Prove that $r(A)=operatorname{tr}(A^2)$












0












$begingroup$


Let $Ain M_n(mathbb{C})$. Show that if $A^3=A$, then $r(A)=operatorname{tr}(A^2)$.





Since $A^3=A$, the possible eigenvalues are $0,1,-1$. I don't know from here how to compute the rank of $A$.



Edited



Since eigenvalues of $A$ are $0,1,-1$ SO eigenvalues of $A^2=0,1$ So $r(A^2)=tr(A^2)$ Now we have to show $r(A^2)=r(A)$ where rank of $A^2$ is the number of non-zero eigenvalues .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See also this question. The arguments are the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39
















0












$begingroup$


Let $Ain M_n(mathbb{C})$. Show that if $A^3=A$, then $r(A)=operatorname{tr}(A^2)$.





Since $A^3=A$, the possible eigenvalues are $0,1,-1$. I don't know from here how to compute the rank of $A$.



Edited



Since eigenvalues of $A$ are $0,1,-1$ SO eigenvalues of $A^2=0,1$ So $r(A^2)=tr(A^2)$ Now we have to show $r(A^2)=r(A)$ where rank of $A^2$ is the number of non-zero eigenvalues .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See also this question. The arguments are the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Let $Ain M_n(mathbb{C})$. Show that if $A^3=A$, then $r(A)=operatorname{tr}(A^2)$.





Since $A^3=A$, the possible eigenvalues are $0,1,-1$. I don't know from here how to compute the rank of $A$.



Edited



Since eigenvalues of $A$ are $0,1,-1$ SO eigenvalues of $A^2=0,1$ So $r(A^2)=tr(A^2)$ Now we have to show $r(A^2)=r(A)$ where rank of $A^2$ is the number of non-zero eigenvalues .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $Ain M_n(mathbb{C})$. Show that if $A^3=A$, then $r(A)=operatorname{tr}(A^2)$.





Since $A^3=A$, the possible eigenvalues are $0,1,-1$. I don't know from here how to compute the rank of $A$.



Edited



Since eigenvalues of $A$ are $0,1,-1$ SO eigenvalues of $A^2=0,1$ So $r(A^2)=tr(A^2)$ Now we have to show $r(A^2)=r(A)$ where rank of $A^2$ is the number of non-zero eigenvalues .







linear-algebra matrix-rank trace






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '18 at 20:00







RAM_3R

















asked Dec 7 '18 at 19:26









RAM_3RRAM_3R

561214




561214












  • $begingroup$
    See also this question. The arguments are the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39


















  • $begingroup$
    See also this question. The arguments are the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39
















$begingroup$
See also this question. The arguments are the same.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 7 '18 at 19:39




$begingroup$
See also this question. The arguments are the same.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 7 '18 at 19:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The rank is the number of nonzero eigenvalues and as their squares are 0 or 1, this number is just the same as the sum of the squares.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    but why both equal ??
    $endgroup$
    – RAM_3R
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:38










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
    $endgroup$
    – Alan
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:46











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030278%2fprove-that-ra-operatornametra2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

The rank is the number of nonzero eigenvalues and as their squares are 0 or 1, this number is just the same as the sum of the squares.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    but why both equal ??
    $endgroup$
    – RAM_3R
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:38










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
    $endgroup$
    – Alan
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:46
















3












$begingroup$

The rank is the number of nonzero eigenvalues and as their squares are 0 or 1, this number is just the same as the sum of the squares.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    but why both equal ??
    $endgroup$
    – RAM_3R
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:38










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
    $endgroup$
    – Alan
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:46














3












3








3





$begingroup$

The rank is the number of nonzero eigenvalues and as their squares are 0 or 1, this number is just the same as the sum of the squares.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The rank is the number of nonzero eigenvalues and as their squares are 0 or 1, this number is just the same as the sum of the squares.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 7 '18 at 19:29









Richard MartinRichard Martin

1,61318




1,61318












  • $begingroup$
    but why both equal ??
    $endgroup$
    – RAM_3R
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:38










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
    $endgroup$
    – Alan
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:46


















  • $begingroup$
    but why both equal ??
    $endgroup$
    – RAM_3R
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
    $endgroup$
    – Zach Langley
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:38










  • $begingroup$
    @RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
    $endgroup$
    – Alan
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Dec 7 '18 at 19:46
















$begingroup$
but why both equal ??
$endgroup$
– RAM_3R
Dec 7 '18 at 19:34




$begingroup$
but why both equal ??
$endgroup$
– RAM_3R
Dec 7 '18 at 19:34












$begingroup$
@RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
$endgroup$
– Zach Langley
Dec 7 '18 at 19:38




$begingroup$
@RAM_3R Since every non-zero eigenvalue of $A^2$ is 1, the trace counts exactly the number of non-zero eigenvalues, which is the same as the rank.
$endgroup$
– Zach Langley
Dec 7 '18 at 19:38












$begingroup$
@RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
$endgroup$
– Alan
Dec 7 '18 at 19:39




$begingroup$
@RAM_3R Because the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues
$endgroup$
– Alan
Dec 7 '18 at 19:39




1




1




$begingroup$
This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
$endgroup$
– user1551
Dec 7 '18 at 19:44




$begingroup$
This is not correct. The rank of a matrix in general is not equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues (consider e.g. any nontrivial nilpotent block). You need to show that $A$ is diagonalisable.
$endgroup$
– user1551
Dec 7 '18 at 19:44












$begingroup$
It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 7 '18 at 19:46




$begingroup$
It's the number of non-zero eigenvalues counted with multiplicity.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Dec 7 '18 at 19:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030278%2fprove-that-ra-operatornametra2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei