Proving ${n choose p} equiv Bigl[frac{n}{p}Bigr] (text{mod} p)$
$begingroup$
This is an exercise from Apostol, which i have been struggling for a while.
Given a prime $p$, how does one show that $${n choose p} equiv biggl[frac{n}{p}biggr] (text{mod} p)$$ Note that $Bigl[frac{n}{p}Bigr]$ denotes the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
I would also like to know as to how does one try to solve this problem. Well, what we need is to show is whenever one divides ${n choose p}$ by a prime $p$ the remainder is the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
Now, $${ n choose p} = frac{n!}{p! cdot (n-p)!}$$ Now $n!$ can be written as $$n!= n cdot (n-1) cdot (n-2) cdots (n-p) cdots 2 cdot 1$$
But i am really struggling in getting the integral part.
number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is an exercise from Apostol, which i have been struggling for a while.
Given a prime $p$, how does one show that $${n choose p} equiv biggl[frac{n}{p}biggr] (text{mod} p)$$ Note that $Bigl[frac{n}{p}Bigr]$ denotes the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
I would also like to know as to how does one try to solve this problem. Well, what we need is to show is whenever one divides ${n choose p}$ by a prime $p$ the remainder is the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
Now, $${ n choose p} = frac{n!}{p! cdot (n-p)!}$$ Now $n!$ can be written as $$n!= n cdot (n-1) cdot (n-2) cdots (n-p) cdots 2 cdot 1$$
But i am really struggling in getting the integral part.
number-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think that this is trivialized with Lucas's theorem.
$endgroup$
– Mayank Pandey
Oct 17 '13 at 2:41
$begingroup$
Here's a cute proof for the case $p=2$: The sign of $begin{pmatrix}n&cdots&2&1end{pmatrix}$ is, on the one hand, $lfloorfrac n2rfloor$: change $1$ with $n$, $2$ with $n-1$, ... On the other hand we can first bring the $1$ in front, step by step; then bring the $2$ to the 2nd place, ... This takes $1+cdots+n-1=binom n2$ transpositions, so $lfloorfrac n2rfloorequivbinom n2pmod2$. I wonder if there's a way to generalise this to all $p$.
$endgroup$
– nbarto
Dec 20 '15 at 19:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is an exercise from Apostol, which i have been struggling for a while.
Given a prime $p$, how does one show that $${n choose p} equiv biggl[frac{n}{p}biggr] (text{mod} p)$$ Note that $Bigl[frac{n}{p}Bigr]$ denotes the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
I would also like to know as to how does one try to solve this problem. Well, what we need is to show is whenever one divides ${n choose p}$ by a prime $p$ the remainder is the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
Now, $${ n choose p} = frac{n!}{p! cdot (n-p)!}$$ Now $n!$ can be written as $$n!= n cdot (n-1) cdot (n-2) cdots (n-p) cdots 2 cdot 1$$
But i am really struggling in getting the integral part.
number-theory
$endgroup$
This is an exercise from Apostol, which i have been struggling for a while.
Given a prime $p$, how does one show that $${n choose p} equiv biggl[frac{n}{p}biggr] (text{mod} p)$$ Note that $Bigl[frac{n}{p}Bigr]$ denotes the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
I would also like to know as to how does one try to solve this problem. Well, what we need is to show is whenever one divides ${n choose p}$ by a prime $p$ the remainder is the integral part of $frac{n}{p}$.
Now, $${ n choose p} = frac{n!}{p! cdot (n-p)!}$$ Now $n!$ can be written as $$n!= n cdot (n-1) cdot (n-2) cdots (n-p) cdots 2 cdot 1$$
But i am really struggling in getting the integral part.
number-theory
number-theory
asked Oct 1 '10 at 11:37
anonymous
$begingroup$
I think that this is trivialized with Lucas's theorem.
$endgroup$
– Mayank Pandey
Oct 17 '13 at 2:41
$begingroup$
Here's a cute proof for the case $p=2$: The sign of $begin{pmatrix}n&cdots&2&1end{pmatrix}$ is, on the one hand, $lfloorfrac n2rfloor$: change $1$ with $n$, $2$ with $n-1$, ... On the other hand we can first bring the $1$ in front, step by step; then bring the $2$ to the 2nd place, ... This takes $1+cdots+n-1=binom n2$ transpositions, so $lfloorfrac n2rfloorequivbinom n2pmod2$. I wonder if there's a way to generalise this to all $p$.
$endgroup$
– nbarto
Dec 20 '15 at 19:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that this is trivialized with Lucas's theorem.
$endgroup$
– Mayank Pandey
Oct 17 '13 at 2:41
$begingroup$
Here's a cute proof for the case $p=2$: The sign of $begin{pmatrix}n&cdots&2&1end{pmatrix}$ is, on the one hand, $lfloorfrac n2rfloor$: change $1$ with $n$, $2$ with $n-1$, ... On the other hand we can first bring the $1$ in front, step by step; then bring the $2$ to the 2nd place, ... This takes $1+cdots+n-1=binom n2$ transpositions, so $lfloorfrac n2rfloorequivbinom n2pmod2$. I wonder if there's a way to generalise this to all $p$.
$endgroup$
– nbarto
Dec 20 '15 at 19:09
$begingroup$
I think that this is trivialized with Lucas's theorem.
$endgroup$
– Mayank Pandey
Oct 17 '13 at 2:41
$begingroup$
I think that this is trivialized with Lucas's theorem.
$endgroup$
– Mayank Pandey
Oct 17 '13 at 2:41
$begingroup$
Here's a cute proof for the case $p=2$: The sign of $begin{pmatrix}n&cdots&2&1end{pmatrix}$ is, on the one hand, $lfloorfrac n2rfloor$: change $1$ with $n$, $2$ with $n-1$, ... On the other hand we can first bring the $1$ in front, step by step; then bring the $2$ to the 2nd place, ... This takes $1+cdots+n-1=binom n2$ transpositions, so $lfloorfrac n2rfloorequivbinom n2pmod2$. I wonder if there's a way to generalise this to all $p$.
$endgroup$
– nbarto
Dec 20 '15 at 19:09
$begingroup$
Here's a cute proof for the case $p=2$: The sign of $begin{pmatrix}n&cdots&2&1end{pmatrix}$ is, on the one hand, $lfloorfrac n2rfloor$: change $1$ with $n$, $2$ with $n-1$, ... On the other hand we can first bring the $1$ in front, step by step; then bring the $2$ to the 2nd place, ... This takes $1+cdots+n-1=binom n2$ transpositions, so $lfloorfrac n2rfloorequivbinom n2pmod2$. I wonder if there's a way to generalise this to all $p$.
$endgroup$
– nbarto
Dec 20 '15 at 19:09
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint $ $ If $rm nequiv j : (mod p): $ and $rm: bigl[frac{n}{p}bigr] = k, : $ then pairing factors so that top $equiv$ bottom $rm:(mod p):$ in the binomial coefficient fractions below makes the result obvious. For example
$${17choose 7} = frac{17}3 frac{16}2 frac{15}1 color{#c00}{frac{14}7}frac{13}6frac{12}5frac{11}4,equiv, color{#c00}2, =, leftlfloorfrac{17}7rightrfloorpmod 7qquadqquad $$
since all of the fractions with bottom $rmne p,$ are $,rmequiv 1pmod p,$ by top $equiv$ bottom, and the red term with the bottom = $rm ,p = 7,$ is just $rm,color{#c00}{kp/p = k}.,$ Generally we have
$$begin{eqnarray}rm {n choose p} &=&rm frac{n:(n-1):cdots:(n-p+1)}{p:(p-1):cdots: 1} \
\
&=& rm frac{n}{j} frac{n-1}{j-1}cdotsfrac{kp+1}{1} color{#c00}{frac{kp}p} frac{kp-1}{p-1}:cdotsfrac{n-p+2}{j+2} frac{n-p+1}{j+1}end{eqnarray}$$
This is a very special case of much more general arithmetical results on binomial coefficients. For example, see Andrew Granville's very interesting survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
Remark The above proof is a special case of a very simple purely arithmetical proof that I devised to show that binomial coefficients are integral. Namely, the same idea of exploiting the innate symmetry by aligning the numerators and denominators $rm:(mod p):$ extends to yield a simple algorithm that, given a binomial coefficient and a prime $rm p$, rewrites the binomial coefficient as a product of fractions whose denominators are all coprime to $rm p$. This implies that no prime divides the lowest-terms denominator, so that we may therefore conclude that the binomial coefficient is integral. For an example and further discussion see my post here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A useful result in such problems is Lucas's Theorem which states that
If $p$ is a prime and if $a = sum_{i=0}^{k} a_{i} p^{i}, 0 le a_i < p $ i.e. the $a_i$ are digits of $a$ in base $p$ and similarly $b = sum_{i=0}^{k} b_{i}p^{i}$ (pad with zeroes if required) then
$${a choose b} = prod_{i=0}^{k} {a_i choose b_i} mod p$$
In our case $n=a$ and $b=p$. Since $b = p$ we have $b_1 = 1$ and rest of the $b_i = 0$.
Thus
$${a choose p} = {a_1 choose 1} = a_1 mod p$$
It is easy to see that $a_1 = [frac{a}{p}] mod p$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another way to look at it. Suppose $n=kp+j,$ for $0 le j le p-1.$ Then
$$ (p-1)! {n choose p} = frac{n(n-1) cdots (n-p+1)}{p} = left( {n-j over p} right)
prod_{i=0,ine j }^{p-1} (n-i)$$
$$ equiv k(p-1)! (textrm{ mod } p). $$
Since the product runs through a complete set of non-zero residues mod p.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
7
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
1
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
1
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
The binomial theorem together with the identity $(x+y)^p = x^p + y^p mod p$ is useful for this type of problem.
Here we want the the $x^p$ coefficient of $(1+x)^{Ap+B} = (1+x^p)^A (1+x)^B = (1 + Ax^p + dots)(1+X)^B$ where $0 leq B < p$. This coefficient comes only from multiplication of $(Ax^p)$ by $(1)$. So the result mod p is $A$.
