Proving a direct product of groups is a group
$begingroup$
I am trying to prove the following and am looking toward the math.stackexchange community to comment on whether I am on the right track or not. Thank you in advance.
Let $n geq 1$ be an integer. Suppose ${G_1,...,G_n}$ is a finite set of groups. Define the set $G = G_1 times G_2 times ... times G_n$ of ordered n-tuples $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$ where $g_i in G_i$. Show that the operation $bullet$: $G times G rightarrow G$ given by $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) = (g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n)$ makes $G$ into a group.
Proof of associativity: $((g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...g'_n)) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n)$ = $(g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n) $ = $(g_1g'_1g''_1,g_2g'_2g''_2,...,g_ng'_ng''_n)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1g''_1,g'_2g''_2,...,g'_ng''_n) = (g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet ((g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n))$
Proof of the existence of an identity For each $G_i in G$, take its identity element $e_i$ and multiply it as follows: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (e_1,e_2,...,e_3)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$.
Proof of the existence of an inverse: Since each $G_i in G$ is a group, simply takes its multiplicative inverse $g_i^{-1}$ and multiply it: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g_1^{-1},g_2^{-1},...,g_n^{-1}) = (e_1,e_2,...,e_n)$.
proof-verification finite-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to prove the following and am looking toward the math.stackexchange community to comment on whether I am on the right track or not. Thank you in advance.
Let $n geq 1$ be an integer. Suppose ${G_1,...,G_n}$ is a finite set of groups. Define the set $G = G_1 times G_2 times ... times G_n$ of ordered n-tuples $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$ where $g_i in G_i$. Show that the operation $bullet$: $G times G rightarrow G$ given by $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) = (g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n)$ makes $G$ into a group.
Proof of associativity: $((g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...g'_n)) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n)$ = $(g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n) $ = $(g_1g'_1g''_1,g_2g'_2g''_2,...,g_ng'_ng''_n)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1g''_1,g'_2g''_2,...,g'_ng''_n) = (g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet ((g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n))$
Proof of the existence of an identity For each $G_i in G$, take its identity element $e_i$ and multiply it as follows: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (e_1,e_2,...,e_3)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$.
Proof of the existence of an inverse: Since each $G_i in G$ is a group, simply takes its multiplicative inverse $g_i^{-1}$ and multiply it: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g_1^{-1},g_2^{-1},...,g_n^{-1}) = (e_1,e_2,...,e_n)$.
proof-verification finite-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Looks fine, and extremely boring as this thing usually is. Just remember to briefly explain that in the associativity part you're using the corresponding associativity of $;G_i;$ in each coordinate, and don't drop the parentheses: $$left((g_1,...)(g_1',...)right)cdot(g_1'',...)=((g_1g_1')g_1'',...)=(g_1 (g_1'cdot g_1''),...);,;;etc.$$
$endgroup$
– Timbuc
Feb 24 '15 at 6:27
$begingroup$
Thank you very much Timbuc for that tip on associativity.
$endgroup$
– letsmakemuffinstogether
Feb 25 '15 at 3:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to prove the following and am looking toward the math.stackexchange community to comment on whether I am on the right track or not. Thank you in advance.
Let $n geq 1$ be an integer. Suppose ${G_1,...,G_n}$ is a finite set of groups. Define the set $G = G_1 times G_2 times ... times G_n$ of ordered n-tuples $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$ where $g_i in G_i$. Show that the operation $bullet$: $G times G rightarrow G$ given by $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) = (g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n)$ makes $G$ into a group.
Proof of associativity: $((g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...g'_n)) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n)$ = $(g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n) $ = $(g_1g'_1g''_1,g_2g'_2g''_2,...,g_ng'_ng''_n)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1g''_1,g'_2g''_2,...,g'_ng''_n) = (g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet ((g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n))$
Proof of the existence of an identity For each $G_i in G$, take its identity element $e_i$ and multiply it as follows: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (e_1,e_2,...,e_3)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$.
Proof of the existence of an inverse: Since each $G_i in G$ is a group, simply takes its multiplicative inverse $g_i^{-1}$ and multiply it: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g_1^{-1},g_2^{-1},...,g_n^{-1}) = (e_1,e_2,...,e_n)$.
proof-verification finite-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
I am trying to prove the following and am looking toward the math.stackexchange community to comment on whether I am on the right track or not. Thank you in advance.
Let $n geq 1$ be an integer. Suppose ${G_1,...,G_n}$ is a finite set of groups. Define the set $G = G_1 times G_2 times ... times G_n$ of ordered n-tuples $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$ where $g_i in G_i$. Show that the operation $bullet$: $G times G rightarrow G$ given by $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) = (g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n)$ makes $G$ into a group.
Proof of associativity: $((g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1,g'_2,...g'_n)) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n)$ = $(g_1g'_1,g_2g'_2,...,g_ng'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n) $ = $(g_1g'_1g''_1,g_2g'_2g''_2,...,g_ng'_ng''_n)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g'_1g''_1,g'_2g''_2,...,g'_ng''_n) = (g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet ((g'_1,g'_2,...,g'_n) bullet (g''_1,g''_2,...,g''_n))$
Proof of the existence of an identity For each $G_i in G$, take its identity element $e_i$ and multiply it as follows: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (e_1,e_2,...,e_3)$ = $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n)$.
Proof of the existence of an inverse: Since each $G_i in G$ is a group, simply takes its multiplicative inverse $g_i^{-1}$ and multiply it: $(g_1,g_2,...,g_n) bullet (g_1^{-1},g_2^{-1},...,g_n^{-1}) = (e_1,e_2,...,e_n)$.
proof-verification finite-groups direct-product
proof-verification finite-groups direct-product
edited Dec 22 '18 at 4:09
Shaun
9,241113684
9,241113684
asked Feb 24 '15 at 6:07
letsmakemuffinstogetherletsmakemuffinstogether
9441717
9441717
1
$begingroup$
Looks fine, and extremely boring as this thing usually is. Just remember to briefly explain that in the associativity part you're using the corresponding associativity of $;G_i;$ in each coordinate, and don't drop the parentheses: $$left((g_1,...)(g_1',...)right)cdot(g_1'',...)=((g_1g_1')g_1'',...)=(g_1 (g_1'cdot g_1''),...);,;;etc.$$
$endgroup$
– Timbuc
Feb 24 '15 at 6:27
$begingroup$
Thank you very much Timbuc for that tip on associativity.
$endgroup$
– letsmakemuffinstogether
Feb 25 '15 at 3:28
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Looks fine, and extremely boring as this thing usually is. Just remember to briefly explain that in the associativity part you're using the corresponding associativity of $;G_i;$ in each coordinate, and don't drop the parentheses: $$left((g_1,...)(g_1',...)right)cdot(g_1'',...)=((g_1g_1')g_1'',...)=(g_1 (g_1'cdot g_1''),...);,;;etc.$$
$endgroup$
– Timbuc
Feb 24 '15 at 6:27
$begingroup$
Thank you very much Timbuc for that tip on associativity.
$endgroup$
– letsmakemuffinstogether
Feb 25 '15 at 3:28
1
1
$begingroup$
Looks fine, and extremely boring as this thing usually is. Just remember to briefly explain that in the associativity part you're using the corresponding associativity of $;G_i;$ in each coordinate, and don't drop the parentheses: $$left((g_1,...)(g_1',...)right)cdot(g_1'',...)=((g_1g_1')g_1'',...)=(g_1 (g_1'cdot g_1''),...);,;;etc.$$
$endgroup$
– Timbuc
Feb 24 '15 at 6:27
$begingroup$
Looks fine, and extremely boring as this thing usually is. Just remember to briefly explain that in the associativity part you're using the corresponding associativity of $;G_i;$ in each coordinate, and don't drop the parentheses: $$left((g_1,...)(g_1',...)right)cdot(g_1'',...)=((g_1g_1')g_1'',...)=(g_1 (g_1'cdot g_1''),...);,;;etc.$$
$endgroup$
– Timbuc
Feb 24 '15 at 6:27
$begingroup$
Thank you very much Timbuc for that tip on associativity.
$endgroup$
– letsmakemuffinstogether
Feb 25 '15 at 3:28
$begingroup$
Thank you very much Timbuc for that tip on associativity.
$endgroup$
– letsmakemuffinstogether
Feb 25 '15 at 3:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Just as @Timbuc says, it looks fine (but one could argue that you need to include some reference to the fact that $G$ is closed under $bullet$, but that follows by construction of $bullet$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1162848%2fproving-a-direct-product-of-groups-is-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Just as @Timbuc says, it looks fine (but one could argue that you need to include some reference to the fact that $G$ is closed under $bullet$, but that follows by construction of $bullet$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just as @Timbuc says, it looks fine (but one could argue that you need to include some reference to the fact that $G$ is closed under $bullet$, but that follows by construction of $bullet$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just as @Timbuc says, it looks fine (but one could argue that you need to include some reference to the fact that $G$ is closed under $bullet$, but that follows by construction of $bullet$).
$endgroup$
Just as @Timbuc says, it looks fine (but one could argue that you need to include some reference to the fact that $G$ is closed under $bullet$, but that follows by construction of $bullet$).
answered Dec 22 '18 at 4:07
ShaunShaun
9,241113684
9,241113684
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1162848%2fproving-a-direct-product-of-groups-is-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Looks fine, and extremely boring as this thing usually is. Just remember to briefly explain that in the associativity part you're using the corresponding associativity of $;G_i;$ in each coordinate, and don't drop the parentheses: $$left((g_1,...)(g_1',...)right)cdot(g_1'',...)=((g_1g_1')g_1'',...)=(g_1 (g_1'cdot g_1''),...);,;;etc.$$
$endgroup$
– Timbuc
Feb 24 '15 at 6:27
$begingroup$
Thank you very much Timbuc for that tip on associativity.
$endgroup$
– letsmakemuffinstogether
Feb 25 '15 at 3:28