How to prove that every open convex set in $mathbb{R}^{n}$ is homeomorphic to an open ball?
$begingroup$
If $A,B$ are compacts,, convex with nonempty interiors, prove that they are homeomorphic
My ideia is to find a homeomorphism between $A$ and $B$ and extended to closure, since in this case $text{int}(overline{A}) = text{int}(A)$ (Can I do this?). My question is: prove that $text{int}(A)$ and $text{int}(B)$ are homeomorphic? I'm trying to prove that a open convex set in $mathbb{R}^{n}$ is homeomorphic to an open ball, but I still cannot. Can someone give me a hint?
I didnt look for other questions because I dont want to see the complete solution. I just wanted a hint of how to prove it.
Lastly, is possible to generalize this result for a complete metric space?
real-analysis metric-spaces convex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $A,B$ are compacts,, convex with nonempty interiors, prove that they are homeomorphic
My ideia is to find a homeomorphism between $A$ and $B$ and extended to closure, since in this case $text{int}(overline{A}) = text{int}(A)$ (Can I do this?). My question is: prove that $text{int}(A)$ and $text{int}(B)$ are homeomorphic? I'm trying to prove that a open convex set in $mathbb{R}^{n}$ is homeomorphic to an open ball, but I still cannot. Can someone give me a hint?
I didnt look for other questions because I dont want to see the complete solution. I just wanted a hint of how to prove it.
Lastly, is possible to generalize this result for a complete metric space?
real-analysis metric-spaces convex-analysis
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I would try to fix a point in the interior of each set, $P,Q$ and then map every segment starting from $P$ into a segment starting from $Q$. More or less what you do when you define a seminorm associated to a convex set
$endgroup$
– Exodd
Dec 23 '18 at 19:48
1
$begingroup$
Google came up with this: math.uni-hamburg.de/home/geschke/papers/ConvexOpen.pdf
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 23 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $A,B$ are compacts,, convex with nonempty interiors, prove that they are homeomorphic
My ideia is to find a homeomorphism between $A$ and $B$ and extended to closure, since in this case $text{int}(overline{A}) = text{int}(A)$ (Can I do this?). My question is: prove that $text{int}(A)$ and $text{int}(B)$ are homeomorphic? I'm trying to prove that a open convex set in $mathbb{R}^{n}$ is homeomorphic to an open ball, but I still cannot. Can someone give me a hint?
I didnt look for other questions because I dont want to see the complete solution. I just wanted a hint of how to prove it.
Lastly, is possible to generalize this result for a complete metric space?
real-analysis metric-spaces convex-analysis
$endgroup$
If $A,B$ are compacts,, convex with nonempty interiors, prove that they are homeomorphic
My ideia is to find a homeomorphism between $A$ and $B$ and extended to closure, since in this case $text{int}(overline{A}) = text{int}(A)$ (Can I do this?). My question is: prove that $text{int}(A)$ and $text{int}(B)$ are homeomorphic? I'm trying to prove that a open convex set in $mathbb{R}^{n}$ is homeomorphic to an open ball, but I still cannot. Can someone give me a hint?
I didnt look for other questions because I dont want to see the complete solution. I just wanted a hint of how to prove it.
Lastly, is possible to generalize this result for a complete metric space?
real-analysis metric-spaces convex-analysis
real-analysis metric-spaces convex-analysis
asked Dec 23 '18 at 19:44
Lucas CorrêaLucas Corrêa
1,5711321
1,5711321
1
$begingroup$
I would try to fix a point in the interior of each set, $P,Q$ and then map every segment starting from $P$ into a segment starting from $Q$. More or less what you do when you define a seminorm associated to a convex set
$endgroup$
– Exodd
Dec 23 '18 at 19:48
1
$begingroup$
Google came up with this: math.uni-hamburg.de/home/geschke/papers/ConvexOpen.pdf
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 23 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I would try to fix a point in the interior of each set, $P,Q$ and then map every segment starting from $P$ into a segment starting from $Q$. More or less what you do when you define a seminorm associated to a convex set
$endgroup$
– Exodd
Dec 23 '18 at 19:48
1
$begingroup$
Google came up with this: math.uni-hamburg.de/home/geschke/papers/ConvexOpen.pdf
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 23 '18 at 19:54
1
1
$begingroup$
I would try to fix a point in the interior of each set, $P,Q$ and then map every segment starting from $P$ into a segment starting from $Q$. More or less what you do when you define a seminorm associated to a convex set
$endgroup$
– Exodd
Dec 23 '18 at 19:48
$begingroup$
I would try to fix a point in the interior of each set, $P,Q$ and then map every segment starting from $P$ into a segment starting from $Q$. More or less what you do when you define a seminorm associated to a convex set
$endgroup$
– Exodd
Dec 23 '18 at 19:48
1
1
$begingroup$
Google came up with this: math.uni-hamburg.de/home/geschke/papers/ConvexOpen.pdf
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 23 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
Google came up with this: math.uni-hamburg.de/home/geschke/papers/ConvexOpen.pdf
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 23 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hints:
$(1). $ Let $zin U$, an open and bounded convex set in $mathbb R^n$. Then, each ray from $z$ intersects $partial U$ in exactly one point.
$(2). $ Set $f(x)=x/|x|$, use $(1)$ to show that $f$ restricts to a bijection from $partial U$ to the sphere.
$(3).$ Extend the inverse of the restricted map in $(2)$ to the ball.
$(4)$. Prove that the map and its inverse are continuous bijections.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Without lost of generality assume $0 in int A $. Then consider $f: A to B$ with
$$ f(x)= frac{x }{| x |} quad forall x in bd A $$
and $f(0) = 0 .$ For the case $x in int A setminus {0}$, note that $f^{-1} {frac{x }{| x |} } in bd A $ is singleton so lets call it by $eta (x)$ then define $$ f(x) = frac{x}{| eta (x) |} $$
Here $B$ is the unit closed ball.
