Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect...
$begingroup$
Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)
I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...
calculus integration faq
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)
I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...
calculus integration faq
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22
$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29
$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06
$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)
I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...
calculus integration faq
$endgroup$
Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)
I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try...
calculus integration faq
calculus integration faq
edited Jan 22 at 10:03
Lee David Chung Lin
4,29031241
4,29031241
asked Sep 15 '13 at 9:56
J LJ L
629102653
629102653
$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22
$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29
$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06
$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22
$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29
$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06
$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18
$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22
$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22
$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29
$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29
$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06
$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06
$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18
$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below

As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$
The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$
Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:
a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?
b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?
c)Integrate to find the volume.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).
If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.
We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:
$$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$
As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
1
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494249%2ffind-the-volume-common-to-two-circular-cylinders-each-with-radius-r-if-the-axe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below

As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$
The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$
Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below

As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$
The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$
Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below

As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$
The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$
Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.
$endgroup$
The main challenge in this problem is to depict the solid itself. Take a look at the image below

As we increase the hight $z$ of the intersecting plane the section of the solid is a square with a side $a$. Since the solid is created with two cylinders of radius $r$, $a$ and $z$ are related by $$a^2+z^2=r^2$$
The area of the square is $A=a^2$ or in terms of $z$: $$A(z)=a^2=r^2-z^2$$ The method of washers tells us $$V=8int_0^rA(z)dz=8int_0^r(r^2-z^2)dz=8left(r^3-frac{r^3}{3}right)=frac{16}{3}r^3$$
Note that the coefficient $8$ is required since we are considering a $1/8$th part of the solid.
answered Sep 19 '13 at 17:30
AstroSharpAstroSharp
776310
776310
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.
$endgroup$
http://www.math.tamu.edu/~Tom.Kiffe/calc3/newcylinder/2cylinder.html
this link gives proper visualisation of intersection of 2 cylinders having same radii. Volume is calculated by 2 different methods.
answered Feb 6 '16 at 12:02
priyapriya
211
211
1
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
1
1
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
$begingroup$
It is always good to enter the gist of the answer while including links, since at some later point in time, the links may actually disappear. BTW, Welcome to Math.SE
$endgroup$
– Shailesh
Feb 6 '16 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.
$endgroup$
The derivation above looks good. This volume is known as a "Steinmetz Solid." There is a page discussing its properties at Mathworld. That page shows another way to get the volume by integration.
answered Feb 26 '14 at 23:26
user62081user62081
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:
a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?
b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?
c)Integrate to find the volume.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:
a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?
b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?
c)Integrate to find the volume.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:
a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?
b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?
c)Integrate to find the volume.
$endgroup$
These are the standard hints I was given in high school:
Consider the two following cylinders: $y^2+z^2=1$ and $x^2+z^2=1$. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the region common to both:
a) Can you explain why the volume is between $frac{4}{3}pi$ and $8$?
b)What section is obtained when $mathcal{C}$ is sliced by a plane that is parallel to the $xy$-plane?
c)Integrate to find the volume.
answered Apr 15 '16 at 17:03
Andres MejiaAndres Mejia
16.1k21548
16.1k21548
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).
If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.
We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).
If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.
We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).
If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.
We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.
$endgroup$
Let r bet the radius of both cylinders and their axes are both perpendicular and intersecting. There is a common sphere enveloped by the 2 intersecting cylinders. If we look at the planar section which passes through both cylinder axes we can see a square area common to both cylinders. This square has an area of (2.r.2.r). We can also see a circle which is produced as a result of the plane passing through the enveloped common sphere. This circle has an area of (Pi.r.r).
If the plane is moved away from the cylinders axes, the intersection surface will reduce until the plane exits the cylinders completely. During this transition an ever changing common surface area is produced, but it will always consist of a square with a circle inside it which is tangential to that square at the middle of each side of the square. The ratio of the square to the circle is (4.r.r)/(pi.r.r)= 4/pi.
We know the volume of the common sphere is (4.Pi.r.r.r/3),So by using a similar shape approach, we can deduce that the common volume of the intersecting cylinders will be (4.Pi.r.r.r/3).(4/Pi)= 16.r.r.r/3 There is no Pi in the answer. hope that's useful, and no Calculus either. Lol.
edited Apr 15 '16 at 16:57
answered Apr 15 '16 at 16:48
RonaldoRonaldo
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:
$$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$
As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
1
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:
$$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$
As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
1
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:
$$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$
As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.
$endgroup$
The volume of a Steinmetz solid $(SS)$, formed by the intersection of $2$ cylinders (radii $r$) at right angles is:
$$V = 4r cdot r cdot r left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right) = 4r^3left(frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{3}right)$$
As the volume of $SS$ is formed by sections of a cylinder, the answer must contain $pi$.
edited Jul 2 '15 at 12:36
Zain Patel
15.7k51949
15.7k51949
answered Jul 2 '15 at 12:17
Bill CreanBill Crean
12
12
3
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
1
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
1
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
3
3
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
With no derivation and no references, it's hard to guess what object this formula describes. The last sentence of the answer is simply false.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 2 '15 at 12:51
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
$begingroup$
"The last sentence of the answer is simply false." Do you have any references to support that statement? No way can an expression, which gives the volume of part of a cylinder could be without pi. The Steinmetz solid is made of 4 sections of a cylinder and thus the expression for its volume must contain pi. There are countless websites on the Steinmetz solid showing the volume of 16r^3/3. Some of the sources dated back 50 years. It was wrong then and it is still wrong. My viewing of these sites (and some of them have good credentials), spurred me to make my entry on this site.
$endgroup$
– Bill Crean
Jul 3 '15 at 14:14
1
1
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
As you yourself say, there are sources with good credentials that give $16r^3/3$ as the volume. I think the onus is on you to give a rigorous proof showing why they are wrong. "You can't have part of a cylinder without pi" is nonsense--start with an infinite cylinder and just cut off pieces at will, and you can make the volume anything you like. Show us exactly why this particular cut leaves any $pi$ in the simplified expression of the volume.
$endgroup$
– David K
Jul 6 '15 at 3:16
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
$begingroup$
Are there references for -- or a derivation of -- your formula?
$endgroup$
– DBS
Mar 26 '17 at 1:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494249%2ffind-the-volume-common-to-two-circular-cylinders-each-with-radius-r-if-the-axe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
"...each with radius..." ??
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 15 '13 at 10:22
$begingroup$
______________r
$endgroup$
– J L
Sep 15 '13 at 10:29
$begingroup$
This post is chosen to be the target for duplicates. Although neither the content of the question post itself or the answers is outstanding, there are 5 existing duplicate links. There are only two other posts with merely one existing dup-link.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Jan 22 at 10:06
$begingroup$
can also be quickly computed without calculus: re. to this related post
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Jan 22 at 11:18