    That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:48












  • $begingroup$
    Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:51


















  • $begingroup$
    A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:00












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:01












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Eiji
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:45












  • $begingroup$
    That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:48












  • $begingroup$
    Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
















$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00






$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00














$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01






$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01














$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45






$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45














$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48






$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48














$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51




$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049194%2ftaylor-expansion-on-prml5-28%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049194%2ftaylor-expansion-on-prml5-28%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei