Should theorems be a single paragraph?












3












$begingroup$


Most of the references I read make theorems (lemmas, propositions, etc) [the theorems themselves, not their proofs!] out to be a single paragraph. I've noticed that even when a theorem spans a whole page, it is still a single paragraph. Is this an established convention of mathematical writing? I'm writing a paper for a journal that uses space rather than indentation to separate paragraphs. Would it be awkard to have two paragraphs in a theorem then?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The proof of Fermat's Last theorem is about $200$ pages.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 22:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the theorem itself is rather short as far as I know.
    $endgroup$
    – Asdf
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    I thought you were asking about the proofs of theorems. I have never seen a one page long statement of a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Maybe. I personally believe policy should never trump intelligence. If your theorem looks like you are combining multiple results that can be proved independently then it probably should be broken up. You might try looking at the style and submission guidelines for a couple of journals to see if they say anything about this.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:16






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One workaround that may not apply to your situation would be a one paragraph claim that, say, all the claims in a list/table somewhere else are true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:55
















3












$begingroup$


Most of the references I read make theorems (lemmas, propositions, etc) [the theorems themselves, not their proofs!] out to be a single paragraph. I've noticed that even when a theorem spans a whole page, it is still a single paragraph. Is this an established convention of mathematical writing? I'm writing a paper for a journal that uses space rather than indentation to separate paragraphs. Would it be awkard to have two paragraphs in a theorem then?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The proof of Fermat's Last theorem is about $200$ pages.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 22:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the theorem itself is rather short as far as I know.
    $endgroup$
    – Asdf
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    I thought you were asking about the proofs of theorems. I have never seen a one page long statement of a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Maybe. I personally believe policy should never trump intelligence. If your theorem looks like you are combining multiple results that can be proved independently then it probably should be broken up. You might try looking at the style and submission guidelines for a couple of journals to see if they say anything about this.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:16






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One workaround that may not apply to your situation would be a one paragraph claim that, say, all the claims in a list/table somewhere else are true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:55














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Most of the references I read make theorems (lemmas, propositions, etc) [the theorems themselves, not their proofs!] out to be a single paragraph. I've noticed that even when a theorem spans a whole page, it is still a single paragraph. Is this an established convention of mathematical writing? I'm writing a paper for a journal that uses space rather than indentation to separate paragraphs. Would it be awkard to have two paragraphs in a theorem then?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Most of the references I read make theorems (lemmas, propositions, etc) [the theorems themselves, not their proofs!] out to be a single paragraph. I've noticed that even when a theorem spans a whole page, it is still a single paragraph. Is this an established convention of mathematical writing? I'm writing a paper for a journal that uses space rather than indentation to separate paragraphs. Would it be awkard to have two paragraphs in a theorem then?







article-writing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 0:32







Asdf

















asked Dec 23 '18 at 22:45









AsdfAsdf

417213




417213












  • $begingroup$
    The proof of Fermat's Last theorem is about $200$ pages.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 22:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the theorem itself is rather short as far as I know.
    $endgroup$
    – Asdf
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    I thought you were asking about the proofs of theorems. I have never seen a one page long statement of a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Maybe. I personally believe policy should never trump intelligence. If your theorem looks like you are combining multiple results that can be proved independently then it probably should be broken up. You might try looking at the style and submission guidelines for a couple of journals to see if they say anything about this.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:16






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One workaround that may not apply to your situation would be a one paragraph claim that, say, all the claims in a list/table somewhere else are true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:55


















  • $begingroup$
    The proof of Fermat's Last theorem is about $200$ pages.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 22:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the theorem itself is rather short as far as I know.
    $endgroup$
    – Asdf
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    I thought you were asking about the proofs of theorems. I have never seen a one page long statement of a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Maybe. I personally believe policy should never trump intelligence. If your theorem looks like you are combining multiple results that can be proved independently then it probably should be broken up. You might try looking at the style and submission guidelines for a couple of journals to see if they say anything about this.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:16






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One workaround that may not apply to your situation would be a one paragraph claim that, say, all the claims in a list/table somewhere else are true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark S.
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:55
















$begingroup$
The proof of Fermat's Last theorem is about $200$ pages.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 23 '18 at 22:58




$begingroup$
The proof of Fermat's Last theorem is about $200$ pages.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 23 '18 at 22:58




1




1




$begingroup$
But the theorem itself is rather short as far as I know.
$endgroup$
– Asdf
Dec 23 '18 at 23:04




$begingroup$
But the theorem itself is rather short as far as I know.
$endgroup$
– Asdf
Dec 23 '18 at 23:04












$begingroup$
I thought you were asking about the proofs of theorems. I have never seen a one page long statement of a theorem.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 23 '18 at 23:07




$begingroup$
I thought you were asking about the proofs of theorems. I have never seen a one page long statement of a theorem.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 23 '18 at 23:07




3




3




$begingroup$
Maybe. I personally believe policy should never trump intelligence. If your theorem looks like you are combining multiple results that can be proved independently then it probably should be broken up. You might try looking at the style and submission guidelines for a couple of journals to see if they say anything about this.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 23 '18 at 23:16




$begingroup$
Maybe. I personally believe policy should never trump intelligence. If your theorem looks like you are combining multiple results that can be proved independently then it probably should be broken up. You might try looking at the style and submission guidelines for a couple of journals to see if they say anything about this.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 23 '18 at 23:16




2




2




$begingroup$
One workaround that may not apply to your situation would be a one paragraph claim that, say, all the claims in a list/table somewhere else are true.
$endgroup$
– Mark S.
Dec 23 '18 at 23:55




$begingroup$
One workaround that may not apply to your situation would be a one paragraph claim that, say, all the claims in a list/table somewhere else are true.
$endgroup$
– Mark S.
Dec 23 '18 at 23:55










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050771%2fshould-theorems-be-a-single-paragraph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050771%2fshould-theorems-be-a-single-paragraph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei