FInding smallest eigenvalues using Lanczos algorithm
$begingroup$
I have some trouble understanding how Lanczos algorithm works for finding $K$ smallest eigenvalues of some large symmetric matrix $A$. For example if I want to calculate 50 smallest eigenvalues of $1000 times 1000$ matrix $A$ how shall I proceed? Right now, I think that first I need to set some number of iterations for Lanczos algorithm. For example $100$ iterations. At the end I will obtain $100times 100$ tridiagonal matrix $T$ and after diagonalizing this matrix I will get 100 eigenvalues that are close to eigenvalues of $A$. From these 100 eigenvalues I will choose $50$ smallest and I will hope that these $50$ smallest eigenvalues of $T$ approximate well enough $50$ smalees eigenvalues of $A$. I really doubt that this is correct, but after googling for some time I didnt find a better answer. Could you please explain me what shall I do?
numerical-linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have some trouble understanding how Lanczos algorithm works for finding $K$ smallest eigenvalues of some large symmetric matrix $A$. For example if I want to calculate 50 smallest eigenvalues of $1000 times 1000$ matrix $A$ how shall I proceed? Right now, I think that first I need to set some number of iterations for Lanczos algorithm. For example $100$ iterations. At the end I will obtain $100times 100$ tridiagonal matrix $T$ and after diagonalizing this matrix I will get 100 eigenvalues that are close to eigenvalues of $A$. From these 100 eigenvalues I will choose $50$ smallest and I will hope that these $50$ smallest eigenvalues of $T$ approximate well enough $50$ smalees eigenvalues of $A$. I really doubt that this is correct, but after googling for some time I didnt find a better answer. Could you please explain me what shall I do?
numerical-linear-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Finding the smallest eigenvalues (in magnitude) using Lanczos is normally coupled with inverse iteration which turns the problem into finding the largest ones where Lanczos works much better.
$endgroup$
– Algebraic Pavel
Dec 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have some trouble understanding how Lanczos algorithm works for finding $K$ smallest eigenvalues of some large symmetric matrix $A$. For example if I want to calculate 50 smallest eigenvalues of $1000 times 1000$ matrix $A$ how shall I proceed? Right now, I think that first I need to set some number of iterations for Lanczos algorithm. For example $100$ iterations. At the end I will obtain $100times 100$ tridiagonal matrix $T$ and after diagonalizing this matrix I will get 100 eigenvalues that are close to eigenvalues of $A$. From these 100 eigenvalues I will choose $50$ smallest and I will hope that these $50$ smallest eigenvalues of $T$ approximate well enough $50$ smalees eigenvalues of $A$. I really doubt that this is correct, but after googling for some time I didnt find a better answer. Could you please explain me what shall I do?
numerical-linear-algebra
$endgroup$
I have some trouble understanding how Lanczos algorithm works for finding $K$ smallest eigenvalues of some large symmetric matrix $A$. For example if I want to calculate 50 smallest eigenvalues of $1000 times 1000$ matrix $A$ how shall I proceed? Right now, I think that first I need to set some number of iterations for Lanczos algorithm. For example $100$ iterations. At the end I will obtain $100times 100$ tridiagonal matrix $T$ and after diagonalizing this matrix I will get 100 eigenvalues that are close to eigenvalues of $A$. From these 100 eigenvalues I will choose $50$ smallest and I will hope that these $50$ smallest eigenvalues of $T$ approximate well enough $50$ smalees eigenvalues of $A$. I really doubt that this is correct, but after googling for some time I didnt find a better answer. Could you please explain me what shall I do?
numerical-linear-algebra
numerical-linear-algebra
asked Dec 19 '18 at 17:54
Studying OptimizationStudying Optimization
727
727
$begingroup$
Finding the smallest eigenvalues (in magnitude) using Lanczos is normally coupled with inverse iteration which turns the problem into finding the largest ones where Lanczos works much better.
$endgroup$
– Algebraic Pavel
Dec 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Finding the smallest eigenvalues (in magnitude) using Lanczos is normally coupled with inverse iteration which turns the problem into finding the largest ones where Lanczos works much better.
$endgroup$
– Algebraic Pavel
Dec 20 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
Finding the smallest eigenvalues (in magnitude) using Lanczos is normally coupled with inverse iteration which turns the problem into finding the largest ones where Lanczos works much better.
$endgroup$
– Algebraic Pavel
Dec 20 '18 at 14:11
$begingroup$
Finding the smallest eigenvalues (in magnitude) using Lanczos is normally coupled with inverse iteration which turns the problem into finding the largest ones where Lanczos works much better.
$endgroup$
– Algebraic Pavel
Dec 20 '18 at 14:11
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046677%2ffinding-smallest-eigenvalues-using-lanczos-algorithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046677%2ffinding-smallest-eigenvalues-using-lanczos-algorithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Finding the smallest eigenvalues (in magnitude) using Lanczos is normally coupled with inverse iteration which turns the problem into finding the largest ones where Lanczos works much better.
$endgroup$
– Algebraic Pavel
Dec 20 '18 at 14:11