Another solution is to use combinatorics. Partition the set of integers from 1 to $n$ into $A$ blocks of size $p$ and a (perhaps empty) remainder of size $B$, as above. Any subset is either a complete block or it contains a proper nonempty subset of at least one block. Rotating the elements in the first partially filled block organizes the $binom{n}{p}$ p-subsets into collections of size $p$, plus a "remainder" consisting of complete $p$-blocks, and there are $A$ of the those.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider ${n choose p}$ as $(n)(n-1)...(p+2)(p+1)/(n-p)!$. That can be written as $(n)/(n-p) cdot (n-1)/(n-p-1) cdot cdots cdot (p+1)/(1)$. Notice that these are all of the form $(x+p)/x$. Thus, terms where $x$ is not divisible by $p$ can be reduced modulo $p$ to $x/x=1$. The rest of the terms are going to be
$(p [n/p])/((p [n/p]-1))) cdot cdots cdot (3p)/(2p) cdot (2p)/(p)$. This product telescopes to $(p [n/p])/p = [n/p]$.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
8
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
1
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
4
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see the solution for the case $p=7$ here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=1775313.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a sketch of a generating-function-based proof of Lucas's theorem (mentioned in passing in a number of other answers). The original problem is just a special linear case.
$rmquadquadquadquad! (1 + X)^{large a + b P + c P^2} (mod P)quadquad$ with $rmquadquad 0 le a,: b,: c < P$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + X)^{large a}, (1 + X^P)^{large b} , (1 + X^{P^{large 2}})^{large c} (mod P)quadquad$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + binom{:a:}1 X ,+ binom{:a:}2 X^2 + binom{a}3 X^3 , + :cdots: + X^{a} )$
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{b}1 X^P + binom{b}2: X^{2P} : + binom{b}3 X^{3P} +: cdots: + X^{bP}) $
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{:c:}1 X^{P^2}! + binom{:c:}2 X^{2P^2} + binom{c}3 X^{3P^2}! +: cdots: + X^{cP^2}) quad (mod P)$
$rmquadquad = sum binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C X^{: A + BP + CP^2}quad (mod P)$
Therefore $rmquad binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C = binom{a + bP + cP^2}{A + BP + CP^2} (mod P)$
$rmquad Rightarrowquad b = binom{b}1 quad : =quad binom{a+bp}p $ for $rm B = 1, A = C = c = 0, P = p$
the result sought with $rm n = a+bp Rightarrow [n/p] = b:$.
For other proofs see Granville's delightful survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5818%2fproving-n-choose-p-equiv-bigl-fracnp-bigr-textmod-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint $ $ If $rm nequiv j : (mod p): $ and $rm: bigl[frac{n}{p}bigr] = k, : $ then pairing factors so that top $equiv$ bottom $rm:(mod p):$ in the binomial coefficient fractions below makes the result obvious. For example
$${17choose 7} = frac{17}3 frac{16}2 frac{15}1 color{#c00}{frac{14}7}frac{13}6frac{12}5frac{11}4,equiv, color{#c00}2, =, leftlfloorfrac{17}7rightrfloorpmod 7qquadqquad $$
since all of the fractions with bottom $rmne p,$ are $,rmequiv 1pmod p,$ by top $equiv$ bottom, and the red term with the bottom = $rm ,p = 7,$ is just $rm,color{#c00}{kp/p = k}.,$ Generally we have
$$begin{eqnarray}rm {n choose p} &=&rm frac{n:(n-1):cdots:(n-p+1)}{p:(p-1):cdots: 1} \
\
&=& rm frac{n}{j} frac{n-1}{j-1}cdotsfrac{kp+1}{1} color{#c00}{frac{kp}p} frac{kp-1}{p-1}:cdotsfrac{n-p+2}{j+2} frac{n-p+1}{j+1}end{eqnarray}$$
This is a very special case of much more general arithmetical results on binomial coefficients. For example, see Andrew Granville's very interesting survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
Remark The above proof is a special case of a very simple purely arithmetical proof that I devised to show that binomial coefficients are integral. Namely, the same idea of exploiting the innate symmetry by aligning the numerators and denominators $rm:(mod p):$ extends to yield a simple algorithm that, given a binomial coefficient and a prime $rm p$, rewrites the binomial coefficient as a product of fractions whose denominators are all coprime to $rm p$. This implies that no prime divides the lowest-terms denominator, so that we may therefore conclude that the binomial coefficient is integral. For an example and further discussion see my post here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint $ $ If $rm nequiv j : (mod p): $ and $rm: bigl[frac{n}{p}bigr] = k, : $ then pairing factors so that top $equiv$ bottom $rm:(mod p):$ in the binomial coefficient fractions below makes the result obvious. For example
$${17choose 7} = frac{17}3 frac{16}2 frac{15}1 color{#c00}{frac{14}7}frac{13}6frac{12}5frac{11}4,equiv, color{#c00}2, =, leftlfloorfrac{17}7rightrfloorpmod 7qquadqquad $$
since all of the fractions with bottom $rmne p,$ are $,rmequiv 1pmod p,$ by top $equiv$ bottom, and the red term with the bottom = $rm ,p = 7,$ is just $rm,color{#c00}{kp/p = k}.,$ Generally we have
$$begin{eqnarray}rm {n choose p} &=&rm frac{n:(n-1):cdots:(n-p+1)}{p:(p-1):cdots: 1} \
\
&=& rm frac{n}{j} frac{n-1}{j-1}cdotsfrac{kp+1}{1} color{#c00}{frac{kp}p} frac{kp-1}{p-1}:cdotsfrac{n-p+2}{j+2} frac{n-p+1}{j+1}end{eqnarray}$$
This is a very special case of much more general arithmetical results on binomial coefficients. For example, see Andrew Granville's very interesting survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
Remark The above proof is a special case of a very simple purely arithmetical proof that I devised to show that binomial coefficients are integral. Namely, the same idea of exploiting the innate symmetry by aligning the numerators and denominators $rm:(mod p):$ extends to yield a simple algorithm that, given a binomial coefficient and a prime $rm p$, rewrites the binomial coefficient as a product of fractions whose denominators are all coprime to $rm p$. This implies that no prime divides the lowest-terms denominator, so that we may therefore conclude that the binomial coefficient is integral. For an example and further discussion see my post here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint $ $ If $rm nequiv j : (mod p): $ and $rm: bigl[frac{n}{p}bigr] = k, : $ then pairing factors so that top $equiv$ bottom $rm:(mod p):$ in the binomial coefficient fractions below makes the result obvious. For example
$${17choose 7} = frac{17}3 frac{16}2 frac{15}1 color{#c00}{frac{14}7}frac{13}6frac{12}5frac{11}4,equiv, color{#c00}2, =, leftlfloorfrac{17}7rightrfloorpmod 7qquadqquad $$
since all of the fractions with bottom $rmne p,$ are $,rmequiv 1pmod p,$ by top $equiv$ bottom, and the red term with the bottom = $rm ,p = 7,$ is just $rm,color{#c00}{kp/p = k}.,$ Generally we have
$$begin{eqnarray}rm {n choose p} &=&rm frac{n:(n-1):cdots:(n-p+1)}{p:(p-1):cdots: 1} \
\
&=& rm frac{n}{j} frac{n-1}{j-1}cdotsfrac{kp+1}{1} color{#c00}{frac{kp}p} frac{kp-1}{p-1}:cdotsfrac{n-p+2}{j+2} frac{n-p+1}{j+1}end{eqnarray}$$
This is a very special case of much more general arithmetical results on binomial coefficients. For example, see Andrew Granville's very interesting survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
Remark The above proof is a special case of a very simple purely arithmetical proof that I devised to show that binomial coefficients are integral. Namely, the same idea of exploiting the innate symmetry by aligning the numerators and denominators $rm:(mod p):$ extends to yield a simple algorithm that, given a binomial coefficient and a prime $rm p$, rewrites the binomial coefficient as a product of fractions whose denominators are all coprime to $rm p$. This implies that no prime divides the lowest-terms denominator, so that we may therefore conclude that the binomial coefficient is integral. For an example and further discussion see my post here.
$endgroup$
Hint $ $ If $rm nequiv j : (mod p): $ and $rm: bigl[frac{n}{p}bigr] = k, : $ then pairing factors so that top $equiv$ bottom $rm:(mod p):$ in the binomial coefficient fractions below makes the result obvious. For example
$${17choose 7} = frac{17}3 frac{16}2 frac{15}1 color{#c00}{frac{14}7}frac{13}6frac{12}5frac{11}4,equiv, color{#c00}2, =, leftlfloorfrac{17}7rightrfloorpmod 7qquadqquad $$
since all of the fractions with bottom $rmne p,$ are $,rmequiv 1pmod p,$ by top $equiv$ bottom, and the red term with the bottom = $rm ,p = 7,$ is just $rm,color{#c00}{kp/p = k}.,$ Generally we have
$$begin{eqnarray}rm {n choose p} &=&rm frac{n:(n-1):cdots:(n-p+1)}{p:(p-1):cdots: 1} \
\
&=& rm frac{n}{j} frac{n-1}{j-1}cdotsfrac{kp+1}{1} color{#c00}{frac{kp}p} frac{kp-1}{p-1}:cdotsfrac{n-p+2}{j+2} frac{n-p+1}{j+1}end{eqnarray}$$
This is a very special case of much more general arithmetical results on binomial coefficients. For example, see Andrew Granville's very interesting survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
Remark The above proof is a special case of a very simple purely arithmetical proof that I devised to show that binomial coefficients are integral. Namely, the same idea of exploiting the innate symmetry by aligning the numerators and denominators $rm:(mod p):$ extends to yield a simple algorithm that, given a binomial coefficient and a prime $rm p$, rewrites the binomial coefficient as a product of fractions whose denominators are all coprime to $rm p$. This implies that no prime divides the lowest-terms denominator, so that we may therefore conclude that the binomial coefficient is integral. For an example and further discussion see my post here.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
1
answered Oct 1 '10 at 16:18
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
211k29193646
211k29193646
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A useful result in such problems is Lucas's Theorem which states that
If $p$ is a prime and if $a = sum_{i=0}^{k} a_{i} p^{i}, 0 le a_i < p $ i.e. the $a_i$ are digits of $a$ in base $p$ and similarly $b = sum_{i=0}^{k} b_{i}p^{i}$ (pad with zeroes if required) then
$${a choose b} = prod_{i=0}^{k} {a_i choose b_i} mod p$$
In our case $n=a$ and $b=p$. Since $b = p$ we have $b_1 = 1$ and rest of the $b_i = 0$.
Thus
$${a choose p} = {a_1 choose 1} = a_1 mod p$$
It is easy to see that $a_1 = [frac{a}{p}] mod p$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A useful result in such problems is Lucas's Theorem which states that
If $p$ is a prime and if $a = sum_{i=0}^{k} a_{i} p^{i}, 0 le a_i < p $ i.e. the $a_i$ are digits of $a$ in base $p$ and similarly $b = sum_{i=0}^{k} b_{i}p^{i}$ (pad with zeroes if required) then
$${a choose b} = prod_{i=0}^{k} {a_i choose b_i} mod p$$
In our case $n=a$ and $b=p$. Since $b = p$ we have $b_1 = 1$ and rest of the $b_i = 0$.
Thus
$${a choose p} = {a_1 choose 1} = a_1 mod p$$
It is easy to see that $a_1 = [frac{a}{p}] mod p$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A useful result in such problems is Lucas's Theorem which states that
If $p$ is a prime and if $a = sum_{i=0}^{k} a_{i} p^{i}, 0 le a_i < p $ i.e. the $a_i$ are digits of $a$ in base $p$ and similarly $b = sum_{i=0}^{k} b_{i}p^{i}$ (pad with zeroes if required) then
$${a choose b} = prod_{i=0}^{k} {a_i choose b_i} mod p$$
In our case $n=a$ and $b=p$. Since $b = p$ we have $b_1 = 1$ and rest of the $b_i = 0$.
Thus
$${a choose p} = {a_1 choose 1} = a_1 mod p$$
It is easy to see that $a_1 = [frac{a}{p}] mod p$.
$endgroup$
A useful result in such problems is Lucas's Theorem which states that
If $p$ is a prime and if $a = sum_{i=0}^{k} a_{i} p^{i}, 0 le a_i < p $ i.e. the $a_i$ are digits of $a$ in base $p$ and similarly $b = sum_{i=0}^{k} b_{i}p^{i}$ (pad with zeroes if required) then
$${a choose b} = prod_{i=0}^{k} {a_i choose b_i} mod p$$
In our case $n=a$ and $b=p$. Since $b = p$ we have $b_1 = 1$ and rest of the $b_i = 0$.
Thus
$${a choose p} = {a_1 choose 1} = a_1 mod p$$
It is easy to see that $a_1 = [frac{a}{p}] mod p$.
answered Oct 1 '10 at 16:56
AryabhataAryabhata
70k6156246
70k6156246
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another way to look at it. Suppose $n=kp+j,$ for $0 le j le p-1.$ Then
$$ (p-1)! {n choose p} = frac{n(n-1) cdots (n-p+1)}{p} = left( {n-j over p} right)
prod_{i=0,ine j }^{p-1} (n-i)$$
$$ equiv k(p-1)! (textrm{ mod } p). $$
Since the product runs through a complete set of non-zero residues mod p.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
7
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
1
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
1
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Here's another way to look at it. Suppose $n=kp+j,$ for $0 le j le p-1.$ Then
$$ (p-1)! {n choose p} = frac{n(n-1) cdots (n-p+1)}{p} = left( {n-j over p} right)
prod_{i=0,ine j }^{p-1} (n-i)$$
$$ equiv k(p-1)! (textrm{ mod } p). $$
Since the product runs through a complete set of non-zero residues mod p.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
7
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
1
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
1
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Here's another way to look at it. Suppose $n=kp+j,$ for $0 le j le p-1.$ Then
$$ (p-1)! {n choose p} = frac{n(n-1) cdots (n-p+1)}{p} = left( {n-j over p} right)
prod_{i=0,ine j }^{p-1} (n-i)$$
$$ equiv k(p-1)! (textrm{ mod } p). $$
Since the product runs through a complete set of non-zero residues mod p.
$endgroup$
Here's another way to look at it. Suppose $n=kp+j,$ for $0 le j le p-1.$ Then
$$ (p-1)! {n choose p} = frac{n(n-1) cdots (n-p+1)}{p} = left( {n-j over p} right)
prod_{i=0,ine j }^{p-1} (n-i)$$
$$ equiv k(p-1)! (textrm{ mod } p). $$
Since the product runs through a complete set of non-zero residues mod p.
edited Oct 1 '10 at 17:39
answered Oct 1 '10 at 17:28
Derek JenningsDerek Jennings
12k3054
12k3054
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
7
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
1
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
1
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
7
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
1
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
1
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Moron Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 17:40
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
$begingroup$
That's equivalent to what I wrote.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 17:50
7
7
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
$begingroup$
@Bill I did not copy your proof and I resent the suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 18:10
1
1
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Bill. No problem. I used my approach as I recalled that my LHS was sometimes given as a hint. See for example problem 22 on page 51 of tar.hu/gergo73/nathanson.pdf . Anyway, I'm not into polemic, so I've just upvoted your answer.
$endgroup$
– Derek Jennings
Oct 1 '10 at 20:40
1
1
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
$begingroup$
@Derek: Thanks for the link. Initially I misunderstood and thought that you explicitly reformulated my proof because you thought there was some advantage to doing so (this happens occasionally here, usually due to my expository gaps, e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/4150). Hopefully with my remark and the link you can see my motivation for presenting it in that form. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 1 '10 at 21:06
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
The binomial theorem together with the identity $(x+y)^p = x^p + y^p mod p$ is useful for this type of problem.
Here we want the the $x^p$ coefficient of $(1+x)^{Ap+B} = (1+x^p)^A (1+x)^B = (1 + Ax^p + dots)(1+X)^B$ where $0 leq B < p$. This coefficient comes only from multiplication of $(Ax^p)$ by $(1)$. So the result mod p is $A$.
Another solution is to use combinatorics. Partition the set of integers from 1 to $n$ into $A$ blocks of size $p$ and a (perhaps empty) remainder of size $B$, as above. Any subset is either a complete block or it contains a proper nonempty subset of at least one block. Rotating the elements in the first partially filled block organizes the $binom{n}{p}$ p-subsets into collections of size $p$, plus a "remainder" consisting of complete $p$-blocks, and there are $A$ of the those.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The binomial theorem together with the identity $(x+y)^p = x^p + y^p mod p$ is useful for this type of problem.
Here we want the the $x^p$ coefficient of $(1+x)^{Ap+B} = (1+x^p)^A (1+x)^B = (1 + Ax^p + dots)(1+X)^B$ where $0 leq B < p$. This coefficient comes only from multiplication of $(Ax^p)$ by $(1)$. So the result mod p is $A$.
Another solution is to use combinatorics. Partition the set of integers from 1 to $n$ into $A$ blocks of size $p$ and a (perhaps empty) remainder of size $B$, as above. Any subset is either a complete block or it contains a proper nonempty subset of at least one block. Rotating the elements in the first partially filled block organizes the $binom{n}{p}$ p-subsets into collections of size $p$, plus a "remainder" consisting of complete $p$-blocks, and there are $A$ of the those.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The binomial theorem together with the identity $(x+y)^p = x^p + y^p mod p$ is useful for this type of problem.
Here we want the the $x^p$ coefficient of $(1+x)^{Ap+B} = (1+x^p)^A (1+x)^B = (1 + Ax^p + dots)(1+X)^B$ where $0 leq B < p$. This coefficient comes only from multiplication of $(Ax^p)$ by $(1)$. So the result mod p is $A$.
Another solution is to use combinatorics. Partition the set of integers from 1 to $n$ into $A$ blocks of size $p$ and a (perhaps empty) remainder of size $B$, as above. Any subset is either a complete block or it contains a proper nonempty subset of at least one block. Rotating the elements in the first partially filled block organizes the $binom{n}{p}$ p-subsets into collections of size $p$, plus a "remainder" consisting of complete $p$-blocks, and there are $A$ of the those.
$endgroup$
The binomial theorem together with the identity $(x+y)^p = x^p + y^p mod p$ is useful for this type of problem.
Here we want the the $x^p$ coefficient of $(1+x)^{Ap+B} = (1+x^p)^A (1+x)^B = (1 + Ax^p + dots)(1+X)^B$ where $0 leq B < p$. This coefficient comes only from multiplication of $(Ax^p)$ by $(1)$. So the result mod p is $A$.
Another solution is to use combinatorics. Partition the set of integers from 1 to $n$ into $A$ blocks of size $p$ and a (perhaps empty) remainder of size $B$, as above. Any subset is either a complete block or it contains a proper nonempty subset of at least one block. Rotating the elements in the first partially filled block organizes the $binom{n}{p}$ p-subsets into collections of size $p$, plus a "remainder" consisting of complete $p$-blocks, and there are $A$ of the those.
answered Oct 1 '10 at 20:32
T..T..
10.4k23446
10.4k23446
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
$begingroup$
REMARK The above generating function approach is mentioned in section 6 of the Granville survey that I mentioned, where he credits its application to Lucas's theorem to Fine (1947). See my other posts here for a sketch of the simple proof (from one of my old sci.math posts).
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Oct 2 '10 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider ${n choose p}$ as $(n)(n-1)...(p+2)(p+1)/(n-p)!$. That can be written as $(n)/(n-p) cdot (n-1)/(n-p-1) cdot cdots cdot (p+1)/(1)$. Notice that these are all of the form $(x+p)/x$. Thus, terms where $x$ is not divisible by $p$ can be reduced modulo $p$ to $x/x=1$. The rest of the terms are going to be
$(p [n/p])/((p [n/p]-1))) cdot cdots cdot (3p)/(2p) cdot (2p)/(p)$. This product telescopes to $(p [n/p])/p = [n/p]$.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
8
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
1
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
4
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider ${n choose p}$ as $(n)(n-1)...(p+2)(p+1)/(n-p)!$. That can be written as $(n)/(n-p) cdot (n-1)/(n-p-1) cdot cdots cdot (p+1)/(1)$. Notice that these are all of the form $(x+p)/x$. Thus, terms where $x$ is not divisible by $p$ can be reduced modulo $p$ to $x/x=1$. The rest of the terms are going to be
$(p [n/p])/((p [n/p]-1))) cdot cdots cdot (3p)/(2p) cdot (2p)/(p)$. This product telescopes to $(p [n/p])/p = [n/p]$.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
8
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
1
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
4
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider ${n choose p}$ as $(n)(n-1)...(p+2)(p+1)/(n-p)!$. That can be written as $(n)/(n-p) cdot (n-1)/(n-p-1) cdot cdots cdot (p+1)/(1)$. Notice that these are all of the form $(x+p)/x$. Thus, terms where $x$ is not divisible by $p$ can be reduced modulo $p$ to $x/x=1$. The rest of the terms are going to be
$(p [n/p])/((p [n/p]-1))) cdot cdots cdot (3p)/(2p) cdot (2p)/(p)$. This product telescopes to $(p [n/p])/p = [n/p]$.
$endgroup$
Consider ${n choose p}$ as $(n)(n-1)...(p+2)(p+1)/(n-p)!$. That can be written as $(n)/(n-p) cdot (n-1)/(n-p-1) cdot cdots cdot (p+1)/(1)$. Notice that these are all of the form $(x+p)/x$. Thus, terms where $x$ is not divisible by $p$ can be reduced modulo $p$ to $x/x=1$. The rest of the terms are going to be
$(p [n/p])/((p [n/p]-1))) cdot cdots cdot (3p)/(2p) cdot (2p)/(p)$. This product telescopes to $(p [n/p])/p = [n/p]$.
edited Oct 1 '10 at 16:04
anon
answered Oct 1 '10 at 12:09
yrudoyyrudoy
1,2381220
1,2381220
6
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
8
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
1
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
4
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
8
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
1
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
4
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
6
6
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
$begingroup$
Please TeX it so that viewers can understand your answer clearly.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 12:15
8
8
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
TeX is not a requirement for answers, but one way that users with high extraction rate (question to answer ratio) can contribute is to add TeX to answers that lack it. Questioners can also provide this courtesy to those who answer, and this is a reasonable division of labor. If somebody answers with correct mathematics and proper typography, that is purely a bonus.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
$begingroup$
@Muad: Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:46
1
1
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
$begingroup$
@T: See, it was just a request, now don't make a big issue out of it.
$endgroup$
– anonymous
Oct 1 '10 at 17:47
4
4
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
$begingroup$
Requesting, in the form of a command, further volunteering from a helper, is bad form. Anyone troubled by the lack of TeX can simply add it. If you wish to educate the helper about site operations, lead by example rather than demanding corrections.
$endgroup$
– T..
Oct 1 '10 at 19:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see the solution for the case $p=7$ here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=1775313.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see the solution for the case $p=7$ here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=1775313.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see the solution for the case $p=7$ here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=1775313.
$endgroup$
You can see the solution for the case $p=7$ here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=1775313.
answered Mar 31 '11 at 7:00
Amir HosseinAmir Hossein
2,38111750
2,38111750
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a sketch of a generating-function-based proof of Lucas's theorem (mentioned in passing in a number of other answers). The original problem is just a special linear case.
$rmquadquadquadquad! (1 + X)^{large a + b P + c P^2} (mod P)quadquad$ with $rmquadquad 0 le a,: b,: c < P$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + X)^{large a}, (1 + X^P)^{large b} , (1 + X^{P^{large 2}})^{large c} (mod P)quadquad$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + binom{:a:}1 X ,+ binom{:a:}2 X^2 + binom{a}3 X^3 , + :cdots: + X^{a} )$
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{b}1 X^P + binom{b}2: X^{2P} : + binom{b}3 X^{3P} +: cdots: + X^{bP}) $
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{:c:}1 X^{P^2}! + binom{:c:}2 X^{2P^2} + binom{c}3 X^{3P^2}! +: cdots: + X^{cP^2}) quad (mod P)$
$rmquadquad = sum binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C X^{: A + BP + CP^2}quad (mod P)$
Therefore $rmquad binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C = binom{a + bP + cP^2}{A + BP + CP^2} (mod P)$
$rmquad Rightarrowquad b = binom{b}1 quad : =quad binom{a+bp}p $ for $rm B = 1, A = C = c = 0, P = p$
the result sought with $rm n = a+bp Rightarrow [n/p] = b:$.
For other proofs see Granville's delightful survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a sketch of a generating-function-based proof of Lucas's theorem (mentioned in passing in a number of other answers). The original problem is just a special linear case.
$rmquadquadquadquad! (1 + X)^{large a + b P + c P^2} (mod P)quadquad$ with $rmquadquad 0 le a,: b,: c < P$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + X)^{large a}, (1 + X^P)^{large b} , (1 + X^{P^{large 2}})^{large c} (mod P)quadquad$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + binom{:a:}1 X ,+ binom{:a:}2 X^2 + binom{a}3 X^3 , + :cdots: + X^{a} )$
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{b}1 X^P + binom{b}2: X^{2P} : + binom{b}3 X^{3P} +: cdots: + X^{bP}) $
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{:c:}1 X^{P^2}! + binom{:c:}2 X^{2P^2} + binom{c}3 X^{3P^2}! +: cdots: + X^{cP^2}) quad (mod P)$
$rmquadquad = sum binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C X^{: A + BP + CP^2}quad (mod P)$
Therefore $rmquad binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C = binom{a + bP + cP^2}{A + BP + CP^2} (mod P)$
$rmquad Rightarrowquad b = binom{b}1 quad : =quad binom{a+bp}p $ for $rm B = 1, A = C = c = 0, P = p$
the result sought with $rm n = a+bp Rightarrow [n/p] = b:$.
For other proofs see Granville's delightful survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is a sketch of a generating-function-based proof of Lucas's theorem (mentioned in passing in a number of other answers). The original problem is just a special linear case.
$rmquadquadquadquad! (1 + X)^{large a + b P + c P^2} (mod P)quadquad$ with $rmquadquad 0 le a,: b,: c < P$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + X)^{large a}, (1 + X^P)^{large b} , (1 + X^{P^{large 2}})^{large c} (mod P)quadquad$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + binom{:a:}1 X ,+ binom{:a:}2 X^2 + binom{a}3 X^3 , + :cdots: + X^{a} )$
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{b}1 X^P + binom{b}2: X^{2P} : + binom{b}3 X^{3P} +: cdots: + X^{bP}) $
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{:c:}1 X^{P^2}! + binom{:c:}2 X^{2P^2} + binom{c}3 X^{3P^2}! +: cdots: + X^{cP^2}) quad (mod P)$
$rmquadquad = sum binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C X^{: A + BP + CP^2}quad (mod P)$
Therefore $rmquad binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C = binom{a + bP + cP^2}{A + BP + CP^2} (mod P)$
$rmquad Rightarrowquad b = binom{b}1 quad : =quad binom{a+bp}p $ for $rm B = 1, A = C = c = 0, P = p$
the result sought with $rm n = a+bp Rightarrow [n/p] = b:$.
For other proofs see Granville's delightful survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
$endgroup$
Below is a sketch of a generating-function-based proof of Lucas's theorem (mentioned in passing in a number of other answers). The original problem is just a special linear case.
$rmquadquadquadquad! (1 + X)^{large a + b P + c P^2} (mod P)quadquad$ with $rmquadquad 0 le a,: b,: c < P$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + X)^{large a}, (1 + X^P)^{large b} , (1 + X^{P^{large 2}})^{large c} (mod P)quadquad$
$rmquadquad = : (1 + binom{:a:}1 X ,+ binom{:a:}2 X^2 + binom{a}3 X^3 , + :cdots: + X^{a} )$
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{b}1 X^P + binom{b}2: X^{2P} : + binom{b}3 X^{3P} +: cdots: + X^{bP}) $
$rmquadquad * (1 + binom{:c:}1 X^{P^2}! + binom{:c:}2 X^{2P^2} + binom{c}3 X^{3P^2}! +: cdots: + X^{cP^2}) quad (mod P)$
$rmquadquad = sum binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C X^{: A + BP + CP^2}quad (mod P)$
Therefore $rmquad binom{a}A binom{b}B binom{c}C = binom{a + bP + cP^2}{A + BP + CP^2} (mod P)$
$rmquad Rightarrowquad b = binom{b}1 quad : =quad binom{a+bp}p $ for $rm B = 1, A = C = c = 0, P = p$
the result sought with $rm n = a+bp Rightarrow [n/p] = b:$.
For other proofs see Granville's delightful survey The Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients
edited Dec 23 '18 at 21:16
answered Oct 1 '10 at 22:26
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
211k29193646
211k29193646
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5818%2fproving-n-choose-p-equiv-bigl-fracnp-bigr-textmod-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think that this is trivialized with Lucas's theorem.
$endgroup$
– Mayank Pandey
Oct 17 '13 at 2:41
$begingroup$
Here's a cute proof for the case $p=2$: The sign of $begin{pmatrix}n&cdots&2&1end{pmatrix}$ is, on the one hand, $lfloorfrac n2rfloor$: change $1$ with $n$, $2$ with $n-1$, ... On the other hand we can first bring the $1$ in front, step by step; then bring the $2$ to the 2nd place, ... This takes $1+cdots+n-1=binom n2$ transpositions, so $lfloorfrac n2rfloorequivbinom n2pmod2$. I wonder if there's a way to generalise this to all $p$.
$endgroup$
– nbarto
Dec 20 '15 at 19:09