joint PDF of 2 dependent variables w/ convolution












0












$begingroup$


Let $X, Y$ be iid standard uniform variables, and let $T = X + Y$. The goal is to find the joint PDF of $X$ and $T$. The work I've done so far is to find the PDF of $T$ by evaluating the convolution, but I'm not even sure if that's useful because $X$ and $T$ aren't independent, so the joint PDF shouldn't be the product of the marginal PDFs. I thought about working from the CDF and writing it as $P(X leq x, T leq t) = P(X leq x, X + Y leq t)$. I didn't know where to go from there due to the lack of independence. Can anyone provide suggestions?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $X, Y$ be iid standard uniform variables, and let $T = X + Y$. The goal is to find the joint PDF of $X$ and $T$. The work I've done so far is to find the PDF of $T$ by evaluating the convolution, but I'm not even sure if that's useful because $X$ and $T$ aren't independent, so the joint PDF shouldn't be the product of the marginal PDFs. I thought about working from the CDF and writing it as $P(X leq x, T leq t) = P(X leq x, X + Y leq t)$. I didn't know where to go from there due to the lack of independence. Can anyone provide suggestions?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $X, Y$ be iid standard uniform variables, and let $T = X + Y$. The goal is to find the joint PDF of $X$ and $T$. The work I've done so far is to find the PDF of $T$ by evaluating the convolution, but I'm not even sure if that's useful because $X$ and $T$ aren't independent, so the joint PDF shouldn't be the product of the marginal PDFs. I thought about working from the CDF and writing it as $P(X leq x, T leq t) = P(X leq x, X + Y leq t)$. I didn't know where to go from there due to the lack of independence. Can anyone provide suggestions?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $X, Y$ be iid standard uniform variables, and let $T = X + Y$. The goal is to find the joint PDF of $X$ and $T$. The work I've done so far is to find the PDF of $T$ by evaluating the convolution, but I'm not even sure if that's useful because $X$ and $T$ aren't independent, so the joint PDF shouldn't be the product of the marginal PDFs. I thought about working from the CDF and writing it as $P(X leq x, T leq t) = P(X leq x, X + Y leq t)$. I didn't know where to go from there due to the lack of independence. Can anyone provide suggestions?







      probability probability-distributions random-variables uniform-distribution






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 10 '18 at 22:37









      0k330k33

      12210




      12210






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You are almost there. Note that
          $$
          P(Xle x, T le t) = P(X le x, X+Y le t) = P(X le x, X le t - Y),
          $$

          It follows from
          $$
          P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) = int_0^{min{x, t- y}} du = min{x, t-y}
          $$

          that
          begin{align*}
          &P(X le x, X le t - Y) \
          &= int_0^1 P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) dy \
          &= int_0^1 min{x, t-y} dy \
          &= int_0^{max{t-x,0}} x dy + int_{max{t-x,0}}^1 (t-y)dy \
          &= xmax{t-x,0} + (1-max{t-x,0})t -frac{1 - (max{t-x,0})^2}{2}.
          end{align*}






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
            $endgroup$
            – 0k33
            Dec 12 '18 at 21:54













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034592%2fjoint-pdf-of-2-dependent-variables-w-convolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          You are almost there. Note that
          $$
          P(Xle x, T le t) = P(X le x, X+Y le t) = P(X le x, X le t - Y),
          $$

          It follows from
          $$
          P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) = int_0^{min{x, t- y}} du = min{x, t-y}
          $$

          that
          begin{align*}
          &P(X le x, X le t - Y) \
          &= int_0^1 P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) dy \
          &= int_0^1 min{x, t-y} dy \
          &= int_0^{max{t-x,0}} x dy + int_{max{t-x,0}}^1 (t-y)dy \
          &= xmax{t-x,0} + (1-max{t-x,0})t -frac{1 - (max{t-x,0})^2}{2}.
          end{align*}






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
            $endgroup$
            – 0k33
            Dec 12 '18 at 21:54


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You are almost there. Note that
          $$
          P(Xle x, T le t) = P(X le x, X+Y le t) = P(X le x, X le t - Y),
          $$

          It follows from
          $$
          P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) = int_0^{min{x, t- y}} du = min{x, t-y}
          $$

          that
          begin{align*}
          &P(X le x, X le t - Y) \
          &= int_0^1 P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) dy \
          &= int_0^1 min{x, t-y} dy \
          &= int_0^{max{t-x,0}} x dy + int_{max{t-x,0}}^1 (t-y)dy \
          &= xmax{t-x,0} + (1-max{t-x,0})t -frac{1 - (max{t-x,0})^2}{2}.
          end{align*}






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
            $endgroup$
            – 0k33
            Dec 12 '18 at 21:54
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You are almost there. Note that
          $$
          P(Xle x, T le t) = P(X le x, X+Y le t) = P(X le x, X le t - Y),
          $$

          It follows from
          $$
          P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) = int_0^{min{x, t- y}} du = min{x, t-y}
          $$

          that
          begin{align*}
          &P(X le x, X le t - Y) \
          &= int_0^1 P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) dy \
          &= int_0^1 min{x, t-y} dy \
          &= int_0^{max{t-x,0}} x dy + int_{max{t-x,0}}^1 (t-y)dy \
          &= xmax{t-x,0} + (1-max{t-x,0})t -frac{1 - (max{t-x,0})^2}{2}.
          end{align*}






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You are almost there. Note that
          $$
          P(Xle x, T le t) = P(X le x, X+Y le t) = P(X le x, X le t - Y),
          $$

          It follows from
          $$
          P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) = int_0^{min{x, t- y}} du = min{x, t-y}
          $$

          that
          begin{align*}
          &P(X le x, X le t - Y) \
          &= int_0^1 P(X le x, X le t - Y| Y = y) dy \
          &= int_0^1 min{x, t-y} dy \
          &= int_0^{max{t-x,0}} x dy + int_{max{t-x,0}}^1 (t-y)dy \
          &= xmax{t-x,0} + (1-max{t-x,0})t -frac{1 - (max{t-x,0})^2}{2}.
          end{align*}







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 10 '18 at 22:48









          induction601induction601

          1,162314




          1,162314












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
            $endgroup$
            – 0k33
            Dec 12 '18 at 21:54




















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
            $endgroup$
            – 0k33
            Dec 12 '18 at 21:54


















          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
          $endgroup$
          – 0k33
          Dec 12 '18 at 21:54






          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much! I definitely follow your explanation. I was wondering if it also might be possible to compute the PDF of X,T via a linear transformation. Since T = X + Y, would it be correct to say that $begin{bmatrix}1&0\1&1end{bmatrix} (X, Y) = (X, T)$? And the matrix has determinant $1$. But then we have that $f_{X,T} = f_{X, Y}(x, t-x}$, which is still $1$ because $f_{X, Y}$ is 1 on the support of $X, Y$. I am sure that something I did is not right?!
          $endgroup$
          – 0k33
          Dec 12 '18 at 21:54




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034592%2fjoint-pdf-of-2-dependent-variables-w-convolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei