Is there a biholomorphic map between a simply connected domain and non simply connected domain?
$begingroup$
Is there a biholomorphic map between a simply connected domain and non simply connected domain?
I am not sure how to approach this question. This is not a homework question but one I simply came across. Perhaps we would be wise looking at the number of homology basis? Does Riemann mapping theorem work here? I have little idea of how to approach this question. I think that the open mapping theorem would be a good use, but I am not sure how to use it.
complex-analysis holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a biholomorphic map between a simply connected domain and non simply connected domain?
I am not sure how to approach this question. This is not a homework question but one I simply came across. Perhaps we would be wise looking at the number of homology basis? Does Riemann mapping theorem work here? I have little idea of how to approach this question. I think that the open mapping theorem would be a good use, but I am not sure how to use it.
complex-analysis holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a biholomorphic map between a simply connected domain and non simply connected domain?
I am not sure how to approach this question. This is not a homework question but one I simply came across. Perhaps we would be wise looking at the number of homology basis? Does Riemann mapping theorem work here? I have little idea of how to approach this question. I think that the open mapping theorem would be a good use, but I am not sure how to use it.
complex-analysis holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
$endgroup$
Is there a biholomorphic map between a simply connected domain and non simply connected domain?
I am not sure how to approach this question. This is not a homework question but one I simply came across. Perhaps we would be wise looking at the number of homology basis? Does Riemann mapping theorem work here? I have little idea of how to approach this question. I think that the open mapping theorem would be a good use, but I am not sure how to use it.
complex-analysis holomorphic-functions
complex-analysis holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
edited Dec 7 '18 at 21:37
Saucy O'Path
5,9191626
5,9191626
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
asked Dec 7 '18 at 21:00
Cute BrownieCute Brownie
990416
990416
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Simple connectedness is a topological invariant, and biholomorphisms are homeomorphisms. Therefore the answer is no.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030364%2fis-there-a-biholomorphic-map-between-a-simply-connected-domain-and-non-simply-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Simple connectedness is a topological invariant, and biholomorphisms are homeomorphisms. Therefore the answer is no.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Simple connectedness is a topological invariant, and biholomorphisms are homeomorphisms. Therefore the answer is no.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Simple connectedness is a topological invariant, and biholomorphisms are homeomorphisms. Therefore the answer is no.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
$endgroup$
Simple connectedness is a topological invariant, and biholomorphisms are homeomorphisms. Therefore the answer is no.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:03
Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path
5,9191626
5,9191626
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030364%2fis-there-a-biholomorphic-map-between-a-simply-connected-domain-and-non-simply-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
