Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect...












3












$begingroup$


Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)



I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "...each with radius..." ??
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    ______________r
    $endgroup$
    – J L
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:29










  • $begingroup$
    This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Jan 22 at 10:06










  • $begingroup$
    can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Jan 22 at 11:18
















3












$begingroup$


Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)



I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "...each with radius..." ??
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    ______________r
    $endgroup$
    – J L
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:29










  • $begingroup$
    This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Jan 22 at 10:06










  • $begingroup$
    can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Jan 22 at 11:18














3












3








3


4



$begingroup$


Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)



I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)



I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...







calculus integration faq






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 10:03









Lee David Chung Lin

4,29031241




4,29031241










asked Sep 15 '13 at 9:56









J LJ L

629102653




629102653












  • $begingroup$
    "...each with radius..." ??
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    ______________r
    $endgroup$
    – J L
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:29










  • $begingroup$
    This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Jan 22 at 10:06










  • $begingroup$
    can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Jan 22 at 11:18


















  • $begingroup$
    "...each with radius..." ??
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    ______________r
    $endgroup$
    – J L
    Sep 15 '13 at 10:29










  • $begingroup$
    This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Jan 22 at 10:06










  • $begingroup$
    can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Jan 22 at 11:18
















$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22




$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22












$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29




$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29












$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06




$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06












$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18




$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below



enter image description here



As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$



The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$



Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
    this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
      $endgroup$
      – Shailesh
      Feb 6 '16 at 12:20



















    1












    $begingroup$

    The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
      Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:



      a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?



      b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?



      c)Integrate to find the volume.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).



        If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.



        We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$





















          -3












          $begingroup$

          The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:



          $$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$



          As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 3




            $begingroup$
            With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
            $endgroup$
            – David K
            Jul 2 '15 at 12:51










          • $begingroup$
            "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Crean
            Jul 3 '15 at 14:14






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
            $endgroup$
            – David K
            Jul 6 '15 at 3:16












          • $begingroup$
            Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
            $endgroup$
            – DBS
            Mar 26 '17 at 1:18











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494249%2ffind-the-volume-common-to-two-circular-cylinders-each-with-radius-r-if-the-axe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          13












          $begingroup$

          The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below



          enter image description here



          As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$



          The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$



          Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$


















            13












            $begingroup$

            The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below



            enter image description here



            As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$



            The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$



            Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$
















              13












              13








              13





              $begingroup$

              The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below



              enter image description here



              As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$



              The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$



              Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below



              enter image description here



              As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$



              The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$



              Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Sep 19 '13 at 17:30









              AstroSharpAstroSharp

              776310




              776310























                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
                  this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$









                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shailesh
                    Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
                  this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$









                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shailesh
                    Feb 6 '16 at 12:20














                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
                  this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
                  this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 6 '16 at 12:02









                  priyapriya

                  211




                  211








                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shailesh
                    Feb 6 '16 at 12:20














                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shailesh
                    Feb 6 '16 at 12:20








                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
                  $endgroup$
                  – Shailesh
                  Feb 6 '16 at 12:20




                  $begingroup$
                  It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
                  $endgroup$
                  – Shailesh
                  Feb 6 '16 at 12:20











                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Feb 26 '14 at 23:26









                      user62081user62081

                      111




                      111























                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
                          Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:



                          a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?



                          b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?



                          c)Integrate to find the volume.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
                            Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:



                            a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?



                            b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?



                            c)Integrate to find the volume.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
                              Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:



                              a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?



                              b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?



                              c)Integrate to find the volume.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
                              Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:



                              a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?



                              b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?



                              c)Integrate to find the volume.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Apr 15 '16 at 17:03









                              Andres MejiaAndres Mejia

                              16.1k21548




                              16.1k21548























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).



                                  If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.



                                  We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).



                                    If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.



                                    We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).



                                      If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.



                                      We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).



                                      If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.



                                      We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                      edited Apr 15 '16 at 16:57

























                                      answered Apr 15 '16 at 16:48









                                      RonaldoRonaldo

                                      11




                                      11























                                          -3












                                          $begingroup$

                                          The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:



                                          $$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$



                                          As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$









                                          • 3




                                            $begingroup$
                                            With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 2 '15 at 12:51










                                          • $begingroup$
                                            "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Bill Crean
                                            Jul 3 '15 at 14:14






                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 6 '15 at 3:16












                                          • $begingroup$
                                            Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – DBS
                                            Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
















                                          -3












                                          $begingroup$

                                          The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:



                                          $$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$



                                          As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$









                                          • 3




                                            $begingroup$
                                            With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 2 '15 at 12:51










                                          • $begingroup$
                                            "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Bill Crean
                                            Jul 3 '15 at 14:14






                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 6 '15 at 3:16












                                          • $begingroup$
                                            Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – DBS
                                            Mar 26 '17 at 1:18














                                          -3












                                          -3








                                          -3





                                          $begingroup$

                                          The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:



                                          $$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$



                                          As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$



                                          The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:



                                          $$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$



                                          As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.







                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                          edited Jul 2 '15 at 12:36









                                          Zain Patel

                                          15.7k51949




                                          15.7k51949










                                          answered Jul 2 '15 at 12:17









                                          Bill CreanBill Crean

                                          12




                                          12








                                          • 3




                                            $begingroup$
                                            With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 2 '15 at 12:51










                                          • $begingroup$
                                            "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Bill Crean
                                            Jul 3 '15 at 14:14






                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 6 '15 at 3:16












                                          • $begingroup$
                                            Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – DBS
                                            Mar 26 '17 at 1:18














                                          • 3




                                            $begingroup$
                                            With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 2 '15 at 12:51










                                          • $begingroup$
                                            "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Bill Crean
                                            Jul 3 '15 at 14:14






                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – David K
                                            Jul 6 '15 at 3:16












                                          • $begingroup$
                                            Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – DBS
                                            Mar 26 '17 at 1:18








                                          3




                                          3




                                          $begingroup$
                                          With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – David K
                                          Jul 2 '15 at 12:51




                                          $begingroup$
                                          With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – David K
                                          Jul 2 '15 at 12:51












                                          $begingroup$
                                          "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Bill Crean
                                          Jul 3 '15 at 14:14




                                          $begingroup$
                                          "The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Bill Crean
                                          Jul 3 '15 at 14:14




                                          1




                                          1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – David K
                                          Jul 6 '15 at 3:16






                                          $begingroup$
                                          As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – David K
                                          Jul 6 '15 at 3:16














                                          $begingroup$
                                          Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – DBS
                                          Mar 26 '17 at 1:18




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – DBS
                                          Mar 26 '17 at 1:18


















                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494249%2ffind-the-volume-common-to-two-circular-cylinders-each-with-radius-r-if-the-axe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Mont Emei

                                          Province de Neuquén

                                          Journaliste