I am learning to solve cubic equation by Cardano's method
$begingroup$
I am learning to solve cubic equation by cardano's method from here and what are saying only gives one root I can't seem to work these equations Q1 $x^3-15x=126$, Q2. $x^3+3x^2+21x+38=0$ so any other question some give only one root other start to give imaginary answer just how can i calculate that? any suggestion or book reference would be nice.
Also are there different types of equation in Cardano's method
polynomials cubic-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am learning to solve cubic equation by cardano's method from here and what are saying only gives one root I can't seem to work these equations Q1 $x^3-15x=126$, Q2. $x^3+3x^2+21x+38=0$ so any other question some give only one root other start to give imaginary answer just how can i calculate that? any suggestion or book reference would be nice.
Also are there different types of equation in Cardano's method
polynomials cubic-equations
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The two equations you included in your question has only 1 real root and 2 imaginary roots. Once you have a real root, you can divide it into a quadratic equation and solve for the imaginary roots.
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Dec 22 '18 at 9:29
$begingroup$
Thank you so much So the formula i am using is correct and applies to all.
$endgroup$
– jesse Roketto
Dec 22 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
Also see my answer to math.stackexchange.com/q/2838797.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 22 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am learning to solve cubic equation by cardano's method from here and what are saying only gives one root I can't seem to work these equations Q1 $x^3-15x=126$, Q2. $x^3+3x^2+21x+38=0$ so any other question some give only one root other start to give imaginary answer just how can i calculate that? any suggestion or book reference would be nice.
Also are there different types of equation in Cardano's method
polynomials cubic-equations
$endgroup$
I am learning to solve cubic equation by cardano's method from here and what are saying only gives one root I can't seem to work these equations Q1 $x^3-15x=126$, Q2. $x^3+3x^2+21x+38=0$ so any other question some give only one root other start to give imaginary answer just how can i calculate that? any suggestion or book reference would be nice.
Also are there different types of equation in Cardano's method
polynomials cubic-equations
polynomials cubic-equations
edited Dec 22 '18 at 9:36
Sik Feng Cheong
1579
1579
asked Dec 22 '18 at 9:20
jesse Rokettojesse Roketto
61
61
1
$begingroup$
The two equations you included in your question has only 1 real root and 2 imaginary roots. Once you have a real root, you can divide it into a quadratic equation and solve for the imaginary roots.
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Dec 22 '18 at 9:29
$begingroup$
Thank you so much So the formula i am using is correct and applies to all.
$endgroup$
– jesse Roketto
Dec 22 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
Also see my answer to math.stackexchange.com/q/2838797.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 22 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The two equations you included in your question has only 1 real root and 2 imaginary roots. Once you have a real root, you can divide it into a quadratic equation and solve for the imaginary roots.
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Dec 22 '18 at 9:29
$begingroup$
Thank you so much So the formula i am using is correct and applies to all.
$endgroup$
– jesse Roketto
Dec 22 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
Also see my answer to math.stackexchange.com/q/2838797.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 22 '18 at 9:39
1
1
$begingroup$
The two equations you included in your question has only 1 real root and 2 imaginary roots. Once you have a real root, you can divide it into a quadratic equation and solve for the imaginary roots.
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Dec 22 '18 at 9:29
$begingroup$
The two equations you included in your question has only 1 real root and 2 imaginary roots. Once you have a real root, you can divide it into a quadratic equation and solve for the imaginary roots.
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Dec 22 '18 at 9:29
$begingroup$
Thank you so much So the formula i am using is correct and applies to all.
$endgroup$
– jesse Roketto
Dec 22 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
Thank you so much So the formula i am using is correct and applies to all.
$endgroup$
– jesse Roketto
Dec 22 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
Also see my answer to math.stackexchange.com/q/2838797.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 22 '18 at 9:39
$begingroup$
Also see my answer to math.stackexchange.com/q/2838797.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 22 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In my opinion, the most "linear" (i.e. easier to convert into a general algorithm)
is that proposed in this thesis by A. Cauli.
I am reporting here the basic steps: for a full analysis please refer to the cited thesis,
which is written in Italian, but should not be difficult to grasp the math .
Starting with the general cubic
$$
x^{,3} + a,x^{,2} + b,x + c = 0
$$
the first step is to reduce it to a "depressed cubic"
$$
left{ matrix{
x = y - a/3 hfill cr
p = b - {{a^{,2} } over 3}quad hfill cr
q = c - {{ab} over 3} + {{2a^{,3} } over {27}} hfill cr} right.quad Rightarrow quad y^{,3} + p,y + q = 0
$$
Then we can do a first check about the type of solutions, according to
$$
Delta = {{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}quad Rightarrow quad left{ {matrix{
{x_{,1} < x_{,2} < x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta < 0} right.} cr
{x_{,1} le x_{,2} = x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta = 0} right.} cr
matrix{
x_{,1} in mathbb R hfill cr
x_{,2} = tilde x_{,3} in mathbb C hfill cr} & {left| {;0 < Delta } right.} cr
} } right.
$$
Independently from the check, put
$$
u = root {3,} of { - {q over 2} + sqrt {{{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}} } quad v = - {p over {3,u}}quad
omega = e^{,i,{{2pi } over 3}}
$$
where in the expression for $u$ you can choose whichever sign for the square root and whichever one of the three solutions for the cubic root.
Therefrom the three solutions of the depressed cubic are given by
$$
y_{,1} = u + vquad y_{,2} = omega ,u + {1 over omega }vquad y_{,3} = {1 over omega },u + omega ,v
$$
and those of the general cubic just follow by deducting $a/3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know a real root $r$ of a cubic equation, let
$$x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0,$$ you can use long division to "remove" it.
$$frac{x^3+ax^2+bx+c}{x-r}=x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)+frac{r^3+ar^2+br+c}{x-r}.$$
As $r$ is a root, this reduces to
$$x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)=0.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049244%2fi-am-learning-to-solve-cubic-equation-by-cardanos-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In my opinion, the most "linear" (i.e. easier to convert into a general algorithm)
is that proposed in this thesis by A. Cauli.
I am reporting here the basic steps: for a full analysis please refer to the cited thesis,
which is written in Italian, but should not be difficult to grasp the math .
Starting with the general cubic
$$
x^{,3} + a,x^{,2} + b,x + c = 0
$$
the first step is to reduce it to a "depressed cubic"
$$
left{ matrix{
x = y - a/3 hfill cr
p = b - {{a^{,2} } over 3}quad hfill cr
q = c - {{ab} over 3} + {{2a^{,3} } over {27}} hfill cr} right.quad Rightarrow quad y^{,3} + p,y + q = 0
$$
Then we can do a first check about the type of solutions, according to
$$
Delta = {{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}quad Rightarrow quad left{ {matrix{
{x_{,1} < x_{,2} < x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta < 0} right.} cr
{x_{,1} le x_{,2} = x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta = 0} right.} cr
matrix{
x_{,1} in mathbb R hfill cr
x_{,2} = tilde x_{,3} in mathbb C hfill cr} & {left| {;0 < Delta } right.} cr
} } right.
$$
Independently from the check, put
$$
u = root {3,} of { - {q over 2} + sqrt {{{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}} } quad v = - {p over {3,u}}quad
omega = e^{,i,{{2pi } over 3}}
$$
where in the expression for $u$ you can choose whichever sign for the square root and whichever one of the three solutions for the cubic root.
Therefrom the three solutions of the depressed cubic are given by
$$
y_{,1} = u + vquad y_{,2} = omega ,u + {1 over omega }vquad y_{,3} = {1 over omega },u + omega ,v
$$
and those of the general cubic just follow by deducting $a/3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my opinion, the most "linear" (i.e. easier to convert into a general algorithm)
is that proposed in this thesis by A. Cauli.
I am reporting here the basic steps: for a full analysis please refer to the cited thesis,
which is written in Italian, but should not be difficult to grasp the math .
Starting with the general cubic
$$
x^{,3} + a,x^{,2} + b,x + c = 0
$$
the first step is to reduce it to a "depressed cubic"
$$
left{ matrix{
x = y - a/3 hfill cr
p = b - {{a^{,2} } over 3}quad hfill cr
q = c - {{ab} over 3} + {{2a^{,3} } over {27}} hfill cr} right.quad Rightarrow quad y^{,3} + p,y + q = 0
$$
Then we can do a first check about the type of solutions, according to
$$
Delta = {{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}quad Rightarrow quad left{ {matrix{
{x_{,1} < x_{,2} < x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta < 0} right.} cr
{x_{,1} le x_{,2} = x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta = 0} right.} cr
matrix{
x_{,1} in mathbb R hfill cr
x_{,2} = tilde x_{,3} in mathbb C hfill cr} & {left| {;0 < Delta } right.} cr
} } right.
$$
Independently from the check, put
$$
u = root {3,} of { - {q over 2} + sqrt {{{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}} } quad v = - {p over {3,u}}quad
omega = e^{,i,{{2pi } over 3}}
$$
where in the expression for $u$ you can choose whichever sign for the square root and whichever one of the three solutions for the cubic root.
Therefrom the three solutions of the depressed cubic are given by
$$
y_{,1} = u + vquad y_{,2} = omega ,u + {1 over omega }vquad y_{,3} = {1 over omega },u + omega ,v
$$
and those of the general cubic just follow by deducting $a/3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my opinion, the most "linear" (i.e. easier to convert into a general algorithm)
is that proposed in this thesis by A. Cauli.
I am reporting here the basic steps: for a full analysis please refer to the cited thesis,
which is written in Italian, but should not be difficult to grasp the math .
Starting with the general cubic
$$
x^{,3} + a,x^{,2} + b,x + c = 0
$$
the first step is to reduce it to a "depressed cubic"
$$
left{ matrix{
x = y - a/3 hfill cr
p = b - {{a^{,2} } over 3}quad hfill cr
q = c - {{ab} over 3} + {{2a^{,3} } over {27}} hfill cr} right.quad Rightarrow quad y^{,3} + p,y + q = 0
$$
Then we can do a first check about the type of solutions, according to
$$
Delta = {{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}quad Rightarrow quad left{ {matrix{
{x_{,1} < x_{,2} < x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta < 0} right.} cr
{x_{,1} le x_{,2} = x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta = 0} right.} cr
matrix{
x_{,1} in mathbb R hfill cr
x_{,2} = tilde x_{,3} in mathbb C hfill cr} & {left| {;0 < Delta } right.} cr
} } right.
$$
Independently from the check, put
$$
u = root {3,} of { - {q over 2} + sqrt {{{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}} } quad v = - {p over {3,u}}quad
omega = e^{,i,{{2pi } over 3}}
$$
where in the expression for $u$ you can choose whichever sign for the square root and whichever one of the three solutions for the cubic root.
Therefrom the three solutions of the depressed cubic are given by
$$
y_{,1} = u + vquad y_{,2} = omega ,u + {1 over omega }vquad y_{,3} = {1 over omega },u + omega ,v
$$
and those of the general cubic just follow by deducting $a/3$.
$endgroup$
In my opinion, the most "linear" (i.e. easier to convert into a general algorithm)
is that proposed in this thesis by A. Cauli.
I am reporting here the basic steps: for a full analysis please refer to the cited thesis,
which is written in Italian, but should not be difficult to grasp the math .
Starting with the general cubic
$$
x^{,3} + a,x^{,2} + b,x + c = 0
$$
the first step is to reduce it to a "depressed cubic"
$$
left{ matrix{
x = y - a/3 hfill cr
p = b - {{a^{,2} } over 3}quad hfill cr
q = c - {{ab} over 3} + {{2a^{,3} } over {27}} hfill cr} right.quad Rightarrow quad y^{,3} + p,y + q = 0
$$
Then we can do a first check about the type of solutions, according to
$$
Delta = {{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}quad Rightarrow quad left{ {matrix{
{x_{,1} < x_{,2} < x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta < 0} right.} cr
{x_{,1} le x_{,2} = x_{,3} ; in mathbb R} & {left| {;Delta = 0} right.} cr
matrix{
x_{,1} in mathbb R hfill cr
x_{,2} = tilde x_{,3} in mathbb C hfill cr} & {left| {;0 < Delta } right.} cr
} } right.
$$
Independently from the check, put
$$
u = root {3,} of { - {q over 2} + sqrt {{{q^{,2} } over 4} + {{p^{,3} } over {27}}} } quad v = - {p over {3,u}}quad
omega = e^{,i,{{2pi } over 3}}
$$
where in the expression for $u$ you can choose whichever sign for the square root and whichever one of the three solutions for the cubic root.
Therefrom the three solutions of the depressed cubic are given by
$$
y_{,1} = u + vquad y_{,2} = omega ,u + {1 over omega }vquad y_{,3} = {1 over omega },u + omega ,v
$$
and those of the general cubic just follow by deducting $a/3$.
answered Dec 22 '18 at 16:24
G CabG Cab
19.6k31239
19.6k31239
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know a real root $r$ of a cubic equation, let
$$x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0,$$ you can use long division to "remove" it.
$$frac{x^3+ax^2+bx+c}{x-r}=x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)+frac{r^3+ar^2+br+c}{x-r}.$$
As $r$ is a root, this reduces to
$$x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)=0.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know a real root $r$ of a cubic equation, let
$$x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0,$$ you can use long division to "remove" it.
$$frac{x^3+ax^2+bx+c}{x-r}=x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)+frac{r^3+ar^2+br+c}{x-r}.$$
As $r$ is a root, this reduces to
$$x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)=0.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know a real root $r$ of a cubic equation, let
$$x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0,$$ you can use long division to "remove" it.
$$frac{x^3+ax^2+bx+c}{x-r}=x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)+frac{r^3+ar^2+br+c}{x-r}.$$
As $r$ is a root, this reduces to
$$x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)=0.$$
$endgroup$
If you know a real root $r$ of a cubic equation, let
$$x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0,$$ you can use long division to "remove" it.
$$frac{x^3+ax^2+bx+c}{x-r}=x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)+frac{r^3+ar^2+br+c}{x-r}.$$
As $r$ is a root, this reduces to
$$x^2+(r+a)x+(r^2+ar+b)=0.$$
edited Dec 22 '18 at 16:32
J.G.
27.2k22843
27.2k22843
answered Dec 22 '18 at 9:41
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
128k675227
128k675227
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049244%2fi-am-learning-to-solve-cubic-equation-by-cardanos-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The two equations you included in your question has only 1 real root and 2 imaginary roots. Once you have a real root, you can divide it into a quadratic equation and solve for the imaginary roots.
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Dec 22 '18 at 9:29
$begingroup$
Thank you so much So the formula i am using is correct and applies to all.
$endgroup$
– jesse Roketto
Dec 22 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
Also see my answer to math.stackexchange.com/q/2838797.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 22 '18 at 9:39