It is easy to show that $f$ is bijection. Continuity of $f$ follows from continuity of $eta : bd B to bd A$. And no need to prove the continuity of the inverse of $f$ because $A$ is compact.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050639%2fhow-to-prove-that-every-open-convex-set-in-mathbbrn-is-homeomorphic-to-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hints:
$(1). $ Let $zin U$, an open and bounded convex set in $mathbb R^n$. Then, each ray from $z$ intersects $partial U$ in exactly one point.
$(2). $ Set $f(x)=x/|x|$, use $(1)$ to show that $f$ restricts to a bijection from $partial U$ to the sphere.
$(3).$ Extend the inverse of the restricted map in $(2)$ to the ball.
$(4)$. Prove that the map and its inverse are continuous bijections.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hints:
$(1). $ Let $zin U$, an open and bounded convex set in $mathbb R^n$. Then, each ray from $z$ intersects $partial U$ in exactly one point.
$(2). $ Set $f(x)=x/|x|$, use $(1)$ to show that $f$ restricts to a bijection from $partial U$ to the sphere.
$(3).$ Extend the inverse of the restricted map in $(2)$ to the ball.
$(4)$. Prove that the map and its inverse are continuous bijections.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hints:
$(1). $ Let $zin U$, an open and bounded convex set in $mathbb R^n$. Then, each ray from $z$ intersects $partial U$ in exactly one point.
$(2). $ Set $f(x)=x/|x|$, use $(1)$ to show that $f$ restricts to a bijection from $partial U$ to the sphere.
$(3).$ Extend the inverse of the restricted map in $(2)$ to the ball.
$(4)$. Prove that the map and its inverse are continuous bijections.
$endgroup$
Hints:
$(1). $ Let $zin U$, an open and bounded convex set in $mathbb R^n$. Then, each ray from $z$ intersects $partial U$ in exactly one point.
$(2). $ Set $f(x)=x/|x|$, use $(1)$ to show that $f$ restricts to a bijection from $partial U$ to the sphere.
$(3).$ Extend the inverse of the restricted map in $(2)$ to the ball.
$(4)$. Prove that the map and its inverse are continuous bijections.
answered Dec 23 '18 at 20:02
MatematletaMatematleta
11.1k2918
11.1k2918
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Without lost of generality assume $0 in int A $. Then consider $f: A to B$ with
$$ f(x)= frac{x }{| x |} quad forall x in bd A $$
and $f(0) = 0 .$ For the case $x in int A setminus {0}$, note that $f^{-1} {frac{x }{| x |} } in bd A $ is singleton so lets call it by $eta (x)$ then define $$ f(x) = frac{x}{| eta (x) |} $$
Here $B$ is the unit closed ball.
It is easy to show that $f$ is bijection. Continuity of $f$ follows from continuity of $eta : bd B to bd A$. And no need to prove the continuity of the inverse of $f$ because $A$ is compact.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Without lost of generality assume $0 in int A $. Then consider $f: A to B$ with
$$ f(x)= frac{x }{| x |} quad forall x in bd A $$
and $f(0) = 0 .$ For the case $x in int A setminus {0}$, note that $f^{-1} {frac{x }{| x |} } in bd A $ is singleton so lets call it by $eta (x)$ then define $$ f(x) = frac{x}{| eta (x) |} $$
Here $B$ is the unit closed ball.
It is easy to show that $f$ is bijection. Continuity of $f$ follows from continuity of $eta : bd B to bd A$. And no need to prove the continuity of the inverse of $f$ because $A$ is compact.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Without lost of generality assume $0 in int A $. Then consider $f: A to B$ with
$$ f(x)= frac{x }{| x |} quad forall x in bd A $$
and $f(0) = 0 .$ For the case $x in int A setminus {0}$, note that $f^{-1} {frac{x }{| x |} } in bd A $ is singleton so lets call it by $eta (x)$ then define $$ f(x) = frac{x}{| eta (x) |} $$
Here $B$ is the unit closed ball.
It is easy to show that $f$ is bijection. Continuity of $f$ follows from continuity of $eta : bd B to bd A$. And no need to prove the continuity of the inverse of $f$ because $A$ is compact.
$endgroup$
Hint: Without lost of generality assume $0 in int A $. Then consider $f: A to B$ with
$$ f(x)= frac{x }{| x |} quad forall x in bd A $$
and $f(0) = 0 .$ For the case $x in int A setminus {0}$, note that $f^{-1} {frac{x }{| x |} } in bd A $ is singleton so lets call it by $eta (x)$ then define $$ f(x) = frac{x}{| eta (x) |} $$
Here $B$ is the unit closed ball.
It is easy to show that $f$ is bijection. Continuity of $f$ follows from continuity of $eta : bd B to bd A$. And no need to prove the continuity of the inverse of $f$ because $A$ is compact.
edited Dec 23 '18 at 20:24
answered Dec 23 '18 at 19:52
Red shoesRed shoes
4,761621
4,761621
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050639%2fhow-to-prove-that-every-open-convex-set-in-mathbbrn-is-homeomorphic-to-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I would try to fix a point in the interior of each set, $P,Q$ and then map every segment starting from $P$ into a segment starting from $Q$. More or less what you do when you define a seminorm associated to a convex set
$endgroup$
– Exodd
Dec 23 '18 at 19:48
1
$begingroup$
Google came up with this: math.uni-hamburg.de/home/geschke/papers/ConvexOpen.pdf
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 23 '18 at 19:54