Definition of adjoint of a linear map
$begingroup$
I am having a tough time understanding adjoint of a linear map.
Consider a linear map between two vector spaces $, f:Vrightarrow W,$ let us denote $f^*$ to denote its adjoint.
- Accroding to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjCs_HyYtSo (around time 5:50) the author explains that adjoint of a linear map is a function from dual of $,W$ (denoted by $,W^*$) to the dual of $,V$ (denoted by $,V^*$). So this implies $,f^*:W^*rightarrow V^*.$
- On the other hand in the pdf http://math.mit.edu/~trasched/18.700.f10/lect17-article.pdf , the adjoint of the linear map is defined as another linear map from $,W$ to $,V.$ So this implies $,f^*:Wrightarrow V.$
Can some body clarify this discrepancy?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am having a tough time understanding adjoint of a linear map.
Consider a linear map between two vector spaces $, f:Vrightarrow W,$ let us denote $f^*$ to denote its adjoint.
- Accroding to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjCs_HyYtSo (around time 5:50) the author explains that adjoint of a linear map is a function from dual of $,W$ (denoted by $,W^*$) to the dual of $,V$ (denoted by $,V^*$). So this implies $,f^*:W^*rightarrow V^*.$
- On the other hand in the pdf http://math.mit.edu/~trasched/18.700.f10/lect17-article.pdf , the adjoint of the linear map is defined as another linear map from $,W$ to $,V.$ So this implies $,f^*:Wrightarrow V.$
Can some body clarify this discrepancy?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Without looking at the links: the second one probably considers only Hilbert spaces. We have a concept of a Hilbert space adjoint between the spaces themselves, and the more general concept of an adjoint mapping the duals. The Hilbert space adjoint corresponds to the general adjoint under the Riesz anti-isomorphism between a Hilbert space and its dual.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
May 3 '16 at 14:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am having a tough time understanding adjoint of a linear map.
Consider a linear map between two vector spaces $, f:Vrightarrow W,$ let us denote $f^*$ to denote its adjoint.
- Accroding to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjCs_HyYtSo (around time 5:50) the author explains that adjoint of a linear map is a function from dual of $,W$ (denoted by $,W^*$) to the dual of $,V$ (denoted by $,V^*$). So this implies $,f^*:W^*rightarrow V^*.$
- On the other hand in the pdf http://math.mit.edu/~trasched/18.700.f10/lect17-article.pdf , the adjoint of the linear map is defined as another linear map from $,W$ to $,V.$ So this implies $,f^*:Wrightarrow V.$
Can some body clarify this discrepancy?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
I am having a tough time understanding adjoint of a linear map.
Consider a linear map between two vector spaces $, f:Vrightarrow W,$ let us denote $f^*$ to denote its adjoint.
- Accroding to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjCs_HyYtSo (around time 5:50) the author explains that adjoint of a linear map is a function from dual of $,W$ (denoted by $,W^*$) to the dual of $,V$ (denoted by $,V^*$). So this implies $,f^*:W^*rightarrow V^*.$
- On the other hand in the pdf http://math.mit.edu/~trasched/18.700.f10/lect17-article.pdf , the adjoint of the linear map is defined as another linear map from $,W$ to $,V.$ So this implies $,f^*:Wrightarrow V.$
Can some body clarify this discrepancy?
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
asked May 3 '16 at 14:48
ConiferousConiferous
171213
171213
3
$begingroup$
Without looking at the links: the second one probably considers only Hilbert spaces. We have a concept of a Hilbert space adjoint between the spaces themselves, and the more general concept of an adjoint mapping the duals. The Hilbert space adjoint corresponds to the general adjoint under the Riesz anti-isomorphism between a Hilbert space and its dual.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
May 3 '16 at 14:54
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Without looking at the links: the second one probably considers only Hilbert spaces. We have a concept of a Hilbert space adjoint between the spaces themselves, and the more general concept of an adjoint mapping the duals. The Hilbert space adjoint corresponds to the general adjoint under the Riesz anti-isomorphism between a Hilbert space and its dual.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
May 3 '16 at 14:54
3
3
$begingroup$
Without looking at the links: the second one probably considers only Hilbert spaces. We have a concept of a Hilbert space adjoint between the spaces themselves, and the more general concept of an adjoint mapping the duals. The Hilbert space adjoint corresponds to the general adjoint under the Riesz anti-isomorphism between a Hilbert space and its dual.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
May 3 '16 at 14:54
$begingroup$
Without looking at the links: the second one probably considers only Hilbert spaces. We have a concept of a Hilbert space adjoint between the spaces themselves, and the more general concept of an adjoint mapping the duals. The Hilbert space adjoint corresponds to the general adjoint under the Riesz anti-isomorphism between a Hilbert space and its dual.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
May 3 '16 at 14:54
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The adjoint of a linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between two vector spaces is given by the definition in the first source: It is the map $T^* : Bbb W^* to Bbb V^*$ defined by
$$(T^*(phi))(v) := phi(T(v))$$ for all $phi in Bbb W^*$ and $v in Bbb V$.
In the second source, $Bbb V$ and $Bbb W$ are inner product spaces. An inner product $langle ,cdot, , ,cdot, rangle$ on a vector space $Bbb U$ defines an isomorphism $Phi : Bbb U stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb U^*$ by
$$(Phi(u))(u') := langle u, u' rangle .$$ Thus, for any linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between inner product spaces, we can identify $Bbb W^*$ with $Bbb W$ and $Bbb V^*$ with $Bbb V$, and hence $T^*$ with a map $Bbb W to Bbb V$. Unwinding the definitions shows that this map satisfies the identity $$langle w, T v rangle = langle T^* w, v rangle$$ in the second definition.
It is an instructive exercise to write out all of these objects in terms of their matrix representations with respect to some bases of $Bbb V, Bbb W$ (of course, this only makes sense in the case that the vector spaces are finite-dimensional but even in the infinite-dimensional case it is a useful mnemonic). In particular, if $Bbb V, Bbb W$ are finite-dimensional real vector spaces and we choose orthonormal bases of both spaces, one can show that the matrix representations of $T^*$ and $T$ are related by $[T^*] = [T]^{top}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the vector spaces V and W have respective nondegenerate bilinear forms $B_V$ and $B_W$, a concept closely related to the transpose – the adjoint – may be defined:
If $f : V → W$ is a linear map between vector spaces $V$ and $W$, we define $g$ as the adjoint of f if $g : W → V$ satisfies :
$ B_V(υ,g(w))=B_W(f(υ),w)$ $ forall υ in V, win W $.
These bilinear forms define an isomorphism between $V $and $V^∗$, and between W and $W^∗$, resulting in an isomorphism between the transpose and adjoint of $f$. The matrix of the adjoint of a map is the transposed matrix only if the bases are orthonormal with respect to their bilinear forms. In this context, many authors use the term transpose to refer to the adjoint as defined here.
The adjoint allows us to consider whether $g : W → V$ is equal to $f^{−1} : W → V$. In particular, this allows the orthogonal group over a vector space $V$ with a quadratic form to be defined without reference to matrices (nor the components thereof) as the set of all linear maps $V → V$ for which the adjoint equals the inverse
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1769834%2fdefinition-of-adjoint-of-a-linear-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The adjoint of a linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between two vector spaces is given by the definition in the first source: It is the map $T^* : Bbb W^* to Bbb V^*$ defined by
$$(T^*(phi))(v) := phi(T(v))$$ for all $phi in Bbb W^*$ and $v in Bbb V$.
In the second source, $Bbb V$ and $Bbb W$ are inner product spaces. An inner product $langle ,cdot, , ,cdot, rangle$ on a vector space $Bbb U$ defines an isomorphism $Phi : Bbb U stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb U^*$ by
$$(Phi(u))(u') := langle u, u' rangle .$$ Thus, for any linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between inner product spaces, we can identify $Bbb W^*$ with $Bbb W$ and $Bbb V^*$ with $Bbb V$, and hence $T^*$ with a map $Bbb W to Bbb V$. Unwinding the definitions shows that this map satisfies the identity $$langle w, T v rangle = langle T^* w, v rangle$$ in the second definition.
It is an instructive exercise to write out all of these objects in terms of their matrix representations with respect to some bases of $Bbb V, Bbb W$ (of course, this only makes sense in the case that the vector spaces are finite-dimensional but even in the infinite-dimensional case it is a useful mnemonic). In particular, if $Bbb V, Bbb W$ are finite-dimensional real vector spaces and we choose orthonormal bases of both spaces, one can show that the matrix representations of $T^*$ and $T$ are related by $[T^*] = [T]^{top}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The adjoint of a linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between two vector spaces is given by the definition in the first source: It is the map $T^* : Bbb W^* to Bbb V^*$ defined by
$$(T^*(phi))(v) := phi(T(v))$$ for all $phi in Bbb W^*$ and $v in Bbb V$.
In the second source, $Bbb V$ and $Bbb W$ are inner product spaces. An inner product $langle ,cdot, , ,cdot, rangle$ on a vector space $Bbb U$ defines an isomorphism $Phi : Bbb U stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb U^*$ by
$$(Phi(u))(u') := langle u, u' rangle .$$ Thus, for any linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between inner product spaces, we can identify $Bbb W^*$ with $Bbb W$ and $Bbb V^*$ with $Bbb V$, and hence $T^*$ with a map $Bbb W to Bbb V$. Unwinding the definitions shows that this map satisfies the identity $$langle w, T v rangle = langle T^* w, v rangle$$ in the second definition.
It is an instructive exercise to write out all of these objects in terms of their matrix representations with respect to some bases of $Bbb V, Bbb W$ (of course, this only makes sense in the case that the vector spaces are finite-dimensional but even in the infinite-dimensional case it is a useful mnemonic). In particular, if $Bbb V, Bbb W$ are finite-dimensional real vector spaces and we choose orthonormal bases of both spaces, one can show that the matrix representations of $T^*$ and $T$ are related by $[T^*] = [T]^{top}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The adjoint of a linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between two vector spaces is given by the definition in the first source: It is the map $T^* : Bbb W^* to Bbb V^*$ defined by
$$(T^*(phi))(v) := phi(T(v))$$ for all $phi in Bbb W^*$ and $v in Bbb V$.
In the second source, $Bbb V$ and $Bbb W$ are inner product spaces. An inner product $langle ,cdot, , ,cdot, rangle$ on a vector space $Bbb U$ defines an isomorphism $Phi : Bbb U stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb U^*$ by
$$(Phi(u))(u') := langle u, u' rangle .$$ Thus, for any linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between inner product spaces, we can identify $Bbb W^*$ with $Bbb W$ and $Bbb V^*$ with $Bbb V$, and hence $T^*$ with a map $Bbb W to Bbb V$. Unwinding the definitions shows that this map satisfies the identity $$langle w, T v rangle = langle T^* w, v rangle$$ in the second definition.
It is an instructive exercise to write out all of these objects in terms of their matrix representations with respect to some bases of $Bbb V, Bbb W$ (of course, this only makes sense in the case that the vector spaces are finite-dimensional but even in the infinite-dimensional case it is a useful mnemonic). In particular, if $Bbb V, Bbb W$ are finite-dimensional real vector spaces and we choose orthonormal bases of both spaces, one can show that the matrix representations of $T^*$ and $T$ are related by $[T^*] = [T]^{top}$.
$endgroup$
The adjoint of a linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between two vector spaces is given by the definition in the first source: It is the map $T^* : Bbb W^* to Bbb V^*$ defined by
$$(T^*(phi))(v) := phi(T(v))$$ for all $phi in Bbb W^*$ and $v in Bbb V$.
In the second source, $Bbb V$ and $Bbb W$ are inner product spaces. An inner product $langle ,cdot, , ,cdot, rangle$ on a vector space $Bbb U$ defines an isomorphism $Phi : Bbb U stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb U^*$ by
$$(Phi(u))(u') := langle u, u' rangle .$$ Thus, for any linear map $T: Bbb V to Bbb W$ between inner product spaces, we can identify $Bbb W^*$ with $Bbb W$ and $Bbb V^*$ with $Bbb V$, and hence $T^*$ with a map $Bbb W to Bbb V$. Unwinding the definitions shows that this map satisfies the identity $$langle w, T v rangle = langle T^* w, v rangle$$ in the second definition.
It is an instructive exercise to write out all of these objects in terms of their matrix representations with respect to some bases of $Bbb V, Bbb W$ (of course, this only makes sense in the case that the vector spaces are finite-dimensional but even in the infinite-dimensional case it is a useful mnemonic). In particular, if $Bbb V, Bbb W$ are finite-dimensional real vector spaces and we choose orthonormal bases of both spaces, one can show that the matrix representations of $T^*$ and $T$ are related by $[T^*] = [T]^{top}$.
edited Dec 24 '18 at 1:45
answered May 3 '16 at 15:23
TravisTravis
60.6k767147
60.6k767147
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
In $[T^*] = {}^t[T]$ does ${}^t[T]$ transpose of the matrix representation of $T$?
$endgroup$
– Coniferous
May 3 '16 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
$begingroup$
Yes; usually I prefer the notation ${}^T$, but I thought it would look peculiar here given the use of $T$ for the transformation.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 3 '16 at 19:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the vector spaces V and W have respective nondegenerate bilinear forms $B_V$ and $B_W$, a concept closely related to the transpose – the adjoint – may be defined:
If $f : V → W$ is a linear map between vector spaces $V$ and $W$, we define $g$ as the adjoint of f if $g : W → V$ satisfies :
$ B_V(υ,g(w))=B_W(f(υ),w)$ $ forall υ in V, win W $.
These bilinear forms define an isomorphism between $V $and $V^∗$, and between W and $W^∗$, resulting in an isomorphism between the transpose and adjoint of $f$. The matrix of the adjoint of a map is the transposed matrix only if the bases are orthonormal with respect to their bilinear forms. In this context, many authors use the term transpose to refer to the adjoint as defined here.
The adjoint allows us to consider whether $g : W → V$ is equal to $f^{−1} : W → V$. In particular, this allows the orthogonal group over a vector space $V$ with a quadratic form to be defined without reference to matrices (nor the components thereof) as the set of all linear maps $V → V$ for which the adjoint equals the inverse
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the vector spaces V and W have respective nondegenerate bilinear forms $B_V$ and $B_W$, a concept closely related to the transpose – the adjoint – may be defined:
If $f : V → W$ is a linear map between vector spaces $V$ and $W$, we define $g$ as the adjoint of f if $g : W → V$ satisfies :
$ B_V(υ,g(w))=B_W(f(υ),w)$ $ forall υ in V, win W $.
These bilinear forms define an isomorphism between $V $and $V^∗$, and between W and $W^∗$, resulting in an isomorphism between the transpose and adjoint of $f$. The matrix of the adjoint of a map is the transposed matrix only if the bases are orthonormal with respect to their bilinear forms. In this context, many authors use the term transpose to refer to the adjoint as defined here.
The adjoint allows us to consider whether $g : W → V$ is equal to $f^{−1} : W → V$. In particular, this allows the orthogonal group over a vector space $V$ with a quadratic form to be defined without reference to matrices (nor the components thereof) as the set of all linear maps $V → V$ for which the adjoint equals the inverse
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the vector spaces V and W have respective nondegenerate bilinear forms $B_V$ and $B_W$, a concept closely related to the transpose – the adjoint – may be defined:
If $f : V → W$ is a linear map between vector spaces $V$ and $W$, we define $g$ as the adjoint of f if $g : W → V$ satisfies :
$ B_V(υ,g(w))=B_W(f(υ),w)$ $ forall υ in V, win W $.
These bilinear forms define an isomorphism between $V $and $V^∗$, and between W and $W^∗$, resulting in an isomorphism between the transpose and adjoint of $f$. The matrix of the adjoint of a map is the transposed matrix only if the bases are orthonormal with respect to their bilinear forms. In this context, many authors use the term transpose to refer to the adjoint as defined here.
The adjoint allows us to consider whether $g : W → V$ is equal to $f^{−1} : W → V$. In particular, this allows the orthogonal group over a vector space $V$ with a quadratic form to be defined without reference to matrices (nor the components thereof) as the set of all linear maps $V → V$ for which the adjoint equals the inverse
$endgroup$
If the vector spaces V and W have respective nondegenerate bilinear forms $B_V$ and $B_W$, a concept closely related to the transpose – the adjoint – may be defined:
If $f : V → W$ is a linear map between vector spaces $V$ and $W$, we define $g$ as the adjoint of f if $g : W → V$ satisfies :
$ B_V(υ,g(w))=B_W(f(υ),w)$ $ forall υ in V, win W $.
These bilinear forms define an isomorphism between $V $and $V^∗$, and between W and $W^∗$, resulting in an isomorphism between the transpose and adjoint of $f$. The matrix of the adjoint of a map is the transposed matrix only if the bases are orthonormal with respect to their bilinear forms. In this context, many authors use the term transpose to refer to the adjoint as defined here.
The adjoint allows us to consider whether $g : W → V$ is equal to $f^{−1} : W → V$. In particular, this allows the orthogonal group over a vector space $V$ with a quadratic form to be defined without reference to matrices (nor the components thereof) as the set of all linear maps $V → V$ for which the adjoint equals the inverse
answered May 3 '16 at 14:54
RebellosRebellos
14.8k31248
14.8k31248
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1769834%2fdefinition-of-adjoint-of-a-linear-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Without looking at the links: the second one probably considers only Hilbert spaces. We have a concept of a Hilbert space adjoint between the spaces themselves, and the more general concept of an adjoint mapping the duals. The Hilbert space adjoint corresponds to the general adjoint under the Riesz anti-isomorphism between a Hilbert space and its dual.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
May 3 '16 at 14